[push-api] Dependency on System Messages
Hi Bryan, Eduardo, All, While working through the push notification versus push message thread, I noticed Push API directly refers to System Messages as defined by SysApps' [runtime] spec. Based on the Note at the top of [runtime], it appears work on that spec has stopped. As such, what is the plan for the Push API spec regarding the dependency on the System Messages feature? -Thanks, AB [runtime] http://runtime.sysapps.org/
Re: [push-api] Dependency on System Messages
One of the other changes in progress is to include service workers on the design of the API. I don't know if that replaces system messages in total but the necessary changes will be considered when a new draft is submitted. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan On Mar 13, 2014, at 12:40 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.commailto:art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Hi Bryan, Eduardo, All, While working through the push notification versus push message thread, I noticed Push API directly refers to System Messages as defined by SysApps' [runtime] spec. Based on the Note at the top of [runtime], it appears work on that spec has stopped. As such, what is the plan for the Push API spec regarding the dependency on the System Messages feature? -Thanks, AB [runtime] http://runtime.sysapps.org/
Re: [push-api] Dependency on System Messages
In Blink/Chrome we are looking into the Push API. We intend to use Service Workers as an alternative for System Messages. The idea is to fire an event in the SW when a push message is received. This has a big advantage: waking up a SW should be much faster than loading the whole document. Regards, Michael On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote: One of the other changes in progress is to include service workers on the design of the API. I don't know if that replaces system messages in total but the necessary changes will be considered when a new draft is submitted. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan On Mar 13, 2014, at 12:40 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Hi Bryan, Eduardo, All, While working through the push notification versus push message thread, I noticed Push API directly refers to System Messages as defined by SysApps' [runtime] spec. Based on the Note at the top of [runtime], it appears work on that spec has stopped. As such, what is the plan for the Push API spec regarding the dependency on the System Messages feature? -Thanks, AB [runtime] http://runtime.sysapps.org/
Re: [push-api] Dependency on System Messages
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, at 22:45, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote: One of the other changes in progress is to include service workers on the design of the API. I don't know if that replaces system messages in total but the necessary changes will be considered when a new draft is submitted. System Messages are definitely abandoned, I do not think any specification should use them. Even in SysApps, we started working on something called Event Pages (similar to what Chrome Apps does) before Service Worker took off. -- Mounir
Re: [push-api] Dependency on System Messages
On 3/13/14 1:52 PM, ext Mounir Lamouri wrote: System Messages are definitely abandoned, I do not think any specification should use them. Even in SysApps, we started working on something called Event Pages (similar to what Chrome Apps does) before Service Worker took off. Given this, seems like the runtime ED and TR should be updated accordingly. -AB
Re: [push-api] Dependency on System Messages
On March 13, 2014 at 2:33:08 PM, Arthur Barstow (art.bars...@nokia.com) wrote: On 3/13/14 1:52 PM, ext Mounir Lamouri wrote: System Messages are definitely abandoned, I do not think any specification should use them. Even in SysApps, we started working on something called Event Pages (similar to what Chrome Apps does) before Service Worker took off. Given this, seems like the runtime ED and TR should be updated accordingly. I’ll trash the ED’s content. But the SysApps WG needs to make this into a Note.
