[libreoffice-projects] Re: Infra call on Tue, Feb 21 at 17:30 UTC

2017-02-21 Thread Norbert Thiebaud 
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Guilhem Moulin
 wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 at 10:51:19 +0100, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>> The next infra call will take place at `date -d 'Tue Feb 21 17:30:00 UTC 
>> 2017'`
>> (18:30:00 Berlin time).
>
> Gentle reminder: that's in 24h!  (And 17:30:00 *UTC* does not
> necessarily mean 17:30:00 local time :-P  Enter the above command in
> your favorite terminal to make the conversion.)

btw

$>:~ n_th$ `date -d 'Tue Feb 21 17:30:00 UTC 2017'`
usage: date [-jnu] [-d dst] [-r seconds] [-t west] [-v[+|-]val[ymwdHMS]] ...
[-f fmt date | [[[mm]dd]HH]MM[[cc]yy][.ss]] [+format]

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: projects+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

[libreoffice-projects] Re: Migration of Gerrit to new Infrastructure - DOWNTIME planning

2014-11-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud 
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Alexander Werner
a...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
 Hi all,

 good news, everyone! Our new infrastructure has proven to be stable and 
 reliable, so the time has come to migrate our gerrit instance to the new 
 platform.
 This brings quite a nifty benefit: The VM gerrit is running in will then be 
 highly available with redundant storage and seamless automigration between 
 servers.
 But the downside is that the migration will take some time, in the case of 
 gerrit the pure copying will take about 10hours, starting and reconfiguring 
 the VM afterwards only 10-20Minutes.
 So a downtime of about 10.5h needs to be planned.

 My proposal is to start the copying of the vm on Saturday, 29 November, 
 0900UTC. The downtime will then end around 1930UTC on the same day.
 I will try to fix the date on Saturday, 15 November, so please comment until 
 then.

Thanks. Sound good to me.
Let's remember to send email reminders to the ML just before and just
after it, and put that info in irc's topic of #libreoffice-dev

I'll be around most likely for the end of it (but prolly not at the start :-D)

moggi, vmiklos, bjoern... you may want to keep an eye on the various
'Bots' to irc/bugzilla etc...

Norbert


PS alex: Let's make _sure_ to keep the rsa host key of the gerrit vm
while migrating :-)
PS2: to all: if your known_host happen to have the ip and not the
hostname for gerrit and/or if you have some extra security that do
track the ip anyway, you may have to tweak things after the migration
as, obviously, the IP of the gerrit server will change.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: projects+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

[libreoffice-projects] Re: LibreOffice Weekly News #5 waiting for reviews

2014-09-13 Thread Norbert Thiebaud 
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 3:25 AM, William Gathoye will...@gathoye.be wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Hi *,

 I've just finished to write the fifth edition of LOWN. [1]

 The latter is waiting for your reviews.

Android version:

Companies ... are pleased to apply
-
Companies ... are welcomed to apply


This call for offers is valid until February 2015.
Nope.  That is a target 'delivery'...  just drop this part.
the deadline to apply is no later than October 6, 2014.

Norbert

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: projects+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

[libreoffice-projects] Re: LibreOffice Weekly News #5 waiting for reviews

2014-09-13 Thread Norbert Thiebaud 
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
 Le 13/09/2014 10:07, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit :

 [...]


 Yet 7 new contributors to the LibreOffice project! Welcome to them!
 -
 We welcomed 7 new contributors to the LibreOffice project:

 And I would say ...7 new contributors to the development team, there are
 new contributors to the project not cited here.

True.. point taken :-)

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: projects+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

[libreoffice-projects] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: LibreOffice Weekly News #5 waiting for reviews

2014-09-13 Thread Norbert Thiebaud 
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi :)
 It is a wiki-page.  It's actually faster and easier for people to do the
 edits themselves.

How can someone possibly come up with the missing 8 references ? How
can anyone but William know what link he intended to use ? It seems to
me that you did not either read the reviews or give much though about
it before belittling _that_ work. (yeah that is the review-content of
the email you _top-posted_ on).

The purpose of the review round is to fact check the LOWN before 'publication'
William is doing a great job.. but so much data means that some of it
is bound to come up wrong

William, as the Editor and main contributor of that publication,
requested a review.. Review does not means got fix it, it means check
and give feed-back.
Of course everyone is invited to help William compile LOWN, but in my
mind, pre-publication 'review' should be in the form of feed back, so
that the Editor is aware of what is in the published document, even
maybe compile an address book of people to ask review or explanation
from over time... you know, like good journalist do when preparing a
piece. Reading wiki diff is really not fun, much less fun than reading
emailed feedback.

Bear in mind too that the current 'Wiki' format is just 'because it is
convenient'...  I can imagine, especially if William can gather
support and contributor around the idea of LOWN, that a better
support, more stable and reliable, be chosen for 'publication'. maybe
in the form of a tdf-branded dedicated blog or some other media...


 While so many people are picking such tiny detail to correct

That is what happen when someone ask for 'review'... although your
conception of 'tiny' is quite peculiar...


 Proof-reading, if
 thought necessary, should really be done by a 2nd person,

No, it should be done by as many person as necessary, and most
importantly by a set of person that can competently talk about the
different topics under review.

Point in case is Robert Antoni review. no other '2nd person' would
have known better than himself if he had sent a license statement and
point to it in the ML.


Norbert

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: projects+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Re: [libreoffice-projects] [ANN] LIbreOffice 4.2.0 RC1 available

2013-12-20 Thread Norbert Thiebaud 
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Mac OS X 10.9. Getting error message when attempting to start (open)
 the app after installing: LibreOffice.app is damaged and can't be
 opened. You should move it to the trash.

 This problem also occured with the Beta2, and Norbert said he thought
 the problem was with code-signing of non-release build. Bug 71884. He
 fixed it by replacing with unsigned file, which worked fine.

Well obviously that was not the cause of my trouble :-(  /me is
investigating ...
and not signing was not a 'solution' merely a stop-gap to try to get
something somewhat usable out there.. but that is not an option for a
RC.

Jean, can you try the 64bits  build ?

Norbert

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: projects+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Re: [libreoffice-projects] [ANN] LIbreOffice 4.2.0 RC1 available

2013-12-20 Thread Norbert Thiebaud 
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Christian,

 I used the regular (32-bit) build, which the download page suggested,
 and which I have always used. Should I be using the 64-bit build? I'll
 try that today.

both should work for 10.9... I would just like a confirmation that the
64 bits build works (which I think it does... as the problem seems to
be tied to the signing of the Python Framework.. which is not
delivered in the 64 bits build (unnecessary since the target 10.8+
already have a suitable system python)

Norbert

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: projects+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted