[issue2483] int and float accept bytes, complex does not
Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Are numbers so special to break the rules? why stopping here? what about other types that may want to accept ASCII bytes instead of characters? Isn't this like going back to the 2.x world? The protocol with embedded ASCII numbers isn't a very convincing case for me. One can read a binary integer in C using a single function call. In Python 2.X this can't be done in a single call, one has to use struct.unpack to decode the bytes read, and there was no complains that I know of. In 3.0 the same happens for ASCII numbers too, one will have to decode them first. The conversion may look like a stupid step, but it's as stupid as having to use struct.unpack to convert some bits to the *same* bits inside the integer object. Writing int(str(value,'ascii')) doesn't look so terrible. And one may argue that int(b'1234') should return 0x34333231 instead of 1234; b'1234' is the binary representation of 0x34333231 in little-endian format. -- nosy: +gagenellina __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2483 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2483] int and float accept bytes, complex does not
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Agreed - I've been convinced that the right thing to do is reject bytes in int() and float() as well. If we decide we still want to support a fast-path conversion it should be via separate methods (e.g an int.from_ascii class method and an int.to_ascii instance method). __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2483 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2488] Backport sys.maxsize to Python 2.6
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: What about #1570? -- nosy: +georg.brandl __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2488 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2488] Backport sys.maxsize to Python 2.6
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: FWIW, I don't see how backports like this add any value at all. The 2- to-3 tool handles renaming well, but a backport just creates a hodge- podge of aliases making the language harder to learn and harder to grep. -- nosy: +rhettinger __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2488 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2484] Cosmetic patch for warning unused variable
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks, fixed in r61927. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2484 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2457] add --help and -h options to pdb
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Go ahead and commit. -- resolution: - accepted __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2457 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2491] io.open() handles errors differently on different platforms
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: With python3.0, os.fdopen() is a simple call to io.open(), which has these missing options. Maybe os.fdopen should be deprecated or removed, and replaced by io.open. Moreover, the comment in os.py is wrong: subprocess does not use fdopen any more, but io.open instead. -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2491 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2490] Assertion failure in datetime.strftime()
Pierre Metras [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: There is an example of a long strftime pattern in the test.py file attached to that issue. Just change the length of the pattern to see that it works for smaller patterns in Python 2.5. The pattern where it occured in my application is a Pango markup string used for localization: markupspan lang=\en\ font_desc=\Sans,Monospace Bold 130\span foreground=\#FF\%H/span:span foreground=\#00FF00\%M/span:span foreground=\#FF\%S/span/span/markup __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2490 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2492] Check implementation of new buffer interface for PyString in 2.6
New submission from Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've only implemented (getbufferproc)string_buffer_getbuffer of the new buffer protocol. Do I have to add exports to the PyString struct and add a releasebufferproc, too? -- components: Interpreter Core keywords: 26backport messages: 64550 nosy: tiran priority: high severity: normal status: open title: Check implementation of new buffer interface for PyString in 2.6 type: behavior versions: Python 2.6 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2492 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2457] add --help and -h options to pdb
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Committed in r61931. -- status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2457 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2492] Check implementation of new buffer interface for PyString in 2.6
Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: By the way the code is in svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/python/branches/trunk-bytearray -- nosy: +teoliphant __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2492 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2490] Assertion failure in datetime.strftime()
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I cannot reproduce this with test.py with Python 2.5.1 on x86 Linux. -- nosy: +georg.brandl __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2490 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2250] rlcompleter raises Exception on bad input
Lorenz Quack [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I was thinking that the code in question could maybe also raise other exceptions. too bad I´m on vacation and can´t try this out myself. I believe the regular expression also matches something like import rlcompleter rlcompleter.Completer().complete(1foo.2bar3.smth, 0) which I guess would result in a SyntaxError. would be nice if someone could verify that. If I´m right I see two possibilities. either change the regular expression to match only valid python identifieres or also catch SyntaxErrors. could there be any other exception? (In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.) __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2250 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1561] py3k: test_mailbox fails on Windows
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Three months later, one obvious correction: open all (text) files with the newline='\n' option. - This makes files identical between Unix and Windows version - no more os.linesep A compatibility problem: mailboxes created with python2.6 cannot be opened with 3.0 -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9865/mailbox.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1561 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2479] Bytearray and io backport
Quentin Gallet-Gilles [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I've just updated my trunk checkout on Ubuntu and run the regression test suite. All tests OK. -- nosy: +quentin.gallet-gilles __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2479 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1561] py3k: test_mailbox fails on Windows
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Another patch, which uses newline='' instead. Tests pass. The patch is much smaller, and old files are more likely to be compatible. OTOH, messages are unicode strings with \r\n. Which one do you prefer? Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9866/mailbox2.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1561 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2402] get rid of warnings in regrtest with -3
Changes by Quentin Gallet-Gilles [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +quentin.gallet-gilles __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2402 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2493] Remove unused constants from optimized code objects
New submission from Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: When peephole optimizer folds multiple constants into one, the old constants remain in co_consts. Attached patch removes such unused constants. -- components: Interpreter Core files: compress-consts.diff keywords: patch messages: 64558 nosy: belopolsky severity: normal status: open title: Remove unused constants from optimized code objects type: resource usage versions: Python 2.6 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9867/compress-consts.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2493 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2490] Assertion failure in datetime.strftime()
Pierre Metras [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I did a mistake: OLPC XO is based on Fedora 7 and not 9. They plan to upgrade to 9 later this year (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Fedora), so this bug will disappear by itself if it's confirmed that test.py runs correctly on Python 2.5.x and Fedora 9 ships with the latest version. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2490 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1222721] tk + setlocale problems...
