Re: [NF] Screen Resolution Messed Up

2012-08-29 Thread Peter Cushing
G Gambill wrote:
 I hooked up a screen projector to my Windows 7 Pro laptop.  Suddenly the
 maximum screen resolution available on the laptop is 1366 x 768.  I need
 1600 X 900 for a home grown motion control GUI.

   
That's the maximum available on my windows 7 pro laptop.  AFAIK that's 
the maximum it has ever shown.  I occasionally use an external monitor. 

Maybe they havn't got round to doing better graphics drivers yet.

Peter





Rajan Imports has changed - we are now Whispering Smith Ltd.  For more 
information see our website at www.whisperingsmith.com


Please update your address book with my new email address: 
pcush...@whisperingsmith.com

.

This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom it is 
addressed.  The contents are confidential and may be protected in law.  
Unauthorised use, copying or 
disclosure of any of it may be unlawful.  If you have received this message in 
error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email.

www.whisperingsmith.com

Whispering Smith Ltd
Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR. Tel:0161 831 3700 
Fax:0161 831 3715
London Office:17-19 Foley Street, London  W1W 6DW Tel:0207 299 7960


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/503ddd9d.1030...@whisperingsmith.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[OT] Official Stirs Texas City With Talk of Rebellion

2012-08-29 Thread lelandj
Things are getting scary in Texas, especially in places like Lubbock and 
Abilene, which have been measure at the top of the list of most 
conservative cities in the USA. I think the irrational feeling of fear 
in Texas, about President Obama, is rooted in prejudice. Children 
brought up in such ultra-conservative cities, as listed above, learn 
wrongly by the age of 1 or 2, that Blacks, Hispanics, and other 
minorities are not equal to whites, who are god's supreme race.

Although racial prejudice has gradually abated in Texas, since the early 
'60s, it will take generations for the old racial biases of the pass to 
work their way out.

#--

Official Stirs Texas City With Talk of Rebellion
By MANNY FERNANDEZ
Published: August 27, 2012

LUBBOCK, Tex. — A hearing on a proposed tax increase had just started at 
the county courthouse here Monday when Grace Rogers, a retired teacher, 
addressed local leaders. Ms. Rogers said she supported the idea of 
increasing the property tax to 34.6 cents per $100 valuation from 32.9 
cents to finance the hiring of additional sheriff’s deputies — with one 
reservation.

It was that, she said, “it does not fund a paramilitary to create an 
insurrection and rebellion against the United States.”

Her comments might have sounded absurd at some other time, in some other 
place. But these days in Lubbock, a West Texas city known as the 
birthplace of the 1950s rock ’n’ roll pioneer Buddy Holly, Ms. Rogers’s 
request was timely and appropriate, under the circumstances.

A few days before, the county’s top elected official, County Judge Tom 
Head, made an appearance on a local television station to generate 
support for the tax increase. He said he was expecting civil unrest if 
President Obama is re-elected, and that the president would send United 
Nations forces into Lubbock, population 233,740, to stop any uprising.

“He is going to try to hand over the sovereignty of the United States to 
the U.N.,” Mr. Head said on Fox 34 last week. “O.K., what’s going to 
happen when that happens? I’m thinking worst-case scenario: civil 
unrest, civil disobedience, civil war, maybe. And we’re not talking just 
a few riots here and demonstrations. We’re talking Lexington, Concord, 
take up arms and get rid of the guy.”

And if the president did send in United Nations troops, Mr. Head 
continued, “I don’t want ’em in Lubbock County. O.K. So I’m going to 
stand in front of their armored personnel carriers and say, ‘You’re not 
coming in here.’ And the sheriff, I’ve already asked him. I said, ‘You 
gonna back me?’ He said, ‘Yeah, I’ll back you.’

“Well, I don’t want a bunch of rookies back there,” Mr. Head said. “I 
want trained, equipped, seasoned veteran officers to back me.”

Mr. Head, a Republican who serves as the county’s emergency management 
director and presides over the commissioner’s court, made international 
headlines. He has not apologized, though he said that his statements 
were taken out of context and that he was using civil unrest only as an 
example of how he must prepare for worst-case scenarios.

On Monday, Mr. Head sat straight-faced and calm at the hearing as more 
than two dozen residents sounded off on the tax increase and his 
statements. In an interview, Sheriff Kelly Rowe said he never had any 
discussions with Mr. Head involving any Obama-related uprisings or 
invasions, but he declined to say what he thought of Mr. Head’s remarks.

To many in Lubbock, the notion of United Nations armored personnel 
carriers rolling down the brick-paved Buddy Holly Avenue, past the 
Greyhound bus station and the Disabled American Veterans thrift store, 
has been an outrage and an embarrassment.

Kenny Ketner, the chairman of the Lubbock County Democratic Party, has 
called for Mr. Head to resign, as did the local newspaper, The Lubbock 
Avalanche-Journal, which wrote in an editorial that Mr. Head “threw 
civility out the window and went in a bizarre direction that not only 
embarrassed himself but all county and West Texas residents.” Gilberto 
Hinojosa, the chairman of the Texas Democratic Party, publicly 
questioned Mr. Head’s “mental competency to hold elected office.”

Ms. Rogers, 74, said after the hearing that she took matters further, 
placing a phone call to the Secret Service. “There is an element in this 
city that is so anti-Obama that I think they have lost grip a little bit 
on reality,” she said.

As the hearing on Monday made clear, Mr. Head and his statements have 
received a small but vocal chorus of support in a place that the Bay 
Area Center for Voting Research, based in California, once called the 
second-most conservative city in the country (behind Provo, Utah) among 
those with more than 100,000 people. A handful of residents said that 
Mr. Head was right in preparing for the worst.

“I believe that we need a sheriff’s militia to protect Lubbock County, 
and get all the sheriffs in Texas to start a militia to protect 

Re: [NF] Screen Resolution Messed Up

2012-08-29 Thread Stephen Russell
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Peter Cushing
pcush...@whisperingsmith.com wrote:
 G Gambill wrote:
 I hooked up a screen projector to my Windows 7 Pro laptop.  Suddenly the
 maximum screen resolution available on the laptop is 1366 x 768.  I need
 1600 X 900 for a home grown motion control GUI.


 That's the maximum available on my windows 7 pro laptop.  AFAIK that's
 the maximum it has ever shown.  I occasionally use an external monitor.

 Maybe they havn't got round to doing better graphics drivers yet.

---

Isn't this determined by hardware and drivers?


-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN

901.246-0159 cell

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYLfS_oeqwDgVQOPPe8J2k-Hn0QtyfFHRtiJJPh=xs3...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Tables left open when form closes

2012-08-29 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
On 8/25/2012 3:39 AM, Allen wrote:
 What is a good reason to use data sessions. I never do and never have these
 problems. I prefer control

For starters, you can have the same table/cursor names open so you can 
code consistently moreso rather than having to create bizarre names for 
your cursors so they don't collide.  Think of several forms each with 
their own datasession.  The old Sylvan app (which kicked ass for 16+ yrs 
and still does so) created bizarre cursor names and kept track of such 
names in variables.  Would have made life much easier if separate data 
sessions were used.  Debugging was many times a nightmare.


-- 
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
http://twitter.com/mbabcock16

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/503e3135.6060...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: Quicker to USE AGAIN instead of SELECT * ?

2012-08-29 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
On 8/10/2012 6:47 PM, Rafael Copquin wrote:
 What I do in these cases is convert the cursor to xml using the
 xmladapter and send it back as a variable to the calling form.
 The calling form then receives it back as xml and using xmladapter turns
 it back into a cursor


What you're describing is fine for a physical n-tier, but mine is a 
logical n-tier, where the layers can see each other.  Besides, your 
approach is pretty much what Anthony Testi described years ago and it 
was reported very slow back then.  For the purposes of what I needed, 
this approach would not be quick (enough) compared to the two ways I 
described.

Thanks though!


-- 
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
http://twitter.com/mbabcock16

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/503e3326.9070...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Screen Resolution Messed Up

2012-08-29 Thread G Gambill
It probably is a hardware/driver issue.  The hardware is the same and the
drivers were probably changed when the screen projector took over. Is there
a way to go back to the origional drivers what ever they were.  FYI, the
laptop came with Windows Home and I upgraded to Pro. for legal reasons.
 Maybe put the upgrade dvd (Ha I only got an upgrade key) an restore or
some such simulare thing?

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Peter Cushing
 pcush...@whisperingsmith.com wrote:
  G Gambill wrote:
  I hooked up a screen projector to my Windows 7 Pro laptop.  Suddenly the
  maximum screen resolution available on the laptop is 1366 x 768.  I need
  1600 X 900 for a home grown motion control GUI.
 
 
  That's the maximum available on my windows 7 pro laptop.  AFAIK that's
  the maximum it has ever shown.  I occasionally use an external monitor.
 
  Maybe they havn't got round to doing better graphics drivers yet.
 
 ---

 Isn't this determined by hardware and drivers?


 --
 Stephen Russell
 Sr. Analyst
 Ring Container Technology
 Oakland TN

 901.246-0159 cell

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPpp0hX2EdsbXJ2uVcJpG5VgUbq+r3Xhj_=qorutncyyfjo...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[NF] Outlook 2010

2012-08-29 Thread Jeff Johnson
If I were interested in automating Outlook, is there a difference 
between Outlook and the educational version of Outlook?

TIA

-- 
Jeff

---

Jeff Johnson
j...@san-dc.com
(623) 582-0323

www.san-dc.com


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/503e59a5.9040...@san-dc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Outlook 2010

2012-08-29 Thread Fred Taylor
Not sure about Outlook or even the educational version of which you speak.
 I do know the trial version of Office installed on some new Dell Windows 7
machines don't support automation at all.

Fred


On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com wrote:

 If I were interested in automating Outlook, is there a difference
 between Outlook and the educational version of Outlook?

 TIA

 --
 Jeff

 ---

 Jeff Johnson
 j...@san-dc.com
 (623) 582-0323

 www.san-dc.com


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJCBksoOR0eMRr1RJDU22xvhn5hXpzBJkWEA2Gd1w5P-q=_...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Outlook 2010

2012-08-29 Thread Jeff Johnson
Cool!

Jeff

---

Jeff Johnson
j...@san-dc.com
(623) 582-0323

www.san-dc.com

On 08/29/2012 02:27 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
 Not sure about Outlook or even the educational version of which you speak.
   I do know the trial version of Office installed on some new Dell Windows 7
 machines don't support automation at all.

 Fred


 On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com wrote:

 If I were interested in automating Outlook, is there a difference
 between Outlook and the educational version of Outlook?

 TIA

 --
 Jeff

 ---

 Jeff Johnson
 j...@san-dc.com
 (623) 582-0323

 www.san-dc.com


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/503e8a1c.1060...@san-dc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Outlook 2010

2012-08-29 Thread Fred Taylor
I think they refer to them as starter versions.  No automation available.

Fred


On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com wrote:

 Cool!

 Jeff

 ---

 Jeff Johnson
 j...@san-dc.com
 (623) 582-0323

 www.san-dc.com

 On 08/29/2012 02:27 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
  Not sure about Outlook or even the educational version of which you
 speak.
I do know the trial version of Office installed on some new Dell
 Windows 7
  machines don't support automation at all.
 
  Fred
 
 
  On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com wrote:
 
  If I were interested in automating Outlook, is there a difference
  between Outlook and the educational version of Outlook?
 
  TIA
 
  --
  Jeff
 
  ---
 
  Jeff Johnson
  j...@san-dc.com
  (623) 582-0323
 
  www.san-dc.com
 
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajcbkspu0p2dfkfnj0samjoafwf10b1t-31yzc1yw6t1wok...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [OT]: A scam

2012-08-29 Thread Jerry Wolper
 I guess they captured my address and are using it, or I got a virus
 in my computer. But it doesn't make sense. Why send from an 
 address and then use my name ? Does anybody knows something ?

The spammers peobably just captured your address. By using an 
innocent From address, they can bypass some spam filters.

-Jerry

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/503e5522.31357.16e...@jwolper.swanzoco.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[NF] Domain renewal

2012-08-29 Thread Jerry Wolper
I have a .us domain that's about to expire, and GoDaddy wants 
$20/year to renew it. Can someone recommend a cheaper registrar?

Thanks.

-Jerry

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/503e5e1a.18677.39f...@jwolper.swanzoco.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Domain renewal

2012-08-29 Thread Mike Copeland
DirectNIC.com

One thing they do that I love is they send you an email 90 days before 
your reg expires...then 60 days, then 30 days.
Good interface, excellent tech support. Dunno if the US domains are 
cheaper than $20 though.

Mike Copeland

 Original Message 
Subject: [NF] Domain renewal
From: Jerry Wolper jwol...@swanzoco.com
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Date: 8/29/2012 5:23 PM

I have a .us domain that's about to expire, and GoDaddy wants
$20/year to renew it. Can someone recommend a cheaper registrar?

Thanks.

-Jerry

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/503e98e3.6070...@ggisoft.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Domain renewal

2012-08-29 Thread Ed Leafe
On Aug 29, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote:

 I have a .us domain that's about to expire, and GoDaddy wants 
 $20/year to renew it. Can someone recommend a cheaper registrar?

http://namecheap.com

I switched all my domains from GoDaddy a few years ago due to their 
disgusting advertising, and so far have been very happy with Namecheap. Not 
only are the prices good, you aren't subjected to all that godawful upselling 
that GoDaddy insists on.


-- Ed Leafe




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/498d8832-4429-4dcb-a3e3-f2ac271f6...@leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Domain renewal

2012-08-29 Thread Michael Oke, II
I use directnic as well and their .us price is $15.00 per year. 


Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221

Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. 

On Aug 29, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Mike Copeland m...@ggisoft.com wrote:

 DirectNIC.com
 
 One thing they do that I love is they send you an email 90 days before 
 your reg expires...then 60 days, then 30 days.
 Good interface, excellent tech support. Dunno if the US domains are 
 cheaper than $20 though.
 
