[OT] When should you not tweet?
http://www.austriantimes.at/index.php?id=14023 -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer SQL Server DBA Web and Winform Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0906191445n354e270ekd5d5bf87c6975...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] VMware ESXi Server, and other VMware virtualization solutions
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: On Jun 19, 2009, at 9:36 PM, Gilbert M. Hale wrote: Why are others looking into virtual? $$ or copy paste to new device? I have saved over $40k going to this architecture thus far, and had I needed to license VirtualCenter it would have only added maybe $3k more. You should also look into Cloud Servers, which are virtual servers hosted by Rackspace (http://www.mosso.com/cloudservers.jsp). It's like having a server that you manage via remote access: exactly what I'm doing in effect with the leafe.com and dabodev.com server, now that I'm half a continent away. It costs pennies per hour; an average size server is about $40/month, and the cheapest is around $12/month, and you have full root access to it. Best of all, if you get a spike in traffic, it automatically expands to handle that extra bandwidth, and you only pay for what you use. Contrast with physical servers that you house on-site: if the traffic to them spikes, you either a) lose business or b) pay a lot for extra capacity up-front that you may never need. BTW, every email from this list passes through my cloud server. If you are a Dabo user, every web update call runs through it, too, as well as all the browserless web app traffic. It was a cheap way to get a fixed IP address that I can use as a relay, and a very cheap way of getting much more reliability than I can get from my personal RoadRunner account. I'm slowly moving more and more of the services on my physical box to the cloud server, with the goal of shutting down that server before we sell the house. -- Ed I am considering the combination of 6 servers at this time. How long will it take to load up into the cloud 25 gig our smallest client to 250 gig our largest one? This is all SQL Server data. Do we upload our backups and logs and just restore away? Or is there another loader for dealing with the cloud? -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer SQL Server DBA Web and Winform Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0906201347s10ad1f57u1fa19050c0125...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] VMware ESXi Server, and other VMware virtualization solutions
On Jun 20, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: How long will it take to load up into the cloud 25 gig our smallest client to 250 gig our largest one? This is all SQL Server data. Do we upload our backups and logs and just restore away? Or is there another loader for dealing with the cloud? I'm sure that load times will be limited by your bandwidth. Once the data is there, the servers tend to run as fast or faster than most regular servers. I don't think that they offer Windows servers in the cloud yet; I know that they've been negotiating with Microsoft for some time to try to come up with a licensing agreement that will make that possible. I would suggest going to the website and opening up a chat session for more specific answers, as I'm not anywhere near an expert on these things. Yes, those are real techs in San Antonio on the other end, not a bot or an offshore contractor. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c92e9d77-b920-4f02-a71e-1efd2b1c4...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP9: Runtime
Good Morning All: I guess I am missing something... I have an app as an .exe on a server. When a user runs the app across the network it reports that the runtime is not found. When I run the app from the server there are no issues. Or if I run the app across the network there are no issues (of course my box has the runtime on it). I am assuming the runtime needs to be on each user's machine. Or what did I miss so that the server supplies the runtime for the user? Regards, Jack Skelley ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0b957900b2b8194d998a441195b66038386be4b...@drdsrv03.drdad.thenewarkarena.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9: Runtime
Did you try the runtimes in the exe directory ? Al -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jack Skelley Sent: 23 June 2009 15:38 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: VFP9: Runtime Good Morning All: I guess I am missing something... I have an app as an .exe on a server. When a user runs the app across the network it reports that the runtime is not found. When I run the app from the server there are no issues. Or if I run the app across the network there are no issues (of course my box has the runtime on it). I am assuming the runtime needs to be on each user's machine. Or what did I miss so that the server supplies the runtime for the user? Regards, Jack Skelley ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/007401c9f409$2eb88f20$8c29ad...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9: Runtime
Al: No. The app was installed on the server so 'I thought' the app could find them in the system folder. I will try it. Thanks. Regards, Jack From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Allen [pro...@gatwicksoftware.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 9:47 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: VFP9: Runtime Did you try the runtimes in the exe directory ? Al -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jack Skelley Sent: 23 June 2009 15:38 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: VFP9: Runtime Good Morning All: I guess I am missing something... I have an app as an .exe on a server. When a user runs the app across the network it reports that the runtime is not found. When I run the app from the server there are no issues. Or if I run the app across the network there are no issues (of course my box has the runtime on it). I am assuming the runtime needs to be on each user's machine. Or what did I miss so that the server supplies the runtime for the user? Regards, Jack Skelley [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0b957900b2b8194d998a441195b66038386be4b...@drdsrv03.drdad.thenewarkarena.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: DynamicBackColor in Grid Column
Hi Ted,
yes, the speed was ok before I put the condition in the columns.
heres is my code:
.DYNAMICBACKCOLOR = [IIF(csrOpen-outcol={} OR
csrOpen-incol={},RGB(255,255,0),THIS.BACKCOLOR)]
It's strange because I've used dynamicbackcolor many times before. This
time I'm customizing existing screens in an application the customer had
purchased from someone else.
