Re: [PPower4] Text in multi-level figures

2000-12-14 Thread Ellie Povey

Thanks everybody for your help. I downloaded the newer version of
supp-pdf.tex, however it didn't seem to have any effect on the placement
of the text elements in this case. 

However, after much guesswork and many false starts, it seems that one
of the
text elements in the figure contained a $, which was interpreted during
processing as the start of a latex formula. Once I corrected this (by
escaping the $ with a \ in the
actual xfig text element), my figure processed and appeared perfectly. 

--
Ellie Povey


Klaus Guntermann wrote:
 
 Ellie Povey writes:
   I'm using the patched xfig and metapost to include some multi-level
   graphics in my document. They work well, except for a tendency to mix up
   the text layers. All graphic elements drawn in xfig appear exactly as
   they should, however text elements are moved around, have their places
   switched, or simply don't appear at all. Grouping the text elements
   together has some effect, but the effect is not consistent and does not
   always work.
 
 The effect, which you describe may be caused by a broken version of
 supp-pdf.tex (which is unfortunately part of e.g. teTeX distributions).
 The version number of supp-pdf is only in the file and not documented
 in the log file. But the log file shows, where to find this file.
 If the version is older than 2000.04.28, you should get a newer
 version.
 
 Klaus
 --
 Klaus Guntermann[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 FG Systemprogrammierung, FB Informatik, TU Darmstadt
 Wilhelminenstr. 7, D-64283 Darmstadt



Re: [PPower4] Text in multi-level figures

2000-12-13 Thread Klaus Guntermann

Herman Bruyninckx writes:
   The version number of supp-pdf is only in the file and not documented
   in the log file. But the log file shows, where to find this file.
   If the version is older than 2000.04.28, you should get a newer
   version.
  
  Where should we get it? (Because a search on CTAN gives a version of
  1998...)

I have hesitated long to put another copy of supp-pdf.tex online,
which is most probably already outdated. But because people keep
asking for it, I have extended the files section of our xfig page at
   http://www-sp.iti.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/software/xfig/
to include a reference to a copy working for me.

Enjoy,
Klaus
-- 
Klaus Guntermann[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FG Systemprogrammierung, FB Informatik, TU Darmstadt
Wilhelminenstr. 7, D-64283 Darmstadt



Re: [PPower4] Text in multi-level figures

2000-12-12 Thread Klaus Guntermann

Ellie Povey writes:
  I'm using the patched xfig and metapost to include some multi-level
  graphics in my document. They work well, except for a tendency to mix up
  the text layers. All graphic elements drawn in xfig appear exactly as
  they should, however text elements are moved around, have their places
  switched, or simply don't appear at all. Grouping the text elements
  together has some effect, but the effect is not consistent and does not
  always work.

The effect, which you describe may be caused by a broken version of
supp-pdf.tex (which is unfortunately part of e.g. teTeX distributions). 
The version number of supp-pdf is only in the file and not documented
in the log file. But the log file shows, where to find this file.
If the version is older than 2000.04.28, you should get a newer
version.

Klaus
-- 
Klaus Guntermann[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FG Systemprogrammierung, FB Informatik, TU Darmstadt
Wilhelminenstr. 7, D-64283 Darmstadt



[PPower4] Text in multi-level figures

2000-12-10 Thread Ellie Povey

Hi all,

I'm using the patched xfig and metapost to include some multi-level
graphics in my document. They work well, except for a tendency to mix up
the text layers. All graphic elements drawn in xfig appear exactly as
they should, however text elements are moved around, have their places
switched, or simply don't appear at all. Grouping the text elements
together has some effect, but the effect is not consistent and does not
always work.

Has anyone else had similar problems? If so, how did you solve them (or
work around them)?

Thanks,

Ellie Povey