Re: taking the plunge
If you have the MCU and the Focusrite peace, you have enough to get up and running I'm thinking. From there, alot of your choices are going to be bassed on preamp, and converter taist. - Original Message - From: Steve Sparrow To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:28 PM Subject: Re: taking the plunge do they also work with a pc, or are they only for pro tools use. Not really a problem either way, but interesting to know. Steve On 12 Apr 2014, at 12:32 pm, Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com wrote: Hi, I would look at the guitar center stores as I got my digi 003 there on line and they are still around if you search for them. Mine came with an older version of pro tools but as I already had my pro tools 10 I did not use it but still have it and the ilok for that earlier version. How much do you think I could get for that older ilok and the pro tools software version 8? Nick Gawronski On 4/11/2014 9:27 PM, Steve Sparrow wrote: ok. Here is the deal. I am upgrading my studio set up. I have the mackie m c u pro control surface. I have a professional studio, I do all sorts of recording, including some full band recording. So I need a lot of i o. and lots of mic prees. I have been thinking about the motu 869 mk 3 audio interface. It looks good, as it has 8 mic line press, and heaps of other things including an optical in and out. I have a focus right octopree, that I will run out of the optical to give me more inputs. But i don't know if this motu interface works with voice over on a mac. I like the motu because it also has gain nobs on each channel, and the gain control is not software controlled. How ever i've never seen one. Just read about them. I'm not sold on it, and i'm quite interested in looking at anything that will accomplish this task and meet my recording needs. But i'm a bit stuck as to just what is accessible. I don't want to fork out money, and find i can't access at least the basics. From what i can gather, the divi 002 and divi 003 do not exhist anymore. So i can't buy one. Which is a bugger, cause they sound like a good option. Any thoughts welcome. On 12 Apr 2014, at 2:48 am, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote: Well Steve, I would think about the Digi 002, 003 or avid artust series. The Digi 002 will be the cheepist, but if you need good built in preamps, it is the bottom of the line more or less. Also, the 002 can work with Protools 11, but may not carry over to any versions after 11, I have a 002 and a 003 as well as the onyx 1620I. Are you going to use outboard pres or converters? Are you going to be recording professionally for clients, or for more personal stuff? These answers will make a difference. If you were recording for your self, you could probably get away with some of the UA apollo stuff and have some decent converters, pres and affects/plugs, but if you will have larger sessions where you would record multable sources at once then a control surface would be the way to go IMO. - Original Message - From: Steve Sparrow To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:43 PM Subject: RE: taking the plunge Hey Poppa bear. I was wondering if you could tell me what audio interface-soundcard you run with pro tools. I'm interested to know what you rrun , as I'm about to upgrade, and need more advice on choosing something, that will take care of all my audio needs, and is accessable. I've bought a mac book pro, and am learning voice over, and I love it. Hoping to start investigating tools in a couple of months Stgeve From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf OfPoppa Bear Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:58 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hello Steve, this is Poppa Bear from the midi list, glad you made it over here, Chris Smart is over here now and a couple others as well. Slau gave you a good solad bottem line answer. After almost two years with PT, I can't see myself going back to Sonar for recording/engineering. I can't speak on the music production side as much because I am mainly running PT to record, mix and master my clients now. - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:08 AM Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hi Steve, Welcome to the list. I can't comment on the comparison to sonar as I've never used it. I've used Pro Tools since around 2001 after switching from an analog console and multitrack tape machine. I won't sugarcoat it: you have a steep learning curve in front of you. You'll need to understand VoiceOver like the back of your
Re: Selecting to end of song for editing
HI Poppa, Use shuffle mode for the cut delete not slip. :) YMMV Chuck On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:49 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: I got you Chuck. One other after thought, on bounce down all of that cut material will not leava blank space I assume. I have had that happen once or twice, but I think it was because I left just a hair of audio at the end of a large bar count. - Original Message - From: CHUCK REICHEL To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 8:36 AM Subject: Re: Selecting to end of song for editing Hi mcdiemert, Shift option return only selects the section. You half to cut copy or paste after that key command, just to clarify. Chuck CHUCK REICHEL soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com www.SoundPictureRecording.com 954-742-0019 Isaiah 26 : 3 Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because he trusteth in thee. In GOD I Trust On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:19 PM, mcdiemert . wrote: shift option return will delete to end of session. On 4/11/14, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, if shift and return selects from the incertian point to the beginning of the song, what command will select from the incercian point to the end of the song? I have clients who bring in instrumentals that are maybe 70 bars long, but they only lay down material for half of that sometimes and I need to select and delete the unused audio. Thanks for any tips -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: taking the plunge
Good morning, I personally use the scarlet 18 I 20, fromfocusrite is pretty much the sapphire 40. One major advantage is you don't really need to use the Scarlet makes control. Once installed I simply just use this in ProTools. Very decent sounding unit for the price point! I'm very impressed with it Sent from my iPhone On Apr 11, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote: Just to add to my last email. I have also looked at the usb pre sonis and would consider this if is accessible with voice over, I’ve also thought about the apolo, but there is not much i o on the u a d stuff. But i’ve heard great things about there plugging. I know ford and others on this list uses u a d plugging, But i’m not sure about accessibility on there hardware. As i said, i’m happy to consider all options. I’d also settle for less mic press if everything else was looking good. Steve On 12 Apr 2014, at 2:48 am, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote: Well Steve, I would think about the Digi 002, 003 or avid artust series. The Digi 002 will be the cheepist, but if you need good built in preamps, it is the bottom of the line more or less. Also, the 002 can work with Protools 11, but may not carry over to any versions after 11, I have a 002 and a 003 as well as the onyx 1620I. Are you going to use outboard pres or converters? Are you going to be recording professionally for clients, or for more personal stuff? These answers will make a difference. If you were recording for your self, you could probably get away with some of the UA apollo stuff and have some decent converters, pres and affects/plugs, but if you will have larger sessions where you would record multable sources at once then a control surface would be the way to go IMO. - Original Message - From: Steve Sparrow To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:43 PM Subject: RE: taking the plunge Hey Poppa bear. I was wondering if you could tell me what audio interface-soundcard you run with pro tools. I’m interested to know what you rrun , as I’m about to upgrade, and need more advice on choosing something, that will take care of all my audio needs, and is accessable. I’ve bought a mac book pro, and am learning voice over, and I love it. Hoping to start investigating tools in a couple of months Stgeve From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf OfPoppa Bear Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:58 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hello Steve, this is Poppa Bear from the midi list, glad you made it over here, Chris Smart is over here now and a couple others as well. Slau gave you a good solad bottem line answer. After almost two years with PT, I can't see myself going back to Sonar for recording/engineering. I can't speak on the music production side as much because I am mainly running PT to record, mix and master my clients now. - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:08 AM Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hi Steve, Welcome to the list. I can't comment on the comparison to sonar as I've never used it. I've used Pro Tools since around 2001 after switching from an analog console and multitrack tape machine. I won't sugarcoat it: you have a steep learning curve in front of you. You'll need to understand VoiceOver like the back of your hand as well as have a good grasp of the OS and how it works. Aside from that, Pro Tools is undoubtedly a complex program but so is Sonar and you learned that over time so, most importantly, you'll have to plan to spend a bunch of time learning it if you decide to go down this path. Cheers, Slau On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote: From: Steve Sparrow [mailto:i...@sparrowsound.