[issue6975] symlinks incorrectly resolved on POSIX platforms
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: I don't really understand your algorithm. Why do you need a stack? Before resolving the symlink we mark the path as unresolved symlink for detecting infinite symlink loops. Before resolving the symlink we mark the path as resolved symlink (and cache the resolved value for speed) for allowing finite symlink recursion. Here is a test which pathlib fails. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28720/pathlib_resolve_test.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6975 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16960] Fix PEP8 errors in stdlib.
New submission from Ramchandra Apte: This bug is intended to contain all the patches for fixing PEP8 errors in stdlib. I am thinking of using a tool such as autopep8 to help fix the errors. -- messages: 179921 nosy: ramchandra.apte priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Fix PEP8 errors in stdlib. ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16960 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16960] Fix PEP8 errors everywhere
Ramchandra Apte added the comment: s/stdlib/everywhere -- components: +None title: Fix PEP8 errors in stdlib. - Fix PEP8 errors everywhere ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16960 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16960] Fix PEP8 errors everywhere
Ezio Melotti added the comment: Sorry, but we don't fix style issue unless we are already working on that code for some other reasons. -- nosy: +ezio.melotti resolution: - rejected stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed type: - enhancement ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16960 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16960] Fix PEP8 errors everywhere
Ramchandra Apte added the comment: Why? This may be low priority. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16960 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16960] Fix PEP8 errors everywhere
Ezio Melotti added the comment: Several reasons, e.g.: * there's the risk of introducing new bugs; * it makes merging more difficult; * it takes time to produce and review the patches; * it makes hg annotate harder to use; -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16960 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11159] Sax parser crashes if given unicode file name
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Yes, this thing was doubted me too. I proceeded from the following considerations. 1. Often system id is used for file operations and in this case you need to use the file system encoding. Unfortunately Python 2 does not have 'surrogateescape' handler which would allow to encode arbitrary name and then restore and re-encode it for file operations. 2. Python 2 in contrary to Python 3 accepts bytes and they may not be valid UTF-8. We have to choose between compatibility with Python 2 and Python 3. I chose the first, because it is more important for bugfix. May be I am wrong. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11159 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16500] Add an 'atfork' module
STINNER Victor added the comment: Might make sense to put this in atexit.atfork() to avoid small-module inflation? It sounds strange to mix at exit and at fork in the same module. Both are very different. 2013/1/13 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis rep...@bugs.python.org: Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Arfrever ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16500 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16500 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2128] sys.argv is wrong for unicode strings
STINNER Victor added the comment: is it correct that this bug no longer appears in Python 2.7.3? Martin wrote that it cannot be fixed in Python 2: For 2.6, I don't think fixing it is feasible. The fix is to upgrade your application to Python 3. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2128 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16960] Fix PEP8 errors everywhere
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: FWIW, I concur with Ezio's reasons for rejecting this. -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16960 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16960] Fix PEP8 errors everywhere
Ramchandra Apte added the comment: It's a valid bug report however difficult or low priority it is. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16960 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15870] PyType_FromSpec should take metaclass as an argument
Changes by lekma lekma...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +lekma ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15870 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16914] timestamping in smtplib.py to help troubleshoot server timeouts/delays
gac added the comment: Here's a second path I've done for the current/default branch, using a separate print function for output, as recommended by Berker Peksag. I tried to add it as a separate patch set using the code review tool but every time I did, I just got a screen full of debug output from Django so I'm going to attach it here instead. The for loop on args inside _print_debug probably isn't ideal, but I've done this to try and make sure that debuglevel 1 output is identical to what it was before my patches. Because args is passed into _print_debug as a tuple, I found that when doing print(message, args, file=stderr) it introduced the extra parentheses and quotes inherent with a tuple into the output. By concatenating string representations of this tuple onto the existing string it means the original output format is duplicated exactly. There may be a speed penalty for this, but realistically it seems that a minor speed penalty would be expected when using debugging options and the output consistency trumps raw speed for debugging. Once I've found a way of achieving the same in 2.7 (i.e. maintaining the original output format when being passed a tuple, the approach I've used for Python 3 doesn't seem to have the desired affect in 2.7) then I'll hopefully submit a patch for that as well. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28721/smtplib.34.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11159] Sax parser crashes if given unicode file name
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Here is an alternative patch. It doesn't encode system id when it settled, instead system id attribute can be bytes or an unicode and encoding/decoding happened only a file opened. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28722/sax_unicode_fn_alt-2.7.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11159 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16903] subprocess.Popen.communicate with universal_newlines=True doesn't accept strings on 3.2
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- stage: - needs patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16903 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16954] Add docstrings for ElementTree module
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- assignee: docs@python - serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16954 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16960] Fix PEP8 errors everywhere
R. David Murray added the comment: It is valid, but it is not *useful* to have it in the bug tracker as an open bug. All developers are aware that when they touch code for some other reason, they can fix PEP8 errors at the same time. Having an open bug report for it would just clutter the ticket system for no practical purpose. -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16960 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16961] No regression tests for -E and individual environment vars
New submission from Nick Coghlan: Accessing an environment variable without Py_GETENV (or breaking Py_IgnoreEnvironmentFlag configuration *cough*) may lead to environment variables being accessed even if -E is passed on the command line. As part of the PEP 432 implementation, I'm adding appropriate regression tests for affected environment variables as I go. Creating this as a reminder to look into backporting the relevant regression tests at least to 3.3 -- assignee: ncoghlan messages: 179934 nosy: ncoghlan priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: No regression tests for -E and individual environment vars versions: Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16961 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16914] timestamping in smtplib.py to help troubleshoot server timeouts/delays
R. David Murray added the comment: Thanks for the suggestion and patch. I haven't reviewed it thoroughly yet, but if you change _print_debug to be: def _print_debug(*args): then print(datetime.datetime.now(), *args, file=stderr) should do what you want for python3 (I don't think the [] are needed, personally). This patch won't be applied to 2.7, which I presume you know, so making that work would be for informational purposes only. -- versions: -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16914] timestamping in smtplib.py to help troubleshoot server timeouts/delays
R. David Murray added the comment: Er, that should have been (self, *args), but actually I'd recommend making it a module function, not a method, in which case my signature would be correct :) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16962] _posixsubprocess module uses outdated getdents system call
New submission from Riku Voipio: Getdents system call was superseded with with getdents64 in Linux 2.4 (January 2001). New architectures, such as 64-Bit ARM opt out not to support legacy system calls, and getdents is one of them. Since getdents64 has been supported for over a decade, I don't think adding ifdef to support both makes sense. Using getdents64 cleans up the current _posixsubprocess code as the entries are long long everywhere. The attached patch makes _posixsubprocess module compile on 64-Bit ARM and causes on regressions on the python3.3 testsuite on x86 and x86_64 -- components: Extension Modules files: movetogetdents64.diff keywords: patch messages: 179937 nosy: riku-voipio priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: _posixsubprocess module uses outdated getdents system call versions: Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28723/movetogetdents64.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16962 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16963] module html.parser HTMLParser's strict mode don't work
New submission from sean:
NOTE: SAME AS Python 3.2.2, Python 3.3 from python.org/download
Python 3.2.2 Stackless 3.1b3 060516 (default, Feb 20 2012, 13:36:12) [MSC
v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
Type copyright, credits or license() for more information.
from html.parser import HTMLParser
class LooseParser(HTMLParser):
def __init__(self, strict=False):
HTMLParser.__init__(self, strict=strict)
def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):
print('Tag:', tag)
p = LooseParser()
p.feed('phello/p')
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 179938
nosy: pysean
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: module html.parser HTMLParser's strict mode don't work
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16963
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16963] module html.parser HTMLParser's strict mode don't work
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
It works for me on 3.2.3, 3.2.3+, 3.3.0+, 3.4.0a0
from html.parser import HTMLParser
class LooseParser(HTMLParser):
... def __init__(self, strict=False):
... HTMLParser.__init__(self, strict=strict)
... def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):
... print('Tag:', tag)
...
