Re: SOAP
On 2018-09-06 09:30, Stephen Russell wrote: Today the industry is changing the name from Web Service to API but in general it works in much the same way. But I get the impression that it's easier to work with the APIs? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1f8cdfa8f2b67a6773a26c1d08f20...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SOAP
Cheers tracey I am going to pick apart the vfptweetapi as it seems to contain
everything I need
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson
Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 20:14
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: SOAP
You need to add a header. How it is formatted depends on the API.
I have this code, I'm also using the Chilkat ActiveX control for the HTTP
requests.
oHTTPRequest.AddHeader("Authorization", "Bearer " + Token)
As an side note, I started using the Chilkat control over the MSXML control
because the logging.
The MSXML doesn't have connectivity logging to diagnose problems. Chilkat does.
Have fun,
Tracy
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Chris Davis
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 2:51 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: SOAP
Keeping it basic at the moment with MsXml2.XmlHttp
But I have noticed in the middle of vfpoauth there is a signrequest method that
doesn't seem to be used ... I have also ventured into the vfptweetapi and that
has the same function so I will delve deeper tomorrow
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson
Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 19:31
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: SOAP
What are you using to make the web requests in VFP?
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Chris Davis
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 2:12 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: SOAP
Progress I have managed to use vfpoauth to get my access token now I need to
work out how to sign a request in vfp , I can get it to work in postman
> On 6 Sep 2018, at 19:01, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
> This might help?
>
> https://github.com/VFPX/VFPOAuth
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:24 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Stephen, I am struggling with oAuth at the moment, the
>> documentation gives examples but obviously not in VFP and it looks
>> like things like javascript and php include oauth modules.
>>
>> So if I can reword my question, has anyone got any oauth code
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
>> Russell
>> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 15:20
>> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
>> Subject: Re: SOAP
>>
>> To be honest, REST is just a way that sets up an interaction in
>> complex ways without the client knowing anything beforehand about the
>> server and the resources it hosts. You define that the transmission
>> is going to be HTTP and then follow the rules for it.
>>
>> Now your call to the API can be done from a web browser, an app on a
>> phone or a tablet.
>>
>> here is something I wrote to get data for ExchangeRates.
>> apicall.Clear(); // This is a string to hold the params for the call
>> I am making for data
>>
>> apicall.Append("api/historical/" + EOM);
>>
>>
>> apicall.Append(".json?app_id=bbfaf8b299c54f93811b2144f9d33c3e=GBP,EUR,CAD");
>> // get the dates for use in the string HttpResponseMessage
>> httpResponseMessage = await client.GetAsync(apicall.ToString());
>> HttpResponseMessage response = httpResponseMessage;
>> if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
>>{ // put the data returend into a data object I have
>> local.
>> eRateReturn rate = await
>> response.Content.ReadAsAsync();
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is eRateReturn class(s) for data:
>> public class Rates
>>{
>>public float GBP { get; set; }
>>public float CAD { get; set; }
>>public float USD { get; set; }
>>public float EUR { get; set; }
>>}
>>
>>public class eRateReturn
>>{
>>public float timestamp { get; set; }
>>public string Base { get; set; }
>>public DateTime date { get; set; }
>>public Rates rates {get; set;}
>>}
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:38 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reply Russell, I have now discovered this particular
>>> thing also supports REST api, just trying to figure out oAuth
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
>>> Russell
>>> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 14:30
>>> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
>>> Subject: Re: SOAP
>>>
>>> Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application
>>> all in Web Service
RE: SOAP
You need to add a header. How it is formatted depends on the API.
I have this code, I'm also using the Chilkat ActiveX control for the HTTP
requests.
oHTTPRequest.AddHeader("Authorization", "Bearer " + Token)
As an side note, I started using the Chilkat control over the MSXML control
because the logging.
The MSXML doesn't have connectivity logging to diagnose problems. Chilkat does.
Have fun,
Tracy
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Chris Davis
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 2:51 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: SOAP
Keeping it basic at the moment with MsXml2.XmlHttp
But I have noticed in the middle of vfpoauth there is a signrequest method that
doesn't seem to be used ... I have also ventured into the vfptweetapi and that
has the same function so I will delve deeper tomorrow
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson
Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 19:31
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: SOAP
What are you using to make the web requests in VFP?
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Chris Davis
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 2:12 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: SOAP
Progress I have managed to use vfpoauth to get my access token now I need to
work out how to sign a request in vfp , I can get it to work in postman
> On 6 Sep 2018, at 19:01, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
> This might help?
>
> https://github.com/VFPX/VFPOAuth
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:24 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Stephen, I am struggling with oAuth at the moment, the
>> documentation gives examples but obviously not in VFP and it looks
>> like things like javascript and php include oauth modules.
>>
>> So if I can reword my question, has anyone got any oauth code
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
>> Russell
>> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 15:20
>> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
>> Subject: Re: SOAP
>>
>> To be honest, REST is just a way that sets up an interaction in
>> complex ways without the client knowing anything beforehand about the
>> server and the resources it hosts. You define that the transmission
>> is going to be HTTP and then follow the rules for it.
>>
>> Now your call to the API can be done from a web browser, an app on a
>> phone or a tablet.
>>
>> here is something I wrote to get data for ExchangeRates.
>> apicall.Clear(); // This is a string to hold the params for the call
>> I am making for data
>>
>> apicall.Append("api/historical/" + EOM);
>>
>>
>> apicall.Append(".json?app_id=bbfaf8b299c54f93811b2144f9d33c3e=GBP,EUR,CAD");
>> // get the dates for use in the string HttpResponseMessage
>> httpResponseMessage = await client.GetAsync(apicall.ToString());
>> HttpResponseMessage response = httpResponseMessage;
>> if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
>>{ // put the data returend into a data object I have
>> local.
>> eRateReturn rate = await
>> response.Content.ReadAsAsync();
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is eRateReturn class(s) for data:
>> public class Rates
>>{
>>public float GBP { get; set; }
>>public float CAD { get; set; }
>>public float USD { get; set; }
>>public float EUR { get; set; }
>>}
>>
>>public class eRateReturn
>>{
>>public float timestamp { get; set; }
>>public string Base { get; set; }
>>public DateTime date { get; set; }
>>public Rates rates {get; set;}
>>}
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:38 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reply Russell, I have now discovered this particular
>>> thing also supports REST api, just trying to figure out oAuth
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
>>> Russell
>>> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 14:30
>>> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
>>> Subject: Re: SOAP
>>>
>>> Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application
>>> all in Web Service calls years ago.
>>>
>>> In general, the "service" is a replacement for a data store. You
>>> ask for data from the service and it gives it to you in SOAP, xml that is.
>>> What you actually receive is some
RE: SOAP
Keeping it basic at the moment with MsXml2.XmlHttp
But I have noticed in the middle of vfpoauth there is a signrequest method that
doesn't seem to be used ... I have also ventured into the vfptweetapi and that
has the same function so I will delve deeper tomorrow
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson
Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 19:31
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: SOAP
What are you using to make the web requests in VFP?
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Chris Davis
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 2:12 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: SOAP
Progress I have managed to use vfpoauth to get my access token now I need to
work out how to sign a request in vfp , I can get it to work in postman
> On 6 Sep 2018, at 19:01, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
> This might help?
>
> https://github.com/VFPX/VFPOAuth
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:24 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Stephen, I am struggling with oAuth at the moment, the
>> documentation gives examples but obviously not in VFP and it looks
>> like things like javascript and php include oauth modules.
>>
>> So if I can reword my question, has anyone got any oauth code
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
>> Russell
>> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 15:20
>> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
>> Subject: Re: SOAP
>>
>> To be honest, REST is just a way that sets up an interaction in
>> complex ways without the client knowing anything beforehand about the
>> server and the resources it hosts. You define that the transmission
>> is going to be HTTP and then follow the rules for it.
>>
>> Now your call to the API can be done from a web browser, an app on a
>> phone or a tablet.
>>
>> here is something I wrote to get data for ExchangeRates.
>> apicall.Clear(); // This is a string to hold the params for the call
>> I am making for data
>>
>> apicall.Append("api/historical/" + EOM);
>>
>>
>> apicall.Append(".json?app_id=bbfaf8b299c54f93811b2144f9d33c3e=GBP,EUR,CAD");
>> // get the dates for use in the string HttpResponseMessage
>> httpResponseMessage = await client.GetAsync(apicall.ToString());
>> HttpResponseMessage response = httpResponseMessage;
>> if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
>>{ // put the data returend into a data object I have
>> local.
>> eRateReturn rate = await
>> response.Content.ReadAsAsync();
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is eRateReturn class(s) for data:
>> public class Rates
>>{
>>public float GBP { get; set; }
>>public float CAD { get; set; }
>>public float USD { get; set; }
>>public float EUR { get; set; }
>>}
>>
>>public class eRateReturn
>>{
>>public float timestamp { get; set; }
>>public string Base { get; set; }
>>public DateTime date { get; set; }
>>public Rates rates {get; set;}
>>}
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:38 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reply Russell, I have now discovered this particular
>>> thing also supports REST api, just trying to figure out oAuth
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
>>> Russell
>>> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 14:30
>>> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
>>> Subject: Re: SOAP
>>>
>>> Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application
>>> all in Web Service calls years ago.
>>>
>>> In general, the "service" is a replacement for a data store. You
>>> ask for data from the service and it gives it to you in SOAP, xml that is.
>>> What you actually receive is some sort of collection of data, that
>>> may have collections within it. You could do the same thing in
>>> arrays if you wanted in VFP.
>>>
>>> Now the data is yours to use at your desire. You may have to
>>> package the data back into XML that mimics the data they sent you
>>> for inserts, updates, maybe even deletes. Now through the "service"
>>> you post that XML pack to them.
>>>
>>> Today the industry is changing the name from Web Service to API but
>>> in general it works in much the same way.
RE: SOAP
What are you using to make the web requests in VFP?
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Chris Davis
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 2:12 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: SOAP
Progress I have managed to use vfpoauth to get my access token now I need to
work out how to sign a request in vfp , I can get it to work in postman
> On 6 Sep 2018, at 19:01, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
> This might help?
>
> https://github.com/VFPX/VFPOAuth
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:24 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Stephen, I am struggling with oAuth at the moment, the
>> documentation gives examples but obviously not in VFP and it looks like
>> things like javascript and php include oauth modules.
>>
>> So if I can reword my question, has anyone got any oauth code
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
>> Russell
>> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 15:20
>> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
>> Subject: Re: SOAP
>>
>> To be honest, REST is just a way that sets up an interaction in complex
>> ways without the client knowing anything beforehand about the server and
>> the resources it hosts. You define that the transmission is going to be
>> HTTP and then follow the rules for it.
>>
>> Now your call to the API can be done from a web browser, an app on a phone
>> or a tablet.
>>
>> here is something I wrote to get data for ExchangeRates.
>> apicall.Clear(); // This is a string to hold the params for the call I
>> am making for data
>>
>> apicall.Append("api/historical/" + EOM);
>>
>>
>> apicall.Append(".json?app_id=bbfaf8b299c54f93811b2144f9d33c3e=GBP,EUR,CAD");
>> // get the dates for use in the string
>> HttpResponseMessage httpResponseMessage = await
>> client.GetAsync(apicall.ToString());
>> HttpResponseMessage response = httpResponseMessage;
>> if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
>>{ // put the data returend into a data object I have
>> local.
>> eRateReturn rate = await
>> response.Content.ReadAsAsync();
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is eRateReturn class(s) for data:
>> public class Rates
>>{
>>public float GBP { get; set; }
>>public float CAD { get; set; }
>>public float USD { get; set; }
>>public float EUR { get; set; }
>>}
>>
>>public class eRateReturn
>>{
>>public float timestamp { get; set; }
>>public string Base { get; set; }
>>public DateTime date { get; set; }
>>public Rates rates {get; set;}
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:38 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reply Russell, I have now discovered this particular
>>> thing also supports REST api, just trying to figure out oAuth
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
>>> Russell
>>> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 14:30
>>> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
>>> Subject: Re: SOAP
>>>
>>> Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application all
>>> in Web Service calls years ago.
