[issue1191964] asynchronous Subprocess

2014-04-05 Thread Josiah Carlson

Josiah Carlson added the comment:

All of the standard tests plus another few that I added all pass on Windows and 
Linux. I've got some cleanup and a couple more tests to add tomorrow, then I'll 
post a patch.

I ended up not using any overlapped IO cancellation in the Windows variant of 
communicate(), as there is no benefit to doing so, and the function is as 
re-entrant as the original.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1191964
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21116] Failure to create multiprocessing shared arrays larger than 50% of memory size under linux

2014-04-05 Thread Charles-François Natali

Charles-François Natali added the comment:

Indeed, I think it would make sense to consider this for 3.4, and even 2.7
if we opt for a simple fix.

As for the best way to fix it in the meantime, I'm fine with a buffered
zero-filling (the mere fact that noone ever complained until now probably
means that the performance isn't a show-stopper for users).

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21116
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21136] fractions.Fraction.__pow__ does unneeded renormalization

2014-04-05 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset 91d7fadac271 by Mark Dickinson in branch 'default':
Issue #21136: Avoid unnecessary normalization in Fractions resulting from power 
and other operations.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/91d7fadac271

--
nosy: +python-dev

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21136
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21136] fractions.Fraction.__pow__ does unneeded renormalization

2014-04-05 Thread Mark Dickinson

Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com:


--
stage: needs patch - committed/rejected

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21136
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21136] fractions.Fraction.__pow__ does unneeded renormalization

2014-04-05 Thread Mark Dickinson

Mark Dickinson added the comment:

Applied.  I added an extra test for the `Fraction(0, 1) ** 2` case.

--
resolution:  - fixed
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21136
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21118] str.translate is absurdly slow in majority of use cases (takes up to 60x longer than similar functions)

2014-04-05 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset 9acc8196a82c by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #21118: Remove unused variable
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9acc8196a82c

New changeset bd594dd71d46 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #21118: Add more unit tests on str.translate()
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bd594dd71d46

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21118
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21118] str.translate is absurdly slow in majority of use cases (takes up to 60x longer than similar functions)

2014-04-05 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset cca6b056236a by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #21118: Optimize str.translate() for ASCII = ASCII translation
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/cca6b056236a

New changeset 6a347c0ffbfc by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #21118: Add unit test for invalid character replacement (code point 
higher than U+10)
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/6a347c0ffbfc

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21118
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue14576] IDLE: IDLE's subprocess didn't make connection.Either IDLE can't start a subprocess or personal firewall software is blocking the connection.

2014-04-05 Thread Divyanshu Sharma

Divyanshu Sharma added the comment:

I found the root cause for the error regarding python in my pc that shows the 
error message 

IDLE's subprocess didn't make connection.Either IDLE can't start a subprocess 
or personal firewall software is blocking the connection.

It was caused due to a software known as proxifier which provides fast and 
somewhat unrestricted network access on proxy networks. It redirected my 
connection request from pythonw.exe to the port and IP on which the proxy 
network is established.

The problem hence can be easily sorted by creating new proxification rules in 
such softwares, if the cause of the problem can be traced to some similar 
mechanisms used that may intercept and modify the network requests for other 
programs.

--
title: IDLE: resolving home directory for configuration uses HOMEDRIVE, 
HOMEPATH, and USERPROFILE inconsistently on Windows. - IDLE: IDLE's 
subprocess didn't make connection.Either IDLE can't start a subprocess or 
personal firewall software is blocking the connection.

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14576
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21159] configparser.InterpolationMissingOptionError is not very intuitive

2014-04-05 Thread Claudiu.Popa

New submission from Claudiu.Popa:

The error message from the title is not very intuitive from a user point of 
view. For instance, in the following traceback, only the first one gives a 
meaning to this error, through the leaked KeyError, thus the user knows that 
home_dir1 is invalid and missing. But the second message with Bad value 
substitution doesn't emphasize the actual problem and you have to stare at it 
for a couple of moments to figure out what's happening and why. Maybe changing 
the Bad value substitution with a Missing value would suffice. This came up 
in issue19546. 