p = LooseParser()
p.feed('phello/p')
Tag: p
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16963
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16963] module html.parser HTMLParser's strict mode don't work
sean added the comment: SAME AS #issue13273 http://bugs.python.org/issue13273 -- resolution: - duplicate status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16963 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16963] module html.parser HTMLParser's strict mode don't work
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- stage: - committed/rejected ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16963 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1602133] non-framework python fails to define os.environ properly
Ronald Oussoren added the comment: The patch didn't work for me because I manually applied and missed a bit. The patches fixes https://bitbucket.org/ronaldoussoren/py2app/issue/81 for me, and the environ(7) manpage also indicates that the call to _NSEnvironment is needed in shared libraries. I've attached a slightly different version of the patch that only enabled the _NSGetEnvironment path for shared library builds (--enable-shared and --enable-framework) and doesn't change anything for the default static builds. Ned: I think this is a bugfix and should be merged into all active branches. Do you agree? If so, I'll apply the patch. -- nosy: +ned.deily versions: +Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1602133 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1470548] Bugfix for #1470540 (XMLGenerator cannot output UTF-16)
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Patch updated. Fixed an error which Georg have found. Restored testing XMLGenerator with StringIO as Antoine pointed. Now XMLGenerator tested for StringIO, BytesIO and an user writer. Added tests for encoding. -- keywords: -easy Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28724/XMLGenerator-4.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1470548 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1470548] Bugfix for #1470540 (XMLGenerator cannot output UTF-16)
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- stage: needs patch - patch review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1470548 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12939] Add new io.FileIO using the native Windows API
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment: Added some comments on Rietveld. The .fileno() method is missing. Can this cause a problem when the file is passed to stdlib functions? subprocess for example? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12939 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12939] Add new io.FileIO using the native Windows API
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: What does this proposal bring exactly? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12939 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16500] Add an 'atfork' module
Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment: On 13.01.2013 00:37, STINNER Victor wrote: By the way, OpenSSL expects that its PRNG is reseed somehow (call RNG_add) after a fork. I wrote a patch for OpenSSL, but I don't remember if I sent it to OpenSSL. https://bitbucket.org/haypo/hasard/src/4a1be69a47eb1b2ec7ca95a341d4ca953a77f8c6/patches/openssl_rand_fork.patch?at=default Apparently not, and according to this thread, they don't think this is an OpenSSL problem to solve: http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/recycled-pids-causes-PRNG-to-repeat-td41669.html Note that you don't have to reseed the RNG just make sure that the two forks use different sequences. Simply adding some extra data in each process will suffice, e.g. by adding the PID of the new process to the RNG pool. This is certainly doable without any major CPU overhead :-) -- nosy: +lemburg ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16500 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16962] _posixsubprocess module uses outdated getdents system call
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- nosy: +gregory.p.smith stage: - patch review type: - behavior versions: +Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16962 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16935] unittest should understand SkipTest at import time during test discovery
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Still, raising SkipTest from the toplevel is useful when some toplevel setup code otherwise depends on the missing module. -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16935 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13968] Support recursive globs
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: I should add a symlink loop detecting to _rlistdir() as Antoine advised me on IRC. -- stage: patch review - needs patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13968 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16956] Allow signed line number deltas in the code object's line number table
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: How does this interact with pdb? -- nosy: +georg.brandl, haypo, pitrou stage: - patch review type: - enhancement versions: +Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16956 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16500] Add an 'atfork' module
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: It sounds strange to mix at exit and at fork in the same module. Both are very different. That's true. The sys module would probably be the right place for both functionalities. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16500 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16715] Get rid of IOError. Use OSError instead
Andrew Svetlov added the comment: Please email python-dev if you think LoadError should be directly specified. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16715 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16944] German number separators not working using format language and locale de_DE
Eric V. Smith added the comment: I think this issue should be closed, since we're doing as we're instructed by the OS. If someone wants to open a new issue for the m format specifier type, I'd support that. -- nosy: +eric.smith ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16944 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16935] unittest should understand SkipTest at import time during test discovery
Zachary Ware added the comment: I agree that raising SkipTest (or subclasses thereof, such as ResourceDenied) at module level should be supported. That would mean no changes would be needed in most of the should-be-skipped-but-fail-instead tests listed in issue 16748 to make test discovery play nicely, and in fact the changes to test_crypt could be mostly reverted. Personally, I don't find either of the suggestions given as alternates to what I did in test_crypt to be particularly prettier, not that what I did is pretty either. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16935 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16944] German number separators not working using format language and locale de_DE
Stefan Krah added the comment: I agree, we can't really do anything here. -- resolution: - invalid stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16944 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16893] Create IDLE help.txt from Doc/library/idle.rst
Zachary Ware added the comment: Georg: Note that Sphinx' make text output already should be suitable. We already update the pydoc topics with that on every release, so we could just as well do the same for the IDLE doc. No need for another separate script. I take it this would mean generating help.txt and then checking it in? Otherwise, users who built their own Python would likely run into issues with IDLE not finding its help file, or would be required to have sphinx available. That's not quite what I had in mind, but if we already do it for pydoc topics, it sounds fine to me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16893 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16964] Add 'm' format specifier for mon_grouping etc.
