Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: How to create a new DOM-element from a string?
That's because I called innerHTML on it at the end, and that returns a
string. If you then want to create a new element out of that, you
could try inserting it into your page somewhere with
$('someElementOnYourPage').insert({after: foo});
Of you could just leave the innerHTML part off the end, which would
leave foo populated with the outer wrapper object created by new
Element...
Walter
On Dec 7, 2010, at 3:20 AM, Luke wrote:
Hmm, damn. the returned value is still a string :(
On Dec 7, 9:16 am, Luke kickingje...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Walter!
On Dec 6, 6:28 pm, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
It's OT for this list, but have a look at Prototype.js. You can
create a new DOM element in memory, and do all the things you want
to it without ever showing it to the user.
Sorry, this was completely bone-headed of me -- I thought I was on
another list.
Walter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype
script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: How to create a new DOM-element from a string?
On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Luke wrote: Hm ok, hoped there would be a way I could generate a DOM object that consists of just the HTML (without wrapper) and before I insert it. There's no need for this, since inserting a string and inserting an object have the same effect as long as you're using the Element.insert() method. But you may be doing too many steps here. What does your Ajax method return to you? What are the transformations you are performing on it? You may be able to do this in fewer stages than you think. Can you post a cut-down example of the code returned through Ajax and the code after you've massaged it but before you've inserted it in your page? I suspect you could do all of the work using string methods, and then using that same string insert the modified HTML into your page. Another approach would be to insert the original HTML using insert(), then obtain or maintain a handle on the inserted code such that you could manipulate it in situ. It would probably happen so quickly that nobody would see the modifications take place. Walter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
RE: [Proto-Scripty] Re: How to create a new DOM-element from a string?
Is it just me,... I don't understand what you're even asking/trying to
accomplish?
What kind of DOM object are you hoping to create? Call it a potayto, or a
potahto but any element you insert the HTML into is a wrapper.
Apologies if this seems terse but I truly do not understand your question/goal.
-Original Message-
From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
[mailto:prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Luke
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 9:59 AM
To: Prototype script.aculo.us
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: How to create a new DOM-element from a string?
Hm ok, hoped there would be a way I could generate a DOM object that
consists of just the HTML (without wrapper) and before I insert it.
On Dec 7, 4:52 pm, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
That's because I called innerHTML on it at the end, and that returns a
string. If you then want to create a new element out of that, you
could try inserting it into your page somewhere with
$('someElementOnYourPage').insert({after: foo});
Of you could just leave the innerHTML part off the end, which would
leave foo populated with the outer wrapper object created by new
Element...
Walter
On Dec 7, 2010, at 3:20 AM, Luke wrote:
Hmm, damn. the returned value is still a string :(
On Dec 7, 9:16 am, Luke kickingje...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Walter!
On Dec 6, 6:28 pm, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
It's OT for this list, but have a look at Prototype.js. You can
create a new DOM element in memory, and do all the things you want
to it without ever showing it to the user.
Sorry, this was completely bone-headed of me -- I thought I was on
another list.
Walter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: How to create a new DOM-element from a string?
Is mystring what you get back from your Ajax request? Do you control
the server that sends it?
If you want to end up with the Element div.something inserted
somewhere on your page, you could do this pretty simply:
var mystring = 'ptext a href=#link/a/ppMore text/pimg
src=asd /';
//mystring could also be the output from your Ajax request
var myDomObject = new Element('div',{
someProperty: someValue,
someFunction: function() {}, ...
}).update(mystring);
myDomObject.addClassName('something');
//no need to extend, 'new Element' is already extended
$('myDiv').insert({top: myDomObject});
So you create the outermost level of the DOM object using new Element,
and that gets you everything you need. You could also pass back from
your server a JSON graph of the desired element, and pass that to new
Element directly, and you could skip some of this.
By the way, I do the addClassName thing separately to humor IE, which
doesn't seem to work when you define the classname in the new Element
parameters level. I haven't tracked this issue to see if it's been
fixed in newer versions of the library, I've just been doing it out of
habit. If anyone can confirm that this is now no longer needed, I'd be
happy to remove it and put it back in the parameters hash where I
believe it belongs.
Walter
On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Luke wrote:
Ok, what I wanna do is this:
-
var mystring = 'div class=somethingptext a href=#link/a/
ppMore text/pimg src=asd //div';
var myDomObject = createDomFromString(mystring);
var methodsAndProperties = {someProperty: someValue,
someFunction: function() {}, ... };
Object.extend(myDomObject, methodsAndProperties);
$('myDiv').insert({top: myDomObject});
-
In normal words, what I want to do is create a DOM-Object BEFORE I
insert it, so I can perform some extensions on it, and dont't have to
do:
-
var mystring = 'div class=somethingptext a href=#link/a/
ppMore text/pimg src=asd //div';
var foo = new Element('div', {}).update(mystring);
var myDomObject = foo.select('.something').first();
Object.extend(myDomObject, methodsAndProperties);
$('myDiv').insert({top: myDomObject});
-
or even insert it, and then search for it.
On Dec 7, 5:10 pm, Rick.Wellman rick.well...@kiewit.com wrote:
Is it just me,... I don't understand what you're even asking/trying
to accomplish?
What kind of DOM object are you hoping to create? Call it a
potayto, or a potahto but any element you insert the HTML into is
a wrapper.
Apologies if this seems terse but I truly do not understand your
question/goal.
-Original Message-
From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com [mailto:prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
] On Behalf Of Luke
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 9:59 AM
To: Prototype script.aculo.us
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: How to create a new DOM-element from a
string?
Hm ok, hoped there would be a way I could generate a DOM object that
consists of just the HTML (without wrapper) and before I insert it.
On Dec 7, 4:52 pm, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
That's because I called innerHTML on it at the end, and that
returns a
string. If you then want to create a new element out of that, you
could try inserting it into your page somewhere with
$('someElementOnYourPage').insert({after: foo});
Of you could just leave the innerHTML part off the end, which would
leave foo populated with the outer wrapper object created by new
Element...
Walter
On Dec 7, 2010, at 3:20 AM, Luke wrote:
Hmm, damn. the returned value is still a string :(
On Dec 7, 9:16 am, Luke kickingje...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Walter!
On Dec 6, 6:28 pm, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
It's OT for this list, but have a look at Prototype.js. You can
create a new DOM element in memory, and do all the things you
want
to it without ever showing it to the user.
Sorry, this was completely bone-headed of me -- I thought I was
on
another list.
Walter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group
