[PVE-User] Sockets vs. Cores
Hallo Guten Tag zusammen, bislang benutze ich auf einer Maschine für die VM's 2 Sockets 2 Cores. Dies ist vermutlich für die Maschine zu viel zugeteilte ungenutzte Leistung. Was wäre die nächstniedrigere Leistungsstufe - 1 Socket 2 Cores oder 2 Sockets 1 Core ? gruß sorry für die noob-Frage ;-) Sebastian ___ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
Re: [PVE-User] Sockets vs. Cores
Hi Sebastian, pleas write in English, this is an English list. normally it depends on your host system. If you have only 1 socket the best for you is to use the cores and left the socket on 1. The socket is only interesting if you have an NUMA machine. So to your question 3 Core would be the next step. On December 30, 2014 at 2:15 PM sebast...@debianfan.de sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: Hallo Guten Tag zusammen, bislang benutze ich auf einer Maschine für die VM's 2 Sockets 2 Cores. Dies ist vermutlich für die Maschine zu viel zugeteilte ungenutzte Leistung. Was wäre die nächstniedrigere Leistungsstufe - 1 Socket 2 Cores oder 2 Sockets 1 Core ? gruß sorry für die noob-Frage ;-) Sebastian __ _ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user Regards Wolfgang ___ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
[PVE-User] Does proxmox fiddle with the ceph host bucket?
As per the subject :) I was experimenting with setting up a SSD only pool as a prelim to setting up a cache tier. I added the osd to ceph.conf [osd.2] host = vnb And added it to the crush map with host=vnb-sdd to stop it getting added to the default ruleset. ceph osd crush add osd.2 0 host=vnb-ssd root=ssd That worked, though the osd list in the gui changed to: -[vnb-ssd] osd.2 and stopped showing vnb/osd.0 vng/osd.1 A pain, but liveable with. However within a short while (minutes) osd.2 was moved from vnb-ssd to vnb which placed it in the default rulset. Fortunately it had a weight of zero, otherwise I could have been looking at a long recovery. The same thing happened with osd.3 that I had setup. I don't believe ceph ever does this - could proxmox be setting the ceph host bucket values from ceph.conf? -- Lindsay signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
Re: [PVE-User] Does proxmox fiddle with the ceph host bucket?
I don't believe ceph ever does this - could proxmox be setting the ceph host bucket values from ceph.conf? The proxmox GUI is only tested with default crush map. I don't think it will work with cache tiers. ___ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
