Re: [PEDA] DXP Newsgroup

2002-08-12 Thread rlamoreaux

 As far as I know this has not been designated a 'non-dxp' area :) :)
 
 But seriously, I know the support people at Protel and my local VAR 
watch this forum as well, and of 
 course, they are more than capable of responding here, if they wished 
too.

I did not say it was. I was just stating my opinion that it would better 
serve you to ask over there since I have seen a lot more responses from 
Altium over there. It appears to me that the developers (as opposed to 
support people) of DXP are watching the DXPTech Forum, when I see no 
evidence that the developers are watching this forum. I find results come 
quicker the fewer levels between you and the guy making the change.


Robert D. LaMoreaux
MTS Systems Corp. 
Powertrain technology Division
4622 Runway Blvd.
Ann Arbor, MI 48108
734-822-9696
Fax 734-973-1103
Main Desk 734-973-



* Tracking #: C4D0C542E476C74AB6FF3381F71B1A8D9C59CD83
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] DXP Newsgroup

2002-08-12 Thread John A. Ross \[Design\]

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Newsgroup


  As far as I know this has not been designated a 'non-dxp' area :) :)
 
  But seriously, I know the support people at Protel and my local VAR
 watch this forum as well, and of
  course, they are more than capable of responding here, if they wished
 too.

 I did not say it was. I was just stating my opinion that it would better
 serve you to ask over there since I have seen a lot more responses from
 Altium over there. It appears to me that the developers (as opposed to
 support people) of DXP are watching the DXPTech Forum, when I see no
 evidence that the developers are watching this forum. I find results come
 quicker the fewer levels between you and the guy making the change.

Robert

After viewing the DXP forum I see you are, of course correct.

There seems to be much more response from Altium there.

I will move my comments to there instead.

Sorry for any offence, it was not intended.

Best Regards

John A. Ross

RSD Communications Ltd
8 BorrowMeadow Road, Springkerse Industrial Estate
Stirling, Scotland FK7 7UW

Tel (Office)  +44 [0]1786 450572 Ext 225
Tel ( Lab  )  +44 [0]1786 450572 Ext 248
Fax  +44 [0]1786 474653
GSM   +44 [0]7831 373727

Email[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW http://www.rsd.tv
==




* Tracking #: A1222710A759A64CBA3C0591150CAFF4F49F86B8
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] DXP Newsgroup

2002-08-12 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support

Why don't they watch where the DXP message traffic is (here)?  Instead of
where they wish it was (there)?

Seriously, I don't have time to register for all the variant lists that some
may propose, i.e. the list of all Protel 99SE users who never owned v2.8,
are thinking about upgrading to DXP, but don't like ATS, have green skin and
pink eyes, ingrown left foot big toenails, and 6 fingers on each hand, etc.

Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website:  www.bagotronix.com


- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Newsgroup


  As far as I know this has not been designated a 'non-dxp' area :) :)
 
  But seriously, I know the support people at Protel and my local VAR
 watch this forum as well, and of
  course, they are more than capable of responding here, if they wished
 too.

 I did not say it was. I was just stating my opinion that it would better
 serve you to ask over there since I have seen a lot more responses from
 Altium over there. It appears to me that the developers (as opposed to
 support people) of DXP are watching the DXPTech Forum, when I see no
 evidence that the developers are watching this forum. I find results come
 quicker the fewer levels between you and the guy making the change.


 Robert D. LaMoreaux
 MTS Systems Corp.
 Powertrain technology Division
 4622 Runway Blvd.
 Ann Arbor, MI 48108
 734-822-9696
 Fax 734-973-1103
 Main Desk 734-973-




* Tracking #: 089C61FEC071D7439F8E526BA8E243FB382F2A13
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] DXP Newsgroup

2002-08-12 Thread mariusrf

probably they don't want regular 99se users to see all dxp problems which
are going to surface . they might assume that most 99se (or older
versions) users are like you and me, busy working, and have no time to
subscribe to a gazillion different lists. Therefore all DXP problems would
become invisible to 99se suckers , sorry for the typo , I meant potential
dxp upgrade customers . I think for the time being I won't advise any of my
clients to buy Protel until this mess ( oops , sorry for the typo again, I
meant marketing strategy) gets sorted out. Not until dxp is reported stable
by a large number of users and the ATS policy guarantees the client receives
at least a bug free version (without having to pay for an undefined duration
the ATS fees) .

best regards,
Matt Tudor , MSEE - embeded , RF and Microwave Consulting
http://www.gigahertzelectronics.com





- Original Message -
From: Bagotronix Tech Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Newsgroup


 Why don't they watch where the DXP message traffic is (here)?  Instead of
 where they wish it was (there)?

 Seriously, I don't have time to register for all the variant lists that
some
 may propose, i.e. the list of all Protel 99SE users who never owned v2.8,
 are thinking about upgrading to DXP, but don't like ATS, have green skin
and
 pink eyes, ingrown left foot big toenails, and 6 fingers on each hand,
etc.

 Best regards,
 Ivan Baggett
 Bagotronix Inc.




* Tracking #: 1405A0D28C7C9E4A9785AABB175225B8DE100F9A
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



[PEDA] DXP Newsgroup

2002-08-10 Thread John Ross

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 09 August 2002 22:16
 To: Protel EDA Forum; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Net lists
 
 
  Is it my imagination or does the net list generator in DXP 
 SCH tools no 
 longer support other vendors 
  formats (PADS PPCB) or a straight wire list?
 
 I can't see it, but the help for Create Netlist shows an 
 additional to be 
 determined function so it may be a future service pack item.
 
 A better place to ask this would be 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] since 
 the developers and Altium Product manager actively participate there.

Robert

As far as I know this has not been designated a 'non-dxp' area :) :)

But seriously, I know the support people at Protel and my local VAR watch this forum 
as well, and of course, they are more than capable of responding here, if they wished 
too.

I don't really know the purpose of splitting topics across various newsgroups as IMHO 
it only confuses issues. Again IMHO it would have been better to set up a BBS system 
using vBulliten or phpBB (similar to forum at w#w.pcbstandards.com). I think the extra 
effort might be worth it. 

BTW, that's just a suggestion/opinion TechServ already do a good job managing  
providing this list server, I would not deliberately imply otherwise.

Best Regards

John A. Ross

RSD Communications Ltd
8 BorrowMeadow Road
Springkerse Industrial Estate
Stirling, Scotland FK7 7UW

Tel +44 [0]1786 450572 Ext 225 (Office)
Tel +44 [0]1786 450572 Ext 248 (Lab)
Fax +44 [0]1786 474653
GSM +44 [0]7831 373727

Email   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW http://www.rsd.tv
==







* Tracking #: C5A14590DA969946B8CBAA308B0BC88EE669538F
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] DXP Newsgroup

2002-08-10 Thread Ian Wilson

On 01:15 PM 10/08/2002 +0100, John Ross said:

As far as I know this has not been designated a 'non-dxp' area :) :)

No, but as stated, you will not get much Altium-input on this list.  There 
is, apparently, a company policy that very few employees post to this list 
- or at least there used to be - even though there may be a number that 
watch the list.  It used to be that the only Altium input on this list was 
via the ProtelCSC.

here
But seriously, I know the support people at Protel and my local VAR watch 
this forum as well, and of course, they are more than capable of 
responding here, if they wished too.

I don't really know the purpose of splitting topics across various 
newsgroups as IMHO it only confuses issues. Again IMHO it would have been 
better to set up a BBS system using vBulliten or phpBB (similar to forum 
at w#w.pcbstandards.com). I think the extra effort might be worth it.

There has always been little support for such a move - even in the face of 
slow action to produce an archive.

Ian Wilson



* Tracking #: E856DBBE851CF84CB527E2B62C12A4D6C229F285
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *