Re: [proletar] Orang atheis itu per-definisi pintar ?

2013-09-24 Terurut Topik ayub


Akankah Ilmu Pengetahuan Mengesampingkan Keberadaan Tuhan?
http://id.berita.yahoo.com/akankah-ilmu-pengetahuan-mengesampingkan-keberadaan-tuhan.html



From: rpara...@live.com rpara...@live.com


  
Hehehe ini mah sama dengan studi2an modelnya si Jondil.  Bisa bener bisa kaga.. 
 tapi lumayan bisa menuh2in majalah cosmo biar bisa naek cetak.. 

Banyak pemikir2/ilmuwan top itu beragama, tapi atheist masih jarang denger. 
Atheis itu sebetulnya cuma agama baru yg dibungkus seolah2 intelek. Setau saya 
pemikir tulen tidak perduli dengan Tuhan dan agama. Tidak perduli tidak sama 
dengan tidak percaya. Itu dua hal yg berbeda...

Atau mungkin studi di bawah memasukkan free thinker ke dalam kelompok atheis..


---In proletar@yahoogroups.com, jack_fanotona@... wrote:


Kalo cuma kasih unjuk satu doang mah kaga valids,

itu ayat2 yang saling bantai gimana ? pedhofil bunuh kafir ? 

kaga di ekspose yah





 Dari: Tawangalun tawangalun@...
Kepada: proletar@yahoogroups.com 
Dikirim: Kamis, 15 Agustus 2013 10:56
Judul: [proletar] Narasi Quran lbh sopan dari Bijbel
 


  
Ini narasi Kitab saya:

Ali 'Imran Ayat 47

قَالَتْ رَبِّ أَنَّىٰ يَكُونُ لِي وَلَدٌ وَلَمْ يَمْسَسْنِي بَشَرٌ ۖ قَالَ 
كَذَٰلِكِ اللَّهُ يَخْلُقُ مَا يَشَاءُ ۚ إِذَا قَضَىٰ أَمْرًا فَإِنَّمَا 
يَقُولُ لَهُ كُنْ فَيَكُونُ

Maryam berkata: Ya Tuhanku, betapa mungkin aku mempunyai anak, padahal aku 
belum pernah DISENTUH oleh seorang laki-lakipun. 

Tawang:
Nah narasinya DISENTUH,padahal kalau ITEM atau Yusfiq pasti DIENTOT.

Bandingen dg narasi Alkitab nanti kan vulgar dg rating XXX:

AYAT-AYAT CINTA dalam Alkitab Christian
Amsal 5:19 rusa yang manis, kijang yang jelita; biarlah BUAH
DADANYA selalu memuaskan engkau, dan engkau SENANTIASA BIRAHI
KARENA CINTANYA.
MARILAH MEMUASKAN BIRAHI, BERSAMA-SAMA MENIKMATI ASMARA… SEBAB
SUAMIKU SEDANG TIDAK ADA DIRUMAH….

AMSAL 7: 16 Telah kubentangkan permadani di atas tempat tidurku,
kain lenan beraneka warna dari Mesir.
17 Pembaringanku telah kutaburi dengan mur, gaharu dan kayu
manis.
18 Marilah kita memuaskan birahi hingga pagi hari, dan
bersama-sama menikmati asmara.
19 Karena suamiku tidak di rumah, ia sedang dalam perjalanan
jauh,

Jadi Alkitabmu itu bahasanya norak dan XXX,nek Kitab saya kan sopan.

Paulus anak wedus.




 

RE: Re: [proletar] Orang atheis itu per-definisi pintar ?

2013-09-24 Terurut Topik rparapat
















Manusia itu sebetulnya gak punya arti apa2 di alam semesta. Sekali kesamber sinar gamma, langsung punah gak berbekas. Ga bakal ada yg tau manusia itu pernah muncul secuil di dalam kehidupan alam semesta. Lost in space...Beda banget kan dengan kitab suci yg gembar gembor manusia adalah pusat segalanya. Nah itu gunanya agama, supaya manusia tetep pede di tengah ketidak pedulian alam semesta heheheheJadi agama dan Tuhan itu gak mungkin ilang... ---In proletar@yahoogroups.com, proletar@yahoogroups.com wrote:Akankah Ilmu Pengetahuan Mengesampingkan Keberadaan Tuhan?  http://id.berita.yahoo.com/akankah-ilmu-pengetahuan-mengesampingkan-keberadaan-tuhan.htmlFrom: rparapat@... rparapat@...



















  
  
  Hehehe ini mah sama dengan studi2an modelnya si Jondil. Bisa bener bisa kaga.. tapi lumayan bisa menuh2in majalah cosmo biar bisa naek cetak..Banyak pemikir2/ilmuwan top itu beragama, tapi atheist masih jarang denger. Atheis itu sebetulnya cuma agama baru yg dibungkus seolah2 intelek. Setau saya pemikir tulen tidak perduli dengan Tuhan dan agama. Tidak perduli tidak sama dengan tidak percaya. Itu dua hal yg berbeda...Atau mungkin studi di bawah memasukkan free
 thinker ke dalam kelompok atheis.. ---In proletar@yahoogroups.com, jack_fanotona@... wrote:Kalo cuma kasih unjuk satu doang mah kaga valids,itu ayat2 yang saling bantai gimana ? pedhofil bunuh kafir ? kaga di ekspose yahDari: Tawangalun tawangalun@... Kepada: proletar@yahoogroups.com  Dikirim: Kamis, 15 Agustus 2013 10:56 Judul: [proletar] Narasi Quran lbh sopan dari Bijbel   



















  
  
  Ini narasi Kitab saya:

Ali Imran Ayat 47

قَالَتْ رَبِّ أَنَّىٰ يَكُونُ لِي وَلَدٌ وَلَمْ يَمْسَسْنِي بَشَرٌ ۖ قَالَ كَذَٰلِكِ اللَّهُ يَخْلُقُ مَا يَشَاءُ ۚ إِذَا قَضَىٰ أَمْرًا فَإِنَّمَا يَقُولُ لَهُ كُنْ فَيَكُونُ

Maryam berkata: Ya Tuhanku, betapa mungkin aku mempunyai anak, padahal aku belum pernah DISENTUH oleh seorang laki-lakipun. 

Tawang:
Nah narasinya DISENTUH,padahal kalau ITEM atau Yusfiq pasti DIENTOT.

Bandingen dg narasi Alkitab nanti kan vulgar dg rating XXX:

AYAT-AYAT CINTA dalam Alkitab Christian
Amsal 5:19 rusa yang manis, kijang yang jelita; biarlah BUAH
DADANYA selalu memuaskan engkau, dan engkau SENANTIASA BIRAHI
KARENA CINTANYA.
MARILAH MEMUASKAN BIRAHI, BERSAMA-SAMA MENIKMATI ASMARA… SEBAB
SUAMIKU SEDANG TIDAK ADA DIRUMAH….

AMSAL 7: 16 Telah kubentangkan permadani di atas tempat tidurku,
kain lenan beraneka warna dari Mesir.
17 Pembaringanku telah kutaburi dengan mur, gaharu dan kayu
manis.
18 Marilah kita memuaskan birahi hingga pagi hari, dan
bersama-sama menikmati asmara.
19 Karena suamiku tidak di rumah, ia sedang dalam perjalanan
jauh,

Jadi Alkitabmu itu bahasanya norak dan XXX,nek Kitab saya kan sopan.

Paulus anak wedus.




 








 



 























__._,_.___

  
  








Post message: prole...@egroups.com
Subscribe : proletar-subscr...@egroups.com
Unsubscribe : proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com
List owner : proletar-ow...@egroups.com
Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___





[proletar] Orang atheis itu per-definisi pintar ?

2013-08-14 Terurut Topik kim
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/religious-people-are-less-intelligent-than-atheists-according-to-analysis-of-scores-of-scientific-studies-stretching-back-over-decades-8758046.html

Religious people are less intelligent than atheists, according to analysis of 
scores of scientific studies stretching back over decades
Study found 'a reliable negative relation between intelligence and religiosity' 
in 53 out of 63 studies

A new review of 63 scientific studies stretching back over decades has 
concluded that religious people are less intelligent than non-believers.

A piece of University of Rochester analysis, led by Professor Miron Zuckerman, 
found a reliable negative relation between intelligence and religiosity in 53 
out of 63 studies.

According to the study entitled, 'The Relation Between Intelligence and 
Religiosity: A Meta-Analysis and Some Proposed Explanations', published in the 
'Personality and Social Psychology Review', even during early years the more 
intelligent a child is the more likely it would be to turn away from religion.

In old age above average intelligence people are less likely to believe, the 
researchers also found.

One of the studies used in Zuckerman's paper was a life-long analysis of the 
beliefs of 1,500 gifted children with with IQs over 135.

The study began in 1921 and continues today. Even in extreme old age the 
subjects had much lower levels of religious belief than the average population.

The review, which is the first systematic meta-analysis of the 63 studies 
conducted in between 1928 and 2012, showed that of the 63 studies, 53 showed a 
negative correlation between intelligence and religiosity, while 10 showed a 
positive one.

Only two studies showed significant positive correlations and significant 
negative correlations were seen in a total of 35 studies.

The authors of the review looked at each study independently, taking into 
account the quality of data collection, the size of the sample and the analysis 
methods used.

The three psychologists carrying out the review defined intelligence as  the 
ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex 
ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience.

Religiosity is defined by the psychologists as involvement in some (or all) 
facets of religion.

According to the review, other factors - such as gender or education - did not 
make any difference to the correlation between intelligence and religious 
belief.

The level of belief, or otherwise, did however vary dependent upon age with the 
correlation found to be weakest among the pre-college population.

