Re: AW: Visual FoxPro Toolkit for .NET
Very funny Peter! I actually had some people bust on me - claiming I had a mullet. But, I think they were exaggerating! -K- On 11/22/2018 7:45 AM, Peter Cushing wrote: What's wrong with having a mullet? ;-) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/01d6a10f-aa54-a2b5-7ec3-069ff2460...@optonline.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: AW: Visual FoxPro Toolkit for .NET
On 22/11/2018 15:34, juer...@wondzinski.de wrote: The main usecase for the toolkit is replicating / packaging classic VFP functions into object calls. If you're an "oldfashioned" FoxPro guy... What's wrong with having a mullet? ;-) Peter This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. The contents are confidential and may be protected in law. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email. www.whisperingsmith.com Whispering Smith Ltd Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR. Tel:0161 831 3700 Fax:0161 831 3715 London Office: 101 St. Martin's Lane,London, WC2N 4AZ Tel:0207 299 7960 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/26cb150b-66fb-07e4-c855-e756ac75f...@whisperingsmith.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
AW: Visual FoxPro Toolkit for .NET
The main usecase for the toolkit is replicating / packaging classic VFP functions into object calls. If you're an "oldfashioned" FoxPro guy, you're used to commands and functions and you know them in and out. Thus you're tempted to have the same "ease of use" with NET. That's absolutely ok, but later on you will notice that the "real" NET way to deal with objects and their methods is notable more flexible. wOOdy -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ProFox Im Auftrag von AndyHC Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. November 2018 16:05 An: profox@leafe.com Betreff: Re: Visual FoxPro Toolkit for .NET On 22-Nov-18 1:53 PM, Alan Bourke wrote: ... so give it, say, another 16 years and it could have caught up with Foxpro [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/007401d48278$ccd9f6f0$668de4d0$@wondzinski.de ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: AW: Visual FoxPro Toolkit for .NET
Yeah, I was gonna ask the Freshness Date of this. On 2018-11-21 16:21, juer...@wondzinski.de wrote: What do you expect from a NET Class-library from 2002 ? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ProFox Im Auftrag von Paul Newton Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. November 2018 15:07 An: 'profox@leafe.com' Betreff: Visual FoxPro Toolkit for .NET Hi all http://foxcentral.net/microsoft/vfptoolkitnet.htm Does anybody have any experience with this? Is it robust and reliable? Thanks Paul Newton [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/360f56c7bec57b403a07f31243cf1...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
AW: Visual FoxPro Toolkit for .NET
What do you expect from a NET Class-library from 2002 ? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ProFox Im Auftrag von Paul Newton Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. November 2018 15:07 An: 'profox@leafe.com' Betreff: Visual FoxPro Toolkit for .NET Hi all http://foxcentral.net/microsoft/vfptoolkitnet.htm Does anybody have any experience with this? Is it robust and reliable? Thanks Paul Newton [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/003301d481e0$36cae130$a460a390$@wondzinski.de ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