>>>
>>> In general, the "service" is a replacement for a data store. You ask
>>> for data from the service and it gives it to you in SOAP, xml that is.
>>> What you actually receive is some sort of collection of data, that may
>>> have collections within it. You could do the same thing in arrays if
>>> you wanted in VFP.
>>>
>>> Now the data is yours to use at your desire. You may have to package
>>> the data back into XML that mimics the data they sent you for inserts,
>>> updates, maybe even deletes. Now through the "service" you post that
>>> XML pack to them.
>>>
>>> Today the industry is changing the name from Web Service to API but in
>>> general it works in much the same way.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:31 AM Chris Davis
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is anyone able to share an example of working with a webservice
>>>> purely in code?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Chris.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
>>>> text/plain (text body -- kept)
>>>> text/html
>>>> ---
>>>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000401d4460f$bba87460$32f95d20$@powerchurch.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SOAP
I have worked with oAuth on two integrations.
1) Google Calendar. We ended up switching gears and are using a C# exe outside
our main exe.
2) Constant Contact. We ended up writing a C# Web service to handle the oAuth
callback. Once the user finishes the login, they need to click a button to
fetch details from our web service.
oAuth 2.0 requires a callback, if I'm remembering correctly. VFP doesn't have
that ability natively. Time constraints prevented me from attempting putting
that in an FLL.
Good luck,
Tracy
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Chris Davis
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 11:40 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: SOAP
Thanks Ted I have found and downloaded vfpoauth but have failed to get it to
work
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 16:31
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: SOAP
Chris:
I searched here: http://bfy.tw/Jl8C
and found this: https://archive.codeplex.com/?p=vfpoauth
HTH,
Ted
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:24 AM Chris Davis wrote:
> Thanks Stephen, I am struggling with oAuth at the moment, the
> documentation gives examples but obviously not in VFP and it looks
> like things like javascript and php include oauth modules.
>
> So if I can reword my question, has anyone got any oauth code
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
> Russell
> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 15:20
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: SOAP
>
> To be honest, REST is just a way that sets up an interaction in
> complex ways without the client knowing anything beforehand about the
> server and the resources it hosts. You define that the transmission is
> going to be HTTP and then follow the rules for it.
>
> Now your call to the API can be done from a web browser, an app on a
> phone or a tablet.
>
> here is something I wrote to get data for ExchangeRates.
> apicall.Clear(); // This is a string to hold the params for the call
> I am making for data
>
> apicall.Append("api/historical/" + EOM);
>
>
> apicall.Append(".json?app_id=bbfaf8b299c54f93811b2144f9d33c3e=GBP,EUR,CAD");
> // get the dates for use in the string
> HttpResponseMessage httpResponseMessage = await
> client.GetAsync(apicall.ToString());
>HttpResponseMessage response = httpResponseMessage;
> if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
> { // put the data returend into a data object I have
> local.
> eRateReturn rate = await
> response.Content.ReadAsAsync();
>
>
>
> Here is eRateReturn class(s) for data:
> public class Rates
> {
> public float GBP { get; set; }
> public float CAD { get; set; }
> public float USD { get; set; }
> public float EUR { get; set; }
> }
>
> public class eRateReturn
> {
> public float timestamp { get; set; }
> public string Base { get; set; }
> public DateTime date { get; set; }
> public Rates rates {get; set;}
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:38 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reply Russell, I have now discovered this particular
> > thing also supports REST api, just trying to figure out oAuth
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
> > Russell
> > Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 14:30
> > To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> > Subject: Re: SOAP
> >
> > Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application
> > all in Web Service calls years ago.
> >
> > In general, the "service" is a replacement for a data store. You
> > ask for data from the service and it gives it to you in SOAP, xml that is.
> > What you actually receive is some sort of collection of data, that
> > may have collections within it. You could do the same thing in
> > arrays if you wanted in VFP.
> >
> > Now the data is yours to use at your desire. You may have to
> > package the data back into XML that mimics the data they sent you
> > for inserts, updates, maybe even deletes. Now through the "service"
> > you post that XML pack to them.
> >
> > Today the industry is changing the name from Web Service to API but
> > in general it works in much the same way.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:31 AM Chris Davis
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone able to share an example of working with a webservice
> > > purely in code?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Chri
Re: SOAP
Progress I have managed to use vfpoauth to get my access token now I need to
work out how to sign a request in vfp , I can get it to work in postman
> On 6 Sep 2018, at 19:01, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
> This might help?
>
> https://github.com/VFPX/VFPOAuth
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:24 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Stephen, I am struggling with oAuth at the moment, the
>> documentation gives examples but obviously not in VFP and it looks like
>> things like javascript and php include oauth modules.
>>
>> So if I can reword my question, has anyone got any oauth code
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
>> Russell
>> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 15:20
>> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
>> Subject: Re: SOAP
>>
>> To be honest, REST is just a way that sets up an interaction in complex
>> ways without the client knowing anything beforehand about the server and
>> the resources it hosts. You define that the transmission is going to be
>> HTTP and then follow the rules for it.
>>
>> Now your call to the API can be done from a web browser, an app on a phone
>> or a tablet.
>>
>> here is something I wrote to get data for ExchangeRates.
>> apicall.Clear(); // This is a string to hold the params for the call I
>> am making for data
>>
>> apicall.Append("api/historical/" + EOM);
>>
>>
>> apicall.Append(".json?app_id=bbfaf8b299c54f93811b2144f9d33c3e=GBP,EUR,CAD");
>> // get the dates for use in the string
>> HttpResponseMessage httpResponseMessage = await
>> client.GetAsync(apicall.ToString());
>> HttpResponseMessage response = httpResponseMessage;
>> if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
>>{ // put the data returend into a data object I have
>> local.
>> eRateReturn rate = await
>> response.Content.ReadAsAsync();
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is eRateReturn class(s) for data:
>> public class Rates
>>{
>>public float GBP { get; set; }
>>public float CAD { get; set; }
>>public float USD { get; set; }
>>public float EUR { get; set; }
>>}
>>
>>public class eRateReturn
>>{
>>public float timestamp { get; set; }
>>public string Base { get; set; }
>>public DateTime date { get; set; }
>>public Rates rates {get; set;}
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:38 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reply Russell, I have now discovered this particular
>>> thing also supports REST api, just trying to figure out oAuth
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
>>> Russell
>>> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 14:30
>>> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
>>> Subject: Re: SOAP
>>>
>>> Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application all
>>> in Web Service calls years ago.
>>>
>>> In general, the "service" is a replacement for a data store. You ask
>>> for data from the service and it gives it to you in SOAP, xml that is.
>>> What you actually receive is some sort of collection of data, that may
>>> have collections within it. You could do the same thing in arrays if
>>> you wanted in VFP.
>>>
>>> Now the data is yours to use at your desire. You may have to package
>>> the data back into XML that mimics the data they sent you for inserts,
>>> updates, maybe even deletes. Now through the "service" you post that
>>> XML pack to them.
>>>
>>> Today the industry is changing the name from Web Service to API but in
>>> general it works in much the same way.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:31 AM Chris Davis
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is anyone able to share an example of working with a webservice
>>>> purely in code?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Chris.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
>>>> text/plain (text body -- kept)
>>>> text/html
>>>> ---
>>>>
> [excessive quoting removed by server]
>
> ___
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subsc
Re: SOAP
This might help?
https://github.com/VFPX/VFPOAuth
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:24 AM Chris Davis wrote:
> Thanks Stephen, I am struggling with oAuth at the moment, the
> documentation gives examples but obviously not in VFP and it looks like
> things like javascript and php include oauth modules.
>
> So if I can reword my question, has anyone got any oauth code
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
> Russell
> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 15:20
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: SOAP
>
> To be honest, REST is just a way that sets up an interaction in complex
> ways without the client knowing anything beforehand about the server and
> the resources it hosts. You define that the transmission is going to be
> HTTP and then follow the rules for it.
>
> Now your call to the API can be done from a web browser, an app on a phone
> or a tablet.
>
> here is something I wrote to get data for ExchangeRates.
> apicall.Clear(); // This is a string to hold the params for the call I
> am making for data
>
> apicall.Append("api/historical/" + EOM);
>
>
> apicall.Append(".json?app_id=bbfaf8b299c54f93811b2144f9d33c3e=GBP,EUR,CAD");
> // get the dates for use in the string
> HttpResponseMessage httpResponseMessage = await
> client.GetAsync(apicall.ToString());
>HttpResponseMessage response = httpResponseMessage;
> if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
> { // put the data returend into a data object I have
> local.
> eRateReturn rate = await
> response.Content.ReadAsAsync();
>
>
>
> Here is eRateReturn class(s) for data:
> public class Rates
> {
> public float GBP { get; set; }
> public float CAD { get; set; }
> public float USD { get; set; }
> public float EUR { get; set; }
> }
>
> public class eRateReturn
> {
> public float timestamp { get; set; }
> public string Base { get; set; }
> public DateTime date { get; set; }
> public Rates rates {get; set;}
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:38 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reply Russell, I have now discovered this particular
> > thing also supports REST api, just trying to figure out oAuth
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
> > Russell
> > Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 14:30
> > To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> > Subject: Re: SOAP
> >
> > Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application all
> > in Web Service calls years ago.
> >
> > In general, the "service" is a replacement for a data store. You ask
> > for data from the service and it gives it to you in SOAP, xml that is.
> > What you actually receive is some sort of collection of data, that may
> > have collections within it. You could do the same thing in arrays if
> > you wanted in VFP.
> >
> > Now the data is yours to use at your desire. You may have to package
> > the data back into XML that mimics the data they sent you for inserts,
> > updates, maybe even deletes. Now through the "service" you post that
> > XML pack to them.
> >
> > Today the industry is changing the name from Web Service to API but in
> > general it works in much the same way.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:31 AM Chris Davis
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone able to share an example of working with a webservice
> > > purely in code?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Chris.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
> > > text/plain (text body -- kept)
> > > text/html
> > > ---
> > >
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYK8k+Ngs0e4cehFqjoXyh-Fsf=8fkuqtlw0ao9qtqn...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SOAP
Thanks Ted I have found and downloaded vfpoauth but have failed to get it to
work
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 16:31
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: SOAP
Chris:
I searched here: http://bfy.tw/Jl8C
and found this: https://archive.codeplex.com/?p=vfpoauth
HTH,
Ted
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:24 AM Chris Davis wrote:
> Thanks Stephen, I am struggling with oAuth at the moment, the
> documentation gives examples but obviously not in VFP and it looks
> like things like javascript and php include oauth modules.
>
> So if I can reword my question, has anyone got any oauth code
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
> Russell
> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 15:20
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: SOAP
>
> To be honest, REST is just a way that sets up an interaction in
> complex ways without the client knowing anything beforehand about the
> server and the resources it hosts. You define that the transmission is
> going to be HTTP and then follow the rules for it.
>
> Now your call to the API can be done from a web browser, an app on a
> phone or a tablet.
>
> here is something I wrote to get data for ExchangeRates.
> apicall.Clear(); // This is a string to hold the params for the call
> I am making for data
>
> apicall.Append("api/historical/" + EOM);
>
>
> apicall.Append(".json?app_id=bbfaf8b299c54f93811b2144f9d33c3e=GBP,EUR,CAD");
> // get the dates for use in the string
> HttpResponseMessage httpResponseMessage = await
> client.GetAsync(apicall.ToString());
>HttpResponseMessage response = httpResponseMessage;
> if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
> { // put the data returend into a data object I have
> local.