The paper concludes that: Most extant explanations (of a negative relation) 
share one central theme —the premise that religious beliefs are irrational, not 
anchored in science, not testable and, therefore, unappealing to intelligent 
people who 'know better'.

Criticisms of the conclusions include that the paper only deals with a 
definition of analytic intelligence and fails to consider newly identified 
forms of creative and emotional intelligence.

The psychologists who carried out the review also sought to pre-empt the 
secularist interpretation of the findings by suggesting that more intelligent 
people are less likely to have religious beliefs as they associate themselves 
with ideas around personal control.

Intelligent people typically spend more time in school - a form of 
self-regulation that may yield long-term benefits, the researchers wrote.

More intelligent people get higher level jobs (and better employment (and 
higher salary) may lead to higher self-esteem, and encourage personal control 
beliefs.





Post message: prole...@egroups.com
Subscribe   :  proletar-subscr...@egroups.com
Unsubscribe :  proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com
List owner  :  proletar-ow...@egroups.com
Homepage:  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [proletar] Orang atheis itu per-definisi pintar ?

2013-08-14 Terurut Topik Full Gospel Indonesia
Memang benar!
Orang atheis itu per-definisi memang jauh lebih pinter dari pemeluk2 agama 
lain,  mereka mudah memahami dunia supranatural, ( Kristen Supranatural ) 
buktinya anggota C.G.I ( Pertumbuhan Gereja Internasional ) partisipants di 
Rusia ada  200-an lembaga Krsiten, di Amerika cuma 34 di Indonesia 29 lembaga.
Pendiri Full Gospel Indonesia bapak Bambang Wiyono dulunya orang athaies, kini 
beliau paham betul tentang dunia roh, dunia supranatural

Admin Milis Full Gospel Indonesial 




 From: kim kimh...@plasa.com
To: proletar@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:29 PM
Subject: [proletar] Orang atheis itu per-definisi pintar ?
 


  
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/religious-people-are-less-intelligent-than-atheists-according-to-analysis-of-scores-of-scientific-studies-stretching-back-over-decades-8758046.html

Religious people are less intelligent than atheists, according to analysis of 
scores of scientific studies stretching back over decades
Study found 'a reliable negative relation between intelligence and religiosity' 
in 53 out of 63 studies

A new review of 63 scientific studies stretching back over decades has 
concluded that religious people are less intelligent than non-believers.

A piece of University of Rochester analysis, led by Professor Miron Zuckerman, 
found a reliable negative relation between intelligence and religiosity in 53 
out of 63 studies.

According to the study entitled, 'The Relation Between Intelligence and 
Religiosity: A Meta-Analysis and Some Proposed Explanations', published in the 
'Personality and Social Psychology Review', even during early years the more 
intelligent a child is the more likely it would be to turn away from religion.

In old age above average intelligence people are less likely to believe, the 
researchers also found.

One of the studies used in Zuckerman's paper was a life-long analysis of the 
beliefs of 1,500 gifted children with with IQs over 135.

The study began in 1921 and continues today. Even in extreme old age the 
subjects had much lower levels of religious belief than the average population.

The review, which is the first systematic meta-analysis of the 63 studies 
conducted in between 1928 and 2012, showed that of the 63 studies, 53 showed a 
negative correlation between intelligence and religiosity, while 10 showed a 
positive one.

Only two studies showed significant positive correlations and significant 
negative correlations were seen in a total of 35 studies.

The authors of the review looked at each study independently, taking into 
account the quality of data collection, the size of the sample and the analysis 
methods used.

The three psychologists carrying out the review defined intelligence as  the 
ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex 
ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience.

Religiosity is defined by the psychologists as involvement in some (or all) 
facets of religion.

According to the review, other factors - such as gender or education - did not 
make any difference to the correlation between intelligence and religious 
belief.

The level of belief, or otherwise, did however vary dependent upon age with the 
correlation found to be weakest among the pre-college population.

The paper concludes that: Most extant explanations (of a negative relation) 
share one central theme —the premise that religious beliefs are irrational, not 
anchored in science, not testable and, therefore, unappealing to intelligent 
people who 'know better'.

Criticisms of the conclusions include that the paper only deals with a 
definition of analytic intelligence and fails to consider newly identified 
forms of creative and emotional intelligence.

The psychologists who carried out the review also sought to pre-empt the 
secularist interpretation of the findings by suggesting that more intelligent 
people are less likely to have religious beliefs as they associate themselves 
with ideas around personal control.

Intelligent people typically spend more time in school - a form of 
self-regulation that may yield long-term benefits, the researchers wrote.

More intelligent people get higher level jobs (and better employment (and 
higher salary) may lead to higher self-esteem, and encourage personal control 
beliefs.


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Post message: prole...@egroups.com
Subscribe   :  proletar-subscr...@egroups.com
Unsubscribe :  proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com
List owner  :  proletar-ow...@egroups.com
Homepage:  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
proletar-dig