ghorvath [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I can confirm that this bug is still present. After
locale.setlocale(locale.LC_ALL, '') Backspace in Tkinter.Entry is not
working anymore.
There is no difference if the Backspace is issued by the keyboard or by
self.master.winfo_toplevel().event_generate('BackSpace')
No messages are written.
Tested on Linux (Ubuntu Gutsy)/Python 2.5.1 and Windows XP/Python 2.4.3
--
nosy: +ghorvath
versions: +Python 2.5
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1222721
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2493] Remove unused constants from optimized code objects
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I've noticed that the original patch does not handle the error condition from failed consts resize correctly. Please see compress-consts-1.diff for a fix. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9868/compress-consts-1.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2493 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1518] Fast globals/builtins access (patch)
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1518 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1222721] tk + setlocale problems...
ghorvath [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Attached a workaround for this problem, based on: http://ml.osdir.com/games.mud.client.lyntin/2005-03/msg5.html I also found that the problem only appears when the LC_NUMERIC setting is different to en_US. (for example if it is de_AT) Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9869/tksetlocalebug.py _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1222721 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2490] Assertion failure in datetime.strftime()
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Okay, closing as out of date. -- resolution: - out of date status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2490 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2268] Fold slice constants
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Just to quantify the improvement: Before: $ ./python -m timeit -sx='abc' x[::-1] 100 loops, best of 3: 0.305 usec per loop $ ./python -O -m timeit -sx='abc' x[::-1] 100 loops, best of 3: 0.275 usec per loop After: $ ./python -m timeit -sx='abc' x[::-1] 100 loops, best of 3: 0.262 usec per loop $ ./python -O -m timeit -sx='abc' x[::-1] 100 loops, best of 3: 0.253 usec per loop For some reason, when I run pybench, the timings vary from run to run so much that I cannot even tell the difference. (Run to run differences are larger than patched to original.) FWIW, the micro-benchmark above shows 8% improvement with -O and 14% improvement without. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2268 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1413192] bsddb: segfault on db.associate call with Txn and large data
Changes by Jesús Cea Avión [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +jcea _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1413192 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2458] Allow Python code to change Py3k warning flag
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Raising priority so this is looked at before we release 2.6. :) -- priority: - critical __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2458 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1503] test_xmlrpc is still flakey
Ralf Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The current buildbot has errors similar to this one (I assume):
Exception happened during processing of request from ('127.0.0.1', 53126)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /Users/ralf/trunk/Lib/SocketServer.py, line 281, in
_handle_request_noblock
self.process_request(request, client_address)
File /Users/ralf/trunk/Lib/SocketServer.py, line 307, in process_request
self.finish_request(request, client_address)
File /Users/ralf/trunk/Lib/SocketServer.py, line 320, in finish_request
self.RequestHandlerClass(request, client_address, self)
File /Users/ralf/trunk/Lib/SocketServer.py, line 615, in __init__
self.handle()
File /Users/ralf/trunk/Lib/BaseHTTPServer.py, line 318, in handle
self.handle_one_request()
File /Users/ralf/trunk/Lib/BaseHTTPServer.py, line 301, in
handle_one_request
self.raw_requestline = self.rfile.readline()
File /Users/ralf/trunk/Lib/socket.py, line 369, in readline
data = self._sock.recv(self._rbufsize)
error: [Errno 35] Resource temporarily unavailable
The problem is that the test calls
serv.socket.settimeout(3)
in the http_server function. This implicitly sets the server socket to
nonblocking state.
The accept call then returns a socket object, which
- is blocking on OS X 10.4 ppc
- is nonblocking on linux
I can easily reproduce that on my mac mini g4 with python 2.6.
