Re: Anybody Heard About This?
lol Being non religious I call OT on happy Christmas messages Also just kidding. Al -Original Message- Just pulling your leg in defense of those times when I am called out for non-[OT] Nicholas Geti ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/30E1127D872D4967A01EDEE37094D3B8@gslredacer ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
Just pulling your leg in defense of those times when I am called out for non-[OT] Nicholas Geti - Original Message - From: "Allen" To: Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 3:35 AM Subject: Re: Anybody Heard About This? I would think NF but not OT myself Al -Original Message- From: Nicholas Geti Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:37 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Anybody Heard About This? Hey. Where is the [OT]? Please. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/A3310A0D14234832B98A0D2AB3DE3A4B@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
I would think NF but not OT myself Al -Original Message- From: Nicholas Geti Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:37 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Anybody Heard About This? Hey. Where is the [OT]? Please. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/C700AA2906D14388A154A0672D7B936C@gslredacer ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
Hey. Where is the [OT]? Please. - Original Message - From: "M Jarvis" To: Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 1:27 PM Subject: Re: Anybody Heard About This? > Store says perfect shopper here, carry on. Ya know, not trying to go all paranoid here, but some day they are going to be able to aggregate all our data... where and when we shop, what we buy, how much... Bought laundry soap six months ago... tonight buy some more... 5 1/2 months from now miraculously get a coupon in mail/email for laundry soap... But if they were doing this already I'd be getting a constant stream of beer vouchers -- Matt Jarvis Eugene, Oregon USA [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2A1EAD4175564C3385FEF706ED40D5D7@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Bob Lee wrote: > I am afraid. Is already here. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_basket_analysis > Marketers track everything they can about you already. > beer and diapers?? trust me, I don't drink THAT much -- Matt Jarvis Eugene, Oregon USA ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capt54ryoiem7dwpekfhxwegepcp1u7rbrvn7hceuisddyep...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Anybody Heard About This?
I am afraid. Is already here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_basket_analysis Marketers track everything they can about you already. Bob Lee -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of M Jarvis Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 1:27 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Anybody Heard About This? > > Store says perfect shopper here, carry on. > Ya know, not trying to go all paranoid here, but some day they are going to be able to aggregate all our data... where and when we shop, what we buy, how much... Bought laundry soap six months ago... tonight buy some more... 5 1/2 months from now miraculously get a coupon in mail/email for laundry soap... But if they were doing this already I'd be getting a constant stream of beer vouchers -- Matt Jarvis Eugene, Oregon USA [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/006901cddfb6$002e5210$008af630$@1amsoftware.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Bob Lee wrote: > Its really not different than what Target does, by using the hidden > camera's > watching how long each of us spend in the various isles, knowing what the > normal path is though their maze of a store. > I'd like to see them track *my* shopping pattern: My wife needs some ski mittons. 1. I see some outdoors wear items. "Oh, this is the hunters' section." She doesn't care for camo or blaze orange. Darn. 2. Try to find the women's department. Wander (apparently) aimlessly. 3. "Oh, there is the women's department." Hmmm, jackets, a display of hats, but no gloves or mittens. 4. Maybe I missed the "normal" ones in the hunter department. 5. Walking back to Hunters, passing through the boys and girls departments, I notice portable displays with mittens and gloves. Hmmm, maybe I missed them. 6. Back to Women -- search -- nope. 7. See a display of work gloves and clothes. Naw, 8. Back to Hunting. Wander. Nope. 9. Back to women. On the way: 10. "Oh, heck: she wanted some hand warmers, too." I saw those by the Hunting stuff. Back to hunting. Got some. 11. Back to Women's. "I must have missed them." Wander. 12. "Gee, I wonder if work mittens would be OK?" Walk over to that department. 13. Across the isle, a whole section of gloves (95%) and mittens. 14. Find only a few pair of reasonable ones. H: Large or Medium? "Gee the Large look *Huge*"; pick Medium. 15. Pay and flee for my life. Get home, wife says you got Large, right. . Back to #1. Folks, I wish I made *any* of this up. If anything, I missed a few steps. Ken --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFyV=ln51vymgqc8gzcgbklnt8jv2gpoo_mdjkoqzwf+bvf...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012, at 11:24 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote: > > We are being watched, in stores, why not for our activities on > > line. ? > Well, the assumption there is that being watched in stores is a good thing, for anything other than in-store security reasons. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1356081572.27826.140661168755853.32a3d...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
Ok, I see - so it picks up a graphic (I'm guessing 1 pixel will do) from a website which logs the visit (like you see Google doing repeatedly). Shouldn't be too difficult to script, I might play around with that. AndyD 8-)# On 20/12/2012 22:58, Alan Bourke wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012, at 04:55 PM, AndyHC wrote: I'm missing something here - I think every email client I have ever used had >option>return receipt. What this does is return a notification to the sender that the recipient has opened the mail, without any knowledge or intervention required by the recipient. Basically if you are the recipient and your mail client can display emails with embedded graphics, and you haven't turned off the option to display them*, then this thing will work. Or been a bit more clever and blocked it at a firewall level etc. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50d40340.1020...@hawthorncottage.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Anybody Heard About This?
> We are being watched, in stores, why not for our activities on > line. ? I'm not thrilled about being tracked that way in stores, or about having my purchases tracked and analyzed. I feel the same way online, where I (should) have more control about what comes and goes from my machine. -Jerry ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50d357e3.2382.1d3...@jwolper.swanzoco.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Anybody Heard About This?
Its really not different than what Target does, by using the hidden camera's watching how long each of us spend in the various isles, knowing what the normal path is though their maze of a store. We are being watched, in stores, why not for our activities on line. ? Most large companies know could tell you how many times you have visited their site, what searches you did on their site, how many pages you saw, When you log on and so on. That way they can create individual marketing campaigns based on what you seem to want. Bob Lee -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 3:05 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Anybody Heard About This? On 12/20/2012 10:27 AM, Ted Roche wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Bob Lee wrote: >> Do a search on "marketing automation", companies like Marketo, and >> Perdot etc, have taken this concept to really interesting levels. >> > > Where you can substitute "deeply disturbing" for "interesting." ROFLMAO Indeed! -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/066d01cddef1$8440db60$8cc29220$@1amsoftware.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
On 12/20/2012 10:27 AM, Ted Roche wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Bob Lee wrote: Do a search on "marketing automation", companies like Marketo, and Perdot etc, have taken this concept to really interesting levels. Where you can substitute "deeply disturbing" for "interesting." ROFLMAO Indeed! -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50d36f71.4050...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
On 12/20/12 9:28 AM, Alan Bourke wrote: > What this does is return a notification to the sender that the recipient > has opened the mail, without any knowledge or intervention required by > the recipient. Basically if you are the recipient and your mail client > can display emails with embedded graphics, and you haven't turned off > the option to display them*, then this thing will work. Displaying remote images has been disabled by default in Thunderbird for ages, if not always. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50d34b3c.1050...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012, at 04:55 PM, AndyHC wrote: > I'm missing something here - I think every email client I have ever used > had >option>return receipt. > What this does is return a notification to the sender that the recipient has opened the mail, without any knowledge or intervention required by the recipient. Basically if you are the recipient and your mail client can display emails with embedded graphics, and you haven't turned off the option to display them*, then this thing will work. Or been a bit more clever and blocked it at a firewall level etc. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1356024483.3742.140661168493213.382f3...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
Sure but most clients allow you to suppress the sending of same. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Dec 20, 2012, at 8:55 AM, AndyHC wrote: > I'm missing something here - I think every email client I have ever used had > >option>return receipt. > > AndyD 8-)# > > On 20/12/2012 21:04, Paul McNett wrote: >> I guess javascript would have to be enabled in the email reader to track >> things like >> how long the email is open and where the mouse is hovering, etc. > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/416ba096-9f55-46d1-bbeb-bc307b0ac...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
I'm missing something here - I think every email client I have ever used had >option>return receipt. AndyD 8-)# On 20/12/2012 21:04, Paul McNett wrote: I guess javascript would have to be enabled in the email reader to track things like how long the email is open and where the mouse is hovering, etc. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50d34317.8020...@hawthorncottage.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
Pretty cool how it works - however if it's still using a hidden image then it won't work for anyone who reads mail in text-only form, or has auto download of images turned off, and so on. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1356019963.21841.140661168463289.1f9a9...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
I guess javascript would have to be enabled in the email reader to track things like how long the email is open and where the mouse is hovering, etc. On 12/20/12 6:46 AM, Bob Lee wrote: > This technology has been around for years. > Marketers use it every second, to track how many emails are opened and by > whom, how long the email remains open, if links are clicked.. > > Do a search on "marketing automation", companies like Marketo, and Perdot > etc, have taken this concept to really interesting levels. > > Bob Lee > > > -Original Message- > From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jeff > Johnson > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:24 PM > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: Anybody Heard About This? > > http://www.msgtag.com/home/ > > It sounds like it does a return receipt on email without user intervention. > > > -- > Jeff > > --- > > Jeff Johnson > j...@san-dc.com > (623) 582-0323 > > www.san-dc.com > www.arelationshipmanager.com > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50d32ff2.6070...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
So basically to read the message I need to follow a link to a website, right? And how is 'received' defined: 1) my email server received the message from readnotify.com 2) my email server scripts placed it in my inbox (as opposed to spam) 3) my email client program downloaded that messages header and I can see it in my inbox. If I don't need to visit a remote site to read the email, and it isn't #1 above, please do send me an email at r...@paulmcnett.com. Paul On 12/19/12 4:43 PM, Sytze de Boer wrote: > I'm not sure if I'm on same wavelength, but I use a system called ReadNotify > > There are times when, for legal reasons, I need to be able to prove you > have received AND read my email. > I send the email tosome...@somewhere.readnotify.com > I then get a message when they've received it, and when they've read it. > > It has helped me out on 3 occasions where, without it, I could have cost me > big time. > > Works a treat. It's a bit like we used to do in the old days when you could > send a letter and have the person sign it to say they'd received it. > Except, in this instance, they don't know they've "told" me. > > If you think it doesn't work, send me your email address and I'll send you > a copy of the report I receive > > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > >> On 12/19/12 2:23 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>> http://www.msgtag.com/home/ >>> >>> It sounds like it does a return receipt on email without user >> intervention. >> >> I'm fairly certain that if someone sent me such a message, Thunderbird >> would warn me >> that it thinks the message is a scam.. >> >> Paul >> >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50d32f75.2030...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Anybody Heard About This?
This technology has been around for years. Marketers use it every second, to track how many emails are opened and by whom, how long the email remains open, if links are clicked.. Do a search on "marketing automation", companies like Marketo, and Perdot etc, have taken this concept to really interesting levels. Bob Lee -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnson Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:24 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Anybody Heard About This? http://www.msgtag.com/home/ It sounds like it does a return receipt on email without user intervention. -- Jeff --- Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com (623) 582-0323 www.san-dc.com www.arelationshipmanager.com --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/05bd01cddec0$dad32450$90796cf0$@1amsoftware.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
I'm not sure if I'm on same wavelength, but I use a system called ReadNotify There are times when, for legal reasons, I need to be able to prove you have received AND read my email. I send the email tosome...@somewhere.readnotify.com I then get a message when they've received it, and when they've read it. It has helped me out on 3 occasions where, without it, I could have cost me big time. Works a treat. It's a bit like we used to do in the old days when you could send a letter and have the person sign it to say they'd received it. Except, in this instance, they don't know they've "told" me. If you think it doesn't work, send me your email address and I'll send you a copy of the report I receive On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > On 12/19/12 2:23 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > http://www.msgtag.com/home/ > > > > It sounds like it does a return receipt on email without user > intervention. > > I'm fairly certain that if someone sent me such a message, Thunderbird > would warn me > that it thinks the message is a scam.. > > Paul > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAG1nNy88=1yAhM97Qy9bEaJBXYSt-E+n=xa3mktpqcxaava...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
On 12/19/12 2:23 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > http://www.msgtag.com/home/ > > It sounds like it does a return receipt on email without user intervention. I'm fairly certain that if someone sent me such a message, Thunderbird would warn me that it thinks the message is a scam.. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50d24f3d.50...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Anybody Heard About This?
Interesting Jeff! Although - I must say - this was my favorite part on the website: "A few MSGTAG users have even told us that they use read proof to figure out who is serious on dating sites. Did she really not get the email, or is she not that keen? With MSGTAG email tracking you now have read proof you need to meet the love of your life. :) " L8r, -K- On 12/19/2012 5:23 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: http://www.msgtag.com/home/ It sounds like it does a return receipt on email without user intervention. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50d240e4.4030...@optonline.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
