Both of these look good to me
Justin
On 1/27/20 2:44 PM, Tatiana Tereshchenko wrote:
I'm looking for feedback on the stories below. For both:
- is the logic correct or if anything is missing?
- where to store info (from a remote) which is needed later?
1. https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4458 As a user, I can configure which
checksum algorithm to use when creating metadata
- the suggestion is to store a checksum type of a remote on a rpm
repo version model.
2. https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6055 As a user, my sync is not
operational if there are no changes
- the suggestion is to store all the necessary details on a
rpm repository model.
Please comment on the issues (preferred) or discuss here.
Thank you,
Tanya
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
