Sorry, I did not investigate it further (I don't currently have a use case
of it - I was just testing the support).
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:26 AM, wrote:
> Hi Arpit,
>
> Did you have any luck?
>
>
> On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 3:24:09 PM UTC-7, Arpit Baldeva wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Are custom options supported with protobuf JS? I have my proto files that
>> work fine with C++/C# so I don't think it is a syntax issue.
>>
>> However, when I try to run the grpc sample (I am not sure it is a grpc
>> issue though), I get an error similar to https://github.com/dcodeIO/
>> protobuf.js/issues/383
>>
>> Parse error at line 5: illegal option name: (toplevel_3.options).,
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> topic/protobuf/TP1rViMydKM/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
