RE: [OT] Obama was born in Kenya.
And into international press... http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100158834/obama-used-to-be-a-kenyan/ -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 17 May 2012 18:57 To: Pro Fox Email List Subject: [OT] Obama was born in Kenya. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-Kenya-Raised-Indonesia-Hawaii [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/442E79C1A7355C4EA228D320AA59D69CBE8681@SBS2011.eurohill.local ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Obama was born in Kenya.
With the revelation that they tried to bribe Reverend Wright with $150,000 to stay quiet during the 2008 election, the 2012 re-election is falling apart. Look for Obama to attack Iran in October. - Original Message - From: Adam Buckland adam.buckl...@apac.co.uk To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 6:08 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Obama was born in Kenya. And into international press... http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100158834/obama-used-to-be-a-kenyan/ -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 17 May 2012 18:57 To: Pro Fox Email List Subject: [OT] Obama was born in Kenya. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-K[excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1337336439.61034.yahoomail...@web125604.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Need my Profox Fix.......
Where is everybody, or do we have an outage? Dave ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bd031ecabf2b60499200aab3dbb4a999f11e5...@ex-a-fpl.fpl.LOCAL ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Need my Profox Fix.......
Well I can see myself. that's a start! Dave -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 18 May 2012 16:53 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Need my Profox Fix... Where is everybody, or do we have an outage? Dave [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bd031ecabf2b60499200aab3dbb4a999f11e5...@ex-a-fpl.fpl.LOCAL ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Need my Profox Fix.......
On May 18, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: Where is everybody, or do we have an outage? They're all busy buying Facebook stock? -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/43507a65-5b75-47e8-b968-ed778cb7f...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Need my Profox Fix.......
Really? But, I TOO was surprised to see ALL of Thur go by - and NO Messages at all. However, I guess, considering your reply Ed - that there was no Actual Outtage - just an Extremely quiet day in the Land of ProFox. -K- -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:03 PM On May 18, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: Where is everybody, or do we have an outage? They're all busy buying Facebook stock? -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a140e260...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Need my Profox Fix.......
I just got the news via the ZDNet newsletter about FB stock now up for sale. So - I guess you were only half joking! So - U run and go buy some? I know Pete would NEVER Buy the stuff - he'd rather run in the other direction as FAST as Possible!!! :-) -K- -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:03 PM On May 18, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: Where is everybody, or do we have an outage? They're all busy buying Facebook stock? -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a140e260...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Need my Profox Fix.......
Another blessed Pete-free day. Praises to the Flying Spaghetti Monster!!! Ken On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Kurt Wendt kurtwe...@waitex.com wrote: Really? But, I TOO was surprised to see ALL of Thur go by - and NO Messages at all. However, I guess, considering your reply Ed - that there was no Actual Outtage - just an Extremely quiet day in the Land of ProFox. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFyV=lnxee9ngaoms+cyg5km6rvcc2bn7h5wpxf+8sxs7yj...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Need my Profox Fix.......
On 5/18/2012 12:29 PM, Paul McNett wrote: On 5/18/12 8:53 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: Where is everybody, or do we have an outage? It turns out Facebook is run on Visual Foxpro DBC's and they need help with data wrangling. We are all in Menlo Park. Paul Bwahahahaahahaha! -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fb67aaf.5040...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Need my Profox Fix.......
On May 18, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote: But, I TOO was surprised to see ALL of Thur go by - and NO Messages at all. However, I guess, considering your reply Ed - that there was no Actual Outtage - just an Extremely quiet day in the Land of ProFox. I saw no signs of any issues, but absence of evidence is not proof... Did anyone post anything yesterday that never appeared? -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/dee81f82-9424-42c0-9111-2ea892b58...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Need my Profox Fix.......
Nope - not me. Seems the Only Hotspot on ProFox yesterday was the Less Pro stuff of crazy OT Discussions about Jesus Obama (although - praise the Lord - NOT in the Same message thread). I just changed my subscriptions so that I can gander at the Crazy OT discussions, and it was immediately Obvious that I was getting my money's worth... ...funny thing is - I ended up getting only OT stuff - and NOT any of the regular stuff - and for a while there - I was worried that I had somehow messed up my subscription - and that was WHY I was only getting OT stuff. But, of course - that's just not possible! -K- -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 1:09 PM On May 18, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote: But, I TOO was surprised to see ALL of Thur go by - and NO Messages at all. However, I guess, considering your reply Ed - that there was no Actual Outtage - just an Extremely quiet day in the Land of ProFox. I saw no signs of any issues, but absence of evidence is not proof... Did anyone post anything yesterday that never appeared? -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a140e260...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Gorehole schmoozing with new chick on tax dime
Hi Everybody, http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=51592 -- Regards, Pete ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fb6927f.1090...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] 1st Solar CEO took his $ out while taking good
Hi Everybody, http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=51551 -- Regards, Pete ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fb696fc.1090...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Did Jesus reveal the name of the Anti-Christ?
Interesting. Jerry -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 10:35 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: [OT] Did Jesus reveal the name of the Anti-Christ? Hi Everybody, Not that anyone would be surprised: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlT9SYR6jq4feature=related -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/E5697D8FE0F7479BAD90C2BE59EE1826@jerryfootePC ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Need my Profox Fix.......
