Re: Bug in proton interop suite??

2015-09-09 Thread Ted Ross
I don't think this is a valid data sequence.  Literally, it is a binary 
sequence of seven octets where the internal encoding of a string is 
coincidental.  Binary is not a compound type and does not contain 
sub-fields.


-Ted

On 09/08/2015 05:36 PM, aconway wrote:

I'm doing some interop work on the go binding, and I see something
strange in the 'message.amqp' file in tests/interop. The message body
is encoded as:

0x77, 0xa0, 0x7, 0xa1, 0x5, 0x68, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x6c, 0x6f
^ AMQP value section
   ^Binary
 ^7 bytes
  ^String
^5 bytes
 h e  l lo

In other words there's an AMQP-encoded string *inside* an AMQP encoded
binary. Looking at the python code that generated this message I would
expect it to be an AMQP 5 byte binary value "hello". I think the intent
was for it to be a string, but in python plain "hello" is binary you
need to say u"hello" to get a string. However I can't see any reason
why there would be a string *inside* a binary. Anyone have a clue
what's going on here?

Cheers,
Alan.



Re: Bug in proton interop suite??

2015-09-09 Thread Chuck Rolke
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-308

More documentation required...

- Original Message -
> From: "aconway" 
> To: "proton" 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 5:36:39 PM
> Subject: Bug in proton interop suite??
> 
> I'm doing some interop work on the go binding, and I see something
> strange in the 'message.amqp' file in tests/interop. The message body
> is encoded as:
> 
> 0x77, 0xa0, 0x7, 0xa1, 0x5, 0x68, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x6c, 0x6f
> ^ AMQP value section
>   ^Binary
> ^7 bytes
>  ^String
>^5 bytes
> h e  l lo
> 
> In other words there's an AMQP-encoded string *inside* an AMQP encoded
> binary. Looking at the python code that generated this message I would
> expect it to be an AMQP 5 byte binary value "hello". I think the intent
> was for it to be a string, but in python plain "hello" is binary you
> need to say u"hello" to get a string. However I can't see any reason
> why there would be a string *inside* a binary. Anyone have a clue
> what's going on here?
> 
> Cheers,
> Alan.
> 
> 


Re: Bug in proton interop suite??

2015-09-09 Thread aconway
On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 08:06 -0400, Chuck Rolke wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-308
> 
> More documentation required...

That's not it. The python code that generates the message does indeed
use "hello" so I would expect a vbin containing the bytes "hello", but
what I see is a vbin containing *the AMQP string encoding* of the
string hello - i.e. a 7 byte binary sequence with the typecode for AMQP
string + the length 5 + the bytes "hello"

> 
> - Original Message -
> > From: "aconway" 
> > To: "proton" 
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 5:36:39 PM
> > Subject: Bug in proton interop suite??
> > 
> > I'm doing some interop work on the go binding, and I see something
> > strange in the 'message.amqp' file in tests/interop. The message
> > body
> > is encoded as:
> > 
> > 0x77, 0xa0, 0x7, 0xa1, 0x5, 0x68, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x6c, 0x6f
> > ^ AMQP value section
> >   ^Binary
> > ^7 bytes
> >  ^String
> >^5 bytes
> > h e  l lo
> > 
> > In other words there's an AMQP-encoded string *inside* an AMQP
> > encoded
> > binary. Looking at the python code that generated this message I
> > would
> > expect it to be an AMQP 5 byte binary value "hello". I think the
> > intent
> > was for it to be a string, but in python plain "hello" is binary
> > you
> > need to say u"hello" to get a string. However I can't see any
> > reason
> > why there would be a string *inside* a binary. Anyone have a clue
> > what's going on here?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Alan.
> > 
> >