New submission from Stefan Krah: This issue proposes an additional 'm' format specifier that behaves like 'n', but uses mon_grouping, mon_decimal_point and mon_thousands_sep. See #16944 for the rationale. -- components: Interpreter Core messages: 179955 nosy: Peter.Stahl, eric.smith, mark.dickinson, skrah priority: low severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: Add 'm' format specifier for mon_grouping etc. type: enhancement versions: Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16964 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16748] Make CPython test package discoverable
Zachary Ware added the comment: Chris: There are lots of modules to change here. I wonder if some or most of this couldn't be automated. Possibly, but I don't mind going through individually if Ezio (or others) don't mind committing individually. From what I've seen, the test suite is varied enough within itself that it would be pretty hard to properly automate the changes I've been making. Also, I'm of the opinion that we'll end up with a higher quality result doing things by hand anyway. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16748 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5066] IDLE documentation for Unix obsolete/incorrect
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset d1ef91025d70 by Andrew Svetlov in branch 'default': Issue #5066: Update IDLE docs http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d1ef91025d70 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5066 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5066] IDLE documentation for Unix obsolete/incorrect
Andrew Svetlov added the comment: Pushed. Thanks. -- resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5066 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16932] urlparse fails at parsing www.python.org:80/
Changes by Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16932 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16893] Create IDLE help.txt from Doc/library/idle.rst
Andrew Svetlov added the comment: Regenerating idle.txt and committing it is fine to me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16893 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16893] Create IDLE help.txt from Doc/library/idle.rst
Georg Brandl added the comment: I take it this would mean generating help.txt and then checking it in? Otherwise, users who built their own Python would likely run into issues with IDLE not finding its help file, or would be required to have sphinx available. Yes, it will be checked in. That's not quite what I had in mind, but if we already do it for pydoc topics, it sounds fine to me. I don't think we have to worry about it getting out of date quickly. Automatically generating the IDLE help at run time from a documentation source file is not posssible anyway, since the doc sources are not available in a standard location for installed Pythons. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16893 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16893] Create IDLE help.txt from Doc/library/idle.rst
Zachary Ware added the comment: I don't think we have to worry about it getting out of date quickly. Fair point :) Automatically generating the IDLE help at run time from a documentation source file is not posssible anyway, since the doc sources are not available in a standard location for installed Pythons. This isn't quite what I meant either; I had intended it to be done at either Python build or install time. Your method is much simpler, though, I like it. That said, here's the diff between the (now) current Lib/idlelib/help.txt and the Sphinx ``make text`` output of Doc/library/idle.rst. I've not found where we've automated the pydoc topics generation, else I'd try to provide a patch to do this as well. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28725/issue16893.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16893 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16893] Create IDLE help.txt from Doc/library/idle.rst
Georg Brandl added the comment: The unified diff is not very helpful; I think somebody has to put the files side by side and merge. The pydoc topics are built with a custom Sphinx builder implemented in tools/sphinxext/pyspecific.py -- but if we just want the vanilla text builder output it should be enough to add a Doc/Makefile target: idledoc: BUILDER = text idledoc: SOURCES = library/idle idledoc: build @echo Build finished; now copying build/text/library/idle.txt to ../Lib/idlelib/help.txt. @cp build/text/library/idle.txt ../Lib/idlelib/help.txt and I add a step to PEP 101 to run this. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16893 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16893] Create IDLE help.txt from Doc/library/idle.rst
Georg Brandl added the comment: To make it actually work, replace library/idle by library/idle.rst. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16893 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16965] 2to3 should rewrite execfile() to open in 'rb' mode
New submission from Barry A. Warsaw: In this distribute bug I describe a problem when pip installing mimeparse, which has a setup.py with a BOM. distribute uses execfile() which gets fixed in Python 3 to use a combination of compile(open()) as the fixer. https://bitbucket.org/tarek/distribute/issue/349/dont-rely-on-2to3-to-properly-rewrite I think the problem is that the fixer opens the file in text mode, which leaves the BOM as a bogus first character, causing the SyntaxError. Instead, if the fixer opened the file in binary mode, then the BOM would be handled correctly by compile(). -- components: 2to3 (2.x to 3.x conversion tool) messages: 179964 nosy: barry priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: 2to3 should rewrite execfile() to open in 'rb' mode versions: Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16965 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1602133] non-framework python fails to define os.environ properly
Ned Deily added the comment: Ronald: the patch? -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1602133 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1602133] non-framework python fails to define os.environ properly
Changes by Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28726/1602133.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1602133 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16955] multiprocessing.connection poll() always returns false
John Brearley added the comment: Hi Rchard: Thanks very much. The wait() method works fine. Regards, John Brearley 613-259-5622 (H) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16955 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16920] multiprocessing.connection listener gets MemoryErroronrecv
John Brearley added the comment: Hi Richard: Thanks for pointers on other methods. I am coming from a TCL background, and learning Python. I have gone through regular sockets, select, asyncore, sockserv, threading and multiprocessing modules. Only multiprocessing seems to be able to use more than a single CPU and the listener is nicely shared between proceses. Is there another module that that would be better suited spreading tasks around CPUS and communicating between hosts? I am trying to understand your reservations about using them for communication over a network Yes, if I was doing a production server, I would turn on authentication. Regards, John Brearley 613-259-5622 (H) -- title: multiprocessing.connection listener gets MemoryError onrecv - multiprocessing.connection listener gets MemoryErroronrecv ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16920 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16966] Publishing multiprocessing listener code
New submission from John Brearley: Hi Richard: I have published my multiprocessing server client scripts on the 2 web sites shown below in the hopes that they will help others learning this module. I haven't seen anyplace on the python.org web site that might be suitable for a copy. Are people encouraged to post sample scripts on python.org? http://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/20516/sample-python-multiprocessin g-connection-server http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1701937 Regards, John Brearley 613-259-5622 (H) -- messages: 179968 nosy: jbrearley priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Publishing multiprocessing listener code ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16966 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1159051] Handle corrupted gzip files with unexpected EOF
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: At the moment gzip can raise two errors on unexpected EOF: struct.error from struct.unpack() or TypeError from ord(). Both bz2 and lzma raise EOFError in such cases. The proposed patch converts both truncated gzip errors to EOFError as for bz2 and lzma. Added similar tests for gzip, bz2 and lzma. I doubt about backward compatibility. It's obvious that struct.error and TypeError are unintentional, and EOFError is purposed for this case. However users can catch undocumented but de facto exceptions and doesn't expect EOFError. -- nosy: +nadeem.vawda stage: needs patch - patch review versions: +Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 3.1 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28727/gzip_eof-3.4.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1159051 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16967] Keyword keyword only default parameters are evaluated before po
New submission from Kay Hayen: Suprisingly, keyword only arguments become evaluated first: def f(a=undefined1,*,b=undefined2):pass ... Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module NameError: name 'undefined2' is not defined It should be undefined1. I am sure, this is going to surprise developers and breaks assumptions, people tend to make. So far (to my knowledge) nothing that was separated by a , could be evaluated in a mixed order. Please consider to change this around. -- components: Interpreter Core messages: 179970 nosy: Kay.Hayen priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Keyword keyword only default parameters are evaluated before po versions: Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16967 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16967] Keyword only argument default values are evaluated before other defaults
Georg Brandl added the comment: Looks like a bug to me, although it isn't likely to cause great harm. -- nosy: +georg.brandl title: Keyword keyword only default parameters are evaluated before po - Keyword only argument default values are evaluated before other defaults ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16967 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16748] Make CPython test package discoverable
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Also, I'm of the opinion that we'll end up with a higher quality result doing things by hand anyway. Automation doesn't (and shouldn't) preclude careful review and modifications by hand. My point was that it seems like it might be able to get you, say, 80% of the way there (e.g. by deleting test_main(), determining which classes are called by test_main(), adding , unittest.TestCase, creating stub classes that could be retained or deleted). Or at least provide some additional checks or info. There are nearly 400 test files using test_main(), no? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16748 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12939] Add new io.FileIO using the native Windows API
Richard Oudkerk added the comment: Added some comments on Rietveld. The .fileno() method is missing. Can this cause a problem when the file is passed to stdlib functions? subprocess for example? Thanks. An older version of the patch had a fileno() method which returned the handle -- but that would have confused anything that expects fileno() to return a true fd. It would be possible to make fileno() lazily create an fd using open_osfhandle(). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12939 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6975] symlinks incorrectly resolved on POSIX platforms
R. David Murray added the comment: Vis the discussion of x[:0] in the review. This kind of construct is only unfamiliar because it is new in Python3, and there are not *that* many places that you want to (and can) deal with both bytes and strings using the same code. But when you can, it is the more-or-less obvious way to write the code. In this particular case you could also write type(x)(). There are pluses and minuses to both forms, but if any of the rest of the code uses slicing to work around the fact that byte strings index into ints, then I would definitely prefer the slice form. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6975 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12939] Add new io.FileIO using the native Windows API
