[psas-avionics] Launch Tower Computer orientation
We preliminarily scheduled an Intro to the Launch Tower Computer meeting for this coming Sunday, the 9th of November. Three things: 1. Paul, can you still make it to that? If not, we should probably reschedule. 2. When should the meeting start? 3. How long do we expect it to last? I can still be there, at any point during the day, and it can last as long as it needs to (but for sanity's sake we should probably keep it to four or six hours). Me and most other people will hopefully have card access to the rocket room by the end of the week so that's a perfectly good place to hold it. ___ psas-avionics mailing list psas-avionics@lists.psas.pdx.edu http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-avionics
Re: [psas-avionics] Launch Tower Computer orientation
I wanted to give a bit more forewarning for other people who wanted to attend just in case. So maybe let's pick a time this Tuesday night for oxt Sunday, the 16th On Nov 8, 2014 2:44 PM, Paul Mullen p...@nellump.net wrote: On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:21:34PM -0800, Aaron Baker wrote: We preliminarily scheduled an Intro to the Launch Tower Computer meeting for this coming Sunday, the 9th of November. I'm still up for a meeting tomorrow. I don't mind postponing until Tuesday night or even next weekend, either. If we meet tomorrow, I suggest we start at noon. I don't expect to need more than two or three hours. -- Paul ___ psas-avionics mailing list psas-avionics@lists.psas.pdx.edu http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-avionics ___ psas-avionics mailing list psas-avionics@lists.psas.pdx.edu http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-avionics
Re: [psas-avionics] Launch Tower Computer orientation
Or. Actually, I'm okay to stay a couple hours extra Tuesday night, and everyone will be there anyway, so maybe that's the best time. On Nov 8, 2014 2:44 PM, Paul Mullen p...@nellump.net wrote: On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:21:34PM -0800, Aaron Baker wrote: We preliminarily scheduled an Intro to the Launch Tower Computer meeting for this coming Sunday, the 9th of November. I'm still up for a meeting tomorrow. I don't mind postponing until Tuesday night or even next weekend, either. If we meet tomorrow, I suggest we start at noon. I don't expect to need more than two or three hours. -- Paul ___ psas-avionics mailing list psas-avionics@lists.psas.pdx.edu http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-avionics ___ psas-avionics mailing list psas-avionics@lists.psas.pdx.edu http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-avionics
[psas-avionics] LTC team preliminary part choices and design change review
I wanted to send out an update about some design decisions the LTC made recently and solicit feedback. Based on internal discussions and conversations with Andrew and Kenny, we've decided to swtich from a 14.4V nominal, 4s lipo battery to a 28.8V nominal, 8s lipo configuration. The primary advantage of this is that it lets us use buck converters down to our power rails at 19V and 5V; configurable buck converters are cheap and easy to find, and have higher efficiencies at a low price point than the boost converters. The downside of this is that we need to do a custom charging circuit because we're moving away from standard 12V nominal MPPT and 4s battery setups. But, upon further investigation, we found the LT8490, which is a combination charger/voltage regulator/solar MPPT, and is discussed below. It will be difficult to implement but is a big win as far as cost and system flexibility. PRELIMINARY COMPONENT CHOICES FOR LTC POWER SYSTEMS: Voltage regulators: This is a 7-pin drop-in converter. It's about $30 per, but it will just work, and give us the current, power, and temperature specs we need. TI PTN78020H (19V rail) TI PTN78020W (5V rail) Battery front-end: LT8490 This is a switching buck/boost regulator with a wide input/output range + charging (LiPO compatible) + solar MPPT. It's very robust and costs about $15. This will be the most complicated circuit and largest time investment of our design, but the work will largely transfer over to the CubeSat power systems. Battery protection: TI BQ77PL900 This is a cell protector/balancer that normally runs on I2C with an analog front-end, but can be configured for stand-alone operation. It is cheap, relatively simple to use, and will do cell balancing for us in the field. Battery: Because we need at least a 2V overhead to provide 19V for shore power in order to use a down-regulator, we will likely use an 8s configuration. 6s is too close (21.6V) to the output, and 7s is available but is a very non-standard battery configuration. Based on assumptions: 90% efficiency, calc. 96W of power (a conservative estimate), 4 hours pure battery, we need a capacity of: 13.2Ah at 28.8V nominal (8s) 15.2Ah at 25.2V nominal (7s) 17.8Ah at 21.6V nominal (6s) We can get two 8s packs at 5.8Ah or four 4s packs at 5.8Ah for around $160. Here's a good option: http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store/__21385__ZIPPY_Compact_5800mAh_8S_25C_Lipo_Pack.html Here's a higher energy-density, lower-discharge (but more than high enough for our purposes) option for the same price: It's a 4p2s pack with 16Ah of storage. http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbycity/store/uh_viewItem.asp?idProduct=66309aff=3019 However, it seems to be perpetually out of stock. We'll keep an eye on it; this would be bulkier but a ton of storage. --- That's all I have for right now. Respond to the list with comments, concerns, criticisms, and invective. Aaron ___ psas-avionics mailing list psas-avionics@lists.psas.pdx.edu http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-avionics
[psas-avionics] Launch-12 BMP180 data
Where in the launch 12 repo is the BMP180 data? Specifically the pressure and temp data from the launch. It's referenced in the post-processing scripts as being in the fc-data folder, but actually it's not. ___ psas-avionics mailing list psas-avionics@lists.psas.pdx.edu http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-avionics