> eRateReturn rate = await
> response.Content.ReadAsAsync();
>
>
>
> Here is eRateReturn class(s) for data:
> public class Rates
> {
> public float GBP { get; set; }
> public float CAD { get; set; }
> public float USD { get; set; }
> public float EUR { get; set; }
> }
>
> public class eRateReturn
> {
> public float timestamp { get; set; }
> public string Base { get; set; }
> public DateTime date { get; set; }
> public Rates rates {get; set;}
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:38 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reply Russell, I have now discovered this particular
> > thing also supports REST api, just trying to figure out oAuth
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
> > Russell
> > Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 14:30
> > To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> > Subject: Re: SOAP
> >
> > Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application
> > all in Web Service calls years ago.
> >
> > In general, the "service" is a replacement for a data store. You
> > ask for data from the service and it gives it to you in SOAP, xml that is.
> > What you actually receive is some sort of collection of data, that
> > may have collections within it. You could do the same thing in
> > arrays if you wanted in VFP.
> >
> > Now the data is yours to use at your desire. You may have to
> > package the data back into XML that mimics the data they sent you
> > for inserts, updates, maybe even deletes. Now through the "service"
> > you post that XML pack to them.
> >
> > Today the industry is changing the name from Web Service to API but
> > in general it works in much the same way.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:31 AM Chris Davis
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone able to share an example of working with a webservice
> > > purely in code?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Chris.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
> > > text/plain (text body -- kept)
> > > text/html
> > > ---
> > >
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4vU4GZ_aoG+OHRACRTCz5uN6XQtwSYat9+rjATdW==g...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly s
Re: SOAP
Chris:
I searched here: http://bfy.tw/Jl8C
and found this: https://archive.codeplex.com/?p=vfpoauth
HTH,
Ted
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:24 AM Chris Davis wrote:
> Thanks Stephen, I am struggling with oAuth at the moment, the
> documentation gives examples but obviously not in VFP and it looks like
> things like javascript and php include oauth modules.
>
> So if I can reword my question, has anyone got any oauth code
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
> Russell
> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 15:20
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: SOAP
>
> To be honest, REST is just a way that sets up an interaction in complex
> ways without the client knowing anything beforehand about the server and
> the resources it hosts. You define that the transmission is going to be
> HTTP and then follow the rules for it.
>
> Now your call to the API can be done from a web browser, an app on a phone
> or a tablet.
>
> here is something I wrote to get data for ExchangeRates.
> apicall.Clear(); // This is a string to hold the params for the call I
> am making for data
>
> apicall.Append("api/historical/" + EOM);
>
>
> apicall.Append(".json?app_id=bbfaf8b299c54f93811b2144f9d33c3e=GBP,EUR,CAD");
> // get the dates for use in the string
> HttpResponseMessage httpResponseMessage = await
> client.GetAsync(apicall.ToString());
>HttpResponseMessage response = httpResponseMessage;
> if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
> { // put the data returend into a data object I have
> local.
> eRateReturn rate = await
> response.Content.ReadAsAsync();
>
>
>
> Here is eRateReturn class(s) for data:
> public class Rates
> {
> public float GBP { get; set; }
> public float CAD { get; set; }
> public float USD { get; set; }
> public float EUR { get; set; }
> }
>
> public class eRateReturn
> {
> public float timestamp { get; set; }
> public string Base { get; set; }
> public DateTime date { get; set; }
> public Rates rates {get; set;}
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:38 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reply Russell, I have now discovered this particular
> > thing also supports REST api, just trying to figure out oAuth
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
> > Russell
> > Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 14:30
> > To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> > Subject: Re: SOAP
> >
> > Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application all
> > in Web Service calls years ago.
> >
> > In general, the "service" is a replacement for a data store. You ask
> > for data from the service and it gives it to you in SOAP, xml that is.
> > What you actually receive is some sort of collection of data, that may
> > have collections within it. You could do the same thing in arrays if
> > you wanted in VFP.
> >
> > Now the data is yours to use at your desire. You may have to package
> > the data back into XML that mimics the data they sent you for inserts,
> > updates, maybe even deletes. Now through the "service" you post that
> > XML pack to them.
> >
> > Today the industry is changing the name from Web Service to API but in
> > general it works in much the same way.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:31 AM Chris Davis
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone able to share an example of working with a webservice
> > > purely in code?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Chris.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
> > > text/plain (text body -- kept)
> > > text/html
> > > ---
> > >
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4vU4GZ_aoG+OHRACRTCz5uN6XQtwSYat9+rjATdW==g...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SOAP
Thanks Stephen, I am struggling with oAuth at the moment, the documentation
gives examples but obviously not in VFP and it looks like things like
javascript and php include oauth modules.
So if I can reword my question, has anyone got any oauth code
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 15:20
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: SOAP
To be honest, REST is just a way that sets up an interaction in complex ways
without the client knowing anything beforehand about the server and the
resources it hosts. You define that the transmission is going to be HTTP and
then follow the rules for it.
Now your call to the API can be done from a web browser, an app on a phone or a
tablet.
here is something I wrote to get data for ExchangeRates.
apicall.Clear(); // This is a string to hold the params for the call I am
making for data
apicall.Append("api/historical/" + EOM);
apicall.Append(".json?app_id=bbfaf8b299c54f93811b2144f9d33c3e=GBP,EUR,CAD");
// get the dates for use in the string
HttpResponseMessage httpResponseMessage = await
client.GetAsync(apicall.ToString());
HttpResponseMessage response = httpResponseMessage;
if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
{ // put the data returend into a data object I have
local.
eRateReturn rate = await
response.Content.ReadAsAsync();
Here is eRateReturn class(s) for data:
public class Rates
{
public float GBP { get; set; }
public float CAD { get; set; }
public float USD { get; set; }
public float EUR { get; set; }
}
public class eRateReturn
{
public float timestamp { get; set; }
public string Base { get; set; }
public DateTime date { get; set; }
public Rates rates {get; set;}
}
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:38 AM Chris Davis wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Russell, I have now discovered this particular
> thing also supports REST api, just trying to figure out oAuth
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
> Russell
> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 14:30
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: SOAP
>
> Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application all
> in Web Service calls years ago.
>
> In general, the "service" is a replacement for a data store. You ask
> for data from the service and it gives it to you in SOAP, xml that is.
> What you actually receive is some sort of collection of data, that may
> have collections within it. You could do the same thing in arrays if
> you wanted in VFP.
>
> Now the data is yours to use at your desire. You may have to package
> the data back into XML that mimics the data they sent you for inserts,
> updates, maybe even deletes. Now through the "service" you post that
> XML pack to them.
>
> Today the industry is changing the name from Web Service to API but in
> general it works in much the same way.
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:31 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>
> > Is anyone able to share an example of working with a webservice
> > purely in code?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Chris.
> >
> >
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
> > text/plain (text body -- kept)
> > text/html
> > ---
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmylo0pw-juzwev4c3edtvkbvr2owfjinst_pnwr3bg2...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Report [OT] Abuse:
http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/cajidmylo0pw-juzwev4c3edtvkbvr2owfjinst_pnwr3bg2...@mail.gmail.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cwlp265mb1668fc326deae27cc761f2158f...@cwlp265mb1668.gbrp265.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SOAP
To be honest, REST is just a way that sets up an interaction in complex
ways without the client knowing anything beforehand about the server and
the resources it hosts. You define that the transmission is going to be
HTTP and then follow the rules for it.
Now your call to the API can be done from a web browser, an app on a phone
or a tablet.
here is something I wrote to get data for ExchangeRates.
apicall.Clear(); // This is a string to hold the params for the call I am
making for data
apicall.Append("api/historical/" + EOM);
apicall.Append(".json?app_id=bbfaf8b299c54f93811b2144f9d33c3e=GBP,EUR,CAD");
// get the dates for use in the string
HttpResponseMessage httpResponseMessage = await
client.GetAsync(apicall.ToString());
HttpResponseMessage response = httpResponseMessage;
if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
{ // put the data returend into a data object I have
local.
eRateReturn rate = await
response.Content.ReadAsAsync();
Here is eRateReturn class(s) for data:
public class Rates
{
public float GBP { get; set; }
public float CAD { get; set; }
public float USD { get; set; }
public float EUR { get; set; }
}
public class eRateReturn
{
public float timestamp { get; set; }
public string Base { get; set; }
public DateTime date { get; set; }
public Rates rates {get; set;}
}
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:38 AM Chris Davis wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Russell, I have now discovered this particular thing
> also supports REST api, just trying to figure out oAuth
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen
> Russell
> Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 14:30
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: SOAP
>
> Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application all in
> Web Service calls years ago.
>
> In general, the "service" is a replacement for a data store. You ask for
> data from the service and it gives it to you in SOAP, xml that is. What
> you actually receive is some sort of collection of data, that may have
> collections within it. You could do the same thing in arrays if you wanted
> in VFP.
>
> Now the data is yours to use at your desire. You may have to package the
> data back into XML that mimics the data they sent you for inserts, updates,
> maybe even deletes. Now through the "service" you post that XML pack to
> them.
>
> Today the industry is changing the name from Web Service to API but in
> general it works in much the same way.
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:31 AM Chris Davis wrote:
>
> > Is anyone able to share an example of working with a webservice purely
> > in code?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Chris.
> >
> >
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
> > text/plain (text body -- kept)
> > text/html
> > ---
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmylo0pw-juzwev4c3edtvkbvr2owfjinst_pnwr3bg2...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SOAP
Chris There are several articles on Web Services that you may find useful on Rick Strahl's web site (west-wind.com) Paul -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Chris Davis Sent: 06 September 2018 13:31 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: SOAP Sent by an external sender -- Is anyone able to share an example of working with a webservice purely in code? Thanks Chris. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/sn1pr0201mb18565842f3fcdce56482f665a1...@sn1pr0201mb1856.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SOAP
Thanks for the reply Russell, I have now discovered this particular thing also supports REST api, just trying to figure out oAuth -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Thursday, 06 September 2018 14:30 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: SOAP Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application all in Web Service calls years ago. In general, the "service" is a replacement for a data store. You ask for data from the service and it gives it to you in SOAP, xml that is. What you actually receive is some sort of collection of data, that may have collections within it. You could do the same thing in arrays if you wanted in VFP. Now the data is yours to use at your desire. You may have to package the data back into XML that mimics the data they sent you for inserts, updates, maybe even deletes. Now through the "service" you post that XML pack to them. Today the industry is changing the name from Web Service to API but in general it works in much the same way. On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:31 AM Chris Davis wrote: > Is anyone able to share an example of working with a webservice purely > in code? > > Thanks > > Chris. > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cwlp265mb1668f3fe6075f25c5cdff3598f...@cwlp265mb1668.gbrp265.prod.outlook.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SOAP
Too bad that Alan is no longer among us, he redid his application all in Web Service calls years ago. In general, the "service" is a replacement for a data store. You ask for data from the service and it gives it to you in SOAP, xml that is. What you actually receive is some sort of collection of data, that may have collections within it. You could do the same thing in arrays if you wanted in VFP. Now the data is yours to use at your desire. You may have to package the data back into XML that mimics the data they sent you for inserts, updates, maybe even deletes. Now through the "service" you post that XML pack to them. Today the industry is changing the name from Web Service to API but in general it works in much the same way. On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:31 AM Chris Davis wrote: > Is anyone able to share an example of working with a webservice purely in > code? > > Thanks > > Chris. > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmy+szmtoxrys7ovr92qeq88ruqs8h7dc1roi15bnadn...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
SOAP
Is anyone able to share an example of working with a webservice purely in code? Thanks Chris. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cwlp265mb166863e56abb06e5999f1f988f...@cwlp265mb1668.gbrp265.prod.outlook.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Using Soap from non web server machine? -- AARGH!!!!
caveat - I have never got SOAP to work -
but it's easy to get VFP to consume xml from a website/ URL - e.g. try this:
LOCAL cURL, oHttp as xmlhttp
cURL = "http://www.hawthorn-cottage.com/tryText.asp;
oHttp = createobject("Microsoft.XmlHttp")
oHttp.Open("POST", cURL, .F.) && Synchronous
oHttp.Send("")
?oHttp.ResponseText
LOCAL oDom as xmldom
oDom = CREATEOBJECT("Microsoft.xmldom") && ??
oDom = oHttp.responseXML && ??
?oDom.baseName && ''
?oDom.nodeName && 'document'
RELEASE ALL
CLEAR ALL
On 22/03/2016 00:23, Vince Teachout wrote:
...
I just need to get the returning xml data to the database server,
parse it, and apply to the data set.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/56f0e7ba.2090...@hawthorncottage.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Using Soap from non web server machine? -- AARGH!!!!
On 3/21/2016 2:20 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: I agree with your understanding of those words. What do you need to do you with the information in the callback? A C# WebAPI self-hosted project could be setup to handle it. A php or python project could be setup as well. I just need to get the returning xml data to the database server, parse it, and apply to the data set. Now that a web server is definitely involved, it actually becomes simpler. I should still be able to push the initial request from VFP as before and get the initial "rejected/pending" response back. Our web guy can write the PHP "listener" on our separate web server, and anything that comes back will be dumped to a table in a database on our data server. (The web server already has working access to the data server, so that's not a problem) I'd modify the program to set a flag if a request was sent, then start a timer to check the database if the flag is set. The other option, if we find it easier, is to dust off the old WAMP server that used to run the website, and is still on the data server, set it to only accept data from the one IP address, and just run the listener on that. In any event, I think things just got a little easier. :-) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/56f04345.9040...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Using Soap from non web server machine? -- AARGH!!!!
Vince Teachout wrote on 2016-03-21: > Well, finally got deep into the documentation provided by the vendor: > > "Testing Data - Field and relationship validation will be performed. > Fields will be checked for accuracy and completeness as well as compared > to other relational fields... > > *The Response will be sent to the customer's incoming post-back URL when > the system is ready (usually within minutes).* >The will indicate whether the Request resulted in a > 'Success" or was "Rejected.'" > > That sounds pretty clearly to me that I'll have to have a web service > running on a web server. :-( > Vince, I agree with your understanding of those words. What do you need to do you with the information in the callback? A C# WebAPI self-hosted project could be setup to handle it. A php or python project could be setup as well. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/002201d1839e$65778c60$3066a520$@powerchurch.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Using Soap from non web server machine? -- AARGH!!!!
Well, finally got deep into the documentation provided by the vendor: "Testing Data – Field and relationship validation will be performed. Fields will be checked for accuracy and completeness as well as compared to other relational fields... *The Response will be sent to the customer’s incoming post-back URL when the system is ready (usually within minutes).* The will indicate whether the Request resulted in a 'Success” or was “Rejected.'" That sounds pretty clearly to me that I'll have to have a web service running on a web server. :-( ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/56f02a3b.7090...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Using Soap from non web server machine?
"billable" Ah, music to my ears! On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Vince Teachout <tea...@taconic.net> wrote: > On 3/21/2016 11:01 AM, Ted Roche wrote: > >> But the basic answer is that "FoxPro can do SOAP." > > > What I'm understanding from the responses is: 1)You can do it, 2)you DON'T > need a web server, 3)and it will be hard work. > > 1) I was pretty sure of to begin with > 2) Is what I was worried about, and it seems like I'm good to go without a > web server > 3) Doesn't scare me, especially as it's billable! :-) > > > Thanks, all! > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4v_cum6f08mrnokpnw9p++sroresoylt_00kxj+9mq...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Using Soap from non web server machine?
On 3/21/2016 11:01 AM, Ted Roche wrote: But the basic answer is that "FoxPro can do SOAP." What I'm understanding from the responses is: 1)You can do it, 2)you DON'T need a web server, 3)and it will be hard work. 1) I was pretty sure of to begin with 2) Is what I was worried about, and it seems like I'm good to go without a web server 3) Doesn't scare me, especially as it's billable! :-) Thanks, all! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/56f0128a.8000...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Using Soap from non web server machine?
On 3/21/2016 10:57 AM, Tracy Pearson wrote: VFP is not multi-threaded, don't expect it to be a service that responds to multiple clients. Something needs to instantiate multiple instances of VFP to do that. (VFP being an ISAPI control in IIS. VFP COM in a C# WCF project.) No, this will be a single client that will send out a user-initiated request to a web service URL, and wait for a response. It will time out after some X seconds, but that's not supposed to happen. (haha) So that doesn't sound like an issue. The other thing would be when it does time out, their server will hold responses in a queue, and I would want to be able to send a request to the queue and handle responses. Again, a single request. So I think I'm good, there. There are multiple ways to do SOAP. I understand Rick Strahl has created a good framework for this. I'm glad I got that framework then! Thanks! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/56f011ff.2070...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Using Soap from non web server machine?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Vince Teachout <tea...@taconic.net> wrote: > > If I'm understanding Ted's response correctly, though, I can do both send > and receive from a VFP program on the MS server, which would be perfect for > me. Thanks! > Well, what you know when you say "the vendor uses SOAP" isn't much more than saying "the vendor uses electricity -- can I do that from VFP?" The answer is "Yeah, but..." Simple Object Access Protocol is MS's "me, too!" answer to low-level messaging on the internet. In simple form, you send a properly formatted "What's up?" to a SOAP API on a server, and it says "Wazzup!" back to you. Of course, from there, it gets way more complex: there's authorization/login, authentication, properly formatting your request and decrypting their response, there's WSDL as a sort of web service description language, and of course there are incompatible versions of SOAP 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0. And almost no one actually implements everything to the spec, so there's always some adjustment to get things working right. But the basic answer is that "FoxPro can do SOAP." -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4t7=7c+z0mzks6bxserpxy3wd8niriya-68nsjnbud...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Using Soap from non web server machine?
Vince Teachout wrote on 2016-03-21: > On 3/21/2016 10:06 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: > My guess is that you need to deal with their web service? "a SOAP > solution which will send claim information out to a site" > > They will post back to your web service as well? "and return responses." > > Correct. > >> You have a Web presence already. "We have a separate web server, on a >> linux box, that can access the MS machine." >> >> Just put up a web service on that web server to push to them as needed as >> well as wrote the reply you get back from them. >> > That was my understanding, and my concern is I don't have any tools to > write a web service for a Linux box. (Unless a web-service is something > that's agnostic, and I can write it on my vfp machine, and then have it > run on the LAMP machine?) > > If I'm understanding Ted's response correctly, though, I can do both > send and receive from a VFP program on the MS server, which would be > perfect for me. Thanks! > Vince, VFP is not multi-threaded, don't expect it to be a service that responds to multiple clients. Something needs to instantiate multiple instances of VFP to do that. (VFP being an ISAPI control in IIS. VFP COM in a C# WCF project.) There are multiple ways to do SOAP. I understand Rick Strahl has created a good framework for this. I used the tools provided with VFP to build an internal project. It was a challenge to debug. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000e01d18381$f1cb56f0$d56204d0$@powerchurch.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Using Soap from non web server machine?
You have to read the requirements from this other business in particular the reply message. Will they send it to you and you have to receive, catch it at any time? Or is it an automatic return from the soap message you initially send? I have done a few service apps and they are a lot of work as they start to grow in capability. Heads up on the communication with their service. In some cases after you pass security checks they will send you an empty document, xml object in reality that is schema. You have to put in the correct settings and pass it back for them to get to the step you want to be at, submission of your soap message. I had to interact with local county service for court data. After security they would send a what type of data are you interested in form. My situation was always pulling data for local consumption instead of uploading data. You may have it a lot easier. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Vince Teachout <tea...@taconic.net> wrote: > On 3/21/2016 10:06 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: > >> My guess is that you need to deal with their web service? "a SOAP >> solution which will send claim information out to a site" >> >> They will post back to your web service as well? "and return responses." >> > > Correct. > > You have a Web presence already. "We have a separate web server, on a >> linux box, that can access the MS machine." >> > > Just put up a web service on that web server to push to them as needed as >> well as wrote the reply you get back from them. >> > > That was my understanding, and my concern is I don't have any tools to > write a web service for a Linux box. (Unless a web-service is something > that's agnostic, and I can write it on my vfp machine, and then have it run > on the LAMP machine?) > > If I'm understanding Ted's response correctly, though, I can do both send > and receive from a VFP program on the MS server, which would be perfect for > me. Thanks! > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmy+fcatql9pbfp78hjrjm0mwzh67ac3hmkxr6e5d+7n...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Using Soap from non web server machine?
On 3/21/2016 10:06 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: My guess is that you need to deal with their web service? "a SOAP solution which will send claim information out to a site" They will post back to your web service as well? "and return responses." Correct. You have a Web presence already. "We have a separate web server, on a linux box, that can access the MS machine." Just put up a web service on that web server to push to them as needed as well as wrote the reply you get back from them. That was my understanding, and my concern is I don't have any tools to write a web service for a Linux box. (Unless a web-service is something that's agnostic, and I can write it on my vfp machine, and then have it run on the LAMP machine?) If I'm understanding Ted's response correctly, though, I can do both send and receive from a VFP program on the MS server, which would be perfect for me. Thanks! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/56f0045a.9010...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Using Soap from non web server machine?
On 3/21/2016 10:05 AM, Ted Roche wrote: I'm RTFM-ing now, but one thing that concerns me, is that if I understand this correctly, I need a web server to get responses back. Is this correct? Nope. SOAP is just an API for sending and receiving packets of data over the internet. Depending on how the services are set up, you should be able to "consume" (send data and get responses) from a web service set up by the other party (who likely has a web server to do this) with a FoxPro app. So I should be able to do this from my MS Server, which is not running a web server, purely in VFP? This gives me hope! :-) Which FMs are you reading? Rick Strahl's west-wind.com site has some of the best references. There's also some good stuff on the Fox Wiki, and in the archives here. We purchased and installed WestWind client, precisely because it has soap and xml classes in it. Started RTFM, but got hung up with something, decided to take a break, and read the older MS "walkthrough" That's when I started to get concerned. I think I'll switch back to Strahl's and more recent documentation. Thanks! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/56f003bb.9060...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Using Soap from non web server machine?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Vince Teachout <vi...@recordables.com> wrote: > After never needing it for 20 years, I now need to develop and implement a > SOAP solution which will send claim information out to a site, and return > responses. My condolences. > I'm RTFM-ing now, but one thing that concerns me, is that if I understand > this correctly, I need a web server to get responses back. Is this correct? Nope. SOAP is just an API for sending and receiving packets of data over the internet. Depending on how the services are set up, you should be able to "consume" (send data and get responses) from a web service set up by the other party (who likely has a web server to do this) with a FoxPro app. It is possible to configure a VFP app with appropriate web server software to act as the server in this case, but you'll need to look at the documentation supplied by the vendor to determine what services they offer and what they expect you to provide. Which FMs are you reading? Rick Strahl's west-wind.com site has some of the best references. There's also some good stuff on the Fox Wiki, and in the archives here. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4viY+oYm1BcFPYfchPZU=D=_hxd6rbzzm-rrahcvg3...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Using Soap from non web server machine?