Richard Oudkerk added the comment: What does this proposal bring exactly? Unless we are willing to completely replace fds with handles on Windows, perhaps not too much. (At one point I had assumed that that was the plan for py3k.) Although not advertised, openhandle() does have a share_flags parameter to control the share mode of the file. This makes it possible to delete files for which there are open handles. Mercurial needs a C extension to support this. regrtest could certainly benefit from such a feature. But one thing that I would at least like to do is create a FileIO replacement for overlapped pipe/socket handles. Then multiprocessing.Connection could be a simple wrapper round a file object, and most of the platform specific code in multiprocessing.connection can go away. The current patch does not support overlapped IO, but that could be added easily enough. (Overlapped IO for normal files might be more complicated.) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12939 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1683368] object.__init__ shouldn't allow args/kwds
Jason R. Coombs added the comment: For reference, I encountered an issue due to this change and didn't quite understand what was going on. I distilled the problem down and posted a question on stack overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14300153/why-does-this-datetime-subclass-fail-on-python-3/14324503#14324503 The answer led me here, so now I understand. I wanted to share this use-case for posterity. I didn't find anything in the what's new documents for Python 3.3 or 3.0. Was this fundamental signature change to all objects documented anywhere? Any objection if I draft a change to the docs? -- nosy: +jason.coombs ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1683368 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6975] symlinks incorrectly resolved on POSIX platforms
Changes by Marco Buccini marcu...@gmail.com: -- nosy: -markon ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6975 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6973] subprocess.Popen.send_signal doesn't check whether the process has terminated
Changes by Marco Buccini marcu...@gmail.com: -- nosy: -markon ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6973 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6074] .pyc files created readonly if .py file is readonly, python won't overwrite
Changes by Marco Buccini marcu...@gmail.com: -- nosy: -markon ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6074 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16920] multiprocessing.connection listener gets MemoryErroronrecv
Richard Oudkerk added the comment: If you want to communicate between processes of the same progam, you are best off calling multiprocessing.Pipe() or multiprocessing.Queue() in the main process. Queues or connections can then be inherited by the child processes. Usually all communication is between the main process and its children: sibling-to-sibling communication is rare. I am trying to understand your reservations about using them for communication over a network Since Connection.recv() automatically unpickles the data it receives it is effected by the issue discussed here http://nadiana.com/python-pickle-insecure Basically, unpickling malicious data can trigger *any* command it wants using the shell. So you *must* use recv_bytes()/send_bytes() when dealing with unauthenticated connections. Over a network you *could* use authentication. But securely sharing the authentication key between all the hosts is far from straight forward. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16920 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16966] Publishing multiprocessing listener code
Richard Oudkerk added the comment: For the reasons I wrote in the other issue, I don't think this an approach to encourage. There was no need to create a new issue: if you post to a closed issue then people on the nosy list will still see your message. So I will close this issue. (Maybe wiki.python.org is the sort of thing you are looking for, but I have never visited it, and it does not seem to be available currently. I think it was recently compromised, so it may be down for a while. Anyway, I don't think your example code is suitable.) -- nosy: +sbt resolution: - rejected stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16966 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13968] Support recursive globs
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: In fact glob() is already protected against an endless recursion (in the same way as Bash). The level of recursion is simply limited by the maximum length of the path. So I did not change the implementation, I have just added a test for symlink loop. I also corrected the other new tests so that they should not fail on the platform without symlinks. -- stage: needs patch - patch review Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28728/glob_recursive_3.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13968 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16748] Make CPython test package discoverable
Zachary Ware added the comment: For the conversion from test_main() to unittest.main(), I could certainly see automation helping a lot; most cases are very simple. But really, that issue is somewhat tangential to this one and in my last message I was thinking from the perspective of just the 80 or so modules that completely fail test discovery otherwise. I believe that trying to automate those would be more trouble than it's worth. Especially if issue 16935 is fixed, as that will knock out most of the tests I listed above that failed to skip properly. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16748 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1602133] non-framework python fails to define os.environ properly
Ned Deily added the comment: LGTM and I agree that it should be considered a bug fix. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1602133 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15539] Fixing Tools/scripts/pindent.py
Andrew Svetlov added the comment: Is it fixed now? -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15539 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16823] Python crashes on running tkinter code with threads
Changes by Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16823 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16887] IDLE - tabify/untabify applied when clicking Cancel
Changes by Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16887 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16901] In http.cookiejar.FileCookieJar() the .load() and .revert() methods don't work
Changes by Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16901 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16921] Docs of subprocess.CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE are wrong
Changes by Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16921 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16935] unittest should understand SkipTest at import time during test discovery
Changes by Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16935 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16968] Fix test discovery for test_concurrent_futures.py
New submission from Zachary Ware: Here's an incomplete patch to test_concurrent_futures.py that does not convert from test_main() to unittest.main(); the decorator on test_main has me unsure how to make the conversion. I've attempted moving various parts of the decorator's functions to setUpModule and tearDownModule functions, but always wind up with a warning that the test has modified threading._dangling. Guidance on this one would be much appreciated :) -- components: Tests files: test_concurrent_futures_discovery.diff keywords: patch messages: 179983 nosy: brett.cannon, ezio.melotti, zach.ware priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Fix test discovery for test_concurrent_futures.py type: behavior versions: Python 3.3, Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28729/test_concurrent_futures_discovery.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16968 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16968] Fix test discovery for test_concurrent_futures.py
Brett Cannon added the comment: The way I would replace test_main() would be: if __name__ == '__main__': try: test.support.reap_threads(unittest.main)() finally: test.support_reap_children() -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16968 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16968] Fix test discovery for test_concurrent_futures.py
Zachary Ware added the comment: That looks quite good, except for the fact that discovery (of the form `python -m unittest discover Lib/test/ 'test_*.py'`) won't hit reap_threads or reap_children. It does cover `python -m test.test_concurrent_futures` and standard regrtest, though; is 2 out of three good enough? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16968 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16967] Keyword only argument default values are evaluated before other defaults
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Arfrever ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16967 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15539] Fixing Tools/scripts/pindent.py
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Yes, it's fixed. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15539 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9720] zipfile writes incorrect local file header for large files in zip64
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset ce869b05762c by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7': Issue #9720: zipfile now writes correct local headers for files larger than 4 GiB. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ce869b05762c New changeset b93848ca7760 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.2': Issue #9720: zipfile now writes correct local headers for files larger than 4 GiB. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b93848ca7760 New changeset 656a45738e5e by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.3': Issue #9720: zipfile now writes correct local headers for files larger than 4 GiB. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/656a45738e5e New changeset 628a6af64a46 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default': Issue #9720: zipfile now writes correct local headers for files larger than 4 GiB. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/628a6af64a46 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9290] IDLE and Command line present different behavior for sys.stdin
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: If no one objects, I'm going to commit this next week. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9290 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9720] zipfile writes incorrect local file header for large files in zip64
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Fixed. Thank you for report, Craig de Stigter. -- resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16715] Get rid of IOError. Use OSError instead
Éric Araujo added the comment: Source code says: # derives from OSError for backwards-compatibility with Python 2.4.0 class LoadError(OSError): pass In 3.0, LoadError could have been made a direct subclass of Exception. Now it’s too late, but a best practice IMO would still be to write LoadError in all new code. This makes no practical difference, unless test_cookiejar does not check that LoadError is properly raised and caught at the right places. In that case, it may be a little more future-proof to follow py-user’s advice. -- nosy: +eric.araujo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16715 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15989] Possible integer overflow of PyLong_AsLong() results
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 13e2e44db99d by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default': Issue #15989: Fix several occurrences of integer overflow http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/13e2e44db99d -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15989 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15989] Possible integer overflow of PyLong_AsLong() results