Any ideas on maybe the screen repainting itself or something?
Thanks,
Philip
Ted Roche wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Philip Borkholderplbor...@netzero.net
wrote:
Does anyone know why when I put a condition in the DynamicBackcolor on
grid columns the whole screen is now taking for ever to refresh and it's
almost like something is spinning before you can click on a column...
Does it repaint itself several times?
is there a setting to stop this time consumption?
What's the expression you have in the DynamicBackColor?
If you remove it, can you click on a column immediately?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a40e28f.9000...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: DynamicBackColor in Grid Column
SCRATCH THAT. :)
Today it is running just fine!
Must have been coincidental last night and something else must have
kicked in on the server to slow things done... geeezzz :)
-Philip
Philip Borkholder wrote:
Hi Ted,
yes, the speed was ok before I put the condition in the columns.
heres is my code:
.DYNAMICBACKCOLOR = [IIF(csrOpen-outcol={} OR
csrOpen-incol={},RGB(255,255,0),THIS.BACKCOLOR)]
It's strange because I've used dynamicbackcolor many times before. This
time I'm customizing existing screens in an application the customer had
purchased from someone else.
Any ideas on maybe the screen repainting itself or something?
Thanks,
Philip
Ted Roche wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Philip Borkholderplbor...@netzero.net
wrote:
Does anyone know why when I put a condition in the DynamicBackcolor on
grid columns the whole screen is now taking for ever to refresh and it's
almost like something is spinning before you can click on a column...
Does it repaint itself several times?
is there a setting to stop this time consumption?
What's the expression you have in the DynamicBackColor?
If you remove it, can you click on a column immediately?
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a40e377.8010...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Report Form - LARGE Point Size Req'd
Stephen - thanks for your suggestion. In the end, this is essentially what I did. In the report form - when you put an image on it - the image referene cam also come from a GENERAL type variable - and that is what I did - and got to work with the General field type for the first time. It all worked out, and my Tech's were QUITE happy and impressed by my solution - since one of the other programmers there Gave Up and said it couldn't be done!!! Too bad that person, and some of the others - are UnAble to Think outside the Box! :-) -K- -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com on behalf of Stephen Russell Sent: Wed 6/17/2009 3:20 PM On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Kurt Wendt kurtwe...@waitex.com wrote: Hey folks, There is this Palet Label that I am working on - and I just got word that a large number on the Form must be set to 150 points... - Use a Graphic image instead of the # in your form. Granted you have to figure out how to switch them on the fly but that is why we make the mediocre money isn't it? I did that in a VB 6 form a few years ago. I got the value and copied the graphic representation of that #'s file over the existing version of it. bigNum.jpg -- Stephen Russell --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/mixed text/plain (text body -- kept) application/ms-tnef --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a1404254...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] VMware ESXi Server, and other VMware virtualization solutions
Ed Leafe wrote: snipped Yes, those are real techs in San Antonio on the other end, not a bot or an offshore contractor. So nice and refreshing to hear these kinds of things, on many levels. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a40e5c6.4050...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP9: Runtime
Jack Skelley wrote: Good Morning All: I guess I am missing something... I have an app as an .exe on a server. When a user runs the app across the network it reports that the runtime is not found. When I run the app from the server there are no issues. Or if I run the app across the network there are no issues (of course my box has the runtime on it). I am assuming the runtime needs to be on each user's machine. Or what did I miss so that the server supplies the runtime for the user? Regards, The runtimes have to be installed on the client machine(s). ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a40ecbe.7030...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9: Runtime
Vince: Thanks Jack From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Vince Teachout [tea...@taconic.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 10:54 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: VFP9: Runtime Jack Skelley wrote: Good Morning All: I guess I am missing something... I have an app as an .exe on a server. When a user runs the app across the network it reports that the runtime is not found. When I run the app from the server there are no issues. Or if I run the app across the network there are no issues (of course my box has the runtime on it). I am assuming the runtime needs to be on each user's machine. Or what did I miss so that the server supplies the runtime for the user? Regards, The runtimes have to be installed on the client machine(s). ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0b957900b2b8194d998a441195b66038386be4b...@drdsrv03.drdad.thenewarkarena.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9: Runtime