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, Hi. My name is Steve Sparrow. I have just joined the list here. I am very seriously considering working with pro tools. I am currently a sonar user running sonar 8.5 with jaws. I am now considering pro tools, mainly because as we know the current sonar is no longer as accessable as it was. I have not bought a mac yet, but I think I’m getting very close to doing so. I know a little about voice over, and would be happy to put the time in to learning it. But I have never used pro tools and no nothing of it’s workings. So not really sured just where to start. I guess the first thing to find out is just how much access we have. I run a recording studio, and use sonar just about all the time. Does pro tools give us as much accessability as what I am used too in sonar. I am quiet happy to put the time in to learning a new system, if I can turn it in to a good solid work horse. I also use a lot of waves plugins. mainly waves API, and ssl 4000 colections. I also use a
Re: taking the plunge
Hi. Yes, that's me with the Motu 828MKII firewire audio/midi interface for sale. The drivers are really solid and the preamps are very clean with a lot of headroom. Mac/Win;32 and 64 bit compatible... Drop me a message off list if interested. Thanks, Cameron. On 4/12/14, Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote: Good morning, I personally use the scarlet 18 I 20, fromfocusrite is pretty much the sapphire 40. One major advantage is you don't really need to use the Scarlet makes control. Once installed I simply just use this in ProTools. Very decent sounding unit for the price point! I'm very impressed with it Sent from my iPhone On Apr 11, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote: Just to add to my last email. I have also looked at the usb pre sonis and would consider this if is accessible with voice over, I've also thought about the apolo, but there is not much i o on the u a d stuff. But i've heard great things about there plugging. I know ford and others on this list uses u a d plugging, But i'm not sure about accessibility on there hardware. As i said, i'm happy to consider all options. I'd also settle for less mic press if everything else was looking good. Steve On 12 Apr 2014, at 2:48 am, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote: Well Steve, I would think about the Digi 002, 003 or avid artust series. The Digi 002 will be the cheepist, but if you need good built in preamps, it is the bottom of the line more or less. Also, the 002 can work with Protools 11, but may not carry over to any versions after 11, I have a 002 and a 003 as well as the onyx 1620I. Are you going to use outboard pres or converters? Are you going to be recording professionally for clients, or for more personal stuff? These answers will make a difference. If you were recording for your self, you could probably get away with some of the UA apollo stuff and have some decent converters, pres and affects/plugs, but if you will have larger sessions where you would record multable sources at once then a control surface would be the way to go IMO. - Original Message - From: Steve Sparrow To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:43 PM Subject: RE: taking the plunge Hey Poppa bear. I was wondering if you could tell me what audio interface-soundcard you run with pro tools. I'm interested to know what you rrun , as I'm about to upgrade, and need more advice on choosing something, that will take care of all my audio needs, and is accessable. I've bought a mac book pro, and am learning voice over, and I love it. Hoping to start investigating tools in a couple of months Stgeve From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf OfPoppa Bear Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:58 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hello Steve, this is Poppa Bear from the midi list, glad you made it over here, Chris Smart is over here now and a couple others as well. Slau gave you a good solad bottem line answer. After almost two years with PT, I can't see myself going back to Sonar for recording/engineering. I can't speak on the music production side as much because I am mainly running PT to record, mix and master my clients now. - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:08 AM Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hi Steve, Welcome to the list. I can't comment on the comparison to sonar as I've never used it. I've used Pro Tools since around 2001 after switching from an analog console and multitrack tape machine. I won't sugarcoat it: you have a steep learning curve in front of you. You'll need to understand VoiceOver like the back of your hand as well as have a good grasp of the OS and how it works. Aside from that, Pro Tools is undoubtedly a complex program but so is Sonar and you learned that over time so, most importantly, you'll have to plan to spend a bunch of time learning it if you decide to go down this path. Cheers, Slau On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote: From: Steve Sparrow [mailto:i...@sparrowsound.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, Hi. My name is Steve Sparrow. I have just joined the list here. I am very seriously considering working with pro tools. I am currently a sonar user running sonar 8.5 with jaws. I am now considering pro tools, mainly because as we know the current sonar is no longer as accessable as it was. I have not bought a mac yet, but I think I'm getting very close to doing so. I know a little about voice over, and would be happy to put the time in to learning it. But I have never used pro tools and no nothing of it's workings. So not really sured just where to start. I guess the first thing to find out is just how much access we have. I run a recording studio, and use sonar just about all the time. Does pro tools give us as
Re: taking the plunge
Hi caneran. I am actually considering the motu 869. hybrid mk iii From what i can gather it's basically the same as the 828 with a few extras. Just wondering about your thoughts on this interface. I am a new voice over user on the mac, and have used windows and jaws for years in the studio. are there any issues with accessibility using this card. Can we get around the hardware ok. I hav heard from gord that is easy to go in to parameters that we don't want, and upset some of our settings. What are your thoughts on this. The other big things i need to know are. Does voice over interact with the motu well on the mac. and is it good for jaws on a pc. Sounds like the motu will meet my needs, subject to accessibility. the specks look good. Guess the only very minor concern i had when looking at the specks was that it only has 53 d.b. of gain on the press. But think i can deal with this, and from what you've said, the head room is good. I like the fact that there are 8 good mic press in this interface, and gain nobs. A lot of other cards i've looked at seem to have gain control as part of there software, and i was not sure if i could get around this. i'm interested in purchasing the motu, unless you feel there are issues i should be aware of. Also if you feel i should be considering something other than the motu i'd be interested in your thoughts. nothing set in concrete here. Thanks in advance Steve On 12 Apr 2014, at 11:30 pm, Cameron Strife came...@cameronstrife.com wrote: Hi. Yes, that's me with the Motu 828MKII firewire audio/midi interface for sale. The drivers are really solid and the preamps are very clean with a lot of headroom. Mac/Win;32 and 64 bit compatible... Drop me a message off list if interested. Thanks, Cameron. On 4/12/14, Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote: Good morning, I personally use the scarlet 18 I 20, fromfocusrite is pretty much the sapphire 40. One major advantage is you don't really need to use the Scarlet makes control. Once installed I simply just use this in ProTools. Very decent sounding unit for the price point! I'm very impressed with it Sent from my iPhone On Apr 11, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote: Just to add to my last email. I have also looked at the usb pre sonis and would consider this if is accessible with voice over, I've also thought about the apolo, but there is not much i o on the u a d stuff. But i've heard great things about there plugging. I know ford and others on this list uses u a d plugging, But i'm not sure about accessibility on there hardware. As i said, i'm happy to consider all options. I'd also settle for less mic press if everything else was looking good. Steve On 12 Apr 2014, at 2:48 am, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote: Well Steve, I would think about the Digi 002, 003 or avid artust series. The Digi 002 will be the cheepist, but if you need good built in preamps, it is the bottom of the line more or less. Also, the 002 can work with Protools 11, but may not carry over to any versions after 11, I have a 002 and a 003 as well as the onyx 1620I. Are you going to use outboard pres or converters? Are you going to be recording professionally for clients, or for more personal stuff? These answers will make a difference. If you were recording for your self, you could probably get away with some of the UA apollo stuff and have some decent converters, pres and affects/plugs, but if you will have larger sessions where you would record multable sources at once then a control surface would be the way to go IMO. - Original Message - From: Steve Sparrow To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:43 PM Subject: RE: taking the plunge Hey Poppa bear. I was wondering if you could tell me what audio interface-soundcard you run with pro tools. I'm interested to know what you rrun , as I'm about to upgrade, and need more advice on choosing something, that will take care of all my audio needs, and is accessable. I've bought a mac book pro, and am learning voice over, and I love it. Hoping to start investigating tools in a couple of months Stgeve From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf OfPoppa Bear Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:58 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hello Steve, this is Poppa Bear from the midi list, glad you made it over here, Chris Smart is over here now and a couple others as well. Slau gave you a good solad bottem line answer. After almost two years with PT, I can't see myself going back to Sonar for recording/engineering. I can't speak on the music production side as much because I am mainly running PT to record, mix and master my clients now. - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:08 AM Subject: Re: taking the
