[issue3888] [PATCH] Document more deprecated modules in What's New in Python 2.6
New submission from Philip Jenvey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The What's New doc is missing a few of these, I've added the ones mentioned in PEP 361 that weren't already there. I also corrected popen2's entry; it's always deprecated in 2.6, not just in the 3.0 warnings mode -- assignee: georg.brandl components: Documentation files: whatsnew-depmod2.6-r66484.diff keywords: patch messages: 73323 nosy: georg.brandl, pjenvey severity: normal status: open title: [PATCH] Document more deprecated modules in What's New in Python 2.6 versions: Python 2.6 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11508/whatsnew-depmod2.6-r66484.diff ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3888 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3835] tkinter goes into an infinite loop (pydoc.gui)
Helmut Jarausch [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Many thanks, that solved the problem. Since the cause of the problem wasn't easy to find out (for me, at least) would be possible to check at import time if Tcl/Tk has been configured with threads enabled? Helmut. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3835 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3887] Python 2.6 doesn't run after installation on amd64
Changes by Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- assignee: - loewis nosy: +loewis priority: - critical ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3887 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3841] IDLE: quirky behavior when displaying strings longer than 4093 characters
Stephen McInerney [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Other people have reported it does NOT occur with either: Win XP / Python 2.5 / Idle 1.2 Mac OS X 10.5.4 / Python 2.5.2 / IDLE 1.2.2 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3841 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3888] [PATCH] Document more deprecated modules in What's New in Python 2.6
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks for the patch, committed as r66485. -- resolution: - accepted status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3888 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3885] errors on _bsddb creation and dealloc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I thought first that the problem was during the execution of gc.collect(), but its not: when configured --with-pydebug, the exception is printed before: import gc, _bsddb; env=_bsddb.DBEnv(3); del env XXX undetected error Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module bsddb.db.DBNoServerError: (-30992, 'DB_NOSERVER: Fatal error, no RPC server -- No Berkeley DB RPC server environment') gc.collect() is just a rude way to display this XXX undetected error. (Victor: does Fusil check for this? gc.collect() will not fail if there is another exception in-between, or in debug mode) Now, to the _bsddb module: in general, the following pattern is wrong: dummy = someFunction(); Py_XDECREF(dummy); because it does nothing about an eventual exception set. If the exception can be discarded, PyErr_Clear() must be called. I think there is an invariant to keep in each function: return NULL if and only if an exception is set. Many places in _bsddb do not respect this. -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3885 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3885] errors on _bsddb creation and dealloc
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: gc.collect() is just a rude way to display this XXX undetected error. (Victor: does Fusil check for this? gc.collect() will not fail if there is another exception in-between, or in debug mode) I stopped to fuzz Python using --pydebug because a critical design error in CPython reference counting: http://bugs.python.org/issue3299 (some modules use PyObject_DEL() instead of Py_DECREF() whereas PyObject_DEL() creates inconsistent objects in the double linked object list). Since nobody cares about this issue, I don't use pydebug anymore. Now, to the _bsddb module: in general, the following pattern is wrong: dummy = someFunction(); Py_XDECREF(dummy); because it does nothing about an eventual exception set. If the exception can be discarded, PyErr_Clear() must be called. Well, we have to choices: don't raise an error, or clear the exception if an exception is raised. I think there is an invariant to keep in each function: return NULL if and only if an exception is set. Many places in _bsddb do not respect this. Where? dealloc() callback prototype is void tp_dealloc(...): no result! It's not possible to tell Python that an error occured. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3885 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3299] invalid object destruction in re.finditer()
Changes by Jesús Cea Avión [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +jcea ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3299 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3885] errors on _bsddb creation and dealloc
Jesús Cea Avión [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: So, the right thing to do seems to drop the check_error flag and just do a PyErr_Clear() if necessary in the dealloc code. This must be done in all dealloc code: DBEnv, DB, DBSequence and DBCursor. Do you agree?. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3885 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3885] errors on _bsddb creation and dealloc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Not only in these functions, but anywhere dummy= is followed by a
Py_XDECREF(dummy);
And code like this must also be changed (in DB_open):
if (makeDBError(err)) {
PyObject *dummy;
dummy=DB_close_internal(self,0);
Py_XDECREF(dummy);
return NULL;
}
if DB_close_internal() raises an exception it will replace the original
error set by makeDBError(). I'm not sure this is desirable.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3885
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3889] Demo/parser/unparse.py
New submission from Greg Darke [EMAIL PROTECTED]: When the unparse demo is run on a file containing a 'from x import y' statement, it incorrectly outputs it as 'from x import , y'. The attached patch fixes this. -- components: Demos and Tools files: fix_import_from_bug.patch keywords: patch messages: 73331 nosy: gregdarke severity: normal status: open title: Demo/parser/unparse.py versions: Python 2.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11509/fix_import_from_bug.patch ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3889 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3835] tkinter goes into an infinite loop (pydoc.gui)