Speaking of runtimes. When I upgrade from sp1 to sp2 do I have to do any thing with runtimes on client machine other than supply new exe. Jerry -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jack Skelley Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 10:27 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: VFP9: Runtime Vince: Thanks Jack From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Vince Teachout [tea...@taconic.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 10:54 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: VFP9: Runtime Jack Skelley wrote: Good Morning All: I guess I am missing something... I have an app as an .exe on a server. When a user runs the app across the network it reports that the runtime is not found. When I run the app from the server there are no issues. Or if I run the app across the network there are no issues (of course my box has the runtime on it). I am assuming the runtime needs to be on each user's machine. Or what did I miss so that the server supplies the runtime for the user? Regards, The runtimes have to be installed on the client machine(s). [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5c1d2937c9ff413dbe4a52fbdfac0...@laptop ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9: Runtime
Yep, you have to upgrade the VFP runtimes on all the clients also. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1245771399.9134.1321776...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9: Runtime
The runtimes have to be installed on the client machine(s). False. While they can be installed on the workstation and the performance is marginally better, they can be installed on the server in the app folder. Rick White Light Computing, Inc. www.whitelightcomputing.com www.swfox.net www.rickschummer.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/00ff01c9f420$a257be80$e7073b...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] VMware ESXi Server, and other VMware virtualization solutions
I don't think that they offer Windows servers in the cloud yet; I know that they've been negotiating with Microsoft for some time to try to come up with a licensing agreement that will make that possible. Good thing Ed is not in sales g, but his advice is good to chat with a rep. I am working with a Windows 2003 server in the Rackspace cloud with SQL Server Express loaded. My client is paying an arm and a leg for it though, but for my client it is worth the expense for their business. It is a real nice setup so far. Amazon's cloud seems like better pricing. I cannot compare the service or the offerings though since I am a third party in all of this. Rick White Light Computing, Inc. www.whitelightcomputing.com www.swfox.net www.rickschummer.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/010001c9f420$a2b806f0$e82814...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP9: Runtime
Rick Schummer wrote: The runtimes have to be installed on the client machine(s). False. While they can be installed on the workstation and the performance is marginally better, they can be installed on the server in the app folder. Indeed? Thank you, I didn't know that! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a41052d.5020...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9: Runtime
Rick: Thanks! Regards, Jack From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Rick Schummer [pro...@whitelightcomputing.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:35 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: VFP9: Runtime The runtimes have to be installed on the client machine(s). False. While they can be installed on the workstation and the performance is marginally better, they can be installed on the server in the app folder. Rick White Light Computing, Inc. www.whitelightcomputing.com www.swfox.net www.rickschummer.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0b957900b2b8194d998a441195b66038386be4b...@drdsrv03.drdad.thenewarkarena.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] VMware ESXi Server, and other VMware virtualization solutions
Ed Leafe wrote: I don't think that they offer Windows servers in the cloud yet; I know that they've been negotiating with Microsoft for some time to try to come up with a licensing agreement that will make that possible. So what you do is get a Linux setup on the Rackspace cloud, set up VMWare server and a remote console to it. Then install Windows to a VMWare host on that server. Or, evaluate migrating to PostgreSQL, Firebird, MySQL, or another free enterprise-class database server and eliminate the hassle and overhead of maintaining a Windows host simply to provide a database server. If you do install Windows in this way, make sure you either shut down the Server and Workstation services as they cause lots of unneeded chatter on the network which you'll probably get dinged for. Maybe the best way to avoid chatter and protect the SQL Server installation would be to set the firewall on the Linux host to *only* allow port 1433 in and out to the Windows VM. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a410de0.2030...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Twisted notion of justice
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: Supreme Court Denies DNA Evidence To Potentially Innocent Man http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/06/18/scotus-dna/ ( -or- http://bit.ly/eDCMT ) Imagine that: evidence exists that could either exonerate an innocent man, or verify a guilty man's conviction, but Chief Justice John Roberts because it might risk overthrowing the established system of justice. Think about that: not rocking the boat is more important than freeing an innocent man. The damage of the Bush administration continues to mount... --- I thought that it was a move to STOP every blasted incarcerated person from filing a motion that demands a retrial. The cost to taxpayers for repeat performances would cripple just about any county, or city court system. Second part is there enough evidence remaining that both sides can make their own tests? Or is there just enough for one side? Do I think it is wrong? Possibly. Why? Because for every 100 imprisoned persons who yells that they are innocent, is there one or maybe five of them that are correct. So we have to go through everyone to find the one? -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer SQL Server DBA Web and Winform Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0906220806x7641625bod0740497a89d1...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] George Tiller was terminated in his 203rd trimester Ann Coulter
[OT] George Tiller was terminated in his 203rd trimester Ann Coulter * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/328681.3515...@web31408.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Twisted notion of justice
On Jun 22, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: I thought that it was a move to STOP every blasted incarcerated person from filing a motion that demands a retrial. No, not at all. DNA evidence that was not available at his trial is now available, and he has offered to pick up the tab for the test. If it matches, things stay the same. If not, there is proof that he was incorrectly incarcerated, and the state has a vital interest in maintaining the liberty of its innocent citizens. The cost to taxpayers for repeat performances would cripple just about any county, or city court system. That's a silly red herring. The cost to society for refusing to free innocent people is much higher. Second part is there enough evidence remaining that both sides can make their own tests? Or is there just enough for one side? ??? Are you reaching for straws here? He has offered to pay for the *state* to do the test. Do I think it is wrong? Possibly. Why? Because for every 100 imprisoned persons who yells that they are innocent, is there one or maybe five of them that are correct. So we have to go through everyone to find the one? Again, it would really help if you read the actual article before making ridiculous statements such as this. There are very few cases where conclusive evidence that was not available at trial is later made available. Performing the test will cost the state *nothing*. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/17660bac-a70a-437e-ab83-bc92493f9...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Twisted notion of justice
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.comwrote: On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: Supreme Court Denies DNA Evidence To Potentially Innocent Man http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/06/18/scotus-dna/ ( -or- http://bit.ly/eDCMT ) Imagine that: evidence exists that could either exonerate an innocent man, or verify a guilty man's conviction, but Chief Justice John Roberts because it might risk overthrowing the established system of justice. Think about that: not rocking the boat is more important than freeing an innocent man. The damage of the Bush administration continues to mount... --- I thought that it was a move to STOP every blasted incarcerated person from filing a motion that demands a retrial. The cost to taxpayers for repeat performances would cripple just about any county, or city court system. Second part is there enough evidence remaining that both sides can make their own tests? Or is there just enough for one side? Do I think it is wrong? Possibly. Why? Because for every 100 imprisoned persons who yells that they are innocent, is there one or maybe five of them that are correct. So we have to go through everyone to find the one? Steve, I think you missed the point of this. The convicted didn't ask for the state or the federal government to pay for his DNA test. He was disallowed from paying for his DNA test out of his own pocket. Bill --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafad1610906231034y644dd8e7lcd8cbfbbeae17...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9: Runtime
Hi Let me get this straight, you run a program that resides on a server from a workstation and the OS of the workstation knows the DLLs required is residing on the server ? I cannot test this at the moment, but I am almost sure that's not the case. E. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b0b018a4dfbc418a866c497dfd9e6...@notebookhp ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] When should you not tweet?
One less idiot to breed! --- On Fri, 6/19/09, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com Subject: [OT] When should you not tweet? To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, June 19, 2009, 5:45 PM http://www.austriantimes.at/index.php?id=14023 -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer SQL Server DBA Web and Winform Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/325909.57260...@web31404.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP9: Runtime
This is true. Years ago with FoxproDos we experimented with having the libraries and our EXE on the local workstation and found that it made very little or no performance difference and was not worth the support effort. We always install the dll ocx with our EXE and it has worked with every fox version through vfp9 sp1. You do need to register many of the dll and ocx on every local machine, but they can be located on the server. We find the single most important factor in performance with vfp (and our program of course) is the amount of memory you have. There are a lot of rumors out there about how much memory you can have on this or that os. We put 4 gb on xp sp2 and we find that it will show at least 3.35 gb and so it is worth the cost if you need performance. Fox is a memory hog, so you may realize decreased performance on the startup because it is loading programs, however, once your program is running, we find the performance is much improved. We have done a lot of tests (with our software only) over the years. - Original Message - From: Rick Schummer To: profox@leafe.com Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 9:35 AM Subject: RE: VFP9: Runtime The runtimes have to be installed on the client machine(s). False. While they can be installed on the workstation and the performance is marginally better, they can be installed on the server in the app folder. Rick White Light Computing, Inc. www.whitelightcomputing.com www.swfox.net www.rickschummer.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/6d8628a7c5fc42378d4a0f80dc4d8...@w2k3s02 ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Twisted notion of justice
