[issue16991] Add OrderedDict written in C
Eric Snow added the comment: @Benjamin: Yeah, I've fixed that. @Ezio: Good point. I've touched that up. Once I have cleared up reference counting issues I'll put up a new patch. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16991 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16774] Additional recipes for itertools docs
Alexey Kachayev added the comment: It's hard to evaluate how popular given recipes, but: * drop is opposite to take, so it's as popular as take * the same situation with splitat, splitby - it's one case of partition that's hard to write each time with enumerator (partition is already in documentation) * takelast, droplast was added cause itertools.islice doesn't support negative indices (which is ok). both functions have not obvious implementation - I'm sure that recipes will be good example for users how to work with iterators even if concrete functions aren't so widely-spreaded -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16774 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16994] collections.Counter.least_common
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: One method of statistically optimising the computation is to remove n least common elements from the set S. May be you need not remove least common elements from the set, but *get* a set of (len(S)-n) most common elements? Does it make any sense to you? Frankly, not very much. Note, that least common element is not defined in most cases. Usually there are only a few most (or even one) common elements, but a lot of least common elements. Result of least_common(n) is practically random due to hash randomization. Another note is that most_common()[:-n] in many cases faster than least_common(n) for n 1. This is right for most_common(n) too, but it usually used for very small n (in particular for n=1) and this has more sense. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16994 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15989] Possible integer overflow of PyLong_AsLong() results
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 974ace29ee2d by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.2': Issue #15989: Fix several occurrences of integer overflow http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/974ace29ee2d New changeset 8f10c9eae183 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.3': Issue #15989: Fix several occurrences of integer overflow http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8f10c9eae183 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15989 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15989] Possible integer overflow of PyLong_AsLong() results
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset d544873d62e9 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7': Issue #15989: Fix several occurrences of integer overflow http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d544873d62e9 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15989 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16953] select module compile errors with broken poll()
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 1d33c79d2f6b by Charles-François Natali in branch '2.7': Issue #16953: Fix socket module compilation on platforms with HAVE_BROKEN_POLL. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1d33c79d2f6b New changeset 101e821e5e70 by Charles-François Natali in branch '3.2': Issue #16953: Fix socket module compilation on platforms with HAVE_BROKEN_POLL. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/101e821e5e70 New changeset f04c97bbb241 by Charles-François Natali in branch '3.3': Issue #16953: Fix socket module compilation on platforms with HAVE_BROKEN_POLL. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f04c97bbb241 New changeset 79912bb1a884 by Charles-François Natali in branch 'default': Issue #16953: Fix socket module compilation on platforms with HAVE_BROKEN_POLL. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/79912bb1a884 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16953 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16945] rewrite CGIHTTPRequestHandler to always use subprocess
Changes by Charles-François Natali cf.nat...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +v+python ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16945 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16953] select module compile errors with broken poll()
Charles-François Natali added the comment: Committed, thanks for the patch! -- stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16953 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11729] libffi assembler relocation check is not robust, fails with clang
Stefan Krah added the comment: The buildbot coverage is good, but the number of (OS, shell, compiler) combinations is much higher. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11729 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10535] Enable warnings by default in unittest
Ezio Melotti added the comment: The two TODOs left are: 1) adding UnittestWarning; 2) improving the error message for deprecations; Technically these are new features, so they can go in 3.4 only, but 2) might be simple enough to be backported. Regarding 1) it might be a bit too late, given that most deprecations have been around for 2-3 versions already. -- status: pending - open ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10535 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15989] Possible integer overflow of PyLong_AsLong() results
Stefan Krah added the comment: Several 2.7 buildbots are failing. Unfortunately I have only platforms where sizeof(int) == sizeof(long) == sizeof(size_t). You can use your cpython ssh key to login to all snakebite buildbot machines. They are tagged with [SB]. http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-September/121651.html -- nosy: +skrah ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15989 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16993] shutil.which() should preserve path case
Ramchandra Apte added the comment: Somehow the patch is not showing for me. -- nosy: +ramchandra.apte ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16993 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Nick Coghlan added the comment: I think we're going to have to separate out two counts in the metrics - the total number of tests (the current counts), and the total number of subtests (the executed subtest blocks). (Other parameterisation solutions can then choose whether to treat each pair of parameters as a distinct test case or as a subtest - historical solutions would appear as distinct test cases, while new approaches might choose to use the subtest machinery). The aggregation of subtest results to test case results would then be that the test case fails if either: - an assertion directly in the test case fails - an assertion fails in at least one subtest of that test case The interpretation of expected failure in a world with subtests is then clear: as long as at least one subtest or assertion fails, the decorator is satisfied that the expected test case failure is occurred. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10590] Parameter type error for xml.sax.parseString(string, ...)
Changes by Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com: -- nosy: -eli.bendersky ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10590 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16993] shutil.which() should preserve path case
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Oh, sorry. Here is a patch. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28781/shutil_which_normcase.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16993 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11983] Inconsistent hash and comparison for code objects
Eugene Toder added the comment: If you add co_firstlineno into code_hash you can say something like /* The rest isn't used in hash and comparisons, except co_name and co_firstlineno, which are preserved for tracebacks and debuggers. */ (Otherwise you'd need to explain why co_firstlineno is not in hash.) BTW, since co_firstlineno is used including co_name is redundant -- there's no way to have 2 named code objects on the same line, AFAIK. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11983 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15989] Possible integer overflow of PyLong_AsLong() results
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset a78ebf9aed06 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7': Ensure that width and precision in string formatting test have type int, not long. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a78ebf9aed06 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15989 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16998] Lost updates with multiprocessing.Value
New submission from Jens Lechtenboerger: Maybe I'm misreading the documentation of multiprocessing.Value and multiprocessing.sharedctypes.Value. I thought that access to the value field of Value instances was protected by locks to avoid lost updates. Specifically, for multiprocessing.Value(typecode_or_type, *args[, lock]) and multiprocessing.sharedctypes.Value(typecode_or_type, *args[, lock]) the documentation states: By default the return value is actually a synchronized wrapper for the object. [...] If lock is True (the default) then a new lock object is created to synchronize access to the value. If lock is a Lock or RLock object then that will be used to synchronize access to the value. If lock is False then access to the returned object will not be automatically protected by a lock, so it will not necessarily be “process-safe”. (By the way, I'm not sure why both, multiprocessing.Value and multiprocessing.sharedctypes.Value are documented. They appear to be the same thing.) The following tests (also attached as file) show that lost updates may occur if several instances of multiprocessing.Process increment the same Value that is passed as args parameter. def do_inc(integer): Increment integer.value for multiprocessing.Value integer. integer.value += 1 def do_test(notasks): Create notasks processes, each incrementing the same Value. As the Value is initialized to 0, its final value is expected to be notasks. tasks = list() integer = multiprocessing.sharedctypes.Value(i, 0) for run in range(notasks): proc = multiprocessing.Process(target=do_inc, args=(integer,)) proc.start() tasks.append(proc) for proc in tasks: proc.join() if integer.value != notasks: logging.error( Unexpected value: %d (expected: %d), integer.value, notasks) if __name__ == __main__: do_test(100) Sample invocations and results: Note that on a single CPU machine the error is not reported for every execution but only for about every third run. $ python --version Python 2.6.5 $ uname -a Linux ubuntu-desktop 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 #2 Fri Jun 18 20:30:49 CEST 2010 i686 GNU/Linux $ python test_multiprocessing.py ERROR:root:Unexpected value: 99 (expected: 100) On a quadcore, the error occurs almost every time. $ uname -a Linux PC 2.6.35.13 #4 SMP Tue Dec 20 15:22:02 CET 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ ~/local/Python-2.7.3/python test_multiprocessing.py ERROR:root:Unexpected value: 95 (expected: 100) $ ~/local/Python-3.3.0/python test_multiprocessing.py ERROR:root:Unexpected value: 86 (expected: 100) -- components: Library (Lib) files: test_multiprocessing.py messages: 180251 nosy: lechten priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Lost updates with multiprocessing.Value type: behavior versions: Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28782/test_multiprocessing.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16998 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15989] Possible integer overflow of PyLong_AsLong() results
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Thank you for point, Stefan. And thanks Trent for his project. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15989 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: The way expectedFailure is currently implemented (it's a decorator which knows nothing about test cases and test results, it only expects an exception to be raised by its callee), it's gonna be difficult to make it participate with subtests without breaking compatibility. (that said, I also think it's a useless feature) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org: -- nosy: +brett.cannon ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10535] Enable warnings by default in unittest
Brett Cannon added the comment: I wouldn't backport; not worth it. Anyway, since I consider this bug closed I'm taking myself off the nosy list. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10535 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I think we're going to have to separate out two counts in the metrics - the total number of tests (the current counts), and the total number of subtests (the executed subtest blocks). This is a reasonable proposal. On the other hand, it was already the case that a single test could count for several failures (for example, an exception in the test method and another in tearDown). Therefore, I think it is independent from the subtest proposal and could be tackled separately (which would also help keep this issue focussed :-)). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16507] Patch selectmodule.c to support WSAPoll on Windows
Guido van Rossum added the comment: This works well enough (tested in old version of Tulip), right? What's holding it up? -- nosy: +gvanrossum ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16507 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: New patch attached: - makes _SubTest a TestCase subclass - clarifies test skipping for subtests (skipTest() only skips the subtest) - makes expected failures work as expected by resorting to a thread-local storage hack -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28783/subtests3.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: New patch attached: - makes _SubTest a TestCase subclass - clarifies test skipping for subtests (skipTest() only skips the subtest) - makes expected failures work as expected by resorting to a thread-local storage hack -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28785/subtests3.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: New patch attached: - makes _SubTest a TestCase subclass - clarifies test skipping for subtests (skipTest() only skips the subtest) - makes expected failures work as expected by resorting to a thread-local storage hack -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28784/subtests3.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14340] Update embedded copy of expat - fix security crash issues
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: If you could apply this to 2.7, that'd be great. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14340 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16998] Lost updates with multiprocessing.Value
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- nosy: +sbt ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16998 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16795] Patch: some changes to AST to make it more useful for static language analysis
Sven Brauch added the comment: Here's the next version which I hope to be somewhat complete now. vararg and kwarg are now of type arg, and I did all the changes which are required to make this possible. The ast tests pass. Do you prefer to have this as one large patch all together, or would you rather like to review (and apply) 3..4 patches split into the individual features I implemented? -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28786/full3.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16795 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16795] Patch: some changes to AST to make it more useful for static language analysis
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: Individual patches would be great. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16795 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16795] Patch: some changes to AST to make it more useful for static language analysis
Sven Brauch added the comment: Alright, I'll be back with those shortly (as soon as I found out how to do this best with hg -- I'm used to git ;). I'll also sign the contributor agreement, that's no problem of course. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16795 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15989] Possible integer overflow of PyLong_AsLong() results
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset ee93a89b4e0f by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7': Issue #15989: Fix possible integer overflow in str formatting as in unicode formatting. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ee93a89b4e0f -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15989 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Changes by florian-rathgeber florian.rathge...@gmail.com: -- nosy: -florian-rathgeber ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1159051] Handle corrupted gzip files with unexpected EOF
Nadeem Vawda added the comment: I've reviewed the patch and posted some comments on Rietveld. I doubt about backward compatibility. It's obvious that struct.error and TypeError are unintentional, and EOFError is purposed for this case. However users can catch undocumented but de facto exceptions and doesn't expect EOFError. I think it's fine for us to change it to raise EOFError in these cases. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1159051 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16795] Patch: some changes to AST to make it more useful for static language analysis
Sven Brauch added the comment: Okay, here they are. I'm not sure how to make hg include a commit message in the patch... 81299-extend-asdl.diff: Changes required to the ASDL framework, in order to allow attributes ( ... ) on a product 81300-change-var-kwargs.diff: Makes var/kwarg be instances of arg, and adds the lineno / col_offset attributes to arg. 81301-change-attr-ranges.diff: Changes power ranges as described in the first post of this report. All three patches include the corresponding changes to the unit tests, and hopefully the correct set of changes to the generated (Python-ast.h/.c) files. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28787/81299-extend-asdl.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16795 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16795] Patch: some changes to AST to make it more useful for static language analysis
Sven Brauch added the comment: second patch file -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28788/81300-change-var-kwargs.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16795 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16795] Patch: some changes to AST to make it more useful for static language analysis
Sven Brauch added the comment: third patch file (... is there a better way to upload three files?) -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28789/81301-change-attr-ranges.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16795 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16998] Lost updates with multiprocessing.Value
Richard Oudkerk added the comment: I thought that access to the value field of Value instances was protected by locks to avoid lost updates. Loads and stores are both atomic. But += is made up of two operations, a load followed by a store, and the lock is dropped between the two. The same lack of atomicity applies when using += to modify an attribute of a normal python object in a multithreaded program. If you want an atomic increment you could try def do_inc(integer): with integer.get_lock(): integer.value += 1 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16998 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16042] smtplib: unlimited readline() from connection
R. David Murray added the comment: Christian, do you want to try to complete this before the 2.7.4 RC? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16042 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15955] gzip, bz2, lzma: add option to limit output size
Nadeem Vawda added the comment: What if unconsumed_tail is not empty but less than needed to decompress at least one byte? We need read more data until unconsumed_tail grow enought to be decompressed. This is possible in zlib, but not in bz2. According to the manual [1], it is perfectly OK to supply one byte at a time. For xz, I'm not sure whether this problem could occur. I had assumed that it could not, but I may be mistaken ;-). Unfortunately liblzma has no proper manual, so I'll have to dig into the implementation to find out, and I haven't had the time to do this yet. [As an aside, it would be nice if the documentation for the zlib module mentioned this problem. We can't assume that users of the Python module are familiar with the C API for zlib...] [1] http://www.bzip.org/1.0.5/bzip2-manual-1.0.5.html -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15955 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10535] Enable warnings by default in unittest
Ezio Melotti added the comment: Agreed, closing. -- resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - status: open - closed versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10535 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17000] Remove cruft from unittest docs
New submission from Antoine Pitrou: There's a lot of obsolete or simply pointless cruft in the unittest docs, including references to the runTest method, or a detailed description of how to manually collect test suites. Following patch simplifies things a lot and makes the doc easier to read. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: unittest-doc-fix.patch keywords: patch messages: 180273 nosy: docs@python, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal stage: patch review status: open title: Remove cruft from unittest docs type: behavior versions: Python 3.3, Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28791/unittest-doc-fix.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17000 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16999] Remove cruft from unittest docs
New submission from Antoine Pitrou: There's a lot of obsolete or simply pointless cruft in the unittest docs, including references to the runTest method, or a detailed description of how to manually collect test suites. Following patch simplifies things a lot and makes the doc easier to read. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: unittest-doc-fix.patch keywords: patch messages: 180274 nosy: docs@python, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal stage: patch review status: open title: Remove cruft from unittest docs type: behavior versions: Python 3.3, Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28790/unittest-doc-fix.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16999 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17001] Make uuid.UUID use functools.total_ordering
New submission from Ramchandra Apte: This would reduce the complexity of uuid.UUID and also if the way it compares changes, one would't have to change all the compare methods. Attached is a patch. -- components: Library (Lib) files: issue.patch keywords: patch messages: 180275 nosy: ramchandra.apte priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Make uuid.UUID use functools.total_ordering versions: Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28792/issue.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17001 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17001] Make uuid.UUID use functools.total_ordering
Changes by Ramchandra Apte maniandra...@gmail.com: -- type: - enhancement ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17001 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16557] PEP 380 isn't reflected in the Functional Programming HOWTO
Ramchandra Apte added the comment: Attached is a patch. Note that this is my first Doc patch; please apologize errors. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +ramchandra.apte Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28793/issue16557.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16557 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17001] Make uuid.UUID use functools.total_ordering
Brian Curtin added the comment: Can you provide test cases for this code? -- nosy: +brian.curtin ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17001 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17001] Make uuid.UUID use functools.total_ordering
Ramchandra Apte added the comment: Yes, will do so. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17001 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16273] f.tell() returning negative number on Windows build
Changes by Brian Curtin br...@python.org: -- nosy: +brian.curtin ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16273 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17001] Make uuid.UUID use functools.total_ordering
Ramchandra Apte added the comment: @Brian Curtin It appears that there are tests for UUID ordering. [0] I will run the tests. [0] http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/d1e6a48dfb0d/Lib/test/test_uuid.py#l188 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17001 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17001] Make uuid.UUID use functools.total_ordering
Ramchandra Apte added the comment: Damn, I forgot to add import functools. Here is a fixed version that passes test_uuid. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28794/issue-v2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17001 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13598] string.Formatter doesn't support empty curly braces {}
Ramchandra Apte added the comment: Buump. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13598 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
