Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]

[Steve VanDeBogart]

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Steve VanDeBogart wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
>> Hi Brona,
>>
>> For mostly historical reasons, WebApps' File* specs still use Tracker
>> rather than Bugzilla (and IIRC, Arun also uses the list archive as well as
>> the spec itself to track issues for the File API spec):
>>
>>  
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/**webapps/track/products
>>
>> For consistency, it would be good to move these specs to Bugzilla but I
>> also don't want to create any "make work" for the Editors. (Arun, Jonas,
>> EricU - if you want Bugzilla components for these specs, please let me know
>> and I'll ask MikeSmith to create them.)
>>
>
> FYI - I previously asked Jonas about this and he didn't seem to be aware
> of the Tracker entries and thought that lack of a Bugzilla component was
> just an oversight.  So at least one of the editors probably wouldn't mind.
>  I asked because I was trying to file a bug/feature request, which still
> isn't tracked anywhere.
>

Sorry, I missed that this was already handled.  Please ignore.

--
Steve


>
>> -AB
>>
>> On 12/21/11 3:21 AM, ext Bronislav Klučka wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/file-**system-api/#widl-FileEntry-**file
>>> says that successCallback is "A callback that is called with the
>>> newFileWriter." there should be "A callback that is called with the File"
>>>
>>> BTW  was trying to file that bug myself, but I could not find suitable
>>> component in WebAppsWG product.
>>>
>>> Brona
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]

[Steve VanDeBogart]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> Hi Brona,
>
> For mostly historical reasons, WebApps' File* specs still use Tracker
> rather than Bugzilla (and IIRC, Arun also uses the list archive as well as
> the spec itself to track issues for the File API spec):
>
>  
> http://www.w3.org/2008/**webapps/track/products
>
> For consistency, it would be good to move these specs to Bugzilla but I
> also don't want to create any "make work" for the Editors. (Arun, Jonas,
> EricU - if you want Bugzilla components for these specs, please let me know
> and I'll ask MikeSmith to create them.)
>

FYI - I previously asked Jonas about this and he didn't seem to be aware of
the Tracker entries and thought that lack of a Bugzilla component was just
an oversight.  So at least one of the editors probably wouldn't mind.  I
asked because I was trying to file a bug/feature request, which still isn't
tracked anywhere.

--
Steve


>
> -AB
>
> On 12/21/11 3:21 AM, ext Bronislav Klučka wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/file-**system-api/#widl-FileEntry-**file
>> says that successCallback is "A callback that is called with the
>> newFileWriter." there should be "A callback that is called with the File"
>>
>> BTW  was trying to file that bug myself, but I could not find suitable
>> component in WebAppsWG product.
>>
>> Brona
>>
>
>

Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]

[Arun Ranganathan]

Art,

I'd be happy with a bugzilla component for File API.

-- A*

- Original Message -
> Hi Brona,
> 
> For mostly historical reasons, WebApps' File* specs still use Tracker
> rather than Bugzilla (and IIRC, Arun also uses the list archive as
> well
> as the spec itself to track issues for the File API spec):
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products
> 
> For consistency, it would be good to move these specs to Bugzilla but
> I
> also don't want to create any "make work" for the Editors. (Arun,
> Jonas,
> EricU - if you want Bugzilla components for these specs, please let me
> know and I'll ask MikeSmith to create them.)
> 
> -AB
> 
> On 12/21/11 3:21 AM, ext Bronislav Klučka wrote:
> > Hi
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/file-system-api/#widl-FileEntry-file
> > says that successCallback is "A callback that is called with the
> > newFileWriter." there should be "A callback that is called with the
> > File"
> >
> > BTW was trying to file that bug myself, but I could not find
> > suitable
> > component in WebAppsWG product.
> >
> > Brona

Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]

[Bronislav Klučka]

Hi Arthur,
I do not "need" them :) that's mainly for editors to keep track in one 
place :)


I just suggest this bug to be fixed and it's silly to spam whole forum 
because of it :)


(I do not have access to file a bug in this W3C tracking tool)

Brona

On 21.12.2011 13:05, Arthur Barstow wrote:

Hi Brona,

For mostly historical reasons, WebApps' File* specs still use Tracker 
rather than Bugzilla (and IIRC, Arun also uses the list archive as 
well as the spec itself to track issues for the File API spec):


  http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products

For consistency, it would be good to move these specs to Bugzilla but 
I also don't want to create any "make work" for the Editors. (Arun, 
Jonas, EricU - if you want Bugzilla components for these specs, please 
let me know and I'll ask MikeSmith to create them.)


-AB

On 12/21/11 3:21 AM, ext Bronislav Klučka wrote:

Hi
http://www.w3.org/TR/file-system-api/#widl-FileEntry-file
says that successCallback is "A callback that is called with the 
newFileWriter." there should be "A callback that is called with the 
File"


BTW  was trying to file that bug myself, but I could not find 
suitable component in WebAppsWG product.


Brona

Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]

[Arthur Barstow]

Hi Brona,

For mostly historical reasons, WebApps' File* specs still use Tracker 
rather than Bugzilla (and IIRC, Arun also uses the list archive as well 
as the spec itself to track issues for the File API spec):


  http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products

For consistency, it would be good to move these specs to Bugzilla but I 
also don't want to create any "make work" for the Editors. (Arun, Jonas, 
EricU - if you want Bugzilla components for these specs, please let me 
know and I'll ask MikeSmith to create them.)


-AB

On 12/21/11 3:21 AM, ext Bronislav Klučka wrote:

Hi
http://www.w3.org/TR/file-system-api/#widl-FileEntry-file
says that successCallback is "A callback that is called with the 
newFileWriter." there should be "A callback that is called with the File"


BTW  was trying to file that bug myself, but I could not find suitable 
component in WebAppsWG product.


Brona