My guess is that you need to deal with their web service? "a SOAP solution which will send claim information out to a site" They will post back to your web service as well? "and return responses." You have a Web presence already. "We have a separate web server, on a linux box, that can access the MS machine." Just put up a web service on that web server to push to them as needed as well as wrote the reply you get back from them. Sounded easy right? Not necessarily the reality in the end. Basically you are going to send out an XML message for them to process. Expect to have a security layer or two as protection for you and them that need to be confirmed before you pass that XML message of the claim. When they respond back you have to have the security set as well and then receive the xml from them, parse it and do what needs to be done depending on your logic. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Vince Teachout <vi...@recordables.com> wrote: > After never needing it for 20 years, I now need to develop and implement a > SOAP solution which will send claim information out to a site, and return > responses. > > I'm RTFM-ing now, but one thing that concerns me, is that if I understand > this correctly, I need a web server to get responses back. Is this correct? > > We have a MS database server where the data, and this application would > live. We have a separate web server, on a linux box, that can access the > MS machine. > > If I write this, > 1) can I send this request out from the DB Server, and get a response back? > 2) Send something to the web server, have the server send and receive the > request and send it back to the db server? > 3) run a very limited web server which would only listen for the client's > ip range, in order to send/get requests? > > I'm not looking for details, I just need an idea of the general direction > I need to head. If I could do 1) that would be awesome, but if I'm > understanding what I'm reading so far, I'll need to do 2 or 3. > > Would appreciate clues. Thank you! > > > -- > > Vince Teachout > Senior Analyst > Recordables, Inc. > 312-288-8566 > > -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > mQENBE2o8OkBCADeegwZu8ZeYxoAwuTLcl1rEXT2fovoCSSHjyAUBrcezJDttLh7 > pMCYVdwvwPesnaA4M05gv1VPhlgg+tjkyBxiqhZja7URMNasDvmzIyzFrh6Eedpf > Vn8zf5SEzpi6PQuI4KKEvexL7eTilPtnB+lJmaVVDxDI1rUk6jsHAJ1FDAZDnRab > PZfWt6woLhzIv3obq07dp1fnRr9CPG5OVjUfzUwLYcCy6eUw6555vnwnHeZG+W6c > mAZEV0082sk00NcSz1FoE8hA+ULZjkRiIBhU7viLJ12Tpw5VcsCM6UjooOds7OhQ > 3wYDYwBPy7WC9eH/3A3RGuZ8pfc0AT7e//FjABEBAAG0NVZpbmNlIFRlYWNob3V0 > ICgyMDExMDQxNS1mb3Rzb3RhKSA8dmluY2VAY2FyYWNhbC5uZXQ+iQE4BBMBAgAi > BQJNqPDpAhsPBgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRCpaAY+vVSIgxjt > B/0UPUl6ejbu0w1zhCfAVjqckKZoLbFqN7GUjPhKRpb3Fof5chzbI8/RYjgSiJF2 > dXjKOH4xyXTDQ1M7zucjLC+3GNLb1y9N803z5FMA6pTtj3ySYPhY+r4yl6TiZDs8 > 8Re+hRA3e06gTy1N4oF24LgDckf78DPWMeqqKjowT623Ttvs1QBTCj3OIvbW2X+i > XJWalOaKFCSUPaZX6zBaUDBT3fZ0sLnAUtDF0m7i1R7HKVI0RHyHWYlQURvV0glQ > 1JSLGEsiHhWyetfbnz0hk4dZ/25S0WU+Mwq4CdEAluj6EdPCG4DurlB7TQogzZJ+ > 8sqPYq1pQ5WTnsYQU5yIUHUm > =LHkH > -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMY+YAT5JppKe=a6qr-5petnqnwgfrw0d-dytkp-zzz9...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Using Soap from non web server machine?
After never needing it for 20 years, I now need to develop and implement a SOAP solution which will send claim information out to a site, and return responses. I'm RTFM-ing now, but one thing that concerns me, is that if I understand this correctly, I need a web server to get responses back. Is this correct? We have a MS database server where the data, and this application would live. We have a separate web server, on a linux box, that can access the MS machine. If I write this, 1) can I send this request out from the DB Server, and get a response back? 2) Send something to the web server, have the server send and receive the request and send it back to the db server? 3) run a very limited web server which would only listen for the client's ip range, in order to send/get requests? I'm not looking for details, I just need an idea of the general direction I need to head. If I could do 1) that would be awesome, but if I'm understanding what I'm reading so far, I'll need to do 2 or 3. Would appreciate clues. Thank you! -- Vince Teachout Senior Analyst Recordables, Inc. 312-288-8566 -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v2 mQENBE2o8OkBCADeegwZu8ZeYxoAwuTLcl1rEXT2fovoCSSHjyAUBrcezJDttLh7 pMCYVdwvwPesnaA4M05gv1VPhlgg+tjkyBxiqhZja7URMNasDvmzIyzFrh6Eedpf Vn8zf5SEzpi6PQuI4KKEvexL7eTilPtnB+lJmaVVDxDI1rUk6jsHAJ1FDAZDnRab PZfWt6woLhzIv3obq07dp1fnRr9CPG5OVjUfzUwLYcCy6eUw6555vnwnHeZG+W6c mAZEV0082sk00NcSz1FoE8hA+ULZjkRiIBhU7viLJ12Tpw5VcsCM6UjooOds7OhQ 3wYDYwBPy7WC9eH/3A3RGuZ8pfc0AT7e//FjABEBAAG0NVZpbmNlIFRlYWNob3V0 ICgyMDExMDQxNS1mb3Rzb3RhKSA8dmluY2VAY2FyYWNhbC5uZXQ+iQE4BBMBAgAi BQJNqPDpAhsPBgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRCpaAY+vVSIgxjt B/0UPUl6ejbu0w1zhCfAVjqckKZoLbFqN7GUjPhKRpb3Fof5chzbI8/RYjgSiJF2 dXjKOH4xyXTDQ1M7zucjLC+3GNLb1y9N803z5FMA6pTtj3ySYPhY+r4yl6TiZDs8 8Re+hRA3e06gTy1N4oF24LgDckf78DPWMeqqKjowT623Ttvs1QBTCj3OIvbW2X+i XJWalOaKFCSUPaZX6zBaUDBT3fZ0sLnAUtDF0m7i1R7HKVI0RHyHWYlQURvV0glQ 1JSLGEsiHhWyetfbnz0hk4dZ/25S0WU+Mwq4CdEAluj6EdPCG4DurlB7TQogzZJ+ 8sqPYq1pQ5WTnsYQU5yIUHUm =LHkH -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/56effa71.9040...@recordables.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
Ok, to continue with this matter, I can confirm that any COM+ component can be automatically published as a web-service without the need of the Soap Toolkit on Windows Server 2003. The bad news is that apparently Microsoft decided to quit this good thing to replace it with WCF. I hate them :_( https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/c37ac0cb-96c7-405e-8acc-64061afa2e5f/com-as-xml-web-services-on-windows-7-uses-soap-setting?forum=windowsgeneraldevelopmentissues 2015-06-06 19:04 GMT+02:00 Fernando D. Bozzo fdbo...@gmail.com: I'm testing this, and found that when you configure COM+ to use Soap (I've using this article: http://www.kehm.de/henrik/blog/files/a5019da836d29c3cee972f5f62b5a8bd-19.html), then every time I replace the component on COM+ console (test_service.dll), a new dll is generated on a .net framework directory, inside the Windows directory (test_serviceSoapLib.dll), then the .net platform is receiving the Soap message and is calling my VFP9 MTDLL component. Awesome! So now I don't understand what part was playing the Soap Toolkit on the server, if it is not necessary for the web-service to function, and don't unserstand the DLL that .net generates automatically based on mine on VFP9. Did anybody know that? It's something new to me, totally unexpected. Up to now I've believed that for .net answering soap messages, then a .net web-service was necessary. Next week I'll try to reproduce this in a 2K12 virtual server (on which Soap Toolkit can't be installed), and if this works, I will report back. Regards.- 2015-06-06 14:55 GMT+02:00 Fernando D. Bozzo fdbo...@gmail.com: For years I've convinced that MSSoap Toolkit was indispensable on the server side for answering Soap requests, and lately I've been searching on the web about how to keep using existent web-services without it, replacing it with something else. Today I've uninstalled the soap toolkit from a virtual Windows Server 2003 SP2, and for my annoyance, the web-services keep working, so... Can somebody explain what component is answering the soap requests and passing the parameters to the components? Thanks! --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cagq_jukdtdnoyehf7tn13yvxpht0zimxsramim3zvuvfc77...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Fernando D. Bozzo fdbo...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, to continue with this matter, I can confirm that any COM+ component can be automatically published as a web-service without the need of the Soap Toolkit on Windows Server 2003. The bad news is that apparently Microsoft decided to quit this good thing to replace it with WCF. I hate them :_( https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/c37ac0cb-96c7-405e-8acc-64061afa2e5f/com-as-xml-web-services-on-windows-7-uses-soap-setting?forum=windowsgeneraldevelopmentissues - WCF is so much better from my experience in making them and publishing them for use. WCF does json very well. WCF you have contract objects that other languages can put in easily, java for sure as well as python. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyjpvxoh_2kjtre8phynb2tumvzsvnhx8mqch2rccn1...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
Hi Stephen ; The problem is that we have a lot of legacy code that can't be migrated right now just because Microsoft thinks it is better the other way, when the code is working OK. This desicion is very hostile for legacy systems :-( El 10/06/2015 16:53, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com escribió: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Fernando D. Bozzo fdbo...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, to continue with this matter, I can confirm that any COM+ component can be automatically published as a web-service without the need of the Soap Toolkit on Windows Server 2003. The bad news is that apparently Microsoft decided to quit this good thing to replace it with WCF. I hate them :_( https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/c37ac0cb-96c7-405e-8acc-64061afa2e5f/com-as-xml-web-services-on-windows-7-uses-soap-setting?forum=windowsgeneraldevelopmentissues - WCF is so much better from my experience in making them and publishing them for use. WCF does json very well. WCF you have contract objects that other languages can put in easily, java for sure as well as python. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cagq_jukckkz6vmbyctzrndiameovo+n+e+tc1-ejousmsxq...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
Fernando D. Bozzo wrote on 2015-06-10: Ok, to continue with this matter, I can confirm that any COM+ component can be automatically published as a web-service without the need of the Soap Toolkit on Windows Server 2003. The bad news is that apparently Microsoft decided to quit this good thing to replace it with WCF. I hate them :_( https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/c37ac0cb-96c7-405e -8acc-64061afa2e5f/com-as-xml-web-services-on-windows-7-uses-soap-setting?fo rum=windowsgeneraldevelopmentissues Fernando, COM+ is difficult to test and debug. Not impossible. The fact that it is difficult, has left many COM+ objects with security problems. COM+ is not going away anytime soon. Using them in IIS is not something I want to repeat. Though I do maintain one in house. I have written one process using WCF that uses VFP9 COM DLL to work with the VFP tables. I later changed the process to use WebAPI that required a change to the VFP9 COM DLL. I'm still learning. I like WebAPI, the calling code can request a return type of XML and it returns it. It will return JSON by default. The easiest way to debug all of that is to create a huge log detailing things. With WebAPI configuration settings, the debug build can have huge amounts of logging, and the release version can easily turn all that off. Though it needs to be setup and the logging needs to be programmed. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000101d0a396$7a0b7ee0$6e227ca0$@powerchurch.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
Hi Tracy, I know COM+ is difficult to test/debug, but this is not really the problem right now. I'm trying to find a web to publish existing components as web-services. Windows Server 2003 do that automatically activating a Uses Soap option, but I don't know how to do it on newver Server versions, and have read many many documents. If you know something about it, will be great :) By the way, it's very interesting all you said aboit WebAPI. I will take a look to it when I get some time. Best Regards.- Fernando, COM+ is difficult to test and debug. Not impossible. The fact that it is difficult, has left many COM+ objects with security problems. COM+ is not going away anytime soon. Using them in IIS is not something I want to repeat. Though I do maintain one in house. I have written one process using WCF that uses VFP9 COM DLL to work with the VFP tables. I later changed the process to use WebAPI that required a change to the VFP9 COM DLL. I'm still learning. I like WebAPI, the calling code can request a return type of XML and it returns it. It will return JSON by default. The easiest way to debug all of that is to create a huge log detailing things. With WebAPI configuration settings, the debug build can have huge amounts of logging, and the release version can easily turn all that off. Though it needs to be setup and the logging needs to be programmed. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGQ_JunDdJnMFXThmRb0k6ASTh1fUUgke9CsjCoHxjQpuc0o=a...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