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File C:\Python34\lib\configparser.py, line 410, in _interpolate_some
v = map[var]
  File C:\Python34\lib\collections\__init__.py, line 789, in __getitem__
return self.__missing__(key)# support subclasses that define 
__missing__
  File C:\Python34\lib\collections\__init__.py, line 781, in __missing__
raise KeyError(key)
KeyError: 'home_dir1'

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File stdin, line 1, in module
  File C:\Python34\lib\configparser.py, line 1204, in __getitem__
return self._parser.get(self._name, key)
  File C:\Python34\lib\configparser.py, line 773, in get
d)
  File C:\Python34\lib\configparser.py, line 374, in before_get
self._interpolate_some(parser, option, L, value, section, defaults, 1)
  File C:\Python34\lib\configparser.py, line 413, in _interpolate_some
option, section, rest, var)
configparser.InterpolationMissingOptionError: Bad value substitution:
section: [Paths]
option : my_dir
key: home_dir1
rawval : /lumberjack

--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 215589
nosy: Claudiu.Popa
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: configparser.InterpolationMissingOptionError is not very intuitive
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.5

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21159
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19546] configparser leaks implementation detail

2014-04-05 Thread Claudiu.Popa

Claudiu.Popa added the comment:

I've created a new issue for the InterpolationMissingOptionError message, 
issue21159. This issue can be closed.

--
resolution:  - 3rd party

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19546
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19546] configparser leaks implementation detail

2014-04-05 Thread Claudiu.Popa

Claudiu.Popa added the comment:

Ups, sorry for the change of resolution.

--
resolution: 3rd party - 

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19546
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21160] incorrect comments in nturl2path.py

2014-04-05 Thread Jurko Gospodnetić

New submission from Jurko Gospodnetić:

nturl2path.py module contains comments implying that it converts local paths to 
URLs with ':' characters replaced with '|'. This has not been true since Python 
2.6.

Commit at:

  
http://bitbucket.org/jurko/cpython/commits/8fe56380b09e238f104ba4a4d7a67df73182bc21

updates those comments - prepared against the CPython development repo.

--
components: Library (Lib), Windows
hgrepos: 230
messages: 215592
nosy: Jurko.Gospodnetić
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: incorrect comments in nturl2path.py
versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21160
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15582] Enhance inspect.getdoc to follow inheritance chains

2014-04-05 Thread Claudiu.Popa

Claudiu.Popa added the comment:

Yury, Nick, how is my latest patch?

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34733/issue15582_1.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15582
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21118] str.translate is absurdly slow in majority of use cases (takes up to 60x longer than similar functions)

2014-04-05 Thread Serhiy Storchaka

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:

fast_translate.patch works only with ASCII input string and ASCII 1:1 mapping. 
Is this actually typical case?

Here is a patch which uses different approach. It caches values for ASCII keys. 
It works with all types of input strings and mappings and can speed up more use 
cases, including non-ASCII data, deletion and enlarging.

translate_timing.py results:

unpatched   patched
Testing 1-1 translation
str.translate   4.551259276999190.7898181750006188
str.translate from bytes trans  1.8910855210015143  0.779950579000797
Testing deletion
str.translate   4.481863372000589   0.771826150138
Testing enlarging translations
str.translate   4.42152127085   0.9290620680003485

translate_script_ascii.py results:

---+---+---
Tests  | translate_script_ascii.34 | 
translate_script_ascii.cached3
---+---+---
replace none, length=10    |   6.12 us (+176%) |    
2.22 us (*)
replace none, length=10**3 |   448 us (+1293%) |    
32.2 us (*)
replace none, length=10**6 |   474 ms (+1435%) |    
30.9 ms (*)
replace 10%, length=10 |   5.73 us (+133%) |    
2.46 us (*)
replace 10%, length=10**3  |   412 us (+1060%) |    
35.5 us (*)
replace 10%, length=10**6  |   442 ms (+1204%) |    
33.9 ms (*)
replace 50%, length=10 |    4.75 us (+85%) |    
2.57 us (*)
replace 50%, length=10**3  |    311 us (+552%) |    
47.7 us (*)
replace 50%, length=10**6  |    331 ms (+617%) |    
46.2 ms (*)
replace 90%, length=10 |    3.36 us (+29%) |    
2.59 us (*)
replace 90%, length=10**3  |    178 us (+250%) |    
50.8 us (*)
replace 90%, length=10**6  |    192 ms (+291%) |    
49.2 ms (*)
replace all, length=10 |    2.64 us (+28%) |    
2.06 us (*)
replace all, length=10**3  |    146 us (+189%) |    
50.3 us (*)
replace all, length=10**6  |    152 ms (+194%) |    
51.7 ms (*)
---+---+---
Total  |  1.59 sec (+651%) | 
212 ms (*)
---+---+---

