Re: RfR: CORS tests - deadline 6 December
Le 22 nov. 2012 à 02:04, Odin Hørthe Omdal a écrit : > > http://test.s0.no/w3c-tests/webappsec/tests/cors/submitted/opera/staging/testrunner.html using this above. >Opera: 92% >Chrome: 90% >Firefox: 81% >IE: 76% Safari Version 6.0.2 (7536.26.17) Application ran for 159 seconds. Score 55.30% Pass 146 Fail 118 # Tests fail: basic.html: 1-2,5-6 credentials-flag.htm: 10-15 preflight-cache.htm: 4-5 redirect-origin.htm: 2-5, 7, 12, 15-43 remote-origin.htm: 13-45 request-headers.htm: 4 simple-requests.htm: 3, 6, 9, 24 status-async.htm: 1, 5-18 status-preflight.htm: 1-16 status.htm: 4 As a note I do not have the same score than yours for Opera. Application ran for 86 seconds. Opera 12.11 Rev 1661 Mac OS X 10.7.5 Score: 76.12% Pass: 102 Fail: 32 -- Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ Developer Relations, Opera Software
[Bug 13681] Make FormData.append return the FormData object
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 Anne changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Anne --- Once ECMAScript adopts this pattern, and looking at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Map it won't, we should consider it, no sooner imo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 16309] meaning of "user interferes with the request"?
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16309 Anne changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NEEDSINFO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 16295] clarify intention of early termination of abort/send
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16295 Anne changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Anne --- This needs to be rewritten as per the other bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 19470 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 20038] New: Upgrade FormData
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20038 Bug ID: 20038 Summary: Upgrade FormData Classification: Unclassified Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XHR Assignee: ann...@annevk.nl Reporter: ann...@annevk.nl QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzi...@w3.org CC: m...@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org We probably want to do some or all of http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FormData but it should be coordinated closely with the URLQuery work (and vice versa). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
RfR: CORS tests - deadline 6 December
This is a request for review of Cross Origin Resource Sharing tests. http://w3c-test.org/webappsec/tests/cors/submitted/opera/staging/ Since there's server side components, you'd like to check out the code: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webappsec/summary I've done a testsuite run on Presto (Opera), WebKit (Chrome), Gecko (Firefox) and Trident (IE) on a server where everything works correctly. http://odinho.html5.org/CORS/testsuite-report.html (Needs javascript right now, but I can compile a flat version later) The w3c-test.org server seems to be doing some nasty things (like eating the OPTIONS header) right now, therefore the testsuite will fail more than it should there. You can run the tests with fewer failures here: http://test.s0.no/w3c-tests/webappsec/tests/cors/submitted/opera/staging/testrunner.html NOTE: 4 of the basic tests will fail, because I'm too lazy to even try setting up SSL on my server. But those 4 should work on w3c-test.org For people that don't like clicking links on the dangerous intarwebs, I can include the most interesting numbers here: Opera: 92% Chrome: 90% Firefox: 81% IE: 76% So quite okay all-around! Only a very few select tests has no passes in any engine. I have read and re-read the spec, and asked annevk and abarth about that, and as far as I can see, the tests should follow the spec. If you have any comments, please send them by Thursday, 2012-12-06 (~3 weeks from now, and my birthday!) If you review any set of the tests and find no issues, please state that as a reply to this RfR (so we can get a sense of whether or not anyone reviewed the tests). In the absence of any comments, these tests will be considered Approved. -- Odin Hørthe Omdal (Velmont/odinho) · Core, Opera Software, http://opera.com
Editor change for "Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs" specification
Hi, Anant stepped down as an editor of "Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs" specification [1] but Mozilla is still interested in this specification so I will replace Anant as an editor. However, given the feedback we got on this specification [2], we are merging it with the "Runtime and security model" specification that will happen in the System Applications Working Group [3]. We are not against keeping the specification in this WG but we fear that it might not gain much traction as-is. [1] http://mozilla.github.com/webapps-spec/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/1017.html [3] http://www.w3.org/2012/09/sysapps-wg-charter Cheers, -- Mounir
