RESULT VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

2014-10-30 Thread Rafael Schloming
The vote carries unanimously with 5 (binding) and 2 (non-binding) +1's.
I've created the branch/tag and checked in the artifacts to the dist repo.
I will update the web site and send out an announcement tomorrow after the
release has propagated to all the mirrors.

--Rafael

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:

 Hi Everyone,

 Sorry for the delay, there seemed to be some kind of Nexus outage today,
 so I was unable to generate the java binaries until just now.

 I've posted RC5 in the usual places. The only difference from RC4 is a one
 line delta that replaces the assertion failure when we receive
 out-of-sequence ids with a connection shutdown error. Please have a look
 and register your vote.

 Source code can be found here:

 http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.8rc5/

 Java binaries are here:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1021

 [   ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final
 [   ] No, because ...

 --Rafael




Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

2014-10-29 Thread Ted Ross
[ X ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

I tested 0.8 against the Dispatch trunk.

On 10/27/2014 09:51 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
 Hi Everyone,
 
 Sorry for the delay, there seemed to be some kind of Nexus outage today, so
 I was unable to generate the java binaries until just now.
 
 I've posted RC5 in the usual places. The only difference from RC4 is a one
 line delta that replaces the assertion failure when we receive
 out-of-sequence ids with a connection shutdown error. Please have a look
 and register your vote.
 
 Source code can be found here:
 
 http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.8rc5/
 
 Java binaries are here:
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1021
 
 [   ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final
 [   ] No, because ...
 
 --Rafael
 


Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

2014-10-29 Thread Clebert Suconic
[X} Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

I tested 0.8 against the HornetQ trunk. Had to rename a few enums (SESSION_OPEN 
to SESSION_LOCAL_OPEN) but other than that everything worked.




Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

2014-10-29 Thread Cliff Jansen
[ x ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

Tested on Windows: 32/64 bit, XP/Win8.1

On Monday, October 27, 2014, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:

 Hi Everyone,

 Sorry for the delay, there seemed to be some kind of Nexus outage today, so
 I was unable to generate the java binaries until just now.

 I've posted RC5 in the usual places. The only difference from RC4 is a one
 line delta that replaces the assertion failure when we receive
 out-of-sequence ids with a connection shutdown error. Please have a look
 and register your vote.

 Source code can be found here:

 http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.8rc5/

 Java binaries are here:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1021

 [   ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final
 [   ] No, because ...

 --Rafael



Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

2014-10-29 Thread Chuck Rolke
[ X ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

Tested Windows Server 2012 RC2 host, compiled with Visual Studio {2008, 2010, 
2012, 2013} {x86, {x64}
passes ctest(s)


Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

2014-10-28 Thread Robbie Gemmell
[ X ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final.

I ran the C and Java build+tests, and tried out the published Java binaries
using the JMS client build+tests.

Aside: doing a binary diff of the archive contents shows a second small
change since RC4, in the python bindings: http://svn.apache.org/r1634078

Robbie

On 28 October 2014 01:51, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:

 Hi Everyone,

 Sorry for the delay, there seemed to be some kind of Nexus outage today, so
 I was unable to generate the java binaries until just now.

 I've posted RC5 in the usual places. The only difference from RC4 is a one
 line delta that replaces the assertion failure when we receive
 out-of-sequence ids with a connection shutdown error. Please have a look
 and register your vote.

 Source code can be found here:

 http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.8rc5/

 Java binaries are here:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1021

 [   ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final
 [   ] No, because ...

 --Rafael



Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

2014-10-28 Thread Ken Giusti
[X] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

Testing: Proton-c build, unit tests, and install on Fedora20 and Centos7 x86_64


- Original Message -
 From: Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu
 To: proton@qpid.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:51:00 PM
 Subject: VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final
 
 Hi Everyone,
 
 Sorry for the delay, there seemed to be some kind of Nexus outage today, so
 I was unable to generate the java binaries until just now.
 
 I've posted RC5 in the usual places. The only difference from RC4 is a one
 line delta that replaces the assertion failure when we receive
 out-of-sequence ids with a connection shutdown error. Please have a look
 and register your vote.
 
 Source code can be found here:
 
 http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.8rc5/
 
 Java binaries are here:
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1021
 
 [   ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final
 [   ] No, because ...
 
 --Rafael
 

-- 
-K


Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

2014-10-28 Thread Timothy Bish

[X] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final

Proton-J side still works for AMQ.

On 10/27/2014 09:51 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:

Hi Everyone,

Sorry for the delay, there seemed to be some kind of Nexus outage today, so
I was unable to generate the java binaries until just now.

I've posted RC5 in the usual places. The only difference from RC4 is a one
line delta that replaces the assertion failure when we receive
out-of-sequence ids with a connection shutdown error. Please have a look
and register your vote.

Source code can be found here:

 http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.8rc5/

Java binaries are here:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1021

[   ] Yes, release Proton 0.8 RC5 as 0.8 final
[   ] No, because ...

--Rafael




--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/



RC5

2012-10-25 Thread Rafael Schloming
Please have a look. This one includes ken's ssl fix in addition to
everything that was in RC4:

http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc5/


Re: RC5

2012-10-25 Thread Ken Giusti
mea culpa - apologies.

