RE: [protobuf] Re: Plans to support C#?
Another +1 for oneof C# support Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:32:43 -0800 From: ejb...@gmail.com To: protobuf@googlegroups.com Subject: [protobuf] Re: Plans to support C#? +1 for oneof. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[protobuf] Re: Plans to support C#?
+1 for oneof. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[protobuf] Re: Plans to support C#?
Yes, oneof support would probably be the top of my list :) We clearly need to support the whole proto language - but there are Java API changes which may not be as useful in the C# community which aren't really part of the proto language itself. This quarter is becoming incredibly busy for me, but it's useful to know that there's some pent up demand... Jon On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 19:28:07 UTC+1, Brian Banks wrote: Jon, for me personally, I'd really like support for the new oneof field. Glad to see you have plans to update it. I appreciate your work. On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 6:37:36 AM UTC-7, Jon Skeet wrote: On Monday, 22 September 2014 05:47:04 UTC+1, RyanE wrote: Are there any plans to add C# to the list of supported language for Protocol Buffers in 2015 or sooner? There are already two mature implementations - protobuf-net ( https://code.google.com/p/protobuf-net/) and protobuf-csharp-port ( https://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/). The latter is my project, and while it's been slumbering somewhat recently, I plan to get back into it soon to support the newer features such as oneof. I haven't yet decided exactly how many of the Java API changes I'll port across - time will tell. Is there any specific feature you're looking for which isn't supported by either of these projects? Jon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[protobuf] Re: Plans to support C#?
Jon, for me personally, I'd really like support for the new oneof field. Glad to see you have plans to update it. I appreciate your work. On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 6:37:36 AM UTC-7, Jon Skeet wrote: On Monday, 22 September 2014 05:47:04 UTC+1, RyanE wrote: Are there any plans to add C# to the list of supported language for Protocol Buffers in 2015 or sooner? There are already two mature implementations - protobuf-net ( https://code.google.com/p/protobuf-net/) and protobuf-csharp-port ( https://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/). The latter is my project, and while it's been slumbering somewhat recently, I plan to get back into it soon to support the newer features such as oneof. I haven't yet decided exactly how many of the Java API changes I'll port across - time will tell. Is there any specific feature you're looking for which isn't supported by either of these projects? Jon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[protobuf] Re: Plans to support C#?
On Monday, 22 September 2014 05:47:04 UTC+1, RyanE wrote: Are there any plans to add C# to the list of supported language for Protocol Buffers in 2015 or sooner? There are already two mature implementations - protobuf-net (https://code.google.com/p/protobuf-net/) and protobuf-csharp-port (https://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/). The latter is my project, and while it's been slumbering somewhat recently, I plan to get back into it soon to support the newer features such as oneof. I haven't yet decided exactly how many of the Java API changes I'll port across - time will tell. Is there any specific feature you're looking for which isn't supported by either of these projects? Jon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