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: On Jun 22, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: I thought that it was a move to STOP every blasted incarcerated person from filing a motion that demands a retrial. No, not at all. DNA evidence that was not available at his trial is now available, and he has offered to pick up the tab for the test. If it matches, things stay the same. If not, there is proof that he was incorrectly incarcerated, and the state has a vital interest in maintaining the liberty of its innocent citizens. -- This was days ago that I heard this on the radio but the test is more precise then what was used back in the day for this case. Yes skillet will pick up the tab for his test first. This could only set a precedent if any skillet was demand a retest. This could tie up every lab in USA, CA, GB, just to go through all of our old cases let alone all the current testing we need today becasue we are all as good as CSI on a local level. ;0 The cost to taxpayers for repeat performances would cripple just about any county, or city court system. That's a silly red herring. The cost to society for refusing to free innocent people is much higher. Second part is there enough evidence remaining that both sides can make their own tests? Or is there just enough for one side? ??? - Evidence collected from the 80s and the 90s in not only fragile, it may also be in short supply. So if there was enough for only 1 test, would it be fair in today's court system to not let the other side have a crack with their team doing the test. Are you reaching for straws here? He has offered to pay for the *state* to do the test. -- No, he was going to do the test on his nickle to see if he had the change to clear his name. At that time he would mount a new motion. Do I think it is wrong? Possibly. Why? Because for every 100 imprisoned persons who yells that they are innocent, is there one or maybe five of them that are correct. So we have to go through everyone to find the one? Again, it would really help if you read the actual article before making ridiculous statements such as this. There are very few cases where conclusive evidence that was not available at trial is later made available. Performing the test will cost the state *nothing*. --- I heard a long story on this subject either in the car driving or at home via TV. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer SQL Server DBA Web and Winform Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0906231153iaaa68f4laa62e57fceef2...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9: Runtime
Let me get this straight, you run a program that resides on a server from a workstation and the OS of the workstation knows the DLLs required is residing on the server ? I cannot test this at the moment, but I am almost sure that's not the case. As long as the runtime files are in the application folder you are fine. If you load them into the common files folder under Program Files it will not run. VFP is searching the app folder, common files and probably the System32 folder for the runtime files. Rick White Light Computing, Inc. www.whitelightcomputing.com www.swfox.net www.rickschummer.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/014301c9f436$5e095110$1a1bf3...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Twisted notion of justice
Stephen Russell wrote: On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: Supreme Court Denies DNA Evidence To Potentially Innocent Man http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/06/18/scotus-dna/ ( -or- http://bit.ly/eDCMT ) Imagine that: evidence exists that could either exonerate an innocent man, or verify a guilty man's conviction, but Chief Justice John Roberts because it might risk overthrowing the established system of justice. Think about that: not rocking the boat is more important than freeing an innocent man. The damage of the Bush administration continues to mount... --- I thought that it was a move to STOP every blasted incarcerated person from filing a motion that demands a retrial. The cost to taxpayers for repeat performances would cripple just about any county, or city court system. Second part is there enough evidence remaining that both sides can make their own tests? Or is there just enough for one side? Do I think it is wrong? Possibly. Why? Because for every 100 imprisoned persons who yells that they are innocent, is there one or maybe five of them that are correct. So we have to go through everyone to find the one? Facts, facts! Always facts before opinion! How much does a DNA test cost? How much does keeping an inmate cost per year? How many more years must he be in jail? After you answer these question there will probably not be much room for opinion. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a4134e0.1090...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Twisted notion of justice
Stephen Russell wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: On Jun 22, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: I thought that it was a move to STOP every blasted incarcerated person from filing a motion that demands a retrial. No, not at all. DNA evidence that was not available at his trial is now available, and he has offered to pick up the tab for the test. If it matches, things stay the same. If not, there is proof that he was incorrectly incarcerated, and the state has a vital interest in maintaining the liberty of its innocent citizens. -- This was days ago that I heard this on the radio but the test is more precise then what was used back in the day for this case. Yes skillet will pick up the tab for his test first. This could only set a precedent if any skillet was demand a retest. This could tie up every lab in USA, CA, GB, just to go through all of our old cases let alone all the current testing we need today becasue we are all as good as CSI on a local level. ;0 Opinions again! Could, would! How many other people would request this? You actually have NO idea whatsoever! Besides which, it's a simple matter of setting priorities. You instruct labs to give current testing a higher priority. Or you could let the market regulate itself... ;cP The cost to taxpayers for repeat performances would cripple just about any county, or city court system. That's a silly red herring. The cost to society for refusing to free innocent people is much higher. Second part is there enough evidence remaining that both sides can make their own tests? Or is there just enough for one side? ??? - Evidence collected from the 80s and the 90s in not only fragile, it may also be in short supply. So if there was enough for only 1 test, would it be fair in today's court system to not let the other side have a crack with their team doing the test. Are you reaching for straws here? He has offered to pay for the *state* to do the test. -- No, he was going to do the test on his nickle to see if he had the change to clear his name. At that time he would mount a new motion. Do I think it is wrong? Possibly. Why? Because for every 100 imprisoned persons who yells that they are innocent, is there one or maybe five of them that are correct. So we have to go through everyone to find the one? Again, it would really help if you read the actual article before making ridiculous statements such as this. There are very few cases where conclusive evidence that was not available at trial is later made available. Performing the test will cost the state *nothing*. --- I heard a long story on this subject either in the car driving or at home via TV. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a4135a7.4020...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Twisted notion of justice
2009/6/23 Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com Facts, facts! Always facts before opinion! How much does a DNA test cost? How much does keeping an inmate cost per year? How many more years must he be in jail? After you answer these question there will probably not be much room for opinion. -- 2006 article states that DNA is in thousand $ range. http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-08.htm Other sites on paternity state that the high cost is for proof of sample being secure through the whole process, or security of sample costs as much as the base test does. So should this be only for the rich? If you can afford it you pay for it at an approved lab? Sucks if you have not had a job in 20 years because you have been in jail that long. Or do you let the people who can pay for it go first? Then when that volume is null then put in the poor folks? I know it is the American Way! What if there is not enough substance left for a comparison? Are you now screwed? This brings a whole lot of OBTW issues up. Proper storage of specimens from the early 80s. Can you sue the government because the evidence is now worthless? If someone were to win on that stupid notion, aka O Jay, does everyone get a monopoly get out of jail free card? -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer SQL Server DBA Web and Winform Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0906231328g49b15ef9m3d13b0ff40ae9...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Twisted notion of justice
On Jun 23, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: This could tie up every lab in USA, CA, GB, just to go through all of our old cases let alone all the current testing we need today becasue we are all as good as CSI on a local level. ;0 Ah, yes. Wouldn't it be wonderful if someone in your family was falsely imprisoned! I'm sure that you would rest comfortably, knowing that their unjust loss of freedom is making the life of lab owners that much more manageable. Evidence collected from the 80s and the 90s in not only fragile, it may also be in short supply. So if there was enough for only 1 test, would it be fair in today's court system to not let the other side have a crack with their team doing the test. First off, you're making up a condition that doesn't exist. Second, even if only one test could be done, he is willing to let the state perform the test on his dime. So there is no conflict here. No, he was going to do the test on his nickle to see if he had the change to clear his name. At that time he would mount a new motion. Of course there would be a new motion if the test showed that the conviction was wrong. There is no other process available for freeing an unjustly convicted citizen. I heard a long story on this subject either in the car driving or at home via TV. And that means what? Slippery Slope arguments are pretty weak when you have a specific case in front of you. The comment above about imagining that it were one of your own loved ones instead of an anonymous nobody isn't just meant to be snarky; instead, such humanizing exercises are a great example of just how lame such abstract arguments are. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/404a82ad-85a2-4401-a5c9-497d05a4a...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] When should you not tweet?
Definately should win a Darwin award this year Michael Madigan wrote: One less idiot to breed! --- On Fri, 6/19/09, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com Subject: [OT] When should you not tweet? To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, June 19, 2009, 5:45 PM http://www.austriantimes.at/index.php?id=14023 -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer SQL Server DBA Web and Winform Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a41411d.5040...@netzero.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Twisted notion of justice
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: On Jun 23, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: This could tie up every lab in USA, CA, GB, just to go through all of our old cases let alone all the current testing we need today becasue we are all as good as CSI on a local level. ;0 Ah, yes. Wouldn't it be wonderful if someone in your family was falsely imprisoned! I'm sure that you would rest comfortably, knowing that their unjust loss of freedom is making the life of lab owners that much more manageable. -- Honestly Ed how many people in prison say that they are falsely imprisoned? I have no idea what population % this involves. Out of the people just for murder could this strike 20% or 50%? Once again I have no idea. The more we talk about this the more absurd the conversation becomes. You honor the rights of the semi dead and will go the limit for just one of them. On the flip side when it comes to termination of the unborn you have a no problem attitude. So far I am just proposing facts about why the judge ruled the way he did, from a management POV not a humans incarcerated one. Problem is our country is such a knee jerk reactionary personality I feel that we open up a huge can of worms when we consider extracting out of sedintary hell the tenth of one precent who are truely innocent. The quagmire/nightmare that it could generate is huge. I guess it is like knowing that you are going to take losses from friendly fire. It doesn't stop you from fighting, you just accept it and continue. Have to deal with car getting worked on. ttfn. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer SQL Server DBA Web and Winform Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0906231434s406d49bdtef221feb0792a...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Twisted notion of justice
At 13:45 2009-06-23, you wrote: On Jun 23, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: This could tie up every lab in USA, CA, GB, just to go through all of our old cases let alone all the current testing we need today becasue we are all as good as CSI on a local level. ;0 Ah, yes. Wouldn't it be wonderful if someone in your family was falsely imprisoned! I'm sure that you would rest comfortably, knowing that their unjust loss of freedom is making the life of lab owners that much more manageable. Well, no. The lab owners do not get as much business. That could cause difficulties in the current economic climate. It is helpful for the government to save money though. Ed is being too easy on you: Mr. Russell, what if YOU were imprisoned for a crime that you did not commit? Would you want to be freed? [snip] Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/20090623213453.348d298...@marge.leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Twisted notion of justice
On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: Honestly Ed how many people in prison say that they are falsely imprisoned? Probably most. So what? I have no idea what population % this involves. Out of the people just for murder could this strike 20% or 50%? Once again I have no idea. Again, so what? The more we talk about this the more absurd the conversation becomes. You honor the rights of the semi dead and will go the limit for just one of them. On the flip side when it comes to termination of the unborn you have a no problem attitude. Semi-dead? Abortion? Absurd is an understatement. I'm done. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/8f0a0e6a-4c9b-492d-b5d5-6bf2ec56c...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Generating GUIDs for primary keys in your app (VFP9SP2)
I like to design in n-tier fashion, so that I can use either a VFP or non-VFP (like MySQL) backend on the flip of a switch. I'm creating a new framework that will use GUID primary keys instead of integers. My question is this: is it best to generate those GUIDs from the app or use some stored proc in the database? I'm thinking the former should suffice, but of course I have slight concern of some freak occurrence of the same string key. Very remote chance probably, but I like to be sure and use the best practice if possible. Tia! -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a414e76.4030...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Generating GUIDs for primary keys in your app (VFP9SP2)
MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: I like to design in n-tier fashion, so that I can use either a VFP or non-VFP (like MySQL) backend on the flip of a switch. I'm creating a new framework that will use GUID primary keys instead of integers. My question is this: is it best to generate those GUIDs from the app or use some stored proc in the database? I'm thinking the former should suffice, but of course I have slight concern of some freak occurrence of the same string key. Very remote chance probably, but I like to be sure and use the best practice if possible. The very definition of GUID is that they are guaranteed to be unique. I generate them in the app, so my app is as database-agnostic as possible. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a41662b.2010...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Generating GUIDs for primary keys in your app (VFP9SP2)
What kind of performance penalty is there compared to integers when doing joins? At 07:32 PM 06/23/2009, you wrote: MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: I like to design in n-tier fashion, so that I can use either a VFP or non-VFP (like MySQL) backend on the flip of a switch. I'm creating a new framework that will use GUID primary keys instead of integers. My question is this: is it best to generate those GUIDs from the app or use some stored proc in the database? I'm thinking the former should suffice, but of course I have slight concern of some freak occurrence of the same string key. Very remote chance probably, but I like to be sure and use the best practice if possible. The very definition of GUID is that they are guaranteed to be unique. I generate them in the app, so my app is as database-agnostic as possible. Paul [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/20090623234429.4970f98...@marge.leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] VMware ESXi Server, and other VMware virtualization solutions
On Jun 23, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Rick Schummer wrote: I don't think that they offer Windows servers in the cloud yet; I know that they've been negotiating with Microsoft for some time to try to come up with a licensing agreement that will make that possible. Good thing Ed is not in sales g, but his advice is good to chat with a rep. I am working with a Windows 2003 server in the Rackspace cloud with SQL Server Express loaded. My client is paying an arm and a leg for it though, but for my client it is worth the expense for their business. It is a real nice setup so far. Right now the Rackspace Cloud offers the following Cloud Servers: CentOS (2 versions) Gentoo Debian Fedora (2 versions) Ubuntu (3 versions) Arch RedHat Enterprise They do not offer Win2K3 cloud servers. You might be thinking of Rackspace Cloud *Sites*, which do offer Windows options. However, these are not servers: you cannot shell into them, add/remove software, change configurations, access the file system, etc. With a Cloud Server, you have a virtual machine that you interact with identically to any other box. With my current situation of being 1700 miles away from the leafe.com box in my house, I work with both that physical box and my cloud sites exactly the same way; the experience is the same. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/709760b2-f105-4016-a685-40c96dfc8...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Generating GUIDs for primary keys in your app (VFP9SP2)
I generate them in the app, so my app is as database-agnostic as possible. Me too. Saves me time maintaining different code bases in different stored procedure languages. I also like controlling the timing of the keys so I can use and propagate as needed. Rick White Light Computing, Inc. www.whitelightcomputing.com www.swfox.net www.rickschummer.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/01f501c9f481$2e0f4140$8a2dc3...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Generating GUIDs for primary keys in your app (VFP9SP2)
Steve Ellenoff wrote: What kind of performance penalty is there compared to integers when doing joins? I'm not sure if there's any penalty or benefit, or what that penalty/benefit would be. I've never had the need to profile my join performance. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a41a6d3.1080...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Generating GUIDs for primary keys in your app (VFP9SP2)
Rick Schummer wrote: I generate them in the app, so my app is as database-agnostic as possible. Me too. Saves me time maintaining different code bases in different stored procedure languages. I also like controlling the timing of the keys so I can use and propagate as needed. Oh YEAH? :) I don't use stored procedures/referential integrity at all in the database. The database is merely a container for me. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a41a765.9050...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] VMware ESXi Server, and other VMware virtualization solutions
They do not offer Win2K3 cloud servers. You might be thinking of Rackspace Cloud *Sites*, which do offer Windows options. However, these are not servers: you cannot shell into them, add/remove software, change configurations, access the file system, etc. With a Cloud Server, you have a virtual machine that you interact with identically to any other box. With my current situation of being 1700 miles away from the leafe.com box in my house, I work with both that physical box and my cloud sites exactly the same way; the experience is the same. Like I said, I am a third party to this process, but I am running a rackspace device that has on it SQL Server 2005, and VFP 9 SP2 latest hotfixes (which we loaded) and some data, programs, etc. I remote desktop into this cloud server/site/box. Maybe this is a managed hosting device instead of a virtual machine, but the arrangement smells a lot like the one you get from the Amazon cloud. Rick White Light Computing, Inc. www.whitelightcomputing.com www.swfox.net www.rickschummer.com -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 10:52 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] VMware ESXi Server, and other VMware virtualization solutions On Jun 23, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Rick Schummer wrote: I don't think that they offer Windows servers in the cloud yet; I know that they've been negotiating with Microsoft for some time to try to come up with a licensing agreement that will make that possible. Good thing Ed is not in sales g, but his advice is good to chat with a rep. I am working with a Windows 2003 server in the Rackspace cloud with SQL Server Express loaded. My client is paying an arm and a leg for it though, but for my client it is worth the expense for their business. It is a real nice setup so far. Right now the Rackspace Cloud offers the following Cloud Servers: CentOS (2 versions) Gentoo Debian Fedora (2 versions) Ubuntu (3 versions) Arch RedHat Enterprise They do not offer Win2K3 cloud servers. You might be thinking of Rackspace Cloud *Sites*, which do offer Windows options. However, these are not servers: you cannot shell into them, add/remove software, change configurations, access the file system, etc. With a Cloud Server, you have a virtual machine that you interact with identically to any other box. With my current situation of being 1700 miles away from the leafe.com box in my house, I work with both that physical box and my cloud sites exactly the same way; the experience is the same. -- Ed Leafe [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/01fc01c9f484$fd5004f0$f7f00e...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Bad/missing HAL.DLL
*Since the movers brought my Desktop PC to my new office, the PC has been slow, etc. **Machine seemed to be ok; but when Selecting [Safe Mode], two choices: * * *Window XP Professional* * *Window (default)* *The OEM **Support said that this means I have two operating systems. * *I asked PowerSpec -- the OEM -- to do a total restore with their OEM Recovery DVD. They had me delete the Master Boot Record. Then Quick Restore ** They had me do another quick recovery. Afterwards, same two choices in Safe Mode. I looked in [boot.ini]: * [boot loader] default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINDOWS [operating systems] multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINNT=Microsoft Windows XP Professional /noexecute=optin /fastdetect *I then search for an [ini] file with [WINNT]. In addition to [boot.ini] there were two for drivers in C:\Powerspec\Drivers\MB\ATI_RC4\Driver: * * *C2_3159.INI* * *CX_3159.INI* *Support said either: * * *Bad hardrive* * *Bad cable * *I see these options: * * *Use Recovery Console from UC's XP CD and EXPAND hal.dll from CD's i386* * *From UC's CD and Recovery Console, **bootcfg /rebuild* * *From UC's CD and Recovery Console, **fixmbr* * *From UC's CD do a Clean Install * * *Try another cable* * *Test/New Harddrive* * *New Machine * *Anything else? And please list steps in sequence. Thank you.* -- *Charles *-- Website: *http://homepages.uc.edu/ http://homepages.uc.edu/%7Eenzerch~enzerch http://homepages.uc.edu/%7Eenzerch* --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4a41ad44.2080...@ucmail.uc.edu ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
