Re: [cabfpub] [FEEDBACK NEEDED] Pull Request: Pandoc-Friendly Formatting

2019-10-29 Thread Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public
Hi Ryan,

Thanks for the feedback! I skimmed the pull request comments last night 
(because I have no life) and they generally look good; I’ll try and get some 
specific feedback on them and update the pull request this week.

I probably could have sent it out to the SCWG mailer; I think I just 
brain-froze on it. Since it’s already on the Forum mailer, we can either leave 
it here or migrate it; six-of-one, square-root-of-thirty-six-of-the-other to 
me. :)


--
Jos Purvis (jopur...@cisco.com<mailto:jopur...@cisco.com>)
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems  | Cryptographic Services
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105  | +1 919.991.9114 (desk)

From: Public  on behalf of CA/B Forum Public List 

Reply-To: Ryan Sleevi , CA/B Forum Public List 

Date: Monday, October 28, 2019 at 8:19 PM
To: CA/B Forum Public List 
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] [FEEDBACK NEEDED] Pull Request: Pandoc-Friendly 
Formatting

Hi Jos!

I know things have been quiet here, but I commented a little on the conversion 
of the BRs.

I know this was sent to Public, but was it meant to go to servercert-wg@, since 
it's for the Server Cert WG? I don't see any of the other documents being 
touched/changed.

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 11:42 AM Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public 
mailto:public@cabforum.org>> wrote:
All,

I’ve created a pull request containing the formatting changes necessary to 
permit using pandoc to automatically convert the BRs from Markdown to PDF, 
HTML, and Word/DOCX. I think the changes are whitespace and markup 
modifications that do not change the content or meaning of the BRs, but since 
it’s a significant number of changes, I’m happy to bring it to ballot (or 
incorporate it into the next ‘Cleanup Ballot’) if people would prefer.

The link to the pull request is below; I’d welcome feedback on whether and how 
people would like this brought to ballot.

https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/142

Cheers,

Jos

--
Jos Purvis (jopur...@cisco.com<mailto:jopur...@cisco.com>)
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems  | Cryptographic Services
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105  | +1 919.991.9114 (desk)
___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org<mailto:Public@cabforum.org>
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public


Re: [cabfpub] [FEEDBACK NEEDED] Pull Request: Pandoc-Friendly Formatting

2019-10-28 Thread Ryan Sleevi via Public
Hi Jos!

I know things have been quiet here, but I commented a little on the
conversion of the BRs.

I know this was sent to Public, but was it meant to go to servercert-wg@,
since it's for the Server Cert WG? I don't see any of the other documents
being touched/changed.

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 11:42 AM Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public <
public@cabforum.org> wrote:

> All,
>
>
>
> I’ve created a pull request containing the formatting changes necessary to
> permit using pandoc to automatically convert the BRs from Markdown to PDF,
> HTML, and Word/DOCX. I *think* the changes are whitespace and markup
> modifications that do not change the content or meaning of the BRs, but
> since it’s a significant number of changes, I’m happy to bring it to ballot
> (or incorporate it into the next ‘Cleanup Ballot’) if people would prefer.
>
>
>
> The link to the pull request is below; I’d welcome feedback on whether and
> how people would like this brought to ballot.
>
>
>
> https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/142
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Jos
>
>
>
> --
> Jos Purvis (jopur...@cisco.com)
> .:|:.:|:. cisco systems  | Cryptographic Services
> PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105  | +1 919.991.9114 <(919)%20991-9114> (desk)
> ___
> Public mailing list
> Public@cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public


Re: [cabfpub] [FEEDBACK NEEDED] Pull Request: Pandoc-Friendly Formatting

2019-10-03 Thread Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public
In case anyone is interested in seeing how the BR document renders in GitHub 
with these changes, I’ll save you clicking around to find it:

    
https://github.com/cabforum/documents/blob/1fd64fdb7bdc84c83c98c584db602ae77965c749/docs/BR.md

 



 

 

-- 
Jos Purvis (jopur...@cisco.com)
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems  | Cryptographic Services
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105  | +1 919.991.9114 (desk)

 

From: Public  on behalf of CA/B Forum Public List 

Reply-To: "Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" , CA/B Forum Public List 

Date: Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 11:42 AM
To: CA/B Forum Public List 
Subject: [cabfpub] [FEEDBACK NEEDED] Pull Request: Pandoc-Friendly Formatting

 

All,

 

I’ve created a pull request containing the formatting changes necessary to 
permit using pandoc to automatically convert the BRs from Markdown to PDF, 
HTML, and Word/DOCX. I think the changes are whitespace and markup 
modifications that do not change the content or meaning of the BRs, but since 
it’s a significant number of changes, I’m happy to bring it to ballot (or 
incorporate it into the next ‘Cleanup Ballot’) if people would prefer.

 

The link to the pull request is below; I’d welcome feedback on whether and how 
people would like this brought to ballot.

 

https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/142

 

Cheers,

 

Jos

 

-- 
Jos Purvis (jopur...@cisco.com)
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems  | Cryptographic Services
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105  | +1 919.991.9114 (desk)



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public


[cabfpub] [FEEDBACK NEEDED] Pull Request: Pandoc-Friendly Formatting

2019-10-03 Thread Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public
All,

 

I’ve created a pull request containing the formatting changes necessary to 
permit using pandoc to automatically convert the BRs from Markdown to PDF, 
HTML, and Word/DOCX. I think the changes are whitespace and markup 
modifications that do not change the content or meaning of the BRs, but since 
it’s a significant number of changes, I’m happy to bring it to ballot (or 
incorporate it into the next ‘Cleanup Ballot’) if people would prefer.

 

The link to the pull request is below; I’d welcome feedback on whether and how 
people would like this brought to ballot.

 

https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/142

 

Cheers,

 

Jos

 

-- 
Jos Purvis (jopur...@cisco.com)
.:|:.:|:. cisco systems  | Cryptographic Services
PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105  | +1 919.991.9114 (desk)



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public