Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PACKAGERS] New dep
2011/5/27 Luke Yelavich : > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 04:52:02AM EST, Arun Raghavan wrote: >> The website worked fine as of a month ago. I don't know why it's down >> now. The library serves the purpose we need well (light weight, doesn't >> invent its own type system, allows you to parse out values individually >> instead of mandating key-value pairs), and is available on every major >> distribution ... > > It is availab ein Ubuntu yes, however its in our universe component of the > package archive, universe being unsupported by Canonical. If PulseAudio > master was used in future versions of Ubuntu, I would feel comfortable > knowing that the json c library being used will reguaruly receive upstrea > maintenance, as that in turn makes it easier for Canonical to commit to > supporting the package in long term releases. The website is (sort of) up again. Although the latest release was almost two years ago, it seems from the svn logs that there is still development going on and that the project is very responsive to bug reports. (I've submitted a few patches for mingw cross-compiling myself, so let's see where that goes) The mailing lists still don't work and the project infrastructure could be a bit better (such as svn web access), but in general I think it looks like a solid upstream. > Luke Maarten ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PACKAGERS] New dep
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 04:52:02AM EST, Arun Raghavan wrote: > The website worked fine as of a month ago. I don't know why it's down > now. The library serves the purpose we need well (light weight, doesn't > invent its own type system, allows you to parse out values individually > instead of mandating key-value pairs), and is available on every major > distribution ... It is availab ein Ubuntu yes, however its in our universe component of the package archive, universe being unsupported by Canonical. If PulseAudio master was used in future versions of Ubuntu, I would feel comfortable knowing that the json c library being used will reguaruly receive upstrea maintenance, as that in turn makes it easier for Canonical to commit to supporting the package in long term releases. Luke ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PACKAGERS] New dep
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 00:22 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: [...] > you speak of is a recent development. I'll mail the developers and ask > them what's happening. Should be up in a day or so. -- Arun ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PACKAGERS] New dep
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 16:23 +0200, Maarten Bosmans wrote: > 2011/5/16 Colin Guthrie : > > Hi, > > > > I've just pushed Arun's (mostly, Pierre-Louis also had a hand!) > > passthrough work to master. > > > > This carries with it a new dependency: json-c > > What is the upstream location of that software? Googling for json > implementations gives a lot of small libraries, it is not clear which > one is needed as the pulse dep. Yes, it's unfortunate that it's a buzz word and the library name doesn't generate unique search results. > I guess it could be the one at http://oss.metaparadigm.com/json-c/, > but that website is out of order for some time now. The .tar file is > only locatable through the packaging systems of various Linux > distros/BSDs. The website worked fine as of a month ago. I don't know why it's down now. The library serves the purpose we need well (light weight, doesn't invent its own type system, allows you to parse out values individually instead of mandating key-value pairs), and is available on every major distribution ... > Needless to say, such an unclear status of a dependency is not really > helpfull in packaging PulseAudio. ... so the dependency was not picked arbitrarily and the unclear status you speak of is a recent development. I'll mail the developers and ask them what's happening. -- Arun ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PACKAGERS] New dep
'Twas brillig, and Maarten Bosmans at 26/05/11 15:23 did gyre and gimble: > 2011/5/16 Colin Guthrie : >> Hi, >> >> I've just pushed Arun's (mostly, Pierre-Louis also had a hand!) >> passthrough work to master. >> >> This carries with it a new dependency: json-c > > What is the upstream location of that software? Googling for json > implementations gives a lot of small libraries, it is not clear which > one is needed as the pulse dep. > > I guess it could be the one at http://oss.metaparadigm.com/json-c/, > but that website is out of order for some time now. The .tar file is > only locatable through the packaging systems of various Linux > distros/BSDs. > > Needless to say, such an unclear status of a dependency is not really > helpfull in packaging PulseAudio. I dunno, we already had a package in Mandriva and I just updated it to the latest version from the Fedora package. Arun, do you have more definitive info? Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/] ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PACKAGERS] New dep
2011/5/16 Colin Guthrie : > Hi, > > I've just pushed Arun's (mostly, Pierre-Louis also had a hand!) > passthrough work to master. > > This carries with it a new dependency: json-c What is the upstream location of that software? Googling for json implementations gives a lot of small libraries, it is not clear which one is needed as the pulse dep. I guess it could be the one at http://oss.metaparadigm.com/json-c/, but that website is out of order for some time now. The .tar file is only locatable through the packaging systems of various Linux distros/BSDs. Needless to say, such an unclear status of a dependency is not really helpfull in packaging PulseAudio. > We may yet remove this and write our own parser for the simple subset of > JSON formatting we use but there may ultimately be other reasons to keep > this longer term. > > But in the interests of simplicity, I'd certainly not be against any > native implementation patches that came along provided they were simple > and clean. > > Please test these changes. I'm sure Arun will post more details and test > requests in due course. > > Col Maarten ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PACKAGERS] New dep on json-c
Dear Colin, Am Montag, den 16.05.2011, 11:56 +0100 schrieb Colin Guthrie: > I've just pushed Arun's (mostly, Pierre-Louis also had a hand!) > passthrough work to master. > > This carries with it a new dependency: json-c > > We may yet remove this and write our own parser for the simple subset of > JSON formatting we use but there may ultimately be other reasons to keep > this longer term. > > But in the interests of simplicity, I'd certainly not be against any > native implementation patches that came along provided they were simple > and clean. > > Please test these changes. I'm sure Arun will post more details and test > requests in due course. looking at the XBMC commit log [1] they seem to move from JsonCpp [2] to YAJL [3]. Thanks, Paul [1] https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/commit/56ac2a40cc3d721d428f026bfe11173b27596fe3/ [2] http://lloyd.github.com/yajl/ [3] http://jsoncpp.sourceforge.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
[pulseaudio-discuss] [PACKAGERS] New dep
Hi, I've just pushed Arun's (mostly, Pierre-Louis also had a hand!) passthrough work to master. This carries with it a new dependency: json-c We may yet remove this and write our own parser for the simple subset of JSON formatting we use but there may ultimately be other reasons to keep this longer term. But in the interests of simplicity, I'd certainly not be against any native implementation patches that came along provided they were simple and clean. Please test these changes. I'm sure Arun will post more details and test requests in due course. Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/] ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss