Re: "Cannot load 32-bit DDL wwipstuff.dll"

[mbsoftwaresolutions]

On 2018-04-18 14:32, Ted Roche wrote:

We moved the DLL to the same folder as the EXE and it's working now.



Another example where putting it in the same folder was better advice 
than the official M$ way.  lol


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2d419c93286a6ee40e363f79eaab4...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: "Cannot load 32-bit DDL wwipstuff.dll"

[Tracy Pearson]

I remember a prior release of VFP (6 or 8) compiled EXE's would C005 on
startup due to a bad path.
That was always hard to resolve over the phone prior to remote access tools.

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted
Roche
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 2:33 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: "Cannot load 32-bit DDL wwipstuff.dll"

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Tracy Pearson 
wrote:

> That specific EXE is now blocked by the local anti-virus solution.
> A customer had that problem a few weeks back. I never heard the results
after we pointed out a second VFP app worked with the tools in question
without a problem. We could not get in to the settings of the A/V to un-ban
the EXE, nor could we confirm it had banned the EXE.
>

Wow, it's like we're programming in a hostile environment!

Thanks, all, for your suggestions. Problem seems to have, er,
subsided. Looks like a non-existent directory slipped into the path
ahead of where the DLL was located, so the search algorithm gave up
before finding the DLL. We moved the DLL to the same folder as the EXE
and it's working now.


-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000a01d3d746$ea6ed150$bf4c73f0$@powerchurch.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: "Cannot load 32-bit DDL wwipstuff.dll"

[Ted Roche]

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Tracy Pearson  wrote:

> That specific EXE is now blocked by the local anti-virus solution.
> A customer had that problem a few weeks back. I never heard the results after 
> we pointed out a second VFP app worked with the tools in question without a 
> problem. We could not get in to the settings of the A/V to un-ban the EXE, 
> nor could we confirm it had banned the EXE.
>

Wow, it's like we're programming in a hostile environment!

Thanks, all, for your suggestions. Problem seems to have, er,
subsided. Looks like a non-existent directory slipped into the path
ahead of where the DLL was located, so the search algorithm gave up
before finding the DLL. We moved the DLL to the same folder as the EXE
and it's working now.


-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4tblrarncccyxhtmnx+rentktb-tmrs4-4xuqkxxxj...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: "Cannot load 32-bit DDL wwipstuff.dll"

[Tracy Pearson]

That specific EXE is now blocked by the local anti-virus solution.
A customer had that problem a few weeks back. I never heard the results after 
we pointed out a second VFP app worked with the tools in question without a 
problem. We could not get in to the settings of the A/V to un-ban the EXE, nor 
could we confirm it had banned the EXE.

HTH,
Tracy


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 1:22 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: "Cannot load 32-bit DDL wwipstuff.dll"

Thanks for the thread reference. We're clueless, but not THAT clueless.

Working app this morning, not working this afternoon, same machine.

Project had to be rebuilt from scratch, and I suspect a file was omitted.

I need to follow some basic debugging procedures here. The client's
crisis over "we need this report YESTERDAY!!!" leaked into the room,
and that's really not our problem, and doesn't help things any.

This is an app I haven't worked on, so I need to ask the basic
questions and follow where they lead.

The DLL is in the path. The DECLARE command, run from a command window
of a freshly started Fox session, runs fine. So, we've got a few
things to check next: we'll run the app through the debugger and stop
before the line of code and see what the environment is like.



On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Fernando D. Bozzo  wrote:
> C++ runtime (msvcrtxx) or other dll dependency
>
> May be this can help:
> https://support.west-wind.com/Thread4T60C0F5O.wwt
>
>
> El mié., 18 abr. 2018 18:51, Ted Roche  escribió:
>
>> Someone in the office hit this today.
>>
>> Win10, 674-bit fully updated.
>>
>> This project has been running fine.
>>
>> The project crashed this morning and had to be rebuilt and only now
>> does the above error show up.
>>
>> What's the most likely thing you'd check?
>>
>> The DLL's in the path.
>>
>> --
>> Ted Roche
>> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
>> http://www.tedroche.com
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000901d3d742$cbad6c30$63084490$@powerchurch.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: "Cannot load 32-bit DDL wwipstuff.dll"

[Richard Kaye]

The C++ runtime DLL possibly blocked?

--

rk

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech  On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 1:22 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: "Cannot load 32-bit DDL wwipstuff.dll"

Thanks for the thread reference. We're clueless, but not THAT clueless.

Working app this morning, not working this afternoon, same machine.

Project had to be rebuilt from scratch, and I suspect a file was omitted.

I need to follow some basic debugging procedures here. The client's
crisis over "we need this report YESTERDAY!!!" leaked into the room,
and that's really not our problem, and doesn't help things any.

This is an app I haven't worked on, so I need to ask the basic
questions and follow where they lead.

The DLL is in the path. The DECLARE command, run from a command window
of a freshly started Fox session, runs fine. So, we've got a few
things to check next: we'll run the app through the debugger and stop
before the line of code and see what the environment is like.



On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Fernando D. Bozzo  wrote:
> C++ runtime (msvcrtxx) or other dll dependency
>
> May be this can help:
> https://support.west-wind.com/Thread4T60C0F5O.wwt
>
>
> El mié., 18 abr. 2018 18:51, Ted Roche  escribió:
>
>> Someone in the office hit this today.
>>
>> Win10, 674-bit fully updated.
>>
>> This project has been running fine.
>>
>> The project crashed this morning and had to be rebuilt and only now
>> does the above error show up.
>>
>> What's the most likely thing you'd check?
>>
>> The DLL's in the path.
>>
>> --
>> Ted Roche
>> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
>> http://www.tedroche.com
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4srf8p+3fqvk6B23ZBGvRA+ysdTPTqRe=1wn6nb8jb...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Report [OT] Abuse: 
http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/CACW6n4srf8p+3fqvk6B23ZBGvRA+ysdTPTqRe=1wn6nb8jb...@mail.gmail.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/dm5pr10mb124433f32b63cda37b3b6593d2...@dm5pr10mb1244.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: "Cannot load 32-bit DDL wwipstuff.dll"

[Ted Roche]

Thanks for the thread reference. We're clueless, but not THAT clueless.

Working app this morning, not working this afternoon, same machine.

Project had to be rebuilt from scratch, and I suspect a file was omitted.

I need to follow some basic debugging procedures here. The client's
crisis over "we need this report YESTERDAY!!!" leaked into the room,
and that's really not our problem, and doesn't help things any.

This is an app I haven't worked on, so I need to ask the basic
questions and follow where they lead.

The DLL is in the path. The DECLARE command, run from a command window
of a freshly started Fox session, runs fine. So, we've got a few
things to check next: we'll run the app through the debugger and stop
before the line of code and see what the environment is like.



On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Fernando D. Bozzo  wrote:
> C++ runtime (msvcrtxx) or other dll dependency
>
> May be this can help:
> https://support.west-wind.com/Thread4T60C0F5O.wwt
>
>
> El mié., 18 abr. 2018 18:51, Ted Roche  escribió:
>
>> Someone in the office hit this today.
>>
>> Win10, 674-bit fully updated.
>>
>> This project has been running fine.
>>
>> The project crashed this morning and had to be rebuilt and only now
>> does the above error show up.
>>
>> What's the most likely thing you'd check?
>>
>> The DLL's in the path.
>>
>> --
>> Ted Roche
>> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
>> http://www.tedroche.com
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4srf8p+3fqvk6B23ZBGvRA+ysdTPTqRe=1wn6nb8jb...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: "Cannot load 32-bit DDL wwipstuff.dll"

[Fernando D. Bozzo]

C++ runtime (msvcrtxx) or other dll dependency

May be this can help:
https://support.west-wind.com/Thread4T60C0F5O.wwt


El mié., 18 abr. 2018 18:51, Ted Roche  escribió:

> Someone in the office hit this today.
>
> Win10, 674-bit fully updated.
>
> This project has been running fine.
>
> The project crashed this morning and had to be rebuilt and only now
> does the above error show up.
>
> What's the most likely thing you'd check?
>
> The DLL's in the path.
>
> --
> Ted Roche
> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
> http://www.tedroche.com
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGQ_Jukj_xnXOUSJnqRknU9D+=aRvFoZ9FTSEE=hox+yg4g...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

"Cannot load 32-bit DDL wwipstuff.dll"

[Ted Roche]

Someone in the office hit this today.

Win10, 674-bit fully updated.

This project has been running fine.

