[pfx] two 2822.From header with header_checks
Hellow Postfix heackers, I have some odd email [1]. That have two 2822.From headrs. I would like to filer such style email. Is it possible to filter with header_checks? From: Byung-Hee HWANG From: Byung-Hee HWANG Because Google Gmail don't like above style... i'm serious now... Thanks in advance! [1] https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/-/raw/9fedd75c57c4dd4aa9739bb7999146e5c77afdf1/stuff/rfc2822-violation.txt Sincerely, Byung-Hee -- ^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))// ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
[pfx] Re: Log/Capture outbound messages?
On 1/26/2024 20:55:16, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 07:51:31PM -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: joe a via Postfix-users: Postfix 3.5.9-5.9.2 Perhaps not a postfix question at all. Looking for a way to capture outbound email, for troubleshooting purposes. Is "smtp-sink" the way to do this? That could be, if you are interested in outbund SMTP deliveries. smtp-sink has a crude option to save messages to file. If you want to save am "extra" copy for investigation, consider using always_bcc, sender_bcc_maps or recipient_bcc_maps. Or just deliver the messages to a maildir. The OP rather failed to specify clearly what "capture" or "outbound mail" meant. Yes, not clearly expressed. The suggestions are appreciated and should suffice for now. Thanks. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
[pfx] Re: Log/Capture outbound messages?
On 1/26/2024 19:51:31, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: joe a via Postfix-users: Postfix 3.5.9-5.9.2 Perhaps not a postfix question at all. Looking for a way to capture outbound email, for troubleshooting purposes. Is "smtp-sink" the way to do this? That could be, if you are interested in outbund SMTP deliveries. smtp-sink has a crude option to save messages to file. If you want to save am "extra" copy for investigation, consider using always_bcc, sender_bcc_maps or recipient_bcc_maps. Wietse ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org Yes, outbound SMTP deliveries. Thanks for the suggestions. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
[pfx] Re: different queue time based on the sender address
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 12:01:55PM +0100, Aleksandar Ivanisevic via Postfix-users wrote: > in main.cf > sender_dependent_default_transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_by_sender > > in /etc/postfix/relay_by_sender > mysender.com smtp:[localhost]:588 The listening SMTP service for that port would have to be part of a different Postfix "instance": https://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html > in master cf > 588 inet n - n - - smtpd -o > maximal_queue_lifetime=1d -o sender_dependent_default_transport_maps= With the parameters in question set in the main.cf file of that instance. You can only override parameters that are documented as relevant to the service (smtpd(8)) in question, and even then only to the extent that they're exclusively used by that service, otherwise (as with e.g. virtual_alias_maps, used in both smtpd(8) for recipient validation, and cleanup(8) for address rewriting) you may not get the results you expected. See the smtpd(8) manpage for the list of parameters known to smtpd(8), and qmgr(8) and trivial-rewrite(8) for the parameters that are "queue-wide", and can only be set per-Postfix-instance, rather than per-SMTP-service. -- Viktor. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
[pfx] Re: different queue time based on the sender address
Aleksandar Ivanisevic via Postfix-users: > i would like to have maximal_queue_lifetime (and possibly some > other parameters) based on the sender address. So I did the following This request is unlikely to be implemented. It is one of those features that benefit a very small fraction of the pupulation at a dispropertionate cost for implementation and maintenance. > in main.cf > sender_dependent_default_transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_by_sender > > in /etc/postfix/relay_by_sender > mysender.com smtp:[localhost]:588 > > in master cf > 588 inet n - n - - smtpd -o > maximal_queue_lifetime=1d -o sender_dependent_default_transport_maps= maximal_queue_lifetime and sender_dependent_default_transport_maps are implemented in different programs. Postfix programs cannot send main.cf settings into other Postfix programs. That is not a bug but a safety feature. Wietse ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
[pfx] different queue time based on the sender address
Hi, i would like to have maximal_queue_lifetime (and possibly some other parameters) based on the sender address. So I did the following in main.cf sender_dependent_default_transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_by_sender in /etc/postfix/relay_by_sender mysender.com smtp:[localhost]:588 in master cf 588 inet n - n - - smtpd -o maximal_queue_lifetime=1d -o sender_dependent_default_transport_maps= but when I try to send a mail, I see that sender is correctly recognized and mapped to port 588, but then I get a loop, as if sender_dependent_default_transport_maps= is ignored or overriden when using port 588 Jan 27 10:00:47 v2 postfix/smtp[320178]: 7DEE8301CF40: to=<3ig4thiixeh...@dkimvalidator.com>, relay=localhost[127.0.0.1]:588, delay=0.23, delays=0.1/0.02/0.02/0.09, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 9CA48301CF48) and then again Jan 27 10:00:47 v2 postfix/smtp[320178]: 9CA48301CF48: to=<3ig4thiixeh...@dkimvalidator.com>, relay=localhost[127.0.0.1]:588, delay=0.23, delays=0.09/0.01/0.05/0.09, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as C0121301CF40) … until Jan 27 10:00:52 v2 postfix/smtp[320178]: DADDB301CF48: to=<3ig4thiixeh...@dkimvalidator.com>, relay=localhost[127.0.0.1]:588, conn_use=47, delay=0.1, delays=0.09/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.0, status=bounced (host localhost[127.0.0.1] said: 554 5.4.0 Error: too many hops (in reply to end of DATA command)) what am I doing wrong here? Is this the right line of thinking or should I use something else? If at all possible I would like to avoid runing another instance of postfix even or another MTA. postfix version is 3.5.8. thank you. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
