[PyQt] Re: LGPL license.

2009-02-11 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Jim Bublitz (Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:13:51 -0800)
 I've never minded people using my software for free - even
 commercially. I just hate it when they whine about software being
 free, but not on terms where they can profit enormously from other
 people's work. It's the whining, not the profiting, that I object to.

The whine about not being free. But they actually mean not being for 
free.

Thorsten

___
PyQt mailing listPyQt@riverbankcomputing.com
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt


[PyQt] Re: LGPL license.

2009-02-10 Thread Wolfgang Rohdewald
On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, Knapp wrote:
 Why do we live?

not for searching the pyqt archives :-)

-- 
Wolfgang
___
PyQt mailing listPyQt@riverbankcomputing.com
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt


[PyQt] Re: LGPL license.

2009-02-10 Thread Robert Kern

On 2009-02-10 15:10, Knapp wrote:

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Andreas Pakulatap...@gmx.de  wrote:

On 10.02.09 19:56:44, Knapp wrote:

I see that the newer QT4.5 has the LGPL license. Does this mean that
pyQT will also have this license? Does using this license mean that
you can use the lib and write a closed source app without having to
pay for a license?

Please read the archive, this has already come up once or twice this
year.

Andreas


Thanks for that important point about the archives. I did read it! It
is as clear as mud.
QT is LGPL


Not until 4.5 is released.


KDE is LGPL
pyKDE is ??? LGPL???


No, PyKDE is GPL.

  http://sourceforge.net/projects/pykde


pyQT is not?? and never will be but maybe someone named Phil is still
thinking about it?


PyQT is currently still licensed under the either the commercial or GPL options. 
The author (that would be Phil) learned about QT's switch to LGPL the same time 
when we did, and he is still considering his options.


--
Robert Kern

I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
 that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
 an underlying truth.
  -- Umberto Eco

___
PyQt mailing listPyQt@riverbankcomputing.com
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt


Re: [PyQt] Re: LGPL license.

2009-02-10 Thread Jim Bublitz
On Tuesday 10 February 2009 13:30:24 pm Robert Kern wrote:
  pyKDE is ??? LGPL???

 No, PyKDE is GPL.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/pykde

PyKDE4 is LGPL (per KDE request, more or less). The docs are (were?) 
Creative Commons.

I'm not sure what PyKDE3 is - it's basically whatever I want it to be.

But it still depends on PyQt, and since Phil has been the author and 
sole maintainer for something close to 10 years, PyQt ought to be 
whatever he wants it to be.

Jim
___
PyQt mailing listPyQt@riverbankcomputing.com
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt