Re: [Potlatch-dev] Ooops
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Andy Allan wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Ed Loach wrote: >> I created this way yesterday by mistake: >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/103531496/history >> Is this a known issue, or should I report it in trac? > > It should be reported to trac, but it's best if you get some steps to > reproduce. > > But I've just spend two secs investigating, and it's quite easy to reproduce. > * Start drawing from an existing node. > * Pause for a second > * Click the same node again. > > Voila, the way ends as is the same node twice, e.g. > http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/201780 > > I'll make some investigations. It doesn't happen if you're just > starting a new way. OK, I've fixed this and I'm pretty sure it works[1]. However, the DrawWay.as logic is getting ever-more complex and I think the nested if-then-else loops can probably be refactored to make things clearer. I'm loathe to refactor them until we get some unit tests since there's a surprisingly large number of things you can do when drawing! Cheers, Andy [1] It'll need deploying at some point when the sysadmins get a chance. ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Re: [Potlatch-dev] MapCSS clarificiation
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
> Rules are parsed in order and applied in order - it's the way that CSS
> works too. Later rules can override ones set earlier.
Normal CSS also has some rules about specificity though, right?
banner.h3 { background: red; }
h3 { background: blue; }
The background of an h3 element in a div with class 'banner' is red.
Does (or will) MapCSS have anything like that?
Steve
___
Potlatch-dev mailing list
Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Re: [Potlatch-dev] MapCSS clarificiation
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote: > I have a question about MapCSS. > > This may end up being moot, because the implementation may drive the > standard, There's multiple implementations, and some of them are much more advanced than Halcyon is. > way[highway=primary] color: red; ... > > way[name=Main Street] ... color: blue; ... > > Which rule would apply to the street? Blue > More importantly (since that queation can be tested), which is the right > answer? Rules are parsed in order and applied in order - it's the way that CSS works too. Later rules can override ones set earlier. Cheers, Andy ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
[Potlatch-dev] MapCSS clarificiation
I have a question about MapCSS. This may end up being moot, because the implementation may drive the standard, but is MapCSS first match, or last match? Eg. Given a primary road named "Main Street", and these to rules: way[highway=primary] color: red; ... way[name=Main Street] ... color: blue; ... Which rule would apply to the street? More importantly (since that queation can be tested), which is the right answer? I didn't see this question addressed in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MapCSS/Implementation Thanks, - Serge ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Re: [Potlatch-dev] Ooops
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Ed Loach wrote: > I created this way yesterday by mistake: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/103531496/history > Is this a known issue, or should I report it in trac? It should be reported to trac, but it's best if you get some steps to reproduce. But I've just spend two secs investigating, and it's quite easy to reproduce. * Start drawing from an existing node. * Pause for a second * Click the same node again. Voila, the way ends as is the same node twice, e.g. http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/201780 I'll make some investigations. It doesn't happen if you're just starting a new way. Cheers, Andy ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
[Potlatch-dev] Ooops
I created this way yesterday by mistake: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/103531496/history Is this a known issue, or should I report it in trac? I can't exactly remember how I did it - I had intended to select a way to add a maxspeed tag, but selected a node by mistake. Or maybe double clicked it by mistake. Not sure exactly. The node itself had at the time a created_by=JOSM tag on it in case that is relevant, though of course saving my changes removed it. The build in the changeset tags reports as 0.5-291-g0c68ba6 Thanks Ed ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
