Re: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC

2016-05-26 Thread Philip Borkholder 

Thanks Tracy,
-Philip

On 5/26/2016 6:30 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:

Philip Borkholder wrote on 2016-05-26:

  Thanks Richard,
  I'll google it to see what to do.
  -Philip
  
  On 5/26/2016 5:51 PM, Richard Kaye wrote:

  It's the equivalent of an SSL certificate for desktop applications.

Google code signing certificate to learn more.
  
  --
  
  rk
  

Philip,

If you do consider signing the EXE, be sure to shop around for the best
price.
This company was the best price that I found when I was searching.
http://codesigning.ksoftware.net/

Tracy Pearson
PowerChurch Software



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/57477c05.1080...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC

2016-05-26 Thread Tracy Pearson 
Philip Borkholder wrote on 2016-05-26: 
>  Thanks Richard,
>  I'll google it to see what to do.
>  -Philip
>  
>  On 5/26/2016 5:51 PM, Richard Kaye wrote:
>  It's the equivalent of an SSL certificate for desktop applications.
Google code signing certificate to learn more.
>  
>  --
>  
>  rk
>  

Philip,

If you do consider signing the EXE, be sure to shop around for the best
price.
This company was the best price that I found when I was searching.
http://codesigning.ksoftware.net/

Tracy Pearson
PowerChurch Software


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/001f01d1b79e$2be2e1a0$83a8a4e0$@powerchurch.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC

2016-05-26 Thread Philip Borkholder 

Thanks Richard,
I'll google it to see what to do.
-Philip

On 5/26/2016 5:51 PM, Richard Kaye wrote:

It's the equivalent of an SSL certificate for desktop applications. Google code 
signing certificate to learn more.

--

rk

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Philip 
Borkholder
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:47 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run 
on your PC

Hi Tracy,
That is something new to me.
What is that and how do I do it? :-)

Thanks
Philip

On 5/26/2016 3:31 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:

Philip Borkholder wrote on 2016-05-26:

   Hey folks,
   Has anyone else experienced this error:
   "This app can't run on your PC"
   
   Our VFP9 App ran fine on Servers 2003, 2008 for Terminal Server with the

   drive mapped as F:\AppFolder\App.EXE
   
   Now when they upgraded to Server 2012, we get this error when running on

   a mapped drive, but if we use the full local drive path of the server:
   E:\Data\Appfolder\App.exe
   
   It runs fine.
   
   Does anyone know what part of Server 2012 is causing this block?
   
   Thanks,

   Philip Borkholder
   

Philip,

Is your EXE digitally signed with a 256 bit key?

Tracy Pearson
PowerChurch Software



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/574770b8.2030...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC

2016-05-26 Thread Richard Kaye 
It's the equivalent of an SSL certificate for desktop applications. Google code 
signing certificate to learn more.

--

rk

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Philip 
Borkholder
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:47 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run 
on your PC

Hi Tracy,
That is something new to me.
What is that and how do I do it? :-)

Thanks
Philip

On 5/26/2016 3:31 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
> Philip Borkholder wrote on 2016-05-26:
>>   Hey folks,
>>   Has anyone else experienced this error:
>>   "This app can't run on your PC"
>>   
>>   Our VFP9 App ran fine on Servers 2003, 2008 for Terminal Server with the
>>   drive mapped as F:\AppFolder\App.EXE
>>   
>>   Now when they upgraded to Server 2012, we get this error when running on
>>   a mapped drive, but if we use the full local drive path of the server:
>>   E:\Data\Appfolder\App.exe
>>   
>>   It runs fine.
>>   
>>   Does anyone know what part of Server 2012 is causing this block?
>>   
>>   Thanks,
>>   Philip Borkholder
>>   
> Philip,
>
> Is your EXE digitally signed with a 256 bit key?
>
> Tracy Pearson
> PowerChurch Software
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bn4pr10mb0913d5aa72bdf1b5b661d1fed2...@bn4pr10mb0913.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC

2016-05-26 Thread Philip Borkholder 

It is the exact same one.
What does not work is to run it from a mapped, shared folder.
It only works running it with the direct local path.
In this case, the TS is the same server as the File Server luckily.

