RE: Your Email
What user does amavis run as? What you say that Postfix uses this new user, what do you mean by that? Amavis is running as user: amavis (uid: 102) and group: amavis (gid: 408). Maildirs are stored as user imap (uid: 1000) and group imap (gid: 1000). Postfix is running as postfix (207/207). I added the user imap/imap to seperate the maildir storage directory from the postfix dir. Come on, there is no basis for this conclusion, indeed the opposite seems likely, the extra copy has: I've just flashed onto something. Is it possible that when an email is sent, the client is authenticated with IMAP credentials, and then again with the SASL-Cyrus? From both header, it seems that one came from IMAP, and the other from the server, which could explain that...? Are you saying that Postfix adds the X-IMAP-Sender header that is not in the original SMTP message? The second copy is injected by user 1000, what is running as that user now? I don't know which email is the original, and which is not... As for the user 1000, it's the user that stores the mail. There's no process running it, just those directive in main.cf: virtual_gid_maps = static:1000 virtual_uid_maps = static:1000 Don't waste your time looking for Postfix bugs. The unwanted duplication will be found in non-Postfix code, unless you find it, you will make no progress. Pursue this on the amavis list. I didn't say it was a postfix bug, maybe a misconfiguration from my part from postfix, or one of the other daemon. From your logs, below are shown the ONLY deliveries performed by Postfix. No Postfix delivery is via a delivery agent that is capable of calling sendmail(1) to fork the message, because lmtp(8) and virtual(8) simply don't have code to do this. All deliveries before virtual(8) delivery are to amavis, which is presumably still running as the wrong user (1000 just like virtual(8) and the IMAP server, instead of a dedicated user). Your amavis config forks the message. Don't do that. Thanks for the analysis. Look at the top of my mail for the uid/gid usage. I'm really beginning to think there's a dual authentication somewhere. Or maybe a misconfiguration in amavis... Daniel
RE: Your Email (SOLVED)
I think I solve the issue...!!! The problem was really coming from a dual submit using IMAP connections. SASL-Cyrus was activated correctly, but in my /etc/courier-imap/imap config file, the line: OUTBOX=.Sent Was set, which was doing this: # If OUTBOX is defined, mail can be sent via the IMAP connection by copying # a message to the INBOX.Outbox folder. So when a mail was submitted via IMAP, mail was sent through SMTP, and a copy was sent using Courier-IMAP. Thanks everyone for the help, insight and explanation on how mails were delivered. Daniel What user does amavis run as? What you say that Postfix uses this new user, what do you mean by that? Amavis is running as user: amavis (uid: 102) and group: amavis (gid: 408). Maildirs are stored as user imap (uid: 1000) and group imap (gid: 1000). Postfix is running as postfix (207/207). I added the user imap/imap to seperate the maildir storage directory from the postfix dir. Come on, there is no basis for this conclusion, indeed the opposite seems likely, the extra copy has: I've just flashed onto something. Is it possible that when an email is sent, the client is authenticated with IMAP credentials, and then again with the SASL-Cyrus? From both header, it seems that one came from IMAP, and the other from the server, which could explain that...? Are you saying that Postfix adds the X-IMAP-Sender header that is not in the original SMTP message? The second copy is injected by user 1000, what is running as that user now? I don't know which email is the original, and which is not... As for the user 1000, it's the user that stores the mail. There's no process running it, just those directive in main.cf: virtual_gid_maps = static:1000 virtual_uid_maps = static:1000 Don't waste your time looking for Postfix bugs. The unwanted duplication will be found in non-Postfix code, unless you find it, you will make no progress. Pursue this on the amavis list. I didn't say it was a postfix bug, maybe a misconfiguration from my part from postfix, or one of the other daemon. From your logs, below are shown the ONLY deliveries performed by Postfix. No Postfix delivery is via a delivery agent that is capable of calling sendmail(1) to fork the message, because lmtp(8) and virtual(8) simply don't have code to do this. All deliveries before virtual(8) delivery are to amavis, which is presumably still running as the wrong user (1000 just like virtual(8) and the IMAP server, instead of a dedicated user). Your amavis config forks the message. Don't do that. Thanks for the analysis. Look at the top of my mail for the uid/gid usage. I'm really beginning to think there's a dual authentication somewhere. Or maybe a misconfiguration in amavis... Daniel
RE: Your Email
I just changed the owner of the IMAP folder and assigned Postfix and courier-authlib to use this new user. It has a UID and GID of 1000. Here a new set of headers (from both duplicated mails), and a copy of my log from this. Sorry if I put a link in my message, it's because I can't include all the header's data from Hotmail... http://www.myrandor.com/postfix2.txt From what I can see in there, the email is picked up only once from my mail client. So I suspect something's wrong in Postfix... Seems like it delivered the mail to Amavis, but doing a copy to itself at the same time...? Daniel Daniel C a écrit : What would be the best strategy? Create a new user and change postfix, amavis and Courier-IMAP to use this user for message storing? No. do not the same user for different services: - keep the 'postfix' account for the postfix server - use amavis or vscan or whatever for amavisd-new - create a mailbox user and configure postfix to deliver mail as this user - courier-imap is generally run as root. if this is not needed, you can run it as the mailbox user Is it easy to adjust configuration for this new user? Also, I think this is not causing my duplicate email, right? as Viktor said, this makes troubleshooting harder. in this particular case, we have a message submitted by user 207, but we have no idea which service or program submitted the message.
Re: Your Email
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 03:49:18AM +, Daniel C wrote: I just changed the owner of the IMAP folder and assigned Postfix and courier-authlib to use this new user. It has a UID and GID of 1000. What user does amavis run as? What you say that Postfix uses this new user, what do you mean by that? Here a new set of headers (from both duplicated mails), and a copy of my log from this. Sorry if I put a link in my message, it's because I can't include all the header's data from Hotmail... http://www.myrandor.com/postfix2.txt From what I can see in there, the email is picked up only once from my mail client. So I suspect something's wrong in Postfix... Come on, there is no basis for this conclusion, indeed the opposite seems likely, the extra copy has: Received: by mail.mydomain.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E671420CF8; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:17:41 -0500 (EST) X-IMAP-Sender: jac...@mydomain.com Are you saying that Postfix adds the X-IMAP-Sender header that is not in the original SMTP message? The second copy is injected by user 1000, what is running as that user now? Seems like it delivered the mail to Amavis, but doing a copy to itself at the same time...? Don't waste your time looking for Postfix bugs. The unwanted duplication will be found in non-Postfix code, unless you find it, you will make no progress. Pursue this on the amavis list. From your logs, below are shown the ONLY deliveries performed by Postfix. No Postfix delivery is via a delivery agent that is capable of calling sendmail(1) to fork the message, because lmtp(8) and virtual(8) simply don't have code to do this. All deliveries before virtual(8) delivery are to amavis, which is presumably still running as the wrong user (1000 just like virtual(8) and the IMAP server, instead of a dedicated user). Your amavis config forks the message. Don't do that. In via smtpd(8) out via lmtp(8) to amavis: Feb 28 22:17:40 homer postfix/smtpd[23674]: B82157EDC6: client=ip-xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.dsl-xxx.net[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], sasl_method=PLAIN,sasl_username=jac...@mydomain.com Feb 28 22:17:40 homer postfix/cleanup[23681]: B82157EDC6: message-id=49a9fe50.1090...@mydomain.com Feb 28 22:17:44 homer postfix/lmtp[23682]: B82157EDC6: to=jac...@mydomain.com, relay=10.0.32.13[10.0.32.13]:10024, delay=3.4, delays=0.08/0.01/0/3.3, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok, id=15794-04, from MTA([10.0.32.13]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 0FF3437098E) In via sendmail(1) out via lmtp(8) to amavis: Feb 28 22:17:41 homer postfix/pickup[23038]: 1E671420CF8: uid=1000 from=jac...@mydomain.com Feb 28 22:17:41 homer postfix/cleanup[23681]: 1E671420CF8: message-id=49a9fe50.1090...@mydomain.com Feb 28 22:17:44 homer postfix/lmtp[23697]: 1E671420CF8: to=jac...@mydomain.com, relay=10.0.32.13[10.0.32.13]:10024, delay=3.5, delays=0.05/0.01/0.01/3.4, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok, id=23199-01, from MTA([10.0.32.13]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 887707EDC6) In via smtpd(8) from amavis out via virtual(8) to maildir: Feb 28 22:17:44 homer postfix/smtpd[23706]: 0FF3437098E: client=homer.mydomain.com[10.0.32.13] Feb 28 22:17:44 homer postfix/cleanup[23681]: 0FF3437098E: message-id=49a9fe50.1090...@mydomain.com Feb 28 22:17:44 homer postfix/virtual[23709]: 0FF3437098E: to=jac...@mydomain.com, relay=virtual, delay=0.08, delays=0.06/0.01/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to maildir) In via smtpd(8) from amavis out via virtual(8) to maildir: Feb 28 22:17:44 homer postfix/smtpd[23706]: 887707EDC6: client=homer.mydomain.com[10.0.32.13] Feb 28 22:17:44 homer postfix/cleanup[23681]: 887707EDC6: message-id=49a9fe50.1090...@mydomain.com Feb 28 22:17:44 homer postfix/virtual[23709]: 887707EDC6: to=jac...@mydomain.com, relay=virtual, delay=0.02, delays=0.01/0/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to maildir) -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not send an it worked, thanks follow-up. If you must respond, please put It worked, thanks in the Subject so I can delete these quickly.
