Re: [widgets PC] i18n comment 17 : What ITS did
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Richard Ishida ish...@w3.org wrote: Comment from the i18n review of: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/ Comment 17 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0907-widgets-pc/ Editorial/substantive: E Tracked by: RI Location in reviewed document: Changes since last pubn [http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/] Comment: I propose: which is what ITS did = which is how ITS tags were formerly specified here The ITS specification doesn't require use of a namespace, and it would be good to change this wording so that that idea is not incorrectly reinforced. Fixed. -- Marcos Caceres Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/ http://datadriven.com.au
[widgets PC] i18n comment 17 : What ITS did
Comment from the i18n review of: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/ Comment 17 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0907-widgets-pc/ Editorial/substantive: E Tracked by: RI Location in reviewed document: Changes since last pubn [http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/] Comment: I propose: which is what ITS did = which is how ITS tags were formerly specified here The ITS specification doesn't require use of a namespace, and it would be good to change this wording so that that idea is not incorrectly reinforced. Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/International/ http://rishida.net/