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The patch attached checks for that when an interpreter is created, not really at import time but should be enough. But my real concern is that tkinter thinks it will work properly when Python is using threads and Tcl wasn't compiled with --enable-threads. Maybe that was true some time ago or maybe in other platforms, but isn't the case anymore. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11510/issue_3835.diff ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3835 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3835] tkinter goes into an infinite loop (pydoc.gui)
Changes by Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: - normal ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3835 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3880] _tkinter._flatten() doesn't check PySequence_Size() error code
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Looks fine, doesn't break anything in Tkinter either. -- nosy: +gpolo ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3880 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3885] errors on _bsddb creation and dealloc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I stopped to fuzz Python using --pydebug because a critical design error in CPython reference counting I won't comment on this, but to get the extra checks you could arrange that ceval.c is compiled with CHECKEXC defined. ./configure BASECFLAGS=-DCHECKEXC did the trick for me. Where? dealloc() callback prototype is void tp_dealloc(...): no result! It's not possible to tell Python that an error occured. Exactly. You cannot return NULL (or -1 for other kind of functions), so no exception may be raised; PyErr_Clear() calls are necessary. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3885 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3862] test_array fails on FreeBSD7 amd64
Andrew I MacIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Mark, your patch will probably get the test to pass, but the underlying reason the test is failing appears to be unexpected behaviour of the platform malloc(). FreeBSD 7.0 introduced a new malloc() implementation that relies on mmap() and this is behaving differently to the malloc() implementation in FreeBSD 6.3 which relied on sbrk(). I have posted a query about the new malloc()'s behaviour to a FreeBSD forum and will report what I find out. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3862 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3886] Integer overflow in _hashopenssl.c (CVE-2008-2316)
Changes by jan matejek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +matejcik ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1068268] subprocess is not EINTR-safe
Matteo Bertini [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Upgrade subprocess.py patch to 25-maint r65475 (apply cleanly with http://bugs.python.org/issue2113 fixed) -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11511/subprocess-eintr-safety-25maint-r65475.patch ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1068268 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I tried applying this patch to a clean SVN checkout of the 2.6 trunk on an OS X Leopard machine and it works (except for the part which patches configure.in). I then built the source tree and ran the test_socket test, which also worked fine. I don't see any tests for the specific functionality in the patch, or any patch to the documentation of the socket module. -- nosy: +janssen ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2574 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:45 AM, bms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exercising the API fully requires an SSM capable multicast LAN. Let's hope the PARC network is still up-to-date. It was when we were developing multicast here some 15-20 years ago :-). Bill Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11512/unnamed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2574 ___div dir=ltrbrbrdiv class=gmail_quoteOn Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:45 AM, bms span dir=ltrlt;a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/agt;/span wrote:brblockquote class=gmail_quote style=border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; br Exercising the API fully requires an SSM capable multicast LAN.br /blockquotedivbrLet#39;s hope the PARC network is still up-to-date.nbsp; It was when we were developing multicast here some 15-20 years ago :-).brbrBill/div/divbr/div ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3870] Parser/asdl_c.py requires python in order to build python
Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I think it would be a good idea to change the Makefile so that it touches these files when no python interpreter is available. -- nosy: +theller ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3870 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3547] Ctypes is confused by bitfields of varying integer types
Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Here is a patch, with test, that fixes this problem. -- keywords: +needs review, patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11513/bitfields.patch ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3547 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3890] ssl.SSLSocket.recv() implementation may not work with non-blocking sockets
New submission from Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As discussed on the python-dev ml I noticed something in the ssl.py code which seems to be wrong. This is the ssl.SSLSocket.recv() method: def recv (self, buflen=1024, flags=0): if self._sslobj: if flags != 0: raise ValueError( non-zero flags not allowed in calls to sendall() on %s % self.__class__) while True: try: return self.read(buflen) except SSLError, x: if x.args[0] == SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ: continue else: raise x else: return socket.recv(self, buflen, flags) I don't know the low levels but that while statement which continues in case of SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ seems to be wrong (blocking), at least when dealing with non-blocking sockets. I think the proper way of doing recv() here is letting SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ propagate and let the upper application (e.g. asyncore) deal with it. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 73342 nosy: giampaolo.rodola, janssen, josiah.carlson, josiahcarlson severity: normal status: open title: ssl.SSLSocket.recv() implementation may not work with non-blocking sockets type: behavior versions: Python 2.6, Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3890 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3886] Integer overflow in _hashopenssl.c (CVE-2008-2316)
