[Proto-Scripty] Re: Delay or defer ajax requests
Hi,
Yes they do. I'm using Script.aculo.us but i have to start multiple
animations (i.e. fadeouts) on multiple elements, so its a bit tricky
to use the afterFinish functions because it would get called after
every finish of every element.
Ah. I'm not a scripty-head, but I wonder if the Parallel effect would
help:
http://wiki.github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/effect-parallel
Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote on 07.12.2009 15:10:19:
I'm not at a computer to try this out, and well, it might be a
little hair-brained but perhaps...
( new Ajax.Updater() ).defer();
Nice idea. But it does not work :-/
Indeed not, all that does is create the Ajax.Updater object (which
starts the update) and then try to call a #defer function on the
returned Ajax.Updater instance -- which isn't a function and doesn't
have a #defer function.
I'm still not seeing why wrapping up the call in a function is a
problem. It seems like a simple and straightforward solution, if you
can't use an `afterFinish` callback (which is, of course, also a
function).
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Dec 7, 8:56 pm, David S. evil.zweitaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote on 12.07.2009 09:38:54
AM:
Hi,
Your animations don't provide an `afterFinish` callback or similar?
Yes they do. I'm using Script.aculo.us but i have to start multiple
animations (i.e. fadeouts) on multiple elements, so its a bit tricky
to use the afterFinish functions because it would get called after
every finish of every element.
Here's the piece of code:
var teaser_select = function (t) {
var t_id = t.identify();
t.absolutize(); // Use before offset calculation!
var moveby_y = t.cumulativeOffset().top;
moveby_y -= ($('mv_logo').cumulativeOffset().top + $
('mv_logo').getHeight());
moveby_y *= -1;
new Effect.Move(t,{ duration: 0.5, x: 0, y: moveby_y, mode:
'relative' });
// Fade out all teasers from bottom to top
$$('.teaser').reverse().each(function (teaser) {
if (teaser.identify() == t_id) return;
teaser.fade({ duration: 0.5, from: 1, to: 0 });
});
// TODO:
// Call ajax after all teasers have been hidden
}
Maybe there's a simpler way to fade out more than one element at once
and the each(...)-iteration becomes needless. Or its possible to call
one function after many effects have been finished.
But how?
Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote on 07.12.2009 15:10:19:
I'm not at a computer to try this out, and well, it might be a
little hair-brained but perhaps...
( new Ajax.Updater() ).defer();
Nice idea. But it does not work :-/
David.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Delay or defer ajax requests
Hi,
I'm using animations on my website, and i want to start an Ajax
request after a animation has finished. So i want to use Function.defer
(...) on the Ajax.Updater function.
Your animations don't provide an `afterFinish` callback or similar?
(Script.aculo.us' do, but you didn't say you were using
script.aculo.us, so I'm not assuming.)
I don't want to create a new function for using the delay:
Pretty sure that's your only choice. What's your objection to it?
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Dec 6, 10:51 pm, David S. evil.zweitaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello.
I'm using animations on my website, and i want to start an Ajax
request after a animation has finished. So i want to use Function.defer
(...) on the Ajax.Updater function. The problem is that the
Ajax.Updater must be initiated using the new keyword, but then
Ajax.Updater isn't working.
I tried it like this:
new Ajax.Updater.defer(5,'main_body', '?topic='+topic, { evalScripts:
true });
I don't want to create a new function for using the delay:
var submit_ajax = function(topic) {
new Ajax.Updater('main_body', '?topic='+topic, { evalScripts:
true });}
submit_ajax.delay(0.7,topic);
How is it possible to run functions that require new after a delay.
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Delay or defer ajax requests
Hi David,
You could also modify the AJAX Base class to accept a delay parameter,
but it's more complex comparing to create an anonymous (or not)
function !
I did not see any other choice.
But I think that you should refine your question, because if your
using scriptaculous, TJ response is the ONE :))
--
david
On 7 déc, 09:38, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm using animations on my website, and i want to start an Ajax
request after a animation has finished. So i want to use Function.defer
(...) on the Ajax.Updater function.
Your animations don't provide an `afterFinish` callback or similar?
(Script.aculo.us' do, but you didn't say you were using
script.aculo.us, so I'm not assuming.)
I don't want to create a new function for using the delay:
Pretty sure that's your only choice. What's your objection to it?
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / comwww.crowdersoftware.com
On Dec 6, 10:51 pm, David S. evil.zweitaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello.
I'm using animations on my website, and i want to start an Ajax
request after a animation has finished. So i want to use Function.defer
(...) on the Ajax.Updater function. The problem is that the
Ajax.Updater must be initiated using the new keyword, but then
Ajax.Updater isn't working.
I tried it like this:
new Ajax.Updater.defer(5,'main_body', '?topic='+topic, { evalScripts:
true });
I don't want to create a new function for using the delay:
var submit_ajax = function(topic) {
new Ajax.Updater('main_body', '?topic='+topic, { evalScripts:
true });}
submit_ajax.delay(0.7,topic);
How is it possible to run functions that require new after a delay.
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Delay or defer ajax requests
I'm not at a computer to try this out, and well, it might be a little
hair-brained but perhaps...
( new Ajax.Updater() ).defer();
-- Sent from my Palm Prē
T.J. Crowder wrote:
Hi,
I'm using animations on my website, and i want to start an Ajax
request after a animation has finished. So i want to use Function.defer
(...) on the Ajax.Updater function.
Your animations don't provide an `afterFinish` callback or similar?
(Script.aculo.us' do, but you didn't say you were using
script.aculo.us, so I'm not assuming.)
I don't want to create a new function for using the delay:
Pretty sure that's your only choice. What's your objection to it?
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Dec 6, 10:51 pm, David S. lt;evil.zweitaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello.
I'm using animations on my website, and i want to start an Ajax
request after a animation has finished. So i want to use Function.defer
(...) on the Ajax.Updater function. The problem is that the
Ajax.Updater must be initiated using the new keyword, but then
Ajax.Updater isn't working.
I tried it like this:
new Ajax.Updater.defer(5,'main_body', '?topic='+topic, { evalScripts:
true });
I don't want to create a new function for using the delay:
var submit_ajax = function(topic) {
new Ajax.Updater('main_body', '?topic='+topic, { evalScripts:
true });}
submit_ajax.delay(0.7,topic);
How is it possible to run functions that require new after a delay.
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype amp; script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