 Mike Copeland
 
  Original Message 
 Subject: [NF] Domain renewal
 From: Jerry Wolper jwol...@swanzoco.com
 To: profoxt...@leafe.com
 Date: 8/29/2012 5:23 PM
 
 I have a .us domain that's about to expire, and GoDaddy wants
 $20/year to renew it. Can someone recommend a cheaper registrar?
 
 Thanks.
 
 -Jerry
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/396d7f20-c140-429c-b758-0a2736131...@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Domain renewal

2012-08-29 Thread jerry foote
I use have used namecheap for 7 years with great success, they have live
U.S. phone support. Domains are 10.87 right now.
Jerry

-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Michael Oke, II
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 5:48 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Domain renewal

I use directnic as well and their .us price is $15.00 per year. 


Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221

Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated
recipient. 

On Aug 29, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Mike Copeland m...@ggisoft.com wrote:

 DirectNIC.com
 
 One thing they do that I love is they send you an email 90 days before 
 your reg expires...then 60 days, then 30 days.
 Good interface, excellent tech support. Dunno if the US domains are 
 cheaper than $20 though.
 
 Mike Copeland
 
  Original Message 
 Subject: [NF] Domain renewal
 From: Jerry Wolper jwol...@swanzoco.com
 To: profoxt...@leafe.com
 Date: 8/29/2012 5:23 PM
 
 I have a .us domain that's about to expire, and GoDaddy wants
 $20/year to renew it. Can someone recommend a cheaper registrar?
 
 Thanks.
 
 -Jerry
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9711797C85244128A4CD1258AA0CA776@jerryfootePC
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] Domain renewal

2012-08-29 Thread jerry foote
I have used namecheap for years with great result, they have live support
and 

-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Michael Oke, II
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 5:48 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Domain renewal

I use directnic as well and their .us price is $15.00 per year. 


Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221

Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated
recipient. 

On Aug 29, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Mike Copeland m...@ggisoft.com wrote:

 DirectNIC.com
 
 One thing they do that I love is they send you an email 90 days before 
 your reg expires...then 60 days, then 30 days.
 Good interface, excellent tech support. Dunno if the US domains are 
 cheaper than $20 though.
 
 Mike Copeland
 
  Original Message 
 Subject: [NF] Domain renewal
 From: Jerry Wolper jwol...@swanzoco.com
 To: profoxt...@leafe.com
 Date: 8/29/2012 5:23 PM
 
 I have a .us domain that's about to expire, and GoDaddy wants
 $20/year to renew it. Can someone recommend a cheaper registrar?
 
 Thanks.
 
 -Jerry
 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49550E9076F04A50829308335CED3349@jerryfootePC
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [OT]: A scam

2012-08-29 Thread Eurico Chagas Filho
Thanks Jerry.
I just received an email from hotmail saying that my account has been blocked
due to an unusual activity and that I should confirm that I am me,s.

E.




 From: Jerry Wolper jwol...@swanzoco.com
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com 
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [OT]: A scam 
 
 I guess they captured my address and are using it, or I got a virus
 in my computer. But it doesn't make sense. Why send from an 
 address and then use my name ? Does anybody knows something ?

The spammers peobably just captured your address. By using an 
innocent From address, they can bypass some spam filters.

-Jerry

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/503e5522.31357.16e...@jwolper.swanzoco.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.




--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1346286455.34152.yahoomail...@web140602.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Domain renewal

2012-08-29 Thread Malcolm Greene
 I have a .us domain that's about to expire, and GoDaddy wants $20/year to 
 renew it. Can someone recommend a cheaper registrar?

No sure if its cheaper (in spite of its nameg), but I'm an ex-Godaddy
customer and a big fan of namecheap.com.

Highly recommended.

Malcolm

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1346288658.23880.140661121318317.2a0ae...@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] Domain renewal

2012-08-29 Thread kamcginnis
We have many domains registered with domainsite.com. They recently raised their 
prices to about $12. I really like their
web site, but I am also interested in other's recommendations. I see no reason 
why it would cost that much. Everything
is fully automated and there is no support necessary if you have a good user 
interface (unlike 1and1 which is almost
impossible to use - at least it was about 14 years ago.)


- Original Message - 
From: Malcolm Greene pro...@bdurham.com
To: profox@leafe.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: [NF] Domain renewal


 I have a .us domain that's about to expire, and GoDaddy wants $20/year to 
 renew it. Can someone recommend a cheaper
registrar?

No sure if its cheaper (in spite of its nameg), but I'm an ex-Godaddy
customer and a big fan of namecheap.com.

Highly recommended.

Malcolm

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/116101cd8654$0ffd8460$7a00a8c0@w2k3s02
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.