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I'm ok with this patch. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3891] collections.deque should have empty() method
New submission from Roy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unless I'm missing something, the only way to tell if a deque is empty is to try and pop() something and catch the resulting IndexError. This is not only awkward, but mutates the data structure when you may not want to. It should be trivial to implement, and run in O(1) time. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 73344 nosy: roysmith severity: normal status: open title: collections.deque should have empty() method type: feature request versions: Python 2.5 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3891 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3891] collections.deque should have empty() method
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- assignee: - rhettinger components: +Extension Modules nosy: +rhettinger versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1 -Python 2.5 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3891 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3891] collections.deque should have empty() method
Roy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I just realized my request may have been ambiguous; empty() is a predicate, not a verb. Doc should be something like: Return true if the deque is empty. Return false otherwise. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3891 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3891] collections.deque should have empty() method
Roy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Sigh. It looks like you can do what I want after all, by just using the deque object itself, i.e.: q = deque() while (q): ... This should be changed to a docs bug -- the doc page for deque should mention this, or include an example of this usage. It's logical that it works this way, but not entirely obvious. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3891 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2876] Write UserDict fixer for 2to3
Nick Edds [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Sorry about the delay with this. I've finally found some time to work on this, so it should be completed within the next couple of days. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2876 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3892] bsddb: test01_basic_replication fails on Windows sometimes
New submission from Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This happens on the Windows buildbot everything once and a while [1]: == FAIL: test01_basic_replication (bsddb.test.test_replication.DBReplicationManager) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File S:\buildbots\python\trunk.nelson-windows\build\lib\bsddb\test\test_replication.py, line 122, in test01_basic_replication self.assertTrue(time.time()timeout) AssertionError -- http://python.org/dev/buildbot/stable/x86%20W2k8%20trunk/builds/159/step-test/0 -- assignee: jcea components: Extension Modules messages: 73348 nosy: benjamin.peterson, jcea severity: normal status: open title: bsddb: test01_basic_replication fails on Windows sometimes versions: Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3892 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3886] Integer overflow in _hashopenssl.c (CVE-2008-2316)
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Fixed in r66496. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3886] Integer overflow in _hashopenssl.c (CVE-2008-2316)
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Hmm. It's seems 3.0 will require a different patch. I can't get the merging to work... -- priority: release blocker - deferred blocker resolution: fixed - status: closed - open versions: -Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3892] bsddb: test01_basic_replication fails on Windows sometimes
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +gregory.p.smith ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3892 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3892] bsddb: test01_basic_replication fails on Windows sometimes
Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: We're going to disable this test for 2.6rc2. Please jcea and gregory.p.smith, take a look at it for 2.6 final. I've made it a deferred blocker for that release. -- nosy: +barry priority: - deferred blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3892 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3892] bsddb: test01_basic_replication fails on Windows sometimes
Mark Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I instrumented the code a little. The error is happening because self.client_startupdone never gets set to True. This is supposed to be set in the client_startupdone() method. It expects an event type of db.DB_EVENT_REP_STARTUPDONE, but we see exactly one call to this function with a value of 2, which is apparently DB_EVENT_REP_CLIENT. After this call no further calls are made to the method and after 10 seconds the test gives up. -- nosy: +mhammond ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3892 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3893] timedelta overflows in a surprising way
New submission from Shannon -jj Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I was very surprised by the following behavior: from datetime import datetime now = datetime.today() future = datetime.today() (now - future).seconds 86395 I know that http://docs.python.org/lib/datetime-timedelta.html says This is exact, but may overflow, but I was really expecting a negative number of seconds. Feel free to close this bug if you disagree. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 73353 nosy: jjinux severity: normal status: open title: timedelta overflows in a surprising way type: behavior versions: Python 2.5 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3893 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3891] collections.deque should have empty() method
Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: What would you suggest? The docs already say: Though list objects support similar operations, they are optimized for fast fixed-length operations and incur O(n) memory movement costs for pop(0) and insert(0, v) operations which change both the size and position of the underlying data representation. How would you suck elements out of a list? Probably with something like: while mylist: elt = mylist.pop() Aside from possible performance issues it's not clear that you would use a deque object differently than a list in this context. -- nosy: +skip.montanaro ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3891 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3894] imageop issue
Changes by Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: - deferred blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3894 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3895] _lsprof issue
New submission from Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/security/issue3 -- components: Extension Modules messages: 73356 nosy: brett.cannon priority: deferred blocker severity: normal status: open title: _lsprof issue type: crash versions: Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3895 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3892] bsddb: test01_basic_replication fails on Windows sometimes
Mark Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: As discussed with Barry on #python-dev, I committed r66498 which skips the failing assertion on Windows and replaces it with some noise to stderr. Note that only that one assertion fails - the rest of the test passes on Windows. Also, Brett Cannon on #python-dev experimented and could see the callback function being called a number of times - with 2 first as Windows does, but then a number of other times and once with the expected value. I'm afraid I've no insight into why these aren't delivered on Windows. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3892 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3891] collections.deque should have empty() method
Roy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: In retrospect, it's obvious that while mydeque is indeed the way to process the queue, yet, when I was reading the docs, I didn't come away with that. The statement, list objects support similar operations, is wishy-washy. It is not the same as saying deque is a subclass of list (which isn't true), nor the set of operations supported by deque is a superset of those supported by list (which also isn't true). Thus, you're left having to interpret the statement as a handwave that deques are sort-of list-like things, with some (indeterminate) set of operations in common. It's not at all obvious (or at least it wasn't to me) that one of those operations is evaluating the container in a boolean context to test for emptiness. Anyway, to more concretely answer your question, I'd just make the plain statement, An empty deque evaluates as false, somewhere right on the page where the methods are listed. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3891 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2210] Nested module import clutters package namespace
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The reason this happens is to support ``import pack.y``. When you reference the module in this way it is accessing the 'y' attribute on the 'pack' module. If import didn't set it this form of importing would never work. -- resolution: - wont fix status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2210 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3893] timedelta overflows in a surprising way
Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Not a bug. Try (future - now).seconds instead so that the timedelta is positive. As explained in the docs, a negative timedelta is normalized so that only the .days attribute is negative, and, as the docs also say, normalization of negative values may be surprising at first. The .seconds and .microseconds attributes are always non-negative. from datetime import datetime now = datetime.today() future = datetime.today() (now - future).seconds 86390 (future - now).seconds 9 now - future datetime.timedelta(-1, 86390, 146000) # only .days is negative -- nosy: +tim_one ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3893 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3628] IDLE does not run with Py30b3
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3628 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3723] Py_NewInterpreter does not work
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3723 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3666] atexit.register with bad input segfaults on exit
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3666 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3664] Pickler.dump from a badly initialized Pickler segfaults
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3664 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3626] python3.0 interpreter on Cygwin ignores all arguments
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3626 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3661] sys.call_tracing segfaults
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3661 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3685] Crash while compiling Python 3000 in OpenBSD 4.4
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3685 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1210] imaplib does not run under Python 3
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1210 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3623] _json: fix raise_errmsg(), py_encode_basestring_ascii() and linecol()
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3623 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3187] os.listdir can return byte strings
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3187 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3787] Make PyInstanceMethod_Type available or remove it
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3787 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1717] Get rid of more refercenes to __cmp__
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1717 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3574] compile() cannot decode Latin-1 source encodings
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3574 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3799] Byte/string inconsistencies between different dbm modules
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3799 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3781] warnings.catch_warnings fails gracelessly when recording warnings but no warnings are emitted
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3781 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3886] Integer overflow in _hashopenssl.c (CVE-2008-2316)
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3894] imageop issue
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3894 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3895] _lsprof issue
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3895 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3892] bsddb: test01_basic_replication fails on Windows sometimes
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- priority: deferred blocker - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3892 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