Philip

On 5/26/2016 5:18 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:

Is the non working EXE exactly the same size as the working one?






Affordable Wireless Plans
Set up is easy. Get online in minutes.
Starting at only $9.95 per month! 
www.netzero.net?refcd=nzmem0216


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/57476f19.90...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC

2016-05-26 Thread Philip Borkholder 

Hi Tracy,
That is something new to me.
What is that and how do I do it? :-)

Thanks
Philip

On 5/26/2016 3:31 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:

Philip Borkholder wrote on 2016-05-26:

  Hey folks,
  Has anyone else experienced this error:
  "This app can't run on your PC"
  
  Our VFP9 App ran fine on Servers 2003, 2008 for Terminal Server with the

  drive mapped as F:\AppFolder\App.EXE
  
  Now when they upgraded to Server 2012, we get this error when running on

  a mapped drive, but if we use the full local drive path of the server:
  E:\Data\Appfolder\App.exe
  
  It runs fine.
  
  Does anyone know what part of Server 2012 is causing this block?
  
  Thanks,

  Philip Borkholder
  

Philip,

Is your EXE digitally signed with a 256 bit key?

Tracy Pearson
PowerChurch Software



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/57476ec5.2080...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC

2016-05-26 Thread Alan Bourke 

Is the non working EXE exactly the same size as the working one?


-- 
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

On Thu, 26 May 2016, at 08:31 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
> Philip Borkholder wrote on 2016-05-26: 
> >  Hey folks,
> >  Has anyone else experienced this error:
> >  "This app can't run on your PC"
> >  
> >  Our VFP9 App ran fine on Servers 2003, 2008 for Terminal Server with the
> >  drive mapped as F:\AppFolder\App.EXE
> >  
> >  Now when they upgraded to Server 2012, we get this error when running on
> >  a mapped drive, but if we use the full local drive path of the server:
> >  E:\Data\Appfolder\App.exe
> >  
> >  It runs fine.
> >  
> >  Does anyone know what part of Server 2012 is causing this block?
> >  
> >  Thanks,
> >  Philip Borkholder
> >  
> 
> Philip,
> 
> Is your EXE digitally signed with a 256 bit key?
> 
> Tracy Pearson
> PowerChurch Software
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1464297489.2603993.619953633.44002...@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Win10 Free Upgrade Expiration???

2016-05-26 Thread Mike Copeland 

+1
Been using it since last January (I think). Works well, so far!

Mike

Philip Borkholder wrote:
Here is a product I downloaded and installed on my Windows 7 to remove 
the Windows 10 upgrade warning and block it completely from installing 
itself.

It's called GWX Control Panel
http://ultimateoutsider.com/downloads/

Philip Borkholder

On 5/23/2016 2:00 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
Andy - that IS Abysmal news indeed! To say M$ has become Arrogant is 
almost putting it lightly. Oh well, at this point - nothing to do but 
move forwards...


On my Win8.1 laptop it keeps nagging about the Win10 update - and, up 
till now - I continue to just ignore the Nag - although, in the end - 
that IS the machine I will eventually update!


Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of 
AndyHC

Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 5:45 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Win10 Free Upgrade Expiration???

Well, expiration has become a moot point - yesterday I found my Win7 
HP laptop displaying a screen saying "Installing Windows 10 Update - 
Do not switch off your PC".  I had NOT clicked accept.
This morning (!) the installation was complete. I could have declined 
to accept the ms licence, but in view of their amazingly arrogant 
behaviour I wasn't sure I wouldn't lose everything.
I declined all the snooping and new default app options and now have 
to find out what does and doesn't work on my Win10 laptop.

Words fail me - which is quite unusual!


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/84350dfb-a3a6-b90c-8157-87f9f67eb...@ggisoft.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Win10 Free Upgrade Expiration???

2016-05-26 Thread Stephen Russell 
As a windows 10 user I am glad I upgraded from 8.

This isn't the same Balmer windows anymore.

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Philip Borkholder 
wrote:

> Here is a product I downloaded and installed on my Windows 7 to remove the
> Windows 10 upgrade warning and block it completely from installing itself.
> It's called GWX Control Panel
> http://ultimateoutsider.com/downloads/
>
> Philip Borkholder
>
> On 5/23/2016 2:00 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
>
>> Andy - that IS Abysmal news indeed! To say M$ has become Arrogant is
>> almost putting it lightly. Oh well, at this point - nothing to do but move
>> forwards...
>>
>> On my Win8.1 laptop it keeps nagging about the Win10 update - and, up
>> till now - I continue to just ignore the Nag - although, in the end - that
>> IS the machine I will eventually update!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kurt Wendt
>> Senior Systems Analyst
>>
>>
>> Tel. +1-212-747-9100
>> www.GlobeTax.com
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
>> AndyHC
>> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 5:45 AM
>> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
>> Subject: Re: [NF] Win10 Free Upgrade Expiration???
>>
>> Well, expiration has become a moot point - yesterday I found my Win7 HP
>> laptop displaying a screen saying "Installing Windows 10 Update - Do not
>> switch off your PC".  I had NOT clicked accept.
>> This morning (!) the installation was complete. I could have declined to
>> accept the ms licence, but in view of their amazingly arrogant behaviour I
>> wasn't sure I wouldn't lose everything.
>> I declined all the snooping and new default app options and now have to
>> find out what does and doesn't work on my Win10 laptop.
>> Words fail me - which is quite unusual!
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYLshLm0Z1coGivUw5gCSrdE9DQRaPfBHv8M5jzKAE=+h...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC

2016-05-26 Thread Tracy Pearson 
Philip Borkholder wrote on 2016-05-26: 
>  Hey folks,
>  Has anyone else experienced this error:
>  "This app can't run on your PC"
>  
>  Our VFP9 App ran fine on Servers 2003, 2008 for Terminal Server with the
>  drive mapped as F:\AppFolder\App.EXE
>  
>  Now when they upgraded to Server 2012, we get this error when running on
>  a mapped drive, but if we use the full local drive path of the server:
>  E:\Data\Appfolder\App.exe
>  
>  It runs fine.
>  
>  Does anyone know what part of Server 2012 is causing this block?
>  
>  Thanks,
>  Philip Borkholder
>  

Philip,

Is your EXE digitally signed with a 256 bit key?

Tracy Pearson
PowerChurch Software


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/001d01d1b785$2aa95990$7ffc0cb0$@powerchurch.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Win10 Free Upgrade Expiration???

2016-05-26 Thread Philip Borkholder 
Here is a product I downloaded and installed on my Windows 7 to remove 
the Windows 10 upgrade warning and block it completely from installing 
itself.

It's called GWX Control Panel
http://ultimateoutsider.com/downloads/

Philip Borkholder

On 5/23/2016 2:00 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:

Andy - that IS Abysmal news indeed! To say M$ has become Arrogant is almost 
putting it lightly. Oh well, at this point - nothing to do but move forwards...

On my Win8.1 laptop it keeps nagging about the Win10 update - and, up till now 
- I continue to just ignore the Nag - although, in the end - that IS the 
machine I will eventually update!

Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst


Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of AndyHC
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 5:45 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Win10 Free Upgrade Expiration???

Well, expiration has become a moot point - yesterday I found my Win7 HP laptop displaying 
a screen saying "Installing Windows 10 Update - Do not switch off your PC".  I 
had NOT clicked accept.
This morning (!) the installation was complete. I could have declined to accept 
the ms licence, but in view of their amazingly arrogant behaviour I wasn't sure 
I wouldn't lose everything.
I declined all the snooping and new default app options and now have to find 
out what does and doesn't work on my Win10 laptop.
Words fail me - which is quite unusual!


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/57474a72.2060...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

VFP 9 App on Server 2012 RDS/Terminal Server: This app can't run on your PC

2016-05-26 Thread Philip Borkholder 

Hey folks,
Has anyone else experienced this error:
"This app can't run on your PC"

Our VFP9 App ran fine on Servers 2003, 2008 for Terminal Server with the 
drive mapped as F:\AppFolder\App.EXE


Now when they upgraded to Server 2012, we get this error when running on 
a mapped drive, but if we use the full local drive path of the server:

E:\Data\Appfolder\App.exe

It runs fine.

Does anyone know what part of Server 2012 is causing this block?

Thanks,
Philip Borkholder


Affordable Wireless Plans
Set up is easy. Get online in minutes.
Starting at only $9.95 per month! 
www.netzero.net?refcd=nzmem0216


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/574748ec.8060...@netzero.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Finding which code is executing

2016-05-26 Thread Koen Piller 
Hi
Usaly a code does not create a fxp file, s fxp
file is created by either do myprg which will create if not yet exists a
myprg.fxp or you can issue compile 'myprg' which will also only create a
myprg.fxp in both cases VFP is running the myprg.fxp.
To find out, in case you have two files myprg.fxp in your environment
sys(16) is your friend.
I would set a messagebox containing the sys(16) in the init of both / all
myprg.prg you dont have to worry about the .fxp file(s) they are
constructed by VFP
rgds
Koen

Op donderdag 26 mei 2016 heeft Joe Yoder  het volgende
geschreven:

> I had  deleted the Visa.fxp and recompiled the project and the .prg
>  without any noticable change.  The Visa.prg code is really standalone. The
> project calls it as dictated by the control table and my test routine
> called it with hard coded parameters.  I realize now that I should have
> checked to see if calling the routine from my test caused the fxp to be
> recreated.
>
> I'm hearing that executing the code in the debugger may be a useful
> exercise.  I suppose by the time I get another opportunity to run this down
> I will have forgotten what I learned! _ I' keep a copy of the thread to
> improve my chances - Joe
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Ted Roche  > wrote:
>
> > Have you recompiled your project since you made this change? If you're
> > running an APP or EXE and the control table is included inside the
> > App/EXE, it would still have a copy of the older version of the table.
> >
> > If this isn't the case, can you set a breakpoint that will trip when
> > the code in question starts to run, for example,
> >
> > "MyInputTable.DBF" $ DBF()
> >
> > If this is the only place that the MyInputTable is opened.
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Joe Yoder  > wrote:
> > > Thanks guys for the input.  I had assumed there might be a function to
> > > figure out which code will run the same way Foxpro does.  The problem
> > with
> > > sys(16) is how to get it into the code when I don't know where it is.
> I
> > > concluded that I should try to give the routine something to do that
> will
> > > make it blow up and hopefully give away its location but before I tried
> > > that everything appeared to return to normal. (the debug stuff in the
> > > edited code started working.)
> > >
> > > The Visa import routine is included in the project along with others
> like
> > > Discover and Checking.  An Import control table stores the routine
> names
> > > along with appropriate parameters.  The routines are called as my code
> > > scans the table and call the appropriate routines.  When I renamed the
> > > routine I changed the name in the control table but did not add the new
> > > routine to the project. The compiler never noticed that a new routine
> > will
> > > be called and does not complain or auto add the new routine.  This
> > behavior
> > > is expected.  As far as I know this approach has nothing to do with the
> > > behavior I experienced but it may be that others may see a connection I
> > > don't.
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Gene Wirchenko  > wrote:
> > >
> > >> At 08:23 2016-05-24, "Tracy Pearson"  > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Joe Yoder wrote on 2016-05-24:
> > >>> >  I have a small procedure file, visa.prg. in my current project
> > folder
> > >>> that
> > >>> >  imports data from .csv files.  I need to support a slightly
> > different
> > >>> >  format so I added some debugging code but it does not run.  When I
> > >>> made a
> > >>> >  copy with a different name it worked as expected.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >  Is there a way to have the system tell me the location of the
> > running
> > >>> code?
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> You can kinda figure some of that out through the debugger.
> > >>> I would search for PRGs and Functions/Procedures with of the name you
> > were
> > >>> calling. (Visa I would assume)
> > >>>
> > >>> VFP doesn't complain when you have two Functions of the same name in
> a
> > >>> PRG.
> > >>> It runs the last one found in the PRG.
> > >>>
> > >>> I have not tested, and do not know which will fire when you have a
> PRG
> > >>> and a
> > >>> Function named the same.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>  I was recently bit by having two methods in a class named the
> same.
> > >> You would think that this would generate a compilation error, but it
> > does
> > >> not.
> > >>
> > >>  My debugging code was not being executed either.
> > >>
> > >>  I only discovered it accidentally when I got desperate and
> started
> > >> instrumenting the entire class and saw what looked like (and was) a
> > >> duplicate name.
> > >>
> > >>  I suggest that you check this possibility before writing more
> > >> debugging code (which is not going to get executed anyway).
> > >>
> > >> Sincerely,
> > >>
> > >> Gene

Re: SYS(2050)

2016-05-26 Thread Wollenhaupt, Christof 
>
> On FoxWiki, there is an entry about SYS(2050) which apparently creates some
> sort of log file. The function does not appear in the VFP Help file -
> anyone know anything more about it?


It's the VFP event loop log. Basically, it records mouse clicks and key
strokes. The first column is the current time, second column the event (key
up, down, click), third column a qualifier (key for keyboard events,
Ctrl/Shift/Alt state for mouse click). The fourth column is probably the
encoded 32-bit message that VFP uses internally (ie. the same as column 2
and 3).

-- 
Christof


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAL4QJhju1ROk_AGKAFO=dpwpx3soxfwjgatnjq2whblzdl8...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Finding which code is executing

2016-05-26 Thread Stephen Russell 
The debugger is your friend when you are using it and find a value from the
command window is still being referenced.

Still have not forgotten that time sink.



On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Ted Roche  wrote:

> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Joe Yoder  wrote:
> >
> > I'm hearing that executing the code in the debugger may be a useful
> > exercise.
>
> The debugger is a very powerful tool. I recall years ago having to
> step-by-step through the code when debugging a problem with the
> framework I was using, and I learned a great deal about the framework
> and appreciated much more how it worked. I also found the bug and got
> the author to fix it!
>
> The debugger is well worth learning.
>
> > I suppose by the time I get another opportunity to run this down
> > I will have forgotten what I learned! _ I' keep a copy of the thread to
> > improve my chances - Joe
>
> --
> Ted Roche
> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
> http://www.tedroche.com
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyl6-mmqfs7iak8-8--xur2to8njbgiosh0gtajtsd7...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Finding which code is executing

2016-05-26 Thread Ted Roche 
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Joe Yoder  wrote:
>
> I'm hearing that executing the code in the debugger may be a useful
> exercise.

The debugger is a very powerful tool. I recall years ago having to
step-by-step through the code when debugging a problem with the
framework I was using, and I learned a great deal about the framework
and appreciated much more how it worked. I also found the bug and got
the author to fix it!

The debugger is well worth learning.

> I suppose by the time I get another opportunity to run this down
> I will have forgotten what I learned! _ I' keep a copy of the thread to
> improve my chances - Joe

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4tco4ofmpugwllfhf1b3szmzqk7dv1aoofl_mu-tiu...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: SYS(2050)

2016-05-26 Thread Alan Bourke 
It doesn't appear because it's undocumented. I would imagine what's on
the Wiki is the sum total of knowledge about it.

-- 
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1464265811.3112012.619427889.281cf...@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

SYS(2050)

2016-05-26 Thread Laurie Alvey 
On FoxWiki, there is an entry about SYS(2050) which apparently creates some
sort of log file. The function does not appear in the VFP Help file -
anyone know anything more about it?

Laurie


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/camvtr9dzo79fnyry7gq0huqui+fmh1ovxc09v5-q0n-6qgn...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.