[VOTE] 0.2 RC4
Posted here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.2rc4/ [ ] Ship it! (Release RC4 as 0.2) [ ] No (We need another RC because...) The only difference between RC3 and RC4 for proton-c is a one line change in engine.c that ensures that pn_transport_output will not fail to produce output under particular conditions despite there being output to produce. There was also a public accessor added in proton-j. Both of these are very small and sufficiently isolated changes that they shouldn't impact any testing that has been done on RC3. I've attached the total diff in case anyone wants to check it out. I'm hoping we can still get enough votes to do a release tonight so please have a look and give it your +1 if it checks out. --Rafael
Re: [VOTE] 0.2 RC4
[X] Ship it! (Release RC4 as 0.2) Tested java and reviewed C change. -- Rob On 5 November 2012 13:19, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Posted here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.2rc4/ [ ] Ship it! (Release RC4 as 0.2) [ ] No (We need another RC because...) The only difference between RC3 and RC4 for proton-c is a one line change in engine.c that ensures that pn_transport_output will not fail to produce output under particular conditions despite there being output to produce. There was also a public accessor added in proton-j. Both of these are very small and sufficiently isolated changes that they shouldn't impact any testing that has been done on RC3. I've attached the total diff in case anyone wants to check it out. I'm hoping we can still get enough votes to do a release tonight so please have a look and give it your +1 if it checks out. --Rafael
Re: [VOTE] 0.2 RC4
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:19:30AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: Posted here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.2rc4/ [X] Ship it! (Release RC4 as 0.2) [ ] No (We need another RC because...) The only difference between RC3 and RC4 for proton-c is a one line change in engine.c that ensures that pn_transport_output will not fail to produce output under particular conditions despite there being output to produce. There was also a public accessor added in proton-j. Both of these are very small and sufficiently isolated changes that they shouldn't impact any testing that has been done on RC3. I've attached the total diff in case anyone wants to check it out. I'm hoping we can still get enough votes to do a release tonight so please have a look and give it your +1 if it checks out. Will the final, official URL for the source be: http://www.apache.org/dist/proton/$VER/qpid-proton-c-$VER.tar.gz ? I'd like to clean up another rpmlint error where it doesn't like a non-URI value for the source. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ pgprHYchqOaf1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [VOTE] 0.2 RC4
[x] Ship it. Reviewed the C code change with Rafi. Rajith On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote: [X] Ship it! (Release RC4 as 0.2) Tested java and reviewed C change. -- Rob On 5 November 2012 13:19, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Posted here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.2rc4/ [ ] Ship it! (Release RC4 as 0.2) [ ] No (We need another RC because...) The only difference between RC3 and RC4 for proton-c is a one line change in engine.c that ensures that pn_transport_output will not fail to produce output under particular conditions despite there being output to produce. There was also a public accessor added in proton-j. Both of these are very small and sufficiently isolated changes that they shouldn't impact any testing that has been done on RC3. I've attached the total diff in case anyone wants to check it out. I'm hoping we can still get enough votes to do a release tonight so please have a look and give it your +1 if it checks out. --Rafael
Re: [VOTE] 0.2 RC4
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote Will the final, official URL for the source be: http://www.apache.org/dist/proton/$VER/qpid-proton-c-$VER.tar.gz ? I'd like to clean up another rpmlint error where it doesn't like a non-URI value for the source. Yes, with the caveat that I believe we (qpid) are encouraged to switch over to using svnpubsub for publishing releases at some point. I don't know if/how this will impact the convention for future releases beyond that point. --Rafael
Re: [VOTE] 0.2 RC4
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.comwrote: Surely its going to be in /dist/qpid/proton since its a sub project? Oops, I misread the post. It will be exactly where 0.1 is except it will say 0.2 instead: http://www.apache.org/dist/qpid/proton/0.1/qpid-proton-c-0.1.tar.gz --Rafael Robbie On 5 November 2012 16:11, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote Will the final, official URL for the source be: http://www.apache.org/dist/proton/$VER/qpid-proton-c-$VER.tar.gz ? I'd like to clean up another rpmlint error where it doesn't like a non-URI value for the source. Yes, with the caveat that I believe we (qpid) are encouraged to switch over to using svnpubsub for publishing releases at some point. I don't know if/how this will impact the convention for future releases beyond that point. --Rafael