I assume I read you correct. When you create a new visual studio project, you can select the .net version to use. Pick 2.0 and you can make a project. I forgot which project type to pick, but it should be the old one prior to WCF. My work computers are off for the night but you should find it. If I remember right, and excuse me if not, it's in c# web. I'm not sure where the uses soap comes into it. I left asp.net and c# to do the soap thing and added the vfp.dll to the project. It just treats it as a dll, not soap. And the VS c# project seems to take care of the soap, including the WSDL. Once the vfp.dll is added as a component you can just see it in the c# parts. I do my work on either a 2003 server, for the soap stuff, or a win 8.1 machine for WCF. Yes the c# part is a bridge and is the soap part. I have not had to play with soap in vfp other than a client. I'm about to start a trip over the pond to Vancouver and a few other USA stops so I may not respond very quick. I would say though that go with Steve's advice and go WCF. Its future proof, at least this week. And you can use the vfp.dll the same way. Al -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fernando D. Bozzo Sent: 10 June 2015 19:13 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit? Hi Allen: And how I do that? I've searching all the web looking how to activate the SOAP section in the Activation page of the COM+ console, and can't find how to do it. Right now, I just check the Uses Soap, drop the VFP9 MTDLL component on the COM+ console, and this only action automatically fires some code in .Net 2.0 that creates the WSDL file, create a .Net (seems to me) bridge file using GAC and other .Net components, and this exposes the web-service. All this is automatic. Can you, please, guide me on how this must be done now on Windows Server 2008 or 2012? Very thanks.- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/006701d0a3a2$ebbc73d0$c3355b70$@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
Hi Allen: And how I do that? I've searching all the web looking how to activate the SOAP section in the Activation page of the COM+ console, and can't find how to do it. Right now, I just check the Uses Soap, drop the VFP9 MTDLL component on the COM+ console, and this only action automatically fires some code in .Net 2.0 that creates the WSDL file, create a .Net (seems to me) bridge file using GAC and other .Net components, and this exposes the web-service. All this is automatic. Can you, please, guide me on how this must be done now on Windows Server 2008 or 2012? Very thanks.- 2015-06-10 17:17 GMT+02:00 Allen pro...@gatwicksoftware.com: You can still use the old ways. You just can't use the latest .net I think you need to pick .net 2.0 Al --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cagq_juny8cmqfaqxmfw4p3cnprsu11wurtymzm5grgadviy...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
You can still use the old ways. You just can't use the latest .net I think you need to pick .net 2.0 Al -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fernando D. Bozzo Sent: 10 June 2015 17:03 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit? Hi Stephen ; The problem is that we have a lot of legacy code that can't be migrated right now just because Microsoft thinks it is better the other way, when the code is working OK. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/005001d0a390$9adf7be0$d09e73a0$@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
It seems that not much people is using VFP services. There are answers about Java and other languages, but not in VFP :-( 2015-06-06 19:04 GMT+02:00 Fernando D. Bozzo fdbo...@gmail.com: I'm testing this, and found that when you configure COM+ to use Soap (I've using this article: http://www.kehm.de/henrik/blog/files/a5019da836d29c3cee972f5f62b5a8bd-19.html), then every time I replace the component on COM+ console (test_service.dll), a new dll is generated on a .net framework directory, inside the Windows directory (test_serviceSoapLib.dll), then the .net platform is receiving the Soap message and is calling my VFP9 MTDLL component. Awesome! So now I don't understand what part was playing the Soap Toolkit on the server, if it is not necessary for the web-service to function, and don't unserstand the DLL that .net generates automatically based on mine on VFP9. Did anybody know that? It's something new to me, totally unexpected. Up to now I've believed that for .net answering soap messages, then a .net web-service was necessary. Next week I'll try to reproduce this in a 2K12 virtual server (on which Soap Toolkit can't be installed), and if this works, I will report back. Regards.- 2015-06-06 14:55 GMT+02:00 Fernando D. Bozzo fdbo...@gmail.com: For years I've convinced that MSSoap Toolkit was indispensable on the server side for answering Soap requests, and lately I've been searching on the web about how to keep using existent web-services without it, replacing it with something else. Today I've uninstalled the soap toolkit from a virtual Windows Server 2003 SP2, and for my annoyance, the web-services keep working, so... Can somebody explain what component is answering the soap requests and passing the parameters to the components? Thanks! --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cagq_jumfsbmu6nvqysfqlpao5blzwm16t1sghhabzeexgl6...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 10:59 AM, AndyHC jarnd...@gmail.com wrote: * see AVFP ? AVFP = Alien Versus F'in Predator? AVFP = Anti-Visual-FoxPro? AVFP = Association for the Vindication of FoxPro? AVFP = Association for Veterinary Family Practice? (really, the internet says so! and the dot-org) AVFP =ALLGEMEINER VERMÖGENS UND FINANZ PARTNER (the dot-com)? AVFP = Arizona Verde Fire Protection, Inc. (the dot-net)? Got me stumped. What's your acronym mean? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4sbriB0u8+bh6WOO_aFokdrQzozOguQ=+Te8HL=R5=w...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
Active VFP I would imagine. http://activevfp.codeplex.com/ -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm On Sun, 7 Jun 2015, at 05:07 PM, Ted Roche wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 10:59 AM, AndyHC jarnd...@gmail.com wrote: * see AVFP ? AVFP = Alien Versus F'in Predator? AVFP = Anti-Visual-FoxPro? AVFP = Association for the Vindication of FoxPro? AVFP = Association for Veterinary Family Practice? (really, the internet says so! and the dot-org) AVFP =ALLGEMEINER VERMÖGENS UND FINANZ PARTNER (the dot-com)? AVFP = Arizona Verde Fire Protection, Inc. (the dot-net)? Got me stumped. What's your acronym mean? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1433693765.3017334.289040857.6b842...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
I recently discovered*, somewhat to my surprise, that vfp .exe's contain a manifest. Maybe that's something to do with it? * see AVFP ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/55745c45.3070...@hawthorncottage.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
For years I've convinced that MSSoap Toolkit was indispensable on the server side for answering Soap requests, and lately I've been searching on the web about how to keep using existent web-services without it, replacing it with something else. Today I've uninstalled the soap toolkit from a virtual Windows Server 2003 SP2, and for my annoyance, the web-services keep working, so... Can somebody explain what component is answering the soap requests and passing the parameters to the components? Thanks! --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cagq_juk0+yn_3e0oqazbfo9fhyufld3bwv2xjhxcbpzujd9...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: W2K3 - Serving web-services without soap toolkit?
I'm testing this, and found that when you configure COM+ to use Soap (I've using this article: http://www.kehm.de/henrik/blog/files/a5019da836d29c3cee972f5f62b5a8bd-19.html), then every time I replace the component on COM+ console (test_service.dll), a new dll is generated on a .net framework directory, inside the Windows directory (test_serviceSoapLib.dll), then the .net platform is receiving the Soap message and is calling my VFP9 MTDLL component. Awesome! So now I don't understand what part was playing the Soap Toolkit on the server, if it is not necessary for the web-service to function, and don't unserstand the DLL that .net generates automatically based on mine on VFP9. Did anybody know that? It's something new to me, totally unexpected. Up to now I've believed that for .net answering soap messages, then a .net web-service was necessary. Next week I'll try to reproduce this in a 2K12 virtual server (on which Soap Toolkit can't be installed), and if this works, I will report back. Regards.- 2015-06-06 14:55 GMT+02:00 Fernando D. Bozzo fdbo...@gmail.com: For years I've convinced that MSSoap Toolkit was indispensable on the server side for answering Soap requests, and lately I've been searching on the web about how to keep using existent web-services without it, replacing it with something else. Today I've uninstalled the soap toolkit from a virtual Windows Server 2003 SP2, and for my annoyance, the web-services keep working, so... Can somebody explain what component is answering the soap requests and passing the parameters to the components? Thanks! --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGQ_Juk17VEbZfEd2F6PcbOf3Ojro2s=fgfp8z_u68i2puq...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Soap
Hi foxgang. I am playing with web services again. No problem they are easy, but with VFP9 it needs soap 3 to be on the machine. Soap 3 is ancient and I wonder if there is a newer way. Al ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/001c01ce4579$66053620$320fa260$@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Soap
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013, at 09:04 AM, Allen wrote: Hi foxgang. I am playing with web services again. No problem they are easy, but with VFP9 it needs soap 3 to be on the machine. Soap 3 is ancient and I wonder if there is a newer way. There's always a newer way in this game. This link might give you some things to think about: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6166746/why-use-soap-for-webservices ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1367310335.8597.140661224590465.5067f...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Soap
Thanks Alan I will have to see how to get this to work with VFP9 web services Al -Original Message- There's always a newer way in this game. This link might give you some things to think about: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6166746/why-use-soap-for-webservices ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/001801ce458c$c98f1ae0$5cad50a0$@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Soap testing
Hi FoxGang I have a web service and would like to test it using an XML file I took that came from the calling web site. Its a complex one. What I’m after is a way of taking the XML that came down to my service, and using another program, to call the web service without bothering with the web site that is calling it (out of my control) for test purposes. I hope that makes sense Al --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CA751343592F4D69855894A7A3C8EDCF@gslredacer ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Soap testing
You probably want something like SOAP UI (http://www.soapui.org) - I seem to remember Microsoft used to have a free one also. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1328803581.20944.140661034373...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] USA readers Are you trying to stop SOAP?
I definitely want to stop SOAP as well. Terrible. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1326356746.4029.140661022422...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] USA readers Are you trying to stop SOAP?
Alan Bourke wrote: I definitely want to stop SOAP as well. Terrible. Hi Alan, Pippa as well? Misspell one, misspell the other . . . SOAP is not SOPA Pippa is not Pipa http://wordpress.org/news/2012/01/help-stop-sopa-pipa/ Soap is something that might be used in the shower. SOPA is Stop Online Piracy Act, a power grab over the Internet that, if enacted, will eventually be found unconstitutional after millions of businesses and individuals are destroyed. Pippa is Kate Middleton's sister. Pipa is SOPA's companion bill in the Senate. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f0eaa68.7090...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] USA readers Are you trying to stop SOAP?
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012, at 04:39 AM, Pete Theisen wrote: Alan Bourke wrote: Pippa as well? Misspell one, misspell the other . . . SOAP is not SOPA I was making a lame joke about how crap Simple Object Access Protocol can be. ;) -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1326377578.20485.140661022529...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] USA readers Are you trying to stop SOAP?
Stephen, I completely agree and to give an example, whilst I don't agree with almost anything Michael and Pete says should there be a far left wing Communist dictator Kenyan President opposed to free speech, I will fight for their right to express their views to their so call death panel .. or is that not what it meant? Adam. On 11 January 2012 19:40, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: http://wordpress.org/news/2012/01/help-stop-sopa-pipa/ -- Stephen Russell 901.246-0159 cell [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPm_51na_44KonavGxcL1TrgrjPfDNGa=o=u_k1xaemrjqx...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] USA readers Are you trying to stop SOAP?
Soap is something we should all be using. SOAP, otoh, is a bad idea implemented worse. As for SOPA|ProtectIP, I've written to Congresscritters in both houses and parties. I am not in favor of piracy -- my own ebooks have appeared on evil sites -- but SOPA et al are poorly considered legislation. We can do better. Member, EFF , ACLU, National Writer's Union (UAW Local 1980, AFL-CIO) --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4s-9+uokczzd5aqqxzqtngshz7qwzft9x5xjjnkopq...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] USA readers Are you trying to stop SOAP?
