GUN OFFENCES

2000-12-13 Thread Martin Essenberg







MARTIN ESSENBERGLot 7 Runnymede Estate 
RdNanango, 4615(07) 41-632-423 (ah)e-mail- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Gun 
web-site- http://www.geocities.com/marsiegen/index.html

Hi to all,
UNLICENCED POSSESSION OF THE STOCK OF A 
RIFLE
(Could anyone receiving this pass it on to other 
pro gun people)

I am due in the Nanango Magistrates Court at 9.30 this morning (14 
Dec) to try to prove once again that the Queensland Weapons Act 1996 is 
illegal.

Attached is a Word document with the case I will be puttong 
forward.

I'll let you know how it goes.

Martin
 COURT 14 Dec.doc


GUN OFFENCES

2000-10-21 Thread Martin Essenberg







MARTIN ESSENBERGLot 7 Runnymede Estate RdNanango, 
4615(07) 41-632-423 (ah)e-mail- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Gun 
web-site- http://www.geocities.com/marsiegen/index.html

Hi all,

Please note that for some reason Yahoo changed my web address. the 
new address is above.

Below is an newspaper article about Brain 
Fyffe. He has been fighting the Victorian Governmentsince 1984and is 
now onweapons offences. After a raid on his home involving 
60Police he was charged withpossession of various weapons that he 
sayswereNOT EVERowned by him.If so it would appear that 
he is being framed.

Martin

Press Release sent to the 5 main Australian newspapers and the 
International Media 

Brigitte Straulino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ONE VOICE  ONE PEOPLE Human Rights Defenders (OVOP) work within 
of the "The Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups 
and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights 
and Fundamental Freedoms". We accept that: 
"NGOs (Non-Governmental Organisations) are essential in 
providing details and case studies which would not be available from Government 
sources." [UN Publication]
OVOP filed a complaint for Mr Brian Fyffe to 
the UN Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) because of the appalling human rights 
violation this man and his family suffered in Australia. For more details and 
the history of this case including the table of human rights violation see our 
web site http://onevoice.freeservers.com/
On 10/10/00 the family Fyffe enjoyed just another police 
raid on their property:

  At night after 8 p.m. an approximately 60men strong force 
  consisting of the police, sheriff's officers and Police Special Operations 
  Group appeared on his land.

  Brian Fyffe was handcuffed, arrested and charged with making 
  threats to kill and with multiple firearm offences as it was alleged that guns 
  were found on his property. 
In a previous police raid - conducted by the Special Operations 
Group and attended by the media, helicopters, horses and dogs - the police found 
modified clocks and batteries in the house. Brian Fyffe was charged with 
possession of explosives under suspicious circumstances, referring to the alarm 
clocks. His family was also arrested (see details on web site).
The clocks found on Brian Fyffe's property were being modified 
by the youngest son, Joe, who was an apprentice diesel mechanic at the time, for 
use as watchdogs on diesel irrigation motors. This was done for the purpose that 
the clocks can shut down a motor at a certain time in the night, without someone 
having to get out of bed. 
Brian Fyffe was held without bail in custody without a trial for 
10 months. 18 serious criminal offences were dropped when the matter was finally 
heard. The charges for possession of explosives under suspicious circumstances 
were upheld despite that no evidence of explosives, detonators or anything 
connected with explosives had been found on the property. Although it turned out 
in the end that the Fyffe family suffered a wrong the Australian Government 
refused to compensate him.
What are the implications of the Fyffe case in 
Australia?
There is indeed an alarming situation in Australia due to the 
precedent set by this case:


  The legal authorities in Australia must find any one in the 
  possession of an alarm clock or a similar device guilty of having the 
  intention to build a bomb in order to avoid discrimination. 

  People in disputes with their business partners, neighbours 
  or with banks, governments, government departments, or any other Australian 
  authority, when found in possession of alarm clocks or similar devices are 
  guilty of being potential bombers and a serious threat to the national 
  security.

  Consequently every civil court case in Australia where the 
  parties are in possession of alarm clocks or similar devices becomes a 
  criminal matter and in some states is subject to mandatory 
  sentencing.

  Considering the amount of alarm clocks and similar devices in 
  use in Australia, this country is in danger to develop into a convict 
  nation.

Unless the Australian Government appoints a Minister with the 
portfolio for alarm clocks and similar devices and legislates retrospectively 
the possession and the use of the above via licensing (like guns), Brian Fyffe 
is entitled to an effective remedy for the violation of his rights under the 
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
It is however a sad fact that human rights are not implemented 
into the law in Australia such failure causing the country to be an outsider by 
modern democratic standards.
Mason CJ, previous Chief Judge of the High Court in Australia 
expresses this situation, when he said: 
"Every democratic, industrialised country except 
Australia has legal protection of rights, including the right to equality, 
of one kind or another". 
Because of the fact mentioned above, the Brian Fyffe case is 
just one of many serious cases