Re: [Pulp-dev] [CentOS-devel] repo_gpgcheck for centos repos?
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 11:12 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:10 PM Brian Stinson wrote: > > > > While we want signed repodata to be *available* to folks who want to enable > > it, We don’t want it necessarily to be the default for all users. We want > > it to be a decision that folks make for their own sites. > > > > This is a very bizarre stance to take. Enabling repo_gpgcheck for > the CentOS provided repos in their repo files should not harm anything > else, and only further ensures the integrity of the repository > content. > > Is there a compelling reason to *not* change the defaults? Because > from my perspective, I don't see any. > The only reason might be to prevent breaking folks who regenerate the repomd locally. Not sure whether pulp preserves the original md or regenerates its own. (I always use exactly the upstream repomd for precisely this reason of avoiding breaking repo_gpgcheck, which is often on "security hardening" checklists.) V/r, James Cassell > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > ___ > CentOS-devel mailing list > centos-de...@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > ___ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
[Pulp-dev] Pulpcore team meeting
## September 8, 2020 ### Previous action items * [dkliban] file a story to allow auto-publish and distribute * Done. https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7469 * [bmbouter] to respond and close https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/pull/659 * not done, moved forward to next week ### Topics * 3.7.0 is scheduled for Sept 22 * https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7463 * Go/No-Go: Tuesday Sept 15th, 12pm - 12:30pm EDT. https://everytimezone.com/s/68f4535a * Pulp UI project accepted by UMAss Lowell. Professors have started recruiting students to take on the project. ### Action Items * [bmbouter] to respond and close https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/pull/659 Brian ___ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
Re: [Pulp-dev] New black version
FYI, this was merged at the pulpcore weekly meeting today. On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1:22 PM David Davis wrote: > A new version of black was released which has fixed some of our docstring > and made a change to how trailing commas are handled. I've fixed a few of > the plugins (pulp_file, pulp_ansible, etc) but the biggest change was in > pulpcore[0]. I don't think it'll create too many conflicts but I wanted to > give people a heads up before I merge it. If there are no objections, I > plan to merge on September 2nd. > > [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/pull/870 > > David > ___ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > ___ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