The project crashed this morning and had to be rebuilt and only now
does the above error show up.

What's the most likely thing you'd check?

The DLL's in the path.

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4s2qfdwwdr0ij0frkhm192ezqa8lyxnuwooebk5wz7...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Microsoft’s Next OS is Based on Linux, Not Windows

[Stephen Russell]

Saving users who travel a lot by swapping out a laptop with a tablet that
can run Office 365 in the cloud is a smart direction for the company or
user to consider.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Ted Roche  wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Alan Bourke 
> wrote:
>
> > I could see them doing a Chromebook-style affair with Office 365
> subscription , using the browser based versions of Word et al.
> >
> > Perhaps with the capability of running the Microsoft Store and UWP apps.
> >
>
> Google's had some success with this. My dad has a Chromebook and
> Chromecast that lets him do web stuff and play videos on the TV.
>
> For surfing, light Google Office work, email, the Chromebook's pretty
> cool. I prefer the larger screens and resolutions, but that's probably
> geezer preference. And older eyes.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYLKzC=fTWqm+od3sC=JGmNTf9DCyJU=efyujtftfhm...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Microsoft’s Next OS is Based on Linux, Not Windows

[Ted Roche]

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Alan Bourke  wrote:

> I could see them doing a Chromebook-style affair with Office 365 subscription 
> , using the browser based versions of Word et al.
>
> Perhaps with the capability of running the Microsoft Store and UWP apps.
>

Google's had some success with this. My dad has a Chromebook and
Chromecast that lets him do web stuff and play videos on the TV.

For surfing, light Google Office work, email, the Chromebook's pretty
cool. I prefer the larger screens and resolutions, but that's probably
geezer preference. And older eyes.

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4tD=rhHHEwQwo4CywuNipTzeH263L+V04mv5k_dRzOT=w...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Microsoft’s Next OS is Based on Linux, Not Windows

[Fernando D. Bozzo]

I agree, they have enough software for getting lots of money with licenses
(visual studio, office, etc) to be worried about the OS.

But if happens, will no be after 5 or 10 years


El mié., 18 abr. 2018 12:53, Alan Bourke  escribió:

> I could see them doing a Chromebook-style affair with Office 365
> subscription , using the browser based versions of Word et al.
>
> Perhaps with the capability of running the Microsoft Store and UWP apps.
>
> --
>   Alan Bourke
>   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cagq_juncdktzf5qni-kopnltxnxdt6pg7v+wu9t2j2jmixt...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: VFP9 - Save as XLSX

[Alan Bourke]

We have hundreds of customers across everything from aerospace to meat packing 
to game development, and almost without exception they're on MS Office, and 
latterly Office 365.

If your requirements go beyond very simple documents in any way and/or you have 
requirements to exchange them with third parties who will almost certainly be 
using MS Office themselves, or automation requirements  then there is only one 
show in town. 


-- 
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1523976722.1024409.1341091408.61040...@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Microsoft’s Next OS is Based on Linux, Not Windows

[Alan Bourke]

I could see them doing a Chromebook-style affair with Office 365 subscription , 
using the browser based versions of Word et al.

Perhaps with the capability of running the Microsoft Store and UWP apps.

-- 
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1524048781.3322684.1342175536.54d27...@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Microsoft’s Next OS is Based on Linux, Not Windows

[Ted Roche]

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Alan Bourke  wrote:

> It wouldn't surprise me if we saw a Microsoft desktop distro in the next 10 
> years.

Really? What do you think would be the selling points? The special features?

I know Oracle has their own Linux, a rebranded Red Hat.

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4tcoApBys69D7SQHC95TCH7GJa6Nq2TwJJXUbTX6W8r=w...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Microsoft’s Next OS is Based on Linux, Not Windows

[Alan Bourke]

It wouldn't surprise me if we saw a Microsoft desktop distro in the next 10 
years.

-- 
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, at 11:38 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> Microsoft’s Next OS is Based on Linux, Not Windows
> 
> https://www.thurrott.com/internet-of-things-iot/156628/microsofts-next-os-based-linux-not-windows
> 
> That's an eye-catching headline. But they're talking about embedded
> systems and I(DI)OT machines, secured with Windows Azure Cloud
> Services.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ted Roche
> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
> http://www.tedroche.com
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1524041871.3274758.1342071024.6a871...@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.