Alan Bourke wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2012, at 04:39 AM, Pete Theisen wrote: Alan Bourke wrote: Pippa as well? Misspell one, misspell the other . . . SOAP is not SOPA I was making a lame joke about how crap Simple Object Access Protocol can be. ;) Hi Alan, Oh, sorry - I didn't get it . . . -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f0f9b92.1090...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] USA readers Are you trying to stop SOAP?
http://wordpress.org/news/2012/01/help-stop-sopa-pipa/ -- Stephen Russell 901.246-0159 cell ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYJ=4762-uah9nqg4qy34x03anyghgzuq5w6k2v2ruz...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] A rant about SOAP (follow-up to recent XML thread)
A great rant! http://72.249.21.88/nonintersecting/?year=2006monthnum=11day=15 name=the-s-stands-for-simplepage= Malcolm --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1232560502.18621.1296004...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] A rant about SOAP (follow-up to recent XML thread)
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Malcolm Greene pro...@bdurham.com wrote: A great rant! http://72.249.21.88/nonintersecting/?year=2006monthnum=11day=15 name=the-s-stands-for-simplepage= Malcolm - I lived that conversation before. Kind of a nightmare all over again. Thanks -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer First Horizon Bank Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0901211017i73f5b20apd02aa7ac3ddfe...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] A rant about SOAP (follow-up to recent XML thread)
On Wed, January 21, 2009 1:17 pm, Stephen Russell wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Malcolm Greene pro...@bdurham.com wrote: A great rant! http://72.249.21.88/nonintersecting/?year=2006monthnum=11day=15 name=the-s-stands-for-simplepage= Malcolm - I lived that conversation before. Kind of a nightmare all over again. Tech changes so fast...it's crazy. If you're not one to accept change, this is the wrong industry to be in...that's for sure! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/13383.69.7.77.20.1232565115.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] A rant about SOAP (follow-up to recent XML thread)
Some of the changes are needless, however, I'll take a stable operation over the bleeding edge every time. * Tech changes so fast...it's crazy. If you're not one to accept change, this is the wrong industry to be in...that's for sure! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/376341.409...@web31403.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] A rant about SOAP (follow-up to recent XML thread)
On Wed, January 21, 2009 2:46 pm, Michael Madigan wrote: Some of the changes are needless, however, I'll take a stable operation over the bleeding edge every time. lol...they don't call it bleeding edge for nothing! ;-) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2540.69.7.77.20.1232568826.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] A rant about SOAP (follow-up to recent XML thread)
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: Some of the changes are needless, however, I'll take a stable operation over the bleeding edge every time. * Says the guy that still codes in FPD. rimshot -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer First Horizon Bank Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0901211251r1d64062bq126f274f6a447...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] A rant about SOAP (follow-up to recent XML thread)
How much more stable can you get than FPD 2.6a? John -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:52 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] A rant about SOAP (follow-up to recent XML thread) On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: Some of the changes are needless, however, I'll take a stable operation over the bleeding edge every time. * Says the guy that still codes in FPD. rimshot -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer First Horizon Bank Memphis TN 901.246-0159 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/003001c97c14$409b75d0$c1d261...@harvey@shelbynet.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] A rant about SOAP (follow-up to recent XML thread)
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:04 PM, John john.har...@shelbynet.com wrote: How much more stable can you get than FPD 2.6a? - Sometimes you can't get enough of that color yellow they presented. Kind of catchy wasn't it? -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer First Horizon Bank Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0901211407h1b42b7b3sfd78a71e40041...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:58 AM Allen wrote: On that subject I gave up and played with west-wind.com idea of a dotnet wrapper. Still playing. On the wsdl subject. If you make the wsdl with the mssoap3 wsdl creator it asks for the dll to use. I think it looks like your making yours in Visual Studio Allen Well, it does not look like Visual Studio. The current is an ASP (somefilename.ASMX?wsdl). When I ran through the Soap WSDL generator, it created a somefilename.wsdl file as well as somefilename.wsml and a somefilenameClient.wsml file. One problem of changing the wsdl file is that is in property of the class and I can't change the .NET code. Thanks! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Tuesday, December 04, 2007 4:23 PM Allen wrote: trouble is copying it does not always do the trick. You need to also copy the recostructed wsdl and extra files plus the vbr/tlb. then regisater it (I think( if the methods change. Its a complete mess this unless you program on the server. Also if its another win2k3 server your trying you need that mapping I already mentioned Allen It turns out that it is using a .NET wsdl as in http://www.webserver.com/somedir/filename.asmx?wsdl. I need to dig deeper into the class as I am getting a The parameter is incorrect error and I don't know why... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Dec 5, 2007 1:07 PM, David Crooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:58 AM Allen wrote: On that subject I gave up and played with west-wind.com idea of a dotnet wrapper. Still playing. On the wsdl subject. If you make the wsdl with the mssoap3 wsdl creator it asks for the dll to use. I think it looks like your making yours in Visual Studio Allen Well, it does not look like Visual Studio. The current is an ASP (somefilename.ASMX?wsdl). When I ran through the Soap WSDL generator, it created a somefilename.wsdl file as well as somefilename.wsml and a somefilenameClient.wsml file. One problem of changing the wsdl file is that is in property of the class and I can't change the .NET code. Thanks! myWebService.asmx is your webservice that is exposed. You can crate a WSDL if you have access to that server in a .NET manner. You may be trying to do one in a VFP manner and that is what is going wrong? http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7h3ystb6(VS.71).aspx --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On that subject I gave up and played with west-wind.com idea of a dotnet wrapper. Still playing. On the wsdl subject. If you make the wsdl with the mssoap3 wsdl creator it asks for the dll to use. I think it looks like your making yours in Visual Studio Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks It turns out that it is using a .NET wsdl as in http://www.webserver.com/somedir/filename.asmx?wsdl. I need to dig deeper into the class as I am getting a The parameter is incorrect error and I don't know why... No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.14/1171 - Release Date: 04/12/2007 19:31 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:31 PM Allen wrote: I meant in the root directory on the server. I know it can be done but Im like you , beginning in this web service game. And the more I try the more I think I need to look elsewhere from VFP. My latest problemn is the inability of VFP to ceate methods with camel case. And memberdata doesnt do it. I have cheated by altering the wsdl. Now i find dotnet does not want to talk to VFP web services. See west-wind.com for that one. You get over one step and fing two more. All of our main servers are Windows Server 2003. I tried this app on another server to see if I could get it to work and it fails with the same error message: OLE-IDispatch exception code 0 from MSXML3.DLL: The system cannot locate the object specified I have searched Google and have come up with nothing of use... PITA! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Dec 4, 2007 1:39 PM, David Crooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:31 PM Allen wrote: I meant in the root directory on the server. I know it can be done but Im like you , beginning in this web service game. And the more I try the more I think I need to look elsewhere from VFP. My latest problemn is the inability of VFP to ceate methods with camel case. And memberdata doesnt do it. I have cheated by altering the wsdl. Now i find dotnet does not want to talk to VFP web services. See west-wind.com for that one. You get over one step and fing two more. All of our main servers are Windows Server 2003. I tried this app on another server to see if I could get it to work and it fails with the same error message: OLE-IDispatch exception code 0 from MSXML3.DLL: The system cannot locate the object specified I have searched Google and have come up with nothing of use... PITA! How is your spanish? http://forum.imasters.com.br/index.php?showtopic=153306 Looks like a miss call to your class for WS. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
did you regsrv32.exe the dll ? Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks All of our main servers are Windows Server 2003. I tried this app on another server to see if I could get it to work and it fails with the same error message: OLE-IDispatch exception code 0 from MSXML3.DLL: The system cannot locate the object specified I have searched Google and have come up with nothing of use... PITA! David L. Crooks No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.13/1169 - Release Date: 03/12/2007 22:56 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:27 PM Allen wrote: did you regsrv32.exe the dll ? Yes. It is registered. Thanks! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
do you have soap3 on there. soap3 has a wizad to make the wsdl file. it wioll ask for the dll and create the other files. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks Sent: 04 December 2007 21:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service On Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:27 PM Allen wrote: did you regsrv32.exe the dll ? Yes. It is registered. Thanks! David L. Crooks No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.13/1169 - Release Date: 03/12/2007 22:56 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:45 PM Allen wrote: do you have soap3 on there. soap3 has a wizard to make the wsdl file. it will ask for the dll and create the other files. It is already running on XP Pro and being copied to Windows Server 2003. Is this going to be backward compatible? Thanks for the prompt response! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
trouble is copying it does not always do the trick. You need to also copy the recostructed wsdl and extra files plus the vbr/tlb. then regisater it (I think( if the methods change. Its a complete mess this unless you program on the server. Also if its another win2k3 server your trying you need that mapping I already mentioned Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks Sent: 04 December 2007 22:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service On Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:45 PM Allen wrote: do you have soap3 on there. soap3 has a wizard to make the wsdl file. it will ask for the dll and create the other files. It is already running on XP Pro and being copied to Windows Server 2003. Is this going to be backward compatible? Thanks for the prompt response! David L. Crooks [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP9 SOAP/WSDL Blues
Hi guys! My wsdl/soap blues are over! I don't need a soap guru anymore ; ) ... I solved the invalid certificate issue easily with Rick Strahl's Web Connection 5.3, it was so easy I can't not believe it. Now have a software that can use for all future projects and my current project is going out in a few weeks. Just a short note in case someone has the same problem. Regards. AiR --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
Ok, I solved the past issue resolved and now on to the next one. It was a source control issue. Now, I get a OLE-IDispatch exception code 0 from MSXML3.DLL: The system cannot locate the object specified error. This is on a Windows 2003 Server and it is supposed to already have MSXML 3.0 installed. Any ideas? David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Thursday, November 29, 2007 3:57 PM Michael wrote: WAG: iirc, installing IE6 (or 7?) installs MSXML 3.0. ?? Well, I already installed the msxml3.msi and xmlsdk.msi. Plus, registered the DLL. Must be another one of the those MSFT's false errors... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
I have seen it depending on where the dll is built. You need to set up the uri for the listener right and where you want the files saved. It does compain about not being able to see the uri but still makes the wsdl files. Its not a very good wizard (as often in VFP), it does need setting correctly. Make sure your methods you want arte selected on the method page. And make sure your address replaces the tempuri address on the namespaces page. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks Sent: 28 November 2007 00:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service On Tuesday, November 27, 2007 5:49 PM Allen wrote: as far as im aware it is created by the task pane web service. at least i get that here Allen So, I need to find out to get around the error: Error generating IntelliSense scripts. Check for a valid WSDL URL location or invalid WSDL content. The WSDL file may have also been in use -- try regenerating the web service files again. I had just started VFP so the WSDL file was not in use. David L. Crooks No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.9/1155 - Release Date: 27/11/2007 20:30 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:02 AM Allen wrote: I have seen it depending on where the dll is built. You need to set up the uri for the listener right and where you want the files saved. It does compain about not being able to see the uri but still makes the wsdl files. Its not a very good wizard (as often in VFP), it does need setting correctly. Make sure your methods you want arte selected on the method page. And make sure your address replaces the tempuri address on the namespaces page. All that looks good to me. I might have to see if I can re-build the DLL (which I did not have to on my PC). Anyway, I posted this on the West-Wind.com website to see if I can some progress: It seems there are 2 errors that are stopping me from going forward on getting this process to run: 1. When I type the following on my local computer: loBaseWS = NEWOBJECT(WSClient, _webservices.vcx) Then loBaseWS. I can see the CreateNewWS method. When I do the same on the server (Windows 2003) I do _not_ see the CreateNewWS method. What do I have to do to get the CreateNewWS method? 2. When I use the IntelliSense Manager/Types/Web Services and enter the name and url then click on Register, I get the following error: Error generating IntelliSense scripts. Check for a valid WSDL URL location or invalid WSDL content. The WSDL file may have also been in use -- try regenerating the web service files again. I had just started VFP so the WSDL file was not in use. Thanks! David L. Crooks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:02 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service I have seen it depending on where the dll is built. You need to set up the uri for the listener right and where you want the files saved. It does compain about not being able to see the uri but still makes the wsdl files. Its not a very good wizard (as often in VFP), it does need setting correctly. Make sure your methods you want arte selected on the method page. And make sure your address replaces the tempuri address on the namespaces page. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks Sent: 28 November 2007 00:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service On Tuesday, November 27, 2007 5:49 PM Allen wrote: as far as im aware it is created by the task pane web service. at least i get that here Allen So, I need to find out to get around the error: Error generating IntelliSense scripts. Check for a valid WSDL URL location or invalid WSDL content. The WSDL file may have also been in use -- try regenerating the web service files again. I had just started VFP so the WSDL file was not in use. David L. Crooks No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.9/1155 - Release Date: 27/11/2007 20:30 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
do you have VFP on the server ? are your ports open. check the firewall. Also check you are calling the web site name. If you can get it from outside it should be ok. I get this myself and its usualy cured by re-registering the dll on the server. make sure you have the right wsdl file. I have seen it in two places on my local machine before copyingh to the server. Make sure the wizard (web services) point to that server else the wsdl points to the wrong place. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks S It seems there are 2 errors that are stopping me from going forward on getting this process to run: 1. When I type the following on my local computer: loBaseWS = NEWOBJECT(WSClient, _webservices.vcx) Then loBaseWS. I can see the CreateNewWS method. When I do the same on the server (Windows 2003) I do _not_ see the CreateNewWS method. What do I have to do to get the CreateNewWS method? 2. When I use the IntelliSense Manager/Types/Web Services and enter the name and url then click on Register, I get the following error: Error generating IntelliSense scripts. Check for a valid WSDL URL location or invalid WSDL content. The WSDL file may have also been in use -- try regenerating the web service files again. I had just started VFP so the WSDL file was not in use. Thanks! No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.9/1155 - Release Date: 27/11/2007 20:30 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 3:58 PM Allen wrote: do you have VFP on the server ? Yes. are your ports open. check the firewall. Also check you are calling the web site name. If you can get it from outside it should be ok. Yes, I typed in the url and it returned the WSDL. I get this myself and its usualy cured by re-registering the dll on the server. make sure you have the right wsdl file. I have seen it in two places on my local machine before copyingh to the server. Make sure the wizard (web services) point to that server else the wsdl points to the wrong place. It is calling: http://www.webaddress.com/somedir/TEST/TestProdWS.asmx?WSDL so the WSDL file is on that server. Right? David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
I would try putting the wsdl/dll etc in the root directory first. I had no luch with subdirectories. also note that the server might not see the web address. mine does not. the w/s may have a hosts file that lets it find it. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks It is calling: http://www.webaddress.com/somedir/TEST/TestProdWS.asmx?WSDL so the WSDL file is on that server. Right? David L. Crooks No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.9/1155 - Release Date: 27/11/2007 20:30 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:20 PM Allen wrote: I would try putting the wsdl/dll etc in the root directory first. I had no luch with subdirectories. also note that the server might not see the web address. mine does not. the w/s may have a hosts file that lets it find it. That is how it is working right now on a Windows XP box. I am trying to get it configured on a Windows 2003 box and haven't found the magic word/configuration/button to get that done yet... Again, thanks for the feedback! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
I meant in the root directory on the server. I know it can be done but Im like you , beginning in this web service game. And the more I try the more I think I need to look elsewhere from VFP. My latest problemn is the inability of VFP to ceate methods with camel case. And memberdata doesnt do it. I have cheated by altering the wsdl. Now i find dotnet does not want to talk to VFP web services. See west-wind.com for that one. You get over one step and fing two more. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks Sent: 28 November 2007 22:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:20 PM Allen wrote: I would try putting the wsdl/dll etc in the root directory first. I had no luch with subdirectories. also note that the server might not see the web address. mine does not. the w/s may have a hosts file that lets it find it. That is how it is working right now on a Windows XP box. I am trying to get it configured on a Windows 2003 box and haven't found the magic word/configuration/button to get that done yet... Again, thanks for the feedback! David L. Crooks No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.9/1155 - Release Date: 27/11/2007 20:30 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:31 PM Allen wrote: I meant in the root directory on the server. I know it can be done but Im like you , beginning in this web service game. And the more I try the more I think I need to look elsewhere from VFP. My latest problemn is the inability of VFP to ceate methods with camel case. And memberdata doesnt do it. I have cheated by altering the wsdl. Now i find dotnet does not want to talk to VFP web services. See west-wind.com for that one. You get over one step and find two more. Yes, the DLL is in the root directory. Something isn't configured right... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
BTW, did I see something about registering the DLL should be done with something other that regsvr32.exe or was that just .NET? Thanks! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
I think its soap 3 you need Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks Sent: 26 November 2007 22:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service On Tuesday, November 20, 2007 3:53 PM I wrote: Update: Windows Server 2003 has MSSOAP.SOAPCLIENT30 and the _webservice.vcx is calling MSSOAP.SOAPCLIENT. What is the best way around that? I installed MS Soap 2.0 and still having trouble getting the web service to run. I am trying to run the Setupclient and getting a Parameter is invalid error. Any ideas? David L. Crooks No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.8/1153 - Release Date: 26/11/2007 21:08 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Tuesday, November 27, 2007 5:48 AM Allen wrote: I think its soap 3 you need Well, now the server has both versions. Do have to change the program to not use the _webservices.vcx which seems tied to soap 2? David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
it is ? I dont know then as I have soap 3 off the vfp disk ok think. have you used the wizard (web service) to create the web service. Note you will need to change the namespaces to suit your server. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks Sent: 27 November 2007 15:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service On Tuesday, November 27, 2007 5:48 AM Allen wrote: I think its soap 3 you need Well, now the server has both versions. Do have to change the program to not use the _webservices.vcx which seems tied to soap 2? David L. Crooks No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.8/1153 - Release Date: 26/11/2007 21:08 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
also while I think of it. put the dll in the root and try it. I had no sucess with putting the dll in another directory. and not the time at the moment to find out why though its probably rights. Are you using win2003 server. thats a problem too and I sorted it out but cant think how at the moment. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Sent: 27 November 2007 16:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service it is ? I dont know then as I have soap 3 off the vfp disk ok think. have you used the wizard (web service) to create the web service. Note you will need to change the namespaces to suit your server. Allen No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.8/1153 - Release Date: 26/11/2007 21:08 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:22 AM Allen wrote: also while I think of it. put the dll in the root and try it. I had no sucess with putting the dll in another directory. and not the time at the moment to find out why though its probably rights. Are you using win2003 server. thats a problem too and I sorted it out but cant think how at the moment. I am in the process of trying the wizard. I will put a copy of the DLL in the root as I am open to any suggestions. Although, based on the error I don't think it is having trouble finding the DLL. Maybe it is a rights issue as it seems 80% of all configuration problems are rights. Yes, it is Windoz 2003 server and I thought I would have fixed it by installing Soap 2.0 but now I am getting the invalid parameter error. Thanks! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
silly me it is 2003. Mapping then. do a search on web service 2003 on leafe.com profox archives and I think something there may shed a light on the problem Allen This was a reply from Derek in the Archives that fixed me up. MSSOAP was never included in a Windows server product, I don't believe-- it's always something you have to install on W2K, XP, and 2003. It is installed by your development environment(VFP), however... Anyways, put that mapping back in(you need it). Also, in IIS, set 'allow unknown isapi extensions' to 'allow'. This will allow it to work. Without it, IIS6 returns INCORRECT 404's with absolutely NO CLUE ANYWHERE what is happening(not the event log, the W3SVC log, or to the end user!)-- it should be returning 500's and not 404's... Anyways, this is likely your problem. I'm well-versed on the tribulations of VFP web services, so if you have any other questions, please ask-- I've been on vacation, hence the long time to reply. Thanks. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.8/1153 - Release Date: 26/11/2007 21:08 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:29 AM Allen wrote: silly me it is 2003. Mapping then. do a search on web service 2003 on leafe.com profox archives and I think something there may shed a light on the problem Allen This was a reply from Derek in the Archives that fixed me up. MSSOAP was never included in a Windows server product, I don't believe-- it's always something you have to install on W2K, XP, and 2003. It is installed by your development environment(VFP), however... Anyways, put that mapping back in(you need it). Also, in IIS, set 'allow unknown isapi extensions' to 'allow'. This will allow it to work. Without it, IIS6 returns INCORRECT 404's with absolutely NO CLUE ANYWHERE what is happening(not the event log, the W3SVC log, or to the end user!)-- it should be returning 500's and not 404's... Anyways, this is likely your problem. I'm well-versed on the tribulations of VFP web services, so if you have any other questions, please ask-- I've been on vacation, hence the long time to reply. Thanks. What do you mean by mapping? I have the local IIS set to allow unknown isapi extensions and the wizard did not help. Also, copying the dll to the root did not help. Thank your assistance and I am sure I keep pounding on this thing until works! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
IIS Manager Home directory Configuration Mapping Add .wsdl and point the executable to SOAPIS30.dll Limit to GET,POST I have script engine selected but not verify that file exists Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks What do you mean by mapping? I have the local IIS set to allow unknown isapi extensions and the wizard did not help. Also, copying the dll to the root did not help. Thank your assistance and I am sure I keep pounding on this thing until works! No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.8/1153 - Release Date: 26/11/2007 21:08 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:09 AM Allen wrote: IIS Manager Home directory Configuration Mapping Add .wsdl and point the executable to SOAPIS30.dll Limit to GET,POST I have script engine selected but not verify that file exists Ok, I did that and it is still failing. Below is the code to create the webservice and the poWebService is failing to be created. The error is .poWebService is an unknown member when the code to use the .poWebService is executed: loBaseWS = NEWOBJECT(WSClient, _webservices.vcx) .poWebService = loBaseWS.CreateNewWS(.pcWebServiceName, .pcWebServiceURL) I do not see in the code any setupclient function call. Is that needed? Thanks! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
Is this with the access code to access the service? On the task pane, there is a web service wizard. Just type in the wsdl url (uri?) and it should register the service and also give a list of available methods. It will also produce some code and you can add your method call where it says to. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks executed: loBaseWS = NEWOBJECT(WSClient, _webservices.vcx) .poWebService = loBaseWS.CreateNewWS(.pcWebServiceName, .pcWebServiceURL) I do not see in the code any setupclient function call. Is that needed? Thanks! David L. Crooks No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.8/1153 - Release Date: 26/11/2007 21:08 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
On Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:01 PM Allen wrote: Is this with the access code to access the service? yes On the task pane, there is a web service wizard. Just type in the wsdl url (uri?) and it should register the service and also give a list of available methods. It will also produce some code and you can add your method call where it says to. I have seem to have lost the task pane and tried to do the same through the IntelliSense Manager. It worked on my local PC. On the server I am getting: Error generating IntelliSense scripts. Check for a valid WSDL URL location or invalid WSDL content. The WSDL file may have been in use -- try regenerating the web service files again. I did shut down VFP to see if that would help but it did not. Any ideas? David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP7: Windows Server 2003 Soap Web service
yes I had that when I tried to create the dll after changing methods. I think possible also to do with putting the dll in a place other than the web root. You can try the web service wizard again to make the wsdl files then a rebuild should work. Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Crooks I have seem to have lost the task pane and tried to do the same through the IntelliSense Manager. It worked on my local PC. On the server I am getting: Error generating IntelliSense scripts. Check for a valid WSDL URL location or invalid WSDL content. The WSDL file may have been in use -- try regenerating the web service files again. I did shut down VFP to see i No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.8/1153 - Release Date: 26/11/2007 21:08 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