I wondered about that myself. I just changed from ProFox to ProFoxTech (guess why), and it occurred to me that maybe Pete had sucked up all the bandwith in [OT] so that no regular posts got through. g Dan On 05/18/12 10:17, Kurt Wendt wrote: Nope - not me. Seems the Only Hotspot on ProFox yesterday was the Less Pro stuff of crazy OT Discussions about Jesus Obama (although - praise the Lord - NOT in the Same message thread). I just changed my subscriptions so that I can gander at the Crazy OT discussions, and it was immediately Obvious that I was getting my money's worth... ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fb6a6f0.2060...@san.rr.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Need my Profox Fix.......
They're all shorting Facebook stock - Original Message - From: Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:02 PM Subject: Re: Need my Profox Fix... On May 18, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: Where is everybody, or do we have an outage? They're all busy buying Facebook stock? -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/43507a65-5b75-47e8-b968-ed778cb7f...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1337371089.96004.yahoomail...@web125604.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Leaf Blower Photography
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/leaf-blower-photographer-incredible-pictures-youll-want-to-see/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1337373773.23130.yahoomail...@web125606.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Error 2066 corruption followup
To your # 3, DTOS always return 8 chars (MMDD) no matter what the SET CENTURY setting is. Not a likely culprit in different length index expressions. More likely #1 or #4 was the cause, though #4 should have alerted you to an issue, not created one. Fred On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.comwrote: I'm writing this in case someone needs to research this later in the archives I was getting a lot of 2066 errors which is index corruption when we took a legacy FPW 2.5 program and converted it to a VFP 9.0 program. We have the old and the new system sharing the same databases. The possible causes and solutions so far, as the number of corruptions have gone down dramatically. 1. Win 7 machines running SMB2 - I shut off SMB2 on all windows 7 machines. 2. Browse noedit screens browsing the same database open in the main form - I replaced the browse database with SQL Selects into a cursor instead. 3. Possible index corruption caused by DTOS(DATE) being part of index field. Troubleshooting a different issue, it turns out perhaps CENTURY was being toggled on and off somewhere in the program. This may cause differences in the length of the index statement, which may cause index corruption. 4. Making sure Tablevalidate is set to 0 everywhere. It was set to the default originally. So far no index corruption at all for the last 3 days and other errors have dropped too. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJCBkspHcCgSONSa2vGmQAJc=3zsohrvybasaslmlzgxqm8...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Error 2066 corruption followup
I'm still not sure if it's fixed, we'll see. - Original Message - From: Fred Taylor fbtay...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 5:22 PM Subject: Re: Error 2066 corruption followup To your # 3, DTOS always return 8 chars (MMDD) no matter what the SET CENTURY setting is. Not a likely culprit in different length index expressions. More likely #1 or #4 was the cause, though #4 should have alerted you to an issue, not created one. Fred On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.comwrote: I'm writing this in case someone needs to research this later in the archives I was getting a lot of 2066 errors which is index corruption when we took a legacy FPW 2.5 program and converted it to a VFP 9.0 program. We have the old and the new system sharing the same databases. The possible causes and solutions so far, as the number of corruptions have gone down dramatically. 1. Win 7 machines running SMB2 - I shut off SMB2 on all windows 7 machines. 2. Browse noedit screens browsing the same database open in the main form - I replaced the browse database with SQL Selects into a cursor instead. 3. Possible index corruption caused by DTOS(DATE) being part of index field. Troubleshooting a different issue, it turns out perhaps CENTURY was being toggled on and off somewhere in the program. This may cause differences in the length of the index statement, which may cause index corruption. 4. Making sure Tablevalidate is set to 0 everywhere. It was set to the default originally. So far no index corruption at all for the last 3 days and other errors have dropped too. I'm ke[excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1337386946.67330.yahoomail...@web125606.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: select question
No, the problem is that the syntax is invalid. From the VFP Help: SELECT [ALL][DISTINCT][TOP exp] field list .. I.e., the top 5 has to come before the field list. Hm.. Well you can do: SELECT myfield1, myfield2 DISTINCT FROM... without a problem. So it's something peculiar to TOP. Ken Dibble www.stic-cil.org ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5.2.1.1.1.20120518202832.01f5e...@pop-server.stny.rr.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: select question
On 5/18/2012 8:29 PM, Ken Dibble wrote: No, the problem is that the syntax is invalid. From the VFP Help: SELECT [ALL][DISTINCT][TOPexp]field list .. I.e., the top 5 has to come before the field list. Hm.. Well you can do: SELECT myfield1, myfield2 DISTINCT FROM... without a problem. So it's something peculiar to TOP. Yes but you really should put DISTINCT first. I don't think other RDBMSes will let you get away with that like the Fox. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fb6f0df.6010...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: select question
On 05/18/12 17:29, Ken Dibble wrote: No, the problem is that the syntax is invalid. From the VFP Help: SELECT [ALL][DISTINCT][TOPexp]field list .. I.e., the top 5 has to come before the field list. Hm.. Well you can do: SELECT myfield1, myfield2 DISTINCT FROM... without a problem. So it's something peculiar to TOP. Not really. There is a bug in the syntax checking for DISTINCT. And the error message is rather unhelpful. Dan Covill San Diego ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fb72732.5080...@san.rr.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
