Re: [Puppet Users] [INFO, maybe ACTION] r10k Feature Proposal

2021-03-11 Thread Ben Ford 
Hey Molly,

The PDK has already been ignoring the /spec directory for quite some time,
so I think this is totally appropriate. It won't even have any effect for
PDK enabled modules from the Forge. Those files are only used for
development purposes, and if you're doing that in your production codebase,
you should go slap yourself on the wrist! 

Honestly, I'm not even sure that r10k should offer an option to opt out. If
you want the specs to do dev work on the module, then you really ought to
just be cloning it into a workspace in the first place. Working directly in
a deployed control repo is a real good way to get yourself stuck. If you
make changes to files, accidentally or not, you can easily get yourself
into the state where r10k or Code Manager can't even deploy cleanly and
you'll have to either clean up the repo, or nuke it and redeploy. We've
recommended for ages that people just treat the deployed control repo as a
black box.

Cheers!

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:07 PM  wrote:

> Molly,
>
>
>
> Should this be an all or nothing or off by default with the option to
> include them?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* puppet-users@googlegroups.com  *On
> Behalf Of *Molly Waggett
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 11, 2021 7:04 PM
> *To:* puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> *Cc:* Froyo Team 
> *Subject:* [Puppet Users] [INFO, maybe ACTION] r10k Feature Proposal
>
>
>
> Hey folks!
>
>
>
> We are planning an r10k feature to stop deploying module spec
> directories. This will lower disk usage, particularly for folks with a lot
> of modules and multiple compilers.
>
>
>
> Our hope is to enable this behavior by default, but leave the option to
> opt out (i.e. continue including spec directories when deploying
> modules). This is based on the assumption that most folks have no need for
> module spec directories in a production environment, since they typically
> just include testing materials for module development.
>
>
>
> If you think this assumption is inaccurate, or even if it’s just
> inaccurate for you, please let us know! If we don’t hear any objections by 
> *Tuesday,
> March 23*, we will proceed with the above plan to adopt this behavior but
> include a way to opt out.
>
>
>
> If you have any questions, please reply to this email or ping @r10k in the 
> Puppet
> Community Slack <https://slack.puppet.com/>.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Molly Waggett*
>
> she/her
>
> Senior Software Engineer @ Puppet
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/CAFOE68C%2BWNLmtfgJgCUkRkjX-rYqoAUAQvUApa-xp1_k7sp7vA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/CAFOE68C%2BWNLmtfgJgCUkRkjX-rYqoAUAQvUApa-xp1_k7sp7vA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/155101d716d3%24aa8c9750%24ffa5c5f0%24%40gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/155101d716d3%24aa8c9750%24ffa5c5f0%24%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/CACkW_L4cU8qUc5F%2BLPocg0oKogi9ce3C3vw98azGdHGwAqCg2g%40mail.gmail.com.

RE: [Puppet Users] [INFO, maybe ACTION] r10k Feature Proposal

2021-03-11 Thread steverobillard 
Molly,

 

Should this be an all or nothing or off by default with the option to include 
them?

 

Thanks,

Steve

 

 

 

 

From: puppet-users@googlegroups.com  On Behalf 
Of Molly Waggett
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 7:04 PM
To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
Cc: Froyo Team 
Subject: [Puppet Users] [INFO, maybe ACTION] r10k Feature Proposal

 

Hey folks!

 

We are planning an r10k feature to stop deploying module spec directories. This 
will lower disk usage, particularly for folks with a lot of modules and 
multiple compilers.

 

Our hope is to enable this behavior by default, but leave the option to opt out 
(i.e. continue including spec directories when deploying modules). This is 
based on the assumption that most folks have no need for module spec 
directories in a production environment, since they typically just include 
testing materials for module development.

 

If you think this assumption is inaccurate, or even if it’s just inaccurate for 
you, please let us know! If we don’t hear any objections by Tuesday, March 23, 
we will proceed with the above plan to adopt this behavior but include a way to 
opt out. 

 

If you have any questions, please reply to this email or ping @r10k in the  
<https://slack.puppet.com/> Puppet Community Slack.

 

Thanks!

 

-- 

Molly Waggett

she/her

Senior Software Engineer @ Puppet

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> .
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/CAFOE68C%2BWNLmtfgJgCUkRkjX-rYqoAUAQvUApa-xp1_k7sp7vA%40mail.gmail.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/CAFOE68C%2BWNLmtfgJgCUkRkjX-rYqoAUAQvUApa-xp1_k7sp7vA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/155101d716d3%24aa8c9750%24ffa5c5f0%24%40gmail.com.

[Puppet Users] [INFO, maybe ACTION] r10k Feature Proposal

2021-03-11 Thread Molly Waggett 
Hey folks!

We are planning an r10k feature to stop deploying module spec directories.
This will lower disk usage, particularly for folks with a lot of modules
and multiple compilers.

Our hope is to enable this behavior by default, but leave the option to opt
out (i.e. continue including spec directories when deploying modules). This
is based on the assumption that most folks have no need for module spec
directories in a production environment, since they typically just include
testing materials for module development.

If you think this assumption is inaccurate, or even if it’s just inaccurate
for you, please let us know! If we don’t hear any objections by Tuesday,
March 23, we will proceed with the above plan to adopt this behavior but
include a way to opt out.

If you have any questions, please reply to this email or ping @r10k in
the Puppet
Community Slack .

Thanks!

-- 
*Molly Waggett*
she/her
Senior Software Engineer @ Puppet

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/CAFOE68C%2BWNLmtfgJgCUkRkjX-rYqoAUAQvUApa-xp1_k7sp7vA%40mail.gmail.com.