However, RC5 looks pretty good on these platforms:

Fedora 17 (64bit)
Debian 6 (32bit, vm)
Ubuntu 12.04 (32bit, vm)
Centos 6 (64bit, vm)


I simply did a make  install, then ran the proton test suite.   A few warnings 
during build, but all tests pass.

The only problem platform was my Centos5 VM (32bit).  The make all/make 
install failed due to the php.swg file not being present.  It appears that the 
version of swig on Centos5 (1.3.29) does not include that php.swg file:

[ 95%] Swig source
/home/kgiusti/work/proton/RC1/qpid-proton-c-0.1/bindings/php/php.i:4: Error: 
Unable to find 'php.swg'
make[2]: *** [bindings/php/phpPHP_wrap.c] Error 1
make[1]: *** [bindings/php/CMakeFiles/cproton.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2


IMHO: +1 RC5, fix the Centos 5 issue in the next release.

-K

- Original Message -
 Please have a look. This one includes ken's ssl fix in addition to
 everything that was in RC4:
 
 http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc5/
 


Re: RC5

2012-10-25 Thread Rob Godfrey
OK - proton-c built OK for me on Ubuntu 12.04 (32-bit) and Centos 6.3
(32 bit)... Tests all worked fine on the Ubuntu machine.  On CentOS I
got the following error:

proton_tests.messenger.MessengerTest.testSendBogus
...
start
  server timed out
proton_tests.messenger.MessengerTest.testSendBogus
...
fail
Error during teardown:  Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./proton-test, line 331, in run
  phase()
File /home/rob/qpid-proton-c-0.1/tests/proton_tests/messenger.py,
line 45, in teardown
  self.client.send()
File /home/rob/qpid-proton-c-0.1/bindings/python/proton.py, line
288, in send
  self._check(pn_messenger_send(self._mng))
File /home/rob/qpid-proton-c-0.1/bindings/python/proton.py, line
149, in _check
  raise exc([%s]: %s % (err, pn_messenger_error(self._mng)))
  Timeout: [-7]: unable to send to address: totally-bogus-address
(getaddrinfo: Name or service not known)

all other tests passed

-- Rob

On 25 October 2012 22:07, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
 Please have a look. This one includes ken's ssl fix in addition to
 everything that was in RC4:

 http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc5/


Re: RC5

2012-10-25 Thread Rafael Schloming
That particular test does a DNS lookup on an invalid address, and if that
happens to take a while it can fail the way you're seeing. It will also
fail if you happen to be on one of those networks that are configured to
resolve all invalid hostnames to some kind of search engine.

--Rafael

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.comwrote:

 OK - proton-c built OK for me on Ubuntu 12.04 (32-bit) and Centos 6.3
 (32 bit)... Tests all worked fine on the Ubuntu machine.  On CentOS I
 got the following error:

 proton_tests.messenger.MessengerTest.testSendBogus

 ...
 start
   server timed out
 proton_tests.messenger.MessengerTest.testSendBogus

 ...
 fail
 Error during teardown:  Traceback (most recent call last):
 File ./proton-test, line 331, in run
   phase()
 File /home/rob/qpid-proton-c-0.1/tests/proton_tests/messenger.py,
 line 45, in teardown
   self.client.send()
 File /home/rob/qpid-proton-c-0.1/bindings/python/proton.py, line
 288, in send
   self._check(pn_messenger_send(self._mng))
 File /home/rob/qpid-proton-c-0.1/bindings/python/proton.py, line
 149, in _check
   raise exc([%s]: %s % (err, pn_messenger_error(self._mng)))
   Timeout: [-7]: unable to send to address: totally-bogus-address
 (getaddrinfo: Name or service not known)

 all other tests passed

 -- Rob

 On 25 October 2012 22:07, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
  Please have a look. This one includes ken's ssl fix in addition to
  everything that was in RC4:
 
  http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc5/



Re: RC5

2012-10-25 Thread Rafael Schloming
This was my bad, I'll post an RC6 with the shim fixed.

--Rafael

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.comwrote:

 We have a build failure on the java side.
 It appears the SSL tests added in Kens fix is failing.
 proton_tests.ssl.SslTest.test_client_authentication .
 fail

 We should exclude this test before we spin the final release.

 Rajith

 On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote:
  mea culpa - apologies.
 
  However, RC5 looks pretty good on these platforms:
 
  Fedora 17 (64bit)
  Debian 6 (32bit, vm)
  Ubuntu 12.04 (32bit, vm)
  Centos 6 (64bit, vm)
 
 
  I simply did a make  install, then ran the proton test suite.   A few
 warnings during build, but all tests pass.
 
  The only problem platform was my Centos5 VM (32bit).  The make all/make
 install failed due to the php.swg file not being present.  It appears that
 the version of swig on Centos5 (1.3.29) does not include that php.swg file:
 
  [ 95%] Swig source
  /home/kgiusti/work/proton/RC1/qpid-proton-c-0.1/bindings/php/php.i:4:
 Error: Unable to find 'php.swg'
  make[2]: *** [bindings/php/phpPHP_wrap.c] Error 1
  make[1]: *** [bindings/php/CMakeFiles/cproton.dir/all] Error 2
  make: *** [all] Error 2
 
 
  IMHO: +1 RC5, fix the Centos 5 issue in the next release.
 
  -K
 
  - Original Message -
  Please have a look. This one includes ken's ssl fix in addition to
  everything that was in RC4:
 
  http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc5/