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- stage: patch review - commit review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15989 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16968] Fix test discovery for test_concurrent_futures.py
Brett Cannon added the comment: Yes as even the current solution doesn't work with ``-m unittest discover`` anyway, right? And if you are running the tests independently then it is a separate process and thus you don't need to worry about dangling threads or processes. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16968 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16968] Fix test discovery for test_concurrent_futures.py
Zachary Ware added the comment: Ok then, I'll update the patch. Thanks, Brett! -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16968 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10527] multiprocessing.Pipe problem: handle out of range in select()
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset da5e520a7ba5 by Richard Oudkerk in branch '2.7': Issue #10527: Use poll() instead of select() for multiprocessing pipes http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/da5e520a7ba5 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10527 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10527] multiprocessing.Pipe problem: handle out of range in select()
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset abf111b9a464 by Richard Oudkerk in branch '3.2': Issue #10527: Use poll() instead of select() for multiprocessing pipes http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/abf111b9a464 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10527 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16748] Make CPython test package discoverable
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Okay, well the title of this issue is Make CPython test package discoverable, so as part of that we should be confirming that test discovery finds the same tests that test_main() runs (and if not, to understand why and/or make them the same). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16748 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16968] Fix test discovery for test_concurrent_futures.py
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: If you want to get the same cleanup logic working with unittest discovery, you could try using the load_tests protocol, and wrapping the functions that actually run the tests there (which may simply mean wrapping the tests passed to load_tests, which I believe are callables). -- nosy: +chris.jerdonek ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16968 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16968] Fix test discovery for test_concurrent_futures.py
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: By the way, I think this process of using unittest (i.e. dog-fooding) is a good exercise in part because it helps us understand better where unittest could use improvement (e.g. the SkipTest during import issue, and the decorator issue raised here). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16968 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1683368] object.__init__ shouldn't allow args/kwds
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: First, What's New explains the new features in Python. This issue is a bugfix. AFAIK, object() has always been documented as having no parameters. The fact that passing extra args should raise a TypeError is no secret. Second, this *is* documented. The third sentence of http://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.3.html is For full details, see the changelog. We really mean that ;-). The changelog is derived from Misc/NEWS in the repository. It says Issue #1683368: object.__new__ and object.__init__ raise a TypeError if they are passed arguments and their complementary method is not overridden. That is prefixed by Issue #1683368:, which links to this issue. This entry is easily found by searching for 'object.__init__' (or a sufficient prefix thereof). For 3.2, the What's New sentence was For full details, see the Misc/NEWS file and the link went to the raw repository file. http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/3.2/Misc/NEWS My impression is that this issue played a role in including the prettified version, instead of just the repository link, in the on-line version of the docs. What's New for 2.7 does not even have the link. In any case, *any* bugfix breaks code that depends on the bug. Hence the decision to make the full changelog more available and more readable. I realize that the change to the header for What's New is hard to miss. But what are we to do? Add a new What's New in What's New doc for one release? Put the change in flashing red type? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1683368 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16823] Python quits on running tkinter code with threads
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: We use 'crash' to mean a segfault (and core dump, on *nix) or the Windows equivalent. We avoid those if at all possible. A Python traceback is not a crash but a semi-graceful shutdown that has be planned for, given the circumstances. What is annoying here is getting a different exception (or at least message type) each time. I presume it depends on what data gets corrupted, and that is somewhat haphazard. The quote seems to be accurate. I know little about threading, but if it were possible to detect tkinter access from other than the main thread (without excessive slowdown), then a consistent exception might be raised. But I am doubtful that this can be done sensibly. Hence a doc change seems like the best first step. -- title: Python crashes on running tkinter code with threads - Python quits on running tkinter code with threads ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16823 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16826] Don't check for PYTHONCASEOK if interpreter started with -E
Meador Inge added the comment: I agree that it is better to cover both cases in one test irrespective of the interpreter command line options. I will take a look at creating a subprocess. Thanks for the review. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16826 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