Re: taking the plunge
Ok. Thanks for this mat. I have heard good things about the scarlet. Think i'll just go and check this out. Do you know if it works with windows and jaws, running sonar. I am just getting in to the mac, only had one for a couple of weeks. I will more than likely be running sonar 8.5.3 for at least a few months yet. But tools is ware i'm heading i think. Focus right do some nice stuff. Thanks again. Steve On 12 Apr 2014, at 11:06 pm, Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote: Good morning, I personally use the scarlet 18 I 20, fromfocusrite is pretty much the sapphire 40. One major advantage is you don't really need to use the Scarlet makes control. Once installed I simply just use this in ProTools. Very decent sounding unit for the price point! I'm very impressed with it Sent from my iPhone On Apr 11, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote: Just to add to my last email. I have also looked at the usb pre sonis and would consider this if is accessible with voice over, I've also thought about the apolo, but there is not much i o on the u a d stuff. But i've heard great things about there plugging. I know ford and others on this list uses u a d plugging, But i'm not sure about accessibility on there hardware. As i said, i'm happy to consider all options. I'd also settle for less mic press if everything else was looking good. Steve On 12 Apr 2014, at 2:48 am, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote: Well Steve, I would think about the Digi 002, 003 or avid artust series. The Digi 002 will be the cheepist, but if you need good built in preamps, it is the bottom of the line more or less. Also, the 002 can work with Protools 11, but may not carry over to any versions after 11, I have a 002 and a 003 as well as the onyx 1620I. Are you going to use outboard pres or converters? Are you going to be recording professionally for clients, or for more personal stuff? These answers will make a difference. If you were recording for your self, you could probably get away with some of the UA apollo stuff and have some decent converters, pres and affects/plugs, but if you will have larger sessions where you would record multable sources at once then a control surface would be the way to go IMO. - Original Message - From: Steve Sparrow To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:43 PM Subject: RE: taking the plunge Hey Poppa bear. I was wondering if you could tell me what audio interface-soundcard you run with pro tools. I'm interested to know what you rrun , as I'm about to upgrade, and need more advice on choosing something, that will take care of all my audio needs, and is accessable. I've bought a mac book pro, and am learning voice over, and I love it. Hoping to start investigating tools in a couple of months Stgeve From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf OfPoppa Bear Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:58 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hello Steve, this is Poppa Bear from the midi list, glad you made it over here, Chris Smart is over here now and a couple others as well. Slau gave you a good solad bottem line answer. After almost two years with PT, I can't see myself going back to Sonar for recording/engineering. I can't speak on the music production side as much because I am mainly running PT to record, mix and master my clients now. - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:08 AM Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hi Steve, Welcome to the list. I can't comment on the comparison to sonar as I've never used it. I've used Pro Tools since around 2001 after switching from an analog console and multitrack tape machine. I won't sugarcoat it: you have a steep learning curve in front of you. You'll need to understand VoiceOver like the back of your hand as well as have a good grasp of the OS and how it works. Aside from that, Pro Tools is undoubtedly a complex program but so is Sonar and you learned that over time so, most importantly, you'll have to plan to spend a bunch of time learning it if you decide to go down this path. Cheers, Slau On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote: From: Steve Sparrow [mailto:i...@sparrowsound.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, Hi. My name is Steve Sparrow. I have just joined the list here. I am very seriously considering working with pro tools. I am currently a sonar user running sonar 8.5 with jaws. I am now considering pro tools, mainly because as we know the current sonar is no longer as accessable as it was. I have not bought a mac yet, but I think I'm getting very close to doing so. I know a little about voice over, and would be happy to put the time in to learning it. But I have never used pro tools and no
Re: taking the plunge
Hello, not sure if it works in sonar, but I have used it in reaper under windows with success. I have tracked entire albums with this unit and the sound quality couple with ProTools comes out very nicely Sent from my iPhone On Apr 12, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote: Ok. Thanks for this mat. I have heard good things about the scarlet. Think i’ll just go and check this out. Do you know if it works with windows and jaws, running sonar. I am just getting in to the mac, only had one for a couple of weeks. I will more than likely be running sonar 8.5.3 for at least a few months yet. But tools is ware i’m heading i think. Focus right do some nice stuff. Thanks again. Steve On 12 Apr 2014, at 11:06 pm, Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote: Good morning, I personally use the scarlet 18 I 20, fromfocusrite is pretty much the sapphire 40. One major advantage is you don't really need to use the Scarlet makes control. Once installed I simply just use this in ProTools. Very decent sounding unit for the price point! I'm very impressed with it Sent from my iPhone On Apr 11, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote: Just to add to my last email. I have also looked at the usb pre sonis and would consider this if is accessible with voice over, I’ve also thought about the apolo, but there is not much i o on the u a d stuff. But i’ve heard great things about there plugging. I know ford and others on this list uses u a d plugging, But i’m not sure about accessibility on there hardware. As i said, i’m happy to consider all options. I’d also settle for less mic press if everything else was looking good. Steve On 12 Apr 2014, at 2:48 am, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote: Well Steve, I would think about the Digi 002, 003 or avid artust series. The Digi 002 will be the cheepist, but if you need good built in preamps, it is the bottom of the line more or less. Also, the 002 can work with Protools 11, but may not carry over to any versions after 11, I have a 002 and a 003 as well as the onyx 1620I. Are you going to use outboard pres or converters? Are you going to be recording professionally for clients, or for more personal stuff? These answers will make a difference. If you were recording for your self, you could probably get away with some of the UA apollo stuff and have some decent converters, pres and affects/plugs, but if you will have larger sessions where you would record multable sources at once then a control surface would be the way to go IMO. - Original Message - From: Steve Sparrow To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:43 PM Subject: RE: taking the plunge Hey Poppa bear. I was wondering if you could tell me what audio interface-soundcard you run with pro tools. I’m interested to know what you rrun , as I’m about to upgrade, and need more advice on choosing something, that will take care of all my audio needs, and is accessable. I’ve bought a mac book pro, and am learning voice over, and I love it. Hoping to start investigating tools in a couple of months Stgeve From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf OfPoppa Bear Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:58 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hello Steve, this is Poppa Bear from the midi list, glad you made it over here, Chris Smart is over here now and a couple others as well. Slau gave you a good solad bottem line answer. After almost two years with PT, I can't see myself going back to Sonar for recording/engineering. I can't speak on the music production side as much because I am mainly running PT to record, mix and master my clients now. - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:08 AM Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hi Steve, Welcome to the list. I can't comment on the comparison to sonar as I've never used it. I've used Pro Tools since around 2001 after switching from an analog console and multitrack tape machine. I won't sugarcoat it: you have a steep learning curve in front of you. You'll need to understand VoiceOver like the back of your hand as well as have a good grasp of the OS and how it works. Aside from that, Pro Tools is undoubtedly a complex program but so is Sonar and you learned that over time so, most importantly, you'll have to plan to spend a bunch of time learning it if you decide to go down this path. Cheers, Slau On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote: From: Steve Sparrow [mailto:i...@sparrowsound.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, Hi. My name is Steve Sparrow. I have just joined the list here. I am very seriously considering working with pro tools. I am currently a sonar user running sonar 8.5 with jaws. I
Re: taking the plunge