RE: Your Email
What would be the best strategy? Create a new user and change postfix, amavis and Courier-IMAP to use this user for message storing? Is it easy to adjust configuration for this new user? Also, I think this is not causing my duplicate email, right? Daniel No, this is wrong, the postfix user must not be the owner the virtual mailboxes, and should not be used by the IMAP server to access them. Fix your configuration to avoid this problem. Use a suitable imap user, not postfix.
Re: Your Email
Daniel C a écrit : What would be the best strategy? Create a new user and change postfix, amavis and Courier-IMAP to use this user for message storing? No. do not the same user for different services: - keep the 'postfix' account for the postfix server - use amavis or vscan or whatever for amavisd-new - create a mailbox user and configure postfix to deliver mail as this user - courier-imap is generally run as root. if this is not needed, you can run it as the mailbox user Is it easy to adjust configuration for this new user? Also, I think this is not causing my duplicate email, right? as Viktor said, this makes troubleshooting harder. in this particular case, we have a message submitted by user 207, but we have no idea which service or program submitted the message.
RE: Your Email
The mail is apparently submitted twice by your mail client. This does not appear to be a postfix or SASL problem. You earlier wrote that a manual telnet session with authentication did not exhibit the duplicated mail problem. This confirms that it is a mail client problem, not a postfix or SASL problem. Well, I could understand if it was cause by the client... What I don't understand is why it was working before, and there an issue now? For client, it has an issue on both Thunderbird and a webmail (Horde/Imp) installed locally...! Also, mail delivered directly through PHP (with mail()) is not delivered twice... I can't understand the logic behind all this... Daniel
RE: Your Email
Here's the header part of the 2 mails I receive when they are duplicate. From what I can understand, it seems that there's only one connection made to Postfix, but Postfix send the mail to LMTP, but made a new copy and send it to itself, which is then sent to LMTP too. Does it means something else? Daniel --- Message #1 --- Received: from localhost (homer.mydomain.com [10.0.32.13])by mail.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561804498EF for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.mydomain.com ([10.0.32.13])by localhost (homer.mydomain.com [10.0.32.13]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NHSD4caH1jdE for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.0.120] (ip-xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.dsl-xxx.xxx [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]) by mail.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0421137074D for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:37 -0500 (EST) --- Message #2 --- Received: from localhost (homer.mydomain.com [10.0.32.13])by mail.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CF64498EC for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.mydomain.com ([10.0.32.13])by localhost (homer.mydomain.com [10.0.32.13]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QgPsqaEw4tIc for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:38 -0500 (EST) by mail.mydomain.com (Postfix, from userid 207)id 314664498FC; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:38 -0500 (EST)
Re: Your Email
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 07:02:41PM +, Daniel C wrote: Message #1 --- Received: from localhost (homer.mydomain.com [10.0.32.13]) by mail.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561804498EF for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.mydomain.com ([10.0.32.13]) by localhost (homer.mydomain.com [10.0.32.13]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NHSD4caH1jdE for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.0.120] (ip-xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.dsl-xxx.xxx [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]) by mail.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0421137074D for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:37 -0500 (EST) This is an incomplete set of message headers. Message #2 --- Received: from localhost (homer.mydomain.com [10.0.32.13]) by mail.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CF64498EC for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.mydomain.com ([10.0.32.13]) by localhost (homer.mydomain.com [10.0.32.13]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QgPsqaEw4tIc for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:38 -0500 (EST) [... something missing here ...] by mail.mydomain.com (Postfix, from userid 207) id 314664498FC; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:37:38 -0500 (EST) This is an corruped and incomplete set of message headers. And yet, it is fairly clear that the two messages are unrelated and not the same, since one arrives via SMTP and other is submmitted locally by user 207. Showing the headers separately from the related mail logs is not terribly useful. Read the headers and related logs carefully. Make sure they are not broken and match up. Then if you still believe Postfix is duplicating your message, post the associated headers and logs. -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not send an it worked, thanks follow-up. If you must respond, please put It worked, thanks in the Subject so I can delete these quickly.
Re: Your Email
Daniel C a écrit : A broken HTML encapsulator is eating all content inside , in your messages, can you post the headers and logs without going trhough the broken (cross-site scripting vulnerable, ...) HTML generator? This message is submitted via SMTP from outside. Well... The only choice I have it to send mail to the mailing list using my Hotmail account, or I'll spam the mailing with 2 mails. The strange thing is that I sent the mail in plain text. Anyway, here a link to both headers and log so the mail client will not be in cause. http://www.myrandor.com/postfix.txt This message is submitted locally. Remove the code that is generating this local message copy via sendmail(1). How can it submit itself locally? for example, if a filter, a delivery script, a .forward, ... uses the sendmail command. Do I have to grep my conf file for a sendmail command? What is user 207 and what is creating the locally submitted message below? User 207 is Postfix, the user that is running Postfix, Amavis and Courier-IMAP. this is borked. do not reuse the postfix user. do not run these services using the same user.
RE: Your Email
for example, if a filter, a delivery script, a .forward, ... uses the sendmail command. Well, this is set as virtual and there's no .forward or delivery script. The problem suddenly happen after an upgrade of my system. Maybe there's a config somewhere that has been changed, I'm just wondering what... this is borked. do not reuse the postfix user. do not run these services using the same user. I was a bit mistaken. Amavis has its own user. As for Postfix, it has to be used by courrier-imap in order to access the virtual maildir correctly, without having to change the ownership of the directories to allow group or other. I hope I'm using a right strategy. ;) Here's a complete copy of my master.cf file. I don't think I made a mistake in there, but maybe I'm wrong. Daniel - master.cf - smtp inet n - n - - smtpd pickupfifo n - n 60 1 pickup cleanup unix n - n - 0 cleanup qmgr fifo n - n 300 1 qmgr tlsmgrunix - - n 1000? 1 tlsmgr rewrite unix - - n - - trivial-rewrite bounceunix - - n - 0 bounce defer unix - - n - 0 bounce trace unix - - n - 0 bounce verifyunix - - n - 1 verify flush unix n - n 1000? 0 flush proxymap unix - - n - - proxymap proxywrite unix - - n - 1 proxymap smtp unix - - n - - smtp relay unix - - n - - smtp -o smtp_fallback_relay= showq unix n - n - - showq error unix - - n - - error retry unix - - n - - error discard unix - - n - - discard local unix - n n - - local virtual unix - n n - - virtual lmtp unix - - n - - lmtp anvil unix - - n - 1 anvil scacheunix - - n - 1 scache smtp-amavis unix - - n - 2 lmtp -o lmtp_data_done_timeout=1200 -o lmtp_send_xforward_command=yes -o disable_dns_lookups=yes -o max_use=20 10.0.32.13:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter= -o local_recipient_maps= -o relay_recipient_maps= -o smtpd_restrictions_classes= -o smtpd_helo_restrictions= -o smtpd_sender_restrictions= -o smtpd_client_restrictions= -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject -o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8,10.0.32.0/24 -o strict_rfc821_envelopes=yes -o smtpd_error_sleep_time=0 -o smtpd_soft_error_limit=1001 -o smtpd_hard_error_limit=1000 -o receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks
Re: Your Email
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 03:35:34AM +, Daniel C wrote: As for Postfix, it has to be used No, this is wrong, the postfix user must not be the owner the virtual mailboxes, and should not be used by the IMAP server to access them. Fix your configuration to avoid this problem. by courrier-imap in order to access the virtual maildir correctly, without having to change the ownership of the directories to allow group or other. I hope I'm using a right strategy. ;) Use a suitable imap user, not postfix. -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not send an it worked, thanks follow-up. If you must respond, please put It worked, thanks in the Subject so I can delete these quickly.
RE: Your Email
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:36:07 -0600 From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org To: jackey...@hotmail.com; postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Your Email Daniel C wrote: Hi, Sorry for the informations missing. Here they are. This is running on a vserver, which are behind a iptables firewall, and the local IPs are in the range 10.0.32.0/24. I've annotated your logs... Feb 19 22:23:15 homer postfix/smtpd[3711]: connect from xx[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] Feb 19 22:23:16 homer postfix/smtpd[3711]: 1B292370557: client=xx[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], sasl_method=PLAIN, sasl_username=jac...@mydomain.com Feb 19 22:23:16 homer postfix/cleanup[3893]: 1B292370557: message-id= Feb 19 22:23:16 homer postfix/qmgr[3176]: 1B292370557: from=, size=796, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Feb 19 22:23:16 homer postfix/smtpd[3711]: disconnect from xx[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] message A arrives via SMTP AUTH One recipient. Feb 19 22:23:16 homer postfix/pickup[3175]: 4774B3706C6: uid=207 from= Feb 19 22:23:16 homer postfix/cleanup[3893]: 4774B3706C6: message-id= Feb 19 22:23:16 homer postfix/qmgr[3176]: 4774B3706C6: from=, size=686, nrcpt=1 (queue active) message B arrives via sendmail(1) one recipient. Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/smtpd[3910]: connect from mail.mydomain.com[10.0.32.13] Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/smtpd[3910]: 81995370679: client=homer.mydomain.com[10.0.32.13] Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/cleanup[3893]: 81995370679: message-id= Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/qmgr[3176]: 81995370679: from=, size=1269, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/smtpd[3910]: disconnect from homer.mydomain.com[10.0.32.13] message AF arrives from content filter still one recipient. Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/qmgr[3176]: 1B292370557: removed Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/lmtp[3894]: 1B292370557: to=, relay=10.0.32.13[10.0.32.13]:10024, delay=3.5, delays=0.1/0.01/0/3.4, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok, id=21166-10, from MTA([10.0.32.13]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 81995370679) message A sent to content filter, new ID is 81995370679 (AF) Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/smtpd[3910]: connect from homer.mydomain.com[10.0.32.13] Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/smtpd[3910]: 9ACC2370557: client=homer.mydomain.com[10.0.32.13] Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/cleanup[3893]: 9ACC2370557: message-id= Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/qmgr[3176]: 9ACC2370557: from=, size=1159, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/smtpd[3910]: disconnect from homer.mydomain.com[10.0.32.13] message BF arrives from content filter still one recipient Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/lmtp[3900]: 4774B3706C6: to=, relay=10.0.32.13[10.0.32.13]:10024, delay=3.4, delays=0.05/0.01/0/3.3, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok, id=21929-10, from MTA([10.0.32.13]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 9ACC2370557) Feb 19 22:23:19 homer postfix/qmgr[3176]: 4774B3706C6: removed message B sent to content filter, new ID 9ACC2370557 (BF) Feb 19 22:23:20 homer postfix/smtp[3913]: 81995370679: to=, relay=mx4.hotmail.com[65.54.244.104]:25, delay=0.6, delays=0.01/0.01/0.25/0.34, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Queued mail for delivery) Feb 19 22:23:20 homer postfix/qmgr[3176]: 81995370679: removed message AF delivered to destination Feb 19 22:23:20 homer postfix/smtp[3914]: 9ACC2370557: to=, relay=mx3.hotmail.com[65.54.244.72]:25, delay=0.56, delays=0.01/0.01/0.25/0.31, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Queued mail for delivery) Feb 19 22:23:20 homer postfix/qmgr[3176]: 9ACC2370557: removed mesasge BF delivered to destination == Looks from here as if the message was submitted twice. The problem you report is apparently not a postfix problem, nor related to your content_filter. BTW (and not related to your reported problem), check the RBLs you are using in your smtpd_recipient_restrictions; several of them are dead. -- Noel Jones Thanks for the informations. I looked at all my RBLs and modified them. For the duplicate message, from what I saw too, it looked like the same message was sent twice. Could it be from the authentication? Could you just take a look to see if I'm missing something there? SASLAUTD is started with the -a pam -r options. In my /etc/sasl2/smtp.conf mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN pwcheck_method: saslauthd In my /etc/pam.d/smtp auth required /lib64/security/pam_mysql.so host=hostname db=database user=username passwd=password table=mailbox usercolumn=username passwdcolumn=password where=active=1 crypt=1 account required /lib64/security/pam_mysql.so host=hostname db=database user=username passwd=password table=mailbox usercolumn=username passwdcolumn=password where=active=1
Re: Your Email
Daniel C wrote: For the duplicate message, from what I saw too, it looked like the same message was sent twice. Could it be from the authentication? Could you just take a look to see if I'm missing something there? The mail is apparently submitted twice by your mail client. This does not appear to be a postfix or SASL problem. You earlier wrote that a manual telnet session with authentication did not exhibit the duplicated mail problem. This confirms that it is a mail client problem, not a postfix or SASL problem. -- Noel Jones
Re: Your Email
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Daniel C wrote: For the duplicate message, from what I saw too, it looked like the same message was sent twice. Could it be from the authentication? Could you just take a look to see if I'm missing something there? No, it has nothing to do with authentication. -- Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net