--
nosy: +schmir
versions: +Python 2.6
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1503
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1503] test_xmlrpc is still flakey
Ralf Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I just double checked with the following program: #! /usr/bin/env python import os import fcntl import socket def isnonblocking(fd): return bool(fcntl.fcntl(fd, fcntl.F_GETFL, 0) os.O_NONBLOCK) def main(): s=socket.socket() s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1) s.bind((0.0.0.0, 8000)) s.listen(5) s.settimeout(30) print server isnonblocking:, isnonblocking(s.fileno()) client, addr = s.accept() print client isnonblocking:, isnonblocking(client.fileno()) if __name__==__main__: main() on my g4 mac it prints: ~/ python serv.py [EMAIL PROTECTED] ok server isnonblocking: True client isnonblocking: True on linux: ~/ python mini/serv.py [EMAIL PROTECTED] ok server isnonblocking: True client isnonblocking: False __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1503 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1503] test_xmlrpc is still flakey
Ralf Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: now that I see that the buildbot was running on ppc *Debian* I'm not quite sure if we're talking about the same issue. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1503 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1503] test_xmlrpc is still flakey
Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: It's my fault the xmlrpc tests try to use non-blocking sockets. That got added because sometimes failing tests would just sit there with the server blocking until the entire test process got killed for running too long. There are some tests that are skipped in test_xmlrpc because of (apparent) Windows socket quirks; should they also be skipped for OS X PPC, or should the flaky tests just be scrapped? When I was last working on this I couldn't come up with a better way to run these tests, so unless somebody can suggest a new approach I'm just left with recommending the skip scrap options as the only way to stop the flakiness. -- nosy: +alanmcintyre __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1503 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1503] test_xmlrpc is still flakey
Ralf Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: No, please do not disable them. I'm not quite sure what to do, but apparently these sockets returned from accept should be turned into blocking sockets. I just do not know, where this should happen. I think that this could even be done inside the accept call (which then might break some code). At least it should be done in the BaseHTTPServer code, which apparently cannot handle nonblocking sockets. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1503 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1503] test_xmlrpc is still flakey
Ralf Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: With the following diff, test_xmlrpc.py passes without problems. Like I said, someone else should decide where to turn on blocking mode. I now think that it should be in the socket.accept (i.e. in the C code) at least for unix platforms. Those who really want a nonblocking socket, will most probably call that setblocking(0) anyway (or their program is broken on linux, which returns blocking sockets by default). --- a/Lib/SocketServer.py Wed Mar 26 22:41:36 2008 +0100 +++ b/Lib/SocketServer.py Wed Mar 26 23:48:13 2008 +0100 @@ -441,8 +441,10 @@ May be overridden. -return self.socket.accept() - +r= self.socket.accept() +r[0].setblocking(1) +return r + def close_request(self, request): Called to clean up an individual request. request.close() __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1503 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2459] speedup loops with better bytecode
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This new patch completes the bytecode modifications. For/while loops as well as list comprehensions and generator expressions are a bit faster now. Also, as a side effect I've introduced a speed improvement for if statements and expressions... Some micro-benchmarks (completing the ones already given above): ./python Tools/pybench/pybench.py -t IfThenElse Before: 167ms per round After: 136ms per round ./python -m timeit -s y=range(100) sum(x for x in y) Before: 1 loops, best of 3: 20.4 usec per loop After: 10 loops, best of 3: 17.9 usec per loop ./python -m timeit -s y=range(100) sum(x for x in y if x) Before: 1 loops, best of 3: 28.5 usec per loop After: 1 loops, best of 3: 23.3 usec per loop ./python -m timeit -s y=range(100) sum(x for x in y if not x) Before: 10 loops, best of 3: 16.4 usec per loop After: 10 loops, best of 3: 12.1 usec per loop ./python -m timeit -s x,y,z=1,2,3 x if y else z Before: 100 loops, best of 3: 0.218 usec per loop After: 1000 loops, best of 3: 0.159 usec per loop A couple of tests seem to be failing in obscure ways in the test suite, I'll try to examine them. Most of the test suite runs fine though. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9870/loops6.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2459 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2459] speedup loops with better bytecode
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Ok, the fix for the bizarre failures was really simple. Now the only failing tests are in test_trace (because it makes assumptions regarding the bytecode that aren't true anymore, I'll have to adapt the tests). Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9871/loops7.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2459 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2487] ldexp(x,n) misbehaves when abs(n) is large
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: There are similar problems with integer shifts. In the trunk: 1(2**40) Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module OverflowError: long int too large to convert to int and in Python 3.0: 1(2**40) Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module OverflowError: Python int too large to convert to C long These should probably by fixed, too, though at least the error message is clear. What should 1(2**31) do? __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2487 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2422] Automatically disable pymalloc when running under valgrind
James Henstridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: An updated version of the patch. The previous ones were missing the valgrind check, resulting in the pymalloc code paths being executed (which in turn cause unintialised read warnings from valgrind). Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9872/disable-pymalloc-on-valgrind-py26.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2422 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1622] zipfile hangs on certain zip files
Eric Huss [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Sorry for the long delay. Yes, the latest patch looks very good to me. -Eric __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1622 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2459] speedup loops with better bytecode
Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Antoine, I hope to look at this patch eventually. Unfortunately, there are too many build/test problems that need to be resolved before the next release. If you can help out with those, I will be able to review this patch sooner. -- nosy: +nnorwitz __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2459 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2065] trunk version does not compile with vs8 and vc6
Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file9424/ocean.zip __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2065 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2065] trunk version does not compile with vs8 and vc6
Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file9456/ocean.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2065 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2065] trunk version does not compile with vs8 and vc6
Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file9577/ocean.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2065 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2065] trunk version does not compile with vs8 and vc6
Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file9595/ocean.zip __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2065 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2065] trunk version does not compile with vs8 and vc6
Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9873/ocean.zip __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2065 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
