[protobuf] Re: Issue 205 in protobuf: Invalid strings are delivered to application
Comment #4 on issue 205 by hamel.st...@gmail.com: Invalid strings are delivered to application http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=205 It would help if the warning (in debug mode) also printed the message type name. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Protobuf and entity framework - included entities serialization
Hi all,
I am not able to serialize nested entities.
This is my transfer object
[ProtoContract]
[Serializable]
[DataContract]
public class MyClassTO
{
[ProtoMember(1)]
[DataMember]
public ListMyEntity ListOfMyEntities {get;set;};
}
On my backend, I fire the following linq to entities query, fill the
transfer object and return it to the client:
var myClassTO = new MyClassTO();
myClassTO.ListOfMyEntities =
Context.MyEntity.Include(ReferencedEntity.AnotherReferencedEntity).ToList;
return myClassTO;
The client receives the list of MyEntity objects but included entities
are not serialized(they are all null). Does anybody have any idea
about it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Re: Issue 351 in protobuf: Make protobuf_lite proto files not create any static initializers
Comment #9 on issue 351 by tha...@chromium.org: Make protobuf_lite proto files not create any static initializers http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=351 Fixed, right? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
[protobuf] Issue 393 in protobuf: Allow configure to disable maintainer mode
Status: New Owner: liuj...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 393 by robnap...@gmail.com: Allow configure to disable maintainer mode http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=393 Currently protobuf does not support disabling automake's maintainer mode. In maintainer mode, the configure script can be rebuilt if it appears to be older than its dependencies. This is good for maintainers, but plays havoc for downstream packagers who checkin the contents of the tarball. Many version control systems do not maintain file dates, so configure can look stale and may be rebuilt when it should not be. If configure is readonly (such as when stored under Perforce), the build will fail. The solution is adding AM_MAINTAINER_MODE([enable]) to configure.ac. This changes nothing by default, but adds the configure option --disable-maintainer-mode, which tells configure never to rebuild itself even if its dates appear incorrect. Attachments: protobuf-maintainermode.patch 547 bytes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