ok. This is very good to know. I will research this a bit more. Out of interest, how did you find reaper. How does it compare to pro tools for you. I have not really played with either yet. Had a little play with reaper, and i reckon i could get it sussed with a bit of work. Have not seen pro tools at all yet. But i'm about to get the pod casts from apple vis. Steve On 13 Apr 2014, at 10:55 am, Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, not sure if it works in sonar, but I have used it in reaper under windows with success. I have tracked entire albums with this unit and the sound quality couple with ProTools comes out very nicely Sent from my iPhone On Apr 12, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote: Ok. Thanks for this mat. I have heard good things about the scarlet. Think i'll just go and check this out. Do you know if it works with windows and jaws, running sonar. I am just getting in to the mac, only had one for a couple of weeks. I will more than likely be running sonar 8.5.3 for at least a few months yet. But tools is ware i'm heading i think. Focus right do some nice stuff. Thanks again. Steve On 12 Apr 2014, at 11:06 pm, Matt Diemert mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote: Good morning, I personally use the scarlet 18 I 20, fromfocusrite is pretty much the sapphire 40. One major advantage is you don't really need to use the Scarlet makes control. Once installed I simply just use this in ProTools. Very decent sounding unit for the price point! I'm very impressed with it Sent from my iPhone On Apr 11, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote: Just to add to my last email. I have also looked at the usb pre sonis and would consider this if is accessible with voice over, I've also thought about the apolo, but there is not much i o on the u a d stuff. But i've heard great things about there plugging. I know ford and others on this list uses u a d plugging, But i'm not sure about accessibility on there hardware. As i said, i'm happy to consider all options. I'd also settle for less mic press if everything else was looking good. Steve On 12 Apr 2014, at 2:48 am, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote: Well Steve, I would think about the Digi 002, 003 or avid artust series. The Digi 002 will be the cheepist, but if you need good built in preamps, it is the bottom of the line more or less. Also, the 002 can work with Protools 11, but may not carry over to any versions after 11, I have a 002 and a 003 as well as the onyx 1620I. Are you going to use outboard pres or converters? Are you going to be recording professionally for clients, or for more personal stuff? These answers will make a difference. If you were recording for your self, you could probably get away with some of the UA apollo stuff and have some decent converters, pres and affects/plugs, but if you will have larger sessions where you would record multable sources at once then a control surface would be the way to go IMO. - Original Message - From: Steve Sparrow To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:43 PM Subject: RE: taking the plunge Hey Poppa bear. I was wondering if you could tell me what audio interface-soundcard you run with pro tools. I'm interested to know what you rrun , as I'm about to upgrade, and need more advice on choosing something, that will take care of all my audio needs, and is accessable. I've bought a mac book pro, and am learning voice over, and I love it. Hoping to start investigating tools in a couple of months Stgeve From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf OfPoppa Bear Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:58 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hello Steve, this is Poppa Bear from the midi list, glad you made it over here, Chris Smart is over here now and a couple others as well. Slau gave you a good solad bottem line answer. After almost two years with PT, I can't see myself going back to Sonar for recording/engineering. I can't speak on the music production side as much because I am mainly running PT to record, mix and master my clients now. - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:08 AM Subject: Re: taking the plunge Hi Steve, Welcome to the list. I can't comment on the comparison to sonar as I've never used it. I've used Pro Tools since around 2001 after switching from an analog console and multitrack tape machine. I won't sugarcoat it: you have a steep learning curve in front of you. You'll need to understand VoiceOver like the back of your hand as well as have a good grasp of the OS and how it works. Aside from that, Pro Tools is undoubtedly a complex program but so is Sonar and you learned that over time so, most importantly, you'll have to plan to
Oxford plugins and pt 11
Hi, i can't change the Oxford Sonnox plugins parameters value correctly in pt 11 when voice over is active, i press(vo) arrows up-down-right-left, and i only can't move the value in a very small range, in example from 0.0db to 0.1db, or I can only go ahed but i can't go back. Do i need to use different commands or do i need to connect an external device? Is 002 a god one in case of? And how can i access the dynamic gain reduction indicator?T Thanks. Nico -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
