[Pulp-dev] [Meeting Minutes] Sprint 98 Planning

[Robin Chan]

2-June-2021

New Sprint 98 query: https://pulp.plan.io/issues?query_id=124

New Agile board: https://pup.plan.io/agile/board?query_id=151


Stats on how we did in previous sprint Sprint 97 Query


New - 28 (!)

Assigned - 11

Post - 10

Modified - 8

Closed - CURRENTRELEASE - 23

Closed - WORKSFORME -

Closed - NOTABUG -

Closed - DUPLICATE - 1

Closed - WONTFIX -

Closed - COMPLETE - 6

Action Items:

   -

   rchan: send out planning minutes
   -

   Rchan update agile board for sprint & Move new, assigned, post issues to
   new sprint
   -

   Rchan: Publish https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Sprint_Plans


   -

   Retro discuss backlog management


Action Items from last Sprint Planning

   -

   Update 3 month planning current quarter line item status


Stakeholder Delivery Dates:

   -

   Katello
   
:
   Keeping short term deadlines and started discussing
   -

  4.1 branching ~May 2021
  -

  4.2 branching ~August 2021
  -

 Alternate Content Sources
 -

  4.3 Branching ~Nov 2021
  -

   Ansible
   -

  AH Operator backup & restore work
  -

  AH 4.4.0 release (October)



Non-redmine tasks:

   -

   HTB support


Dates & Content:

https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Sprint_Plans

Sprint candidates:

https://pulp.plan.io/issues?query_id=26

Items put on hold:

  * (pulp2) Need to investigate cert-issue 8000


  * disk usage during sync

  * https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8295 - was a Lubos candidate but we’ll
put this one on hold.

*  reclaim disk space https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8459 waits on katello
inputs

Pending Items:

None
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

[Pulp-dev] Katello/Pulp3 Integration meeting

[Grant Gainey]

Hey folks,

Pulp is experimenting with using Github Discussions for communications
instead of email lists, as a way of keeping discussions closer to the code.
You will find the meeting-minutes for $TOPIC here:

https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/discussions/1366#discussioncomment-816813

Let us know what you think!

G
-- 
Grant Gainey
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] pulpcore team meeting notes - May 25, 2021

[Neal Gompa]

Hey Brian,

Yes, for sure! I'm basically looking into using RBAC to support a
workflow like so:

* Automation via a service account imports RPMs and DEBs into a pool
* Automation via another service account selects those packages to
publish into various staging repos
* Select users/groups can promote those packages to their assigned
"stable" repos

The idea is that I can partition ACLs for various functions of Pulp to
prevent unwanted actions.


On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 10:56 AM Brian Bouterse  wrote:
>
> Hi Neal,
>
> Apologies for the late reply. We've added the RBAC to various endpoints in 
> pulpcore and some plugins, but what I think would be helpful is if we had a 
> way to more clearly identify what has RBAC and what doesn't across pulpcore 
> and plugins. Would that be helpful?
>
> Thank you,
> Brian
>
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:46 AM Neal Gompa  wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:23 AM Brian Bouterse  wrote:
>> >
>> > * Making top-level Authentication page in docs
>> > * https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8799
>>
>> The docs currently mention that RBAC stuff is planned, is there
>> something that shows the status of that? This is something that I'd
>> love to see in Pulp sooner rather than later...
>>
>>
>> --
>> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
>>


--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!


___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] pulpcore team meeting notes - May 25, 2021

[Brian Bouterse]

Hi Neal,

Apologies for the late reply. We've added the RBAC to various endpoints in
pulpcore and some plugins, but what I think would be helpful is if we had a
way to more clearly identify what has RBAC and what doesn't across pulpcore
and plugins. Would that be helpful?

Thank you,
Brian


On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:46 AM Neal Gompa  wrote:

> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:23 AM Brian Bouterse 
> wrote:
> >
> > * Making top-level Authentication page in docs
> > * https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8799
>
> The docs currently mention that RBAC stuff is planned, is there
> something that shows the status of that? This is something that I'd
> love to see in Pulp sooner rather than later...
>
>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
>
>
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev