[Proto-Scripty] Re: Proposal: Alias clearContent for update()

2010-04-12 Thread joe t.
Admittedly, there are methods in Prototype (and any library) which are
not perfectly intuitive because they can serve multiple purposes for
the sake of condensing code.

i personally see the update() method as suitable. When there's an
argument, you're updating with the content in the argument. When
there's none, you're updating the element to empty content. There are
a lot of aliases in the Prototype library as it is - something i see
more often as a confusing eyesore than a help. If you really want to
propose the alias to the core, though, join the Prototype Core group
and toss it out there, see if it sticks.
-joe t.


On Apr 12, 9:01 am, Rüdiger Plantiko ruediger.plant...@astrotexte.ch
wrote:
 Hi,

 I didn't find a method for clearing the content of an HTML element
 *and* which from its name clearly indicates this action.

 I formerly used $(myContainer).update() for clearing the element's
 content, i.e. calling the update method with no arguments. But I
 prefer a readable alias like Element.clearContent() for this. (I first
 tried an alias Element.clear() but this wasn't a good idea, the
 function clear seems to be reserved for other things).

 I like to propose such an alias for the Prototype standard.

 Regards,
 Rüdiger

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



[Proto-Scripty] Re: Proposal: Alias clearContent for update()

2010-04-12 Thread T.J. Crowder
 If you really want to
 propose the alias to the core, though, join the Prototype Core group
 and toss it out there, see if it sticks.

Or file an enhancement request:
http://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886/home

But I'm with Joe on this (FWIW), I think just #update is clear enough
that that Prototype has enough aliases as it is...
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com


On Apr 13, 3:23 am, joe t. thooke...@gmail.com wrote:
 Admittedly, there are methods in Prototype (and any library) which are
 not perfectly intuitive because they can serve multiple purposes for
 the sake of condensing code.

 i personally see the update() method as suitable. When there's an
 argument, you're updating with the content in the argument. When
 there's none, you're updating the element to empty content. There are
 a lot of aliases in the Prototype library as it is - something i see
 more often as a confusing eyesore than a help. If you really want to
 propose the alias to the core, though, join the Prototype Core group
 and toss it out there, see if it sticks.
 -joe t.

 On Apr 12, 9:01 am, Rüdiger Plantiko ruediger.plant...@astrotexte.ch
 wrote:



  Hi,

  I didn't find a method for clearing the content of an HTML element
  *and* which from its name clearly indicates this action.

  I formerly used $(myContainer).update() for clearing the element's
  content, i.e. calling the update method with no arguments. But I
  prefer a readable alias like Element.clearContent() for this. (I first
  tried an alias Element.clear() but this wasn't a good idea, the
  function clear seems to be reserved for other things).

  I like to propose such an alias for the Prototype standard.

  Regards,
  Rüdiger

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.