Re: publish new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12
Sounds good to me. That's much better. Thank you for catching that. On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Domenic Denicola dome...@domenicdenicola.com wrote: From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com] Could you live with those short qualifications/clarifications? Definitely; I see the concern and am glad you caught that. Yeah, sounds good. I've added an issue to Bikeshed https://github.com/tabatkins/bikeshed/issues/174 to address this. ~TJ -- Hayato
Re: publish new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Domenic Denicola dome...@domenicdenicola.com wrote: From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com] Could you live with those short qualifications/clarifications? Definitely; I see the concern and am glad you caught that. Yeah, sounds good. I've added an issue to Bikeshed https://github.com/tabatkins/bikeshed/issues/174 to address this. ~TJ
PSA: publish new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12
This is a heads-up that Hayato-san created a draft WD of Shadow DOM and the plan is to publish it on June 12: https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/publish/shadow/WD-shadow-dom-20140612/ If anyone has any comments or concerns about this plan, please let us know by June 9 at the latest. -Thanks, AB
RE: publish new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12
I am a big fan of the giant warning at the bottom of the document. Will it be maintained in the published version? That would be ideal. -Original Message- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 20:18 To: public-webapps Subject: PSA: publish new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12 This is a heads-up that Hayato-san created a draft WD of Shadow DOM and the plan is to publish it on June 12: https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/publish/shadow/WD-shadow-dom-20140612/ If anyone has any comments or concerns about this plan, please let us know by June 9 at the latest. -Thanks, AB
Re: publish new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12
On 6/6/14 8:39 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: I am a big fan of the giant warning at the bottom of the document. Will it be maintained in the published version? That would be ideal. My current plan is to submit the document for publication `as is`. That said, I do think a small part of the expanded text is a bit confusing: [[ This specification is obsolete and has been replaced by the document at http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/. Do not attempt to implement this specification. Do not refer to this specification except as a historical artifact. ]] I think this could be interpreted as meaning the spec is dead/stopped. I think something like the following would address this concern: [[ This version of the specification is obsolete and has been replaced by the document at http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/. Do not attempt to implement this version of the specification. Do not refer to this version except as a historical artifact. ]] Could you live with those short qualifications/clarifications?
RE: publish new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com] Could you live with those short qualifications/clarifications? Definitely; I see the concern and am glad you caught that.
