[protobuf] Re: Issue 188 in protobuf: protobuf fails to link after compiling with LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed because of missing -lpthread
Updates: Status: Accepted Owner: liuj...@google.com Labels: -FixedIn-2.4.0 Comment #13 on issue 188 by liuj...@google.com: protobuf fails to link after compiling with LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed because of missing -lpthread http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=188 Well, the previous fix isn't correct. Rolled it back. Will have another look. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 248 in protobuf: protobuf will not compile without thread library
Comment #7 on issue 248 by liuj...@google.com: protobuf will not compile without thread library http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=248 Yes, the r353 fix isn't correct. Rolled it back at r360. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 188 in protobuf: protobuf fails to link after compiling with LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed because of missing -lpthread
Updates: Status: NeedPatchFromUser Comment #14 on issue 188 by liuj...@google.com: protobuf fails to link after compiling with LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed because of missing -lpthread http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=188 Hi, xarthisius.kk, The line above: AC_TRY_LINK(,, , [done=yes]) will only set done=yes when the AC_TRY_LINK failed. AC_TRY_LINK(includes, function-body, action-if-found, action-if-not-found) So protobuf-2.3.0-asneeded.patch just skipped the first -pthread try, which happened to fix your problem.. I also set LDFLAGS to -Wl,--as-needed, but can not reproduce the link error(x86-linux). So set this issue as NeedPatchFromUser. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 249 in protobuf: Default values are not assumed to be filled in.
Comment #2 on issue 249 by osfan6313: Default values are not assumed to be filled in. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=249 Ah. Well I haven't seen any information which ever said that; the documentation is rather lacking in that regard. It would be nice to have this as an option though. The amount of code required is rather trivial. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] How to use Protocol buffers in visual studio c#.net
Sir, Any body please send me any example program and how to use protocol buffers in c#.net visual stduio -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 249 in protobuf: Default values are not assumed to be filled in.
Comment #3 on issue 249 by mdpo...@troilus.org: Default values are not assumed to be filled in. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=249 The behavior and documentation seem clear to me: required means the user must set it to something (i.e. it is required). Why would making your field optional not meet your needs? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 249 in protobuf: Default values are not assumed to be filled in.
Comment #4 on issue 249 by osfan6313: Default values are not assumed to be filled in. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=249 We're using protocol buffers to store user settings, so we want some fields to be required(for data validation purposes). However, when we first generate the data we want there to be some default value for these settings, so that we can have default settings already filled in automatically. I could be wrong, but I think that even if I made the field 'optional', and immediately built the protocol buffer, no information would be set by default. Or, to put it another way: When making a protocol buffer, you don't always want ALL fields to be set, however some fields MUST have a value. If no user-value is defined, then the default value is used for that field. For example, if you use a JOptionPane to show the user some information, you don't always want to give the user OK and Cancel buttons, because they're not relevant. However, you always have a Component and a Message as parameters. If nothing else is provided, then the defaults for the other settings(icon, title, ok/cancel) buttons are set to the default(none). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] How to use Protocol buffers in visual studio c#.net
Any body send me example program on protocl buffers using in c#.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
Re: [protobuf] How to use Protocol buffers in visual studio c#.net
It depends on the exact scenario Are you already using protocol buffers for other platforms? Working from .proto? There are several C# implementations, with different levels of VS integration. The two I would mainly think of is Jon Skeet's C# port ( http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/) and my own offering: protobuf-net (http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-net/). Jon's port exposes an almost identical API to the Java version (and IIRC has very similar tooling); protobuf-net looks at it the other way around: it is .NET centric *first*, with .proto support secondary - as such, with protobuf-net you don't strictly *need* a .proto *at all*. Of course, you *can* use a .proto (an msi for VS integration is on the protobuf-net home page, with a write-up here: http://marcgravell.blogspot.com/2009/07/protobuf-net-now-with-added-orcas.html) - but if I'm honest I *personally* mainly use it *without* .proto, as I am usually just talking .NET to .NET, and I just want to serialize stuff. Jon may be offer to give more specific pointers about his version. Marc Gravell On 9 December 2010 14:06, vinu vinodkumara...@gmail.com wrote: Sir, Any body please send me any example program and how to use protocol buffers in c#.net visual stduio -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comprotobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. -- Regards, Marc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