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34734/translate_cached.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21118
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21161] list comprehensions don't see local variables in pdb in python3

2014-04-05 Thread Kay

New submission from Kay:

Using generators in pdb are very handy but since Python3 they don't work 
properly. For example:

import pdb
def foo():
  items = [1, 2, 3]
  limit = 5
  pdb.set_trace()

foo()

in pdb prompt the following fails:

(pdf) all(x  limit for x in items)
*** NameError: global name 'items' is not defined

I can express that in a lambda expression (i.e. pass items as an argument) but 
this seems unnecessary and very inelegant.

--
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 215595
nosy: kay
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: list comprehensions don't see local variables in pdb in python3
versions: Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21161
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21153] bdist_rpm fails if project contains files with spaces in the names

2014-04-05 Thread Jason R. Coombs

Jason R. Coombs added the comment:

My last version of the repo script would have worked had I coded it correctly. 
The line-by-line substitution was broken, not taking into account the newline 
character.

This new script demonstrates that quoting each file works - simply run the 
script with --install-script install.txt.

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34735/issue21153.py

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21153
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21161] list comprehensions don't see local variables in pdb in python3

2014-04-05 Thread Kay

Changes by Kay straitsai...@gmail.com:


--
type:  - behavior

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21161
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue809163] Can't add files with spaces under bdist_rpm

2014-04-05 Thread Jason R. Coombs

Jason R. Coombs added the comment:

In issue21153, I explored this problem as well, before being aware of this 
issue. I had searched for bdist_rpm.

I've since confirmed that the sed approach is viable. For example, the 
following works around the issue by overriding the install_script with the sed 
technique:

$ cat  install.txt
python setup.py install -O1 --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT --record=INSTALLED_FILES
sed -i -e 's/.*/\0/' INSTALLED_FILES

$ python setup.py bdist_rpm --install-script install.txt

I agree that sed can probably be assumed to be present, though it would be 
nicer not to depend on it.

It may also be possible not to have to list the files explicitly. In reading 
the rpm docs 
(http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html), I 
discovered that rpm will traverse a directory, adding it and its contents. 
Perhaps the whole routine of recording installed files and then listing them 
explicitly can be replaced by simply referencing the build root.

--
nosy: +jason.coombs
title: Can't add files with spaces - Can't add files with spaces under 
bdist_rpm

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue809163
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21118] str.translate is absurdly slow in majority of use cases (takes up to 60x longer than similar functions)

2014-04-05 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset 47b0c076e17d by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #21118: Optimize also str.translate() for ASCII = ASCII deletion
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/47b0c076e17d

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21118
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21118] str.translate is absurdly slow in majority of use cases (takes up to 60x longer than similar functions)

2014-04-05 Thread STINNER Victor

STINNER Victor added the comment:

Serhiy wrote:
 fast_translate.patch works only with ASCII input string and ASCII 1:1 
 mapping. Is this actually typical case?

I just checked the Python stdlib: as expected, all usages of
str.translate() except of email.quoprimime use ASCII 1:1. My
optimization is only used if the input string is ASCII, but I expect
that most strings are just ASCI.

** distutils: ASCII = ASCII (1:1)

   longopt_xlate = str.maketrans('-', '_')
and
   WS_TRANS = {ord(_wschar) : ' ' for _wschar in string.whitespace};
.. text = text.translate(WS_TRANS)

** email.quoprimes:

encoded = header_bytes.decode('latin1').translate(_QUOPRI_HEADER_MAP)
and
body = body.translate(_QUOPRI_BODY_ENCODE_MAP)

= my optimization is used if the input string contains safe header
characters (a-z, A-Z, 0-9, space and -!*+/). It should be the
common case for emails.

** rot13 encoding: ASCII 1:1

** idlelib.PyParse: ASCII 1:1

str = str.translate(_tran)

** textwrap: ASCII 1:1

text = text.translate(self.unicode_whitespace_trans)

** zipfile: ASCII 1:1

arcname = arcname.translate(table)

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21118
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21118] str.translate is absurdly slow in majority of use cases (takes up to 60x longer than similar functions)

2014-04-05 Thread Serhiy Storchaka

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:

Previous patch and results were against source code before committing 
fast_translate.patch. Here is a patch synchronized with current code.

translate_timing.py results:

unpatched   patched
Testing 1-1 translation
str.translate   0.526542655469  0.6120695240006171
str.translate from bytes trans  0.260863407289  0.32327288200031035
Testing deletion
str.translate   4.331346814999051   0.7960810519998631
Testing enlarging translations
str.translate   4.392650978999882   0.9280614529998275

translate_script_ascii.py results:

---+--+---
Tests  | translate_script_ascii.fastA | 
translate_script_ascii.cached2
---+--+---
replace none, length=10    |  1.54 us (*) | 
2.07 us (+34%)
replace none, length=10**3 |  10.5 us (*) | 
   10.6 us
replace none, length=10**6 |  12.6 ms |    
12.3 ms (*)
replace 10%, length=10 |  1.69 us (*) | 
2.31 us (+37%)
replace 10%, length=10**3  |  10.6 us (*) | 
   10.7 us
replace 10%, length=10**6  |  12.6 ms |    
12.1 ms (*)
replace 50%, length=10 |  1.69 us (*) | 
2.31 us (+36%)
replace 50%, length=10**3  |  10.6 us (*) | 
   10.9 us
replace 50%, length=10**6  |  12.6 ms |    
12.3 ms (*)
replace 90%, length=10 |  1.69 us (*) | 
2.26 us (+34%)
replace 90%, length=10**3  |  10.6 us (*) | 
   10.7 us
replace 90%, length=10**6  |  12.6 ms |    
12.2 ms (*)
replace all, length=10 |  1.07 us (*) | 
1.68 us (+56%)
replace all, length=10**3  |  9.28 us (*) | 
   9.46 us
replace all, length=10**6  |  12.6 ms | 
 12 ms (*)
---+--+---
Total  |    63 ms |    
60.9 ms (*)
---+--+---

translate_cached_2.patch little slows down translation of short ASCII strings 
(due to cache initialization and freeing), but speeds up deletion and enlarging 
and works with non-ASCII data.

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34736/translate_cached_2.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21118
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue809163] Can't add files with spaces under bdist_rpm

2014-04-05 Thread Jason R. Coombs

Jason R. Coombs added the comment:

I decided to test my proposition. It seems that simply specifying / for %files 
leads to the RPM including parent directories. Here's the output I get when 
running my test with the sed workaround:

$ rpm -q -filesbypkg -p dist/issue21153-package-0.0.0-1.noarch.rpm
issue21153-package
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/issue21153_package-0.0.0.egg-info
issue21153-package/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg/__init__.py
issue21153-package
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg/__init__.pyc
issue21153-package
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg/__init__.pyo
issue21153-package/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg/file with 
spaces.py
issue21153-package/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg/file with 
spaces.pyc
issue21153-package/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg/file with 
spaces.pyo

If instead I apply the no-record patch (attached), I can run bdist_rpm (not 
using sed workaround) without errors, but the resulting RPM has more 
directories specified:

$ rpm -q -filesbypkg -p dist/issue21153-package-0.0.0-1.noarch.rpm
issue21153-package/
issue21153-package/usr
issue21153-package/usr/local
issue21153-package/usr/local/lib
issue21153-package/usr/local/lib/python2.7
issue21153-package/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
issue21153-package
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/issue21153_package-0.0.0.egg-info
issue21153-package/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg
issue21153-package/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg/__init__.py
issue21153-package
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg/__init__.pyc
issue21153-package
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg/__init__.pyo
issue21153-package/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg/file with 
spaces.py
issue21153-package/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg/file with 
spaces.pyc
issue21153-package/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg/file with 
spaces.pyo

Perhaps that's acceptable. If it is, it makes the code simpler and cleaner.

Can someone comment on the impact of the presence of those parent directories 
in the RPM?

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34737/issue809163-no-record.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue809163
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21118] str.translate is absurdly slow in majority of use cases (takes up to 60x longer than similar functions)

2014-04-05 Thread STINNER Victor

STINNER Victor added the comment:

bench_translate.py: benchmark ASCII 1:1 but also ASCII 1:1 with deletion. 
Results of the benchmark comparing tip (47b0c076e17d which includes my latest 
optimization on deletion) and 6a347c0ffbfc + translate_cached_2.patch.

Common platform:
Python unicode implementation: PEP 393
CFLAGS: -Wno-unused-result -Werror=declaration-after-statement -DNDEBUG -g 
-fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
Platform: Linux-3.12.8-300.fc20.x86_64-x86_64-with-fedora-20-Heisenbug
Bits: int=32, long=64, long long=64, size_t=64, void*=64
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz
Timer: time.perf_counter
Timer precision: 45 ns
Timer info: namespace(adjustable=False, 
implementation='clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC)', monotonic=True, 
resolution=1e-09)

Platform of campaign remove:
SCM: hg revision=47b0c076e17d tag=tip branch=default date=2014-04-05 14:27 
+0200
Python version: 3.5.0a0 (default:47b0c076e17d, Apr 5 2014, 14:50:53) [GCC 4.8.2 
20131212 (Red Hat 4.8.2-7)]
Date: 2014-04-05 14:51:55

Platform of campaign cache:
SCM: hg revision=6a347c0ffbfc+ branch=default date=2014-04-05 11:56 +0200
Python version: 3.5.0a0 (default:6a347c0ffbfc+, Apr 5 2014, 14:53:02) [GCC 
4.8.2 20131212 (Red Hat 4.8.2-7)]
Date: 2014-04-05 14:53:12

---+-+
Tests  |  remove |   cache
---+-+
replace none, length=10|  184 ns (*) |   275 ns (+50%)
replace none, length=10**3 | 1.06 us (*) |  1.1 us
replace none, length=10**6 |  827 us (*) |  792 us
replace 10%, length=10 |  207 ns (*) |   298 ns (+44%)
replace 10%, length=10**3  | 1.08 us (*) | 1.12 us
replace 10%, length=10**6  |  828 us (*) |  793 us
replace 50%, length=10 |  205 ns (*) |   298 ns (+46%)
replace 50%, length=10**3  | 1.08 us (*) |   1.17 us (+7%)
replace 50%, length=10**6  |  827 us (*) |  793 us
replace 90%, length=10 |  208 ns (*) |   298 ns (+44%)
replace 90%, length=10**3  | 1.09 us (*) | 1.13 us
replace 90%, length=10**6  |  850 us (*) |793 us (-7%)
replace all, length=10 |  145 ns (*) |   226 ns (+56%)
replace all, length=10**3  | 1.03 us (*) | 1.04 us
replace all, length=10**6  |  827 us (*) |  792 us
remove none, length=10 |  184 ns (*) |   274 ns (+49%)
remove none, length=10**3  | 1.07 us (*) | 1.09 us
remove none, length=10**6  |  836 us (*) |793 us (-5%)
remove 10%, length=10  |  223 ns (*) |   408 ns (+83%)
remove 10%, length=10**3   | 1.45 us (*) | 9.13 us (+531%)
remove 10%, length=10**6   | 1.08 ms (*) | 8.73 ms (+706%)
remove 50%, length=10  |  221 ns (*) |   407 ns (+84%)
remove 50%, length=10**3   | 1.23 us (*) | 8.28 us (+575%)
remove 50%, length=10**6   |  948 us (*) |  7.9 ms (+734%)
remove 90%, length=10  |  230 ns (*) |   375 ns (+63%)
remove 90%, length=10**3   | 1.57 us (*) | 3.86 us (+145%)
remove 90%, length=10**6   | 1.28 ms (*) | 3.49 ms (+173%)
remove all, length=10  |  139 ns (*) |   266 ns (+92%)
remove all, length=10**3   | 1.24 us (*) |  2.46 us (+99%)
remove all, length=10**6   | 1.07 ms (*) | 2.13 ms (+100%)
---+-+
Total  | 9.38 ms (*) |   27 ms (+188%)
---+-+

You patch is always slower for the common case (ASCII = ASCII translation).

I implemented the most obvious optimization for the most common case (ASCII 1:1 
and ASCII 1:1 with deletion). I consider that the current code is enough to 
close this issue.

@Josh Rosenberg: Thanks for the report. The current implementation should be 
almost as fast as bytes.translate() (the 60x factor you mentionned in the 
title) for ASCII 1:1 mapping.

--

Serhiy: If you are interested to optimize str.translate() for the general case 
(larger charset), please open a new issue. It will probably require more 
complex cache. You may take a look at charmap codec which has such more 
complex cache (cache with 3 levels), see my message msg215301.

IMO it's not interesting to invest time on optimizing str.translate(), it's not 
a common function. It took some years before an user run a benchmark on it :-)

--
resolution:  - fixed
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21118
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21159] configparser.InterpolationMissingOptionError is not very intuitive

2014-04-05 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray added the comment:

Another problem with that error message is that it seems confusing as to where 
the bad value *reference* came from, given that rawval doesn't seem to include 
any interpolation point.

--
nosy: +r.david.murray

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21159
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19546] configparser leaks implementation detail

2014-04-05 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray added the comment:

I've been thinking about this more, and I think I will revise my opinion.  I 
haven't been able to think of a place where knowing that the key is missing in 
self._sections would in fact be helpful to a programmer using the module.  So 
I'm OK with this being an example of a place where the new error fully 
encapsulates the information from the context and therefore the context can be 
suppressed.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19546
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21161] list comprehensions don't see local variables in pdb in python3

2014-04-05 Thread R. David Murray

Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:


--
nosy: +r.david.murray

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21161
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21111] PyLong_AsUnsignedLongAndOverflow does not exist

2014-04-05 Thread Hristo Venev

Hristo Venev added the comment:

Please apply in 3.4.1. I need this ASAP.

--
versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 3.5
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34738/a

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21118] str.translate is absurdly slow in majority of use cases (takes up to 60x longer than similar functions)

2014-04-05 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset e56c71c6b45e by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #21118: str.translate() now raises a ValueError, not a TypeError, if the
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e56c71c6b45e

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21118
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21111] PyLong_AsUnsignedLongAndOverflow does not exist

2014-04-05 Thread STINNER Victor

STINNER Victor added the comment:

 Please apply in 3.4.1. I need this ASAP.

New functions are new features, and new features are no more added after a 
release (ex: 3.4.0). If something is changed, it will done in Python 3.5.

You can add PyLong_AsUnsigned*AndOverflow() functions to your project so you 
will support older versions too, like Python 3.3.

--
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue18478] Class bodies: when does a name become local?

2014-04-05 Thread Nitika Agarwal

Nitika Agarwal added the comment:

Hi,
I have attached the patch for the issue.Please someone review my patch.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18478
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4744] asynchat documentation needs to be more precise

2014-04-05 Thread Nitika Agarwal

Nitika Agarwal added the comment:

Hi,
I hvae attached the patch for review.I am waiting for reviewal.Please review 
the attached patch as soon as possible.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4744
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16927] Separate built-in types from functions and group similar functions in functions.rst

2014-04-05 Thread Nitika Agarwal

Nitika Agarwal added the comment:

@Ezio Melotti
Please see if this is what you wanted.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16927
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21118] str.translate is absurdly slow in majority of use cases (takes up to 60x longer than similar functions)

2014-04-05 Thread Serhiy Storchaka

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:

субота, 05-кві-2014 12:49:22 ви написали:
 STINNER Victor added the comment:
 
 Serhiy wrote:
  fast_translate.patch works only with ASCII input string and ASCII 1:1
  mapping. Is this actually typical case?
 I just checked the Python stdlib: as expected, all usages of
 str.translate() except of email.quoprimime use ASCII 1:1.

Because str.translate() is much slower than a series of str.replace() (which 
already is optimized), some usages of str.translate() was rewritten to use 
str.replace(). See for example html.escape(). This is about what this issue.

 My
 optimization is only used if the input string is ASCII, but I expect
 that most strings are just ASCI.

In most (if not all) these cases input string can be non-ASCII.

 bench_translate.py: benchmark ASCII 1:1 but also ASCII 1:1 with deletion.

Could you please provide bench_translate.py?

 It will probably require more complex cache. You may take a look at
 charmap codec which has such more complex cache (cache with 3 levels), see
 my message msg215301.

I were going to do this on next step. Full cache can grow up to 1114112 
characters, so I planned to cache only BMP characters (cache with 2 levels).

You commit too fast, I am late for you. ;)

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21118
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21118] str.translate is absurdly slow in majority of use cases (takes up to 60x longer than similar functions)

2014-04-05 Thread Serhiy Storchaka

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:

Do you plan to backport bug fixes to 3.3 and 2.7?

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21118
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19655] Replace the ASDL parser carried with CPython

2014-04-05 Thread Eli Bendersky

Eli Bendersky added the comment:

Nick, it shouldn't be hard to drop to 3.3, but I'm curious why would the 3.4 
requirement break Fedora, or anything for that matter? Does Fedora regenerate 
the C implementation of the AST for some reason on every build? AFAIU, building 
Python from source with make should not do that.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19655
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21111] PyLong_AsUnsignedLongAndOverflow does not exist

2014-04-05 Thread Hristo Venev

Hristo Venev added the comment:

Will you release 3.5 in the next few weeks?

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19655] Replace the ASDL parser carried with CPython

2014-04-05 Thread Nick Coghlan

Nick Coghlan added the comment:

It won't break the build, but requiring 3.4 to be installed (rather than
3.3) makes it more annoying for me (and other Fedora users) to work on the
compiler before F21 is released :)

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19655
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19655] Replace the ASDL parser carried with CPython

2014-04-05 Thread Larry Hastings

Larry Hastings added the comment:

I was told to keep Argument Clinic compatible with 3.3.  I think it's a good 
idea for the tools to not require absolutely current Python.  Would it be a big 
deal to support 3.3?

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19655
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19316] devguide: compiler - wording

2014-04-05 Thread Nitika Agarwal

Nitika Agarwal added the comment:

Hi,
I have attached the patch.Please review the patch attached.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19316
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue18566] In unittest.TestCase docs for setUp() and tearDown() don't mention AssertionError

2014-04-05 Thread Nitika Agarwal

Nitika Agarwal added the comment:

Hi,
Please review the patch attached.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18566
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21111] PyLong_AsUnsignedLongAndOverflow does not exist

2014-04-05 Thread Benjamin Peterson

Benjamin Peterson added the comment:

No

--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21162] code in multiprocessing.pool freeze if inside some code from scikit-learn (and probably liblinear) executed on ubuntu 12.04 64 Bit

2014-04-05 Thread Ivan K

New submission from Ivan K:

Here is a code. https://gist.github.com/anonymous/9994217 When I run it in 
freeze and never end. If I run it without pool with loop or joblib - it works 
fine.

Also there is a question on stackoverflow: 
http://stackoverflow.com/q/22881850/1888017

Python 2.7.6/2.7.3, cpu core i7 if it's important

--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 215620
nosy: Ivan.K
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: code in multiprocessing.pool freeze if inside some code from 
scikit-learn (and probably liblinear) executed on ubuntu 12.04 64 Bit
versions: Python 2.7

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21162
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19546] configparser leaks implementation detail

2014-04-05 Thread Łukasz Langa

Łukasz Langa added the comment:

FWIW I agree with Claudiu that the internal exceptions are an implementation 
detail. If we ever made, say, a SQLite-based or memcache-based configparser, 
those would be different, but the external API would stay the same.

Will fix.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19546
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21159] configparser.InterpolationMissingOptionError is not very intuitive

2014-04-05 Thread Łukasz Langa

Łukasz Langa added the comment:

Those exception messages are really old. I agree we should fix them, we have to 
think about possible compatibility breakage though. I'll look into it.

--
assignee:  - lukasz.langa
nosy: +lukasz.langa
stage:  - needs patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21159
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21162] code in multiprocessing.pool freeze if inside some code from scikit-learn (and probably liblinear) executed on ubuntu 12.04 64 Bit

2014-04-05 Thread Ned Deily

Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org:


--
nosy: +sbt

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21162
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue10769] ast: provide more useful range information

2014-04-05 Thread Ethan Furman

Changes by Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us:


--
nosy: +ethan.furman

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10769
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21161] list comprehensions don't see local variables in pdb in python3

2014-04-05 Thread Kay

Changes by Kay straitsai...@gmail.com:


--
nosy: +georg.brandl

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21161
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16927] Separate built-in types from functions and group similar functions in functions.rst

2014-04-05 Thread Terry J. Reedy

Terry J. Reedy added the comment:

I think 'Builtin-in Types' should probably be 'Built-in Classes' as there is no 
longer any difference between types and classes. Note that after the 
unification, we added 'issubclass', not 'issubtype'.

type should at least be listed under types/classes. The one-parameter 
introspection use returns an existing instance of type rather than a new 
instance. In this, it is similar to bool, which returns an existing rather than 
new bool instance, and which is also used for introspection. I think both 
should be listed as classes, which they are, and then the intro to 
Introspection should mention that bool(ob) and type(ob) both return information 
about ob by returning existing instances of bool and type respectively.

I thought about whether we should merely add a categorized index or also 
re-arrange the entire page. It it the possibly of adding section paragraphs, 
including cross-references like the above, that pushes me in the latter 
direction. The math section intro could mention that functions of collections 
of numbers are in the Iterables section section.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16927
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue18478] Class bodies: when does a name become local?

2014-04-05 Thread Terry J. Reedy

Terry J. Reedy added the comment:

After seeing my suggestion applied, I decided I don't like it. Sorry. A 
'function code block' is a 'function suite'. A deeper problem is that the 
revision now omits the rules for classes. The base problem is that I don't know 
what the rules are when classes and functions are nested within each other 
(does anybody, without reading the code?). A puzzling example was posted on 
python-list yesterday, which I will try to find.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18478
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21161] list comprehensions don't see local variables in pdb in python3

2014-04-05 Thread Georg Brandl

Georg Brandl added the comment:

Your failure appears to be not pasted from an interpreter session; the actual 
failure is:

(Pdb) all(x  limit for x in items)
*** NameError: global name 'limit' is not defined

(i.e. limit is not found, not items).  This actually does not work in 
Python 2 either.  What did work in Python 2 and doesn't work in 3, is using a 
list comprehension like

all([x  limit for x in items])

This is because list comprehensions are now implemented with their own function 
object like generator expressions have always been.  To make the code in pdb 
compile as if it was put in the debugged function will be as good as 
impossible, so I'm closing this as won't fix.

--
resolution:  - wont fix
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21161
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21044] tarfile does not handle file .name being an int

2014-04-05 Thread Antoine Pietri

Antoine Pietri added the comment:

Well, that seems complicated: you can't overwrite a io.FileIO().name attribute, 
and doing so would be nonsensical for tarfile, which would try to perform IO 
operations on a random file descriptor... Also, I can't think of any case where 
a .name attribute could actually be bytes (I was just mirroring the code in 
msg214670).

Here's a patch that tries all combinations of encoding for writing, but I can't 
see a way to enforce manually the name attribute being an int, even for this 
test purposes.

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34739/test_tarfile_all_modes.diff

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21044
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue13781] gzip module does the wrong thing with an os.fdopen()'ed fileobj

2014-04-05 Thread Antoine Pietri

Antoine Pietri added the comment:

Actually, thinking about it, it seems safer to use os.open() + os.fdopen() than 
TemporaryFile(), like in the equivalent test for 'gzip'.

This new patch replaces last one.

--
nosy: +seirl
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34740/test_tarfile_fdopen.diff

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13781
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue13781] gzip module does the wrong thing with an os.fdopen()'ed fileobj

2014-04-05 Thread Ezio Melotti

Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:


--
Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg215627

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13781
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21156] Consider moving importlib.abc.InspectLoader.source_to_code() to importlib.abc.Loader

2014-04-05 Thread Eric Snow

Eric Snow added the comment:

source_to_code() seems like a good fit on InspectLoader to me.  Is there
something in particular that motivated the idea of moving it up to Loader?

--
nosy: +eric.snow

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21156
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue20383] Add a keyword-only spec argument to types.ModuleType

2014-04-05 Thread Eric Snow

Eric Snow added the comment:

Sounds good to me.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20383
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue13781] gzip module does the wrong thing with an os.fdopen()'ed fileobj

2014-04-05 Thread Ezio Melotti

Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:


Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file34740/test_tarfile_fdopen.diff

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13781
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21044] tarfile does not handle file .name being an int

2014-04-05 Thread Ezio Melotti

Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:


Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34740/test_tarfile_fdopen.diff

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21044
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16927] Separate built-in types from functions and group similar functions in functions.rst

2014-04-05 Thread Raymond Hettinger

Raymond Hettinger added the comment:

FWIW, I don't think we should separate built-in types from built-in functions.  
Tools like str(x) and int(x) are frequently used as if there were functions.   
Tools like iter(x) and open(x) could be viewed as constructors.  Tools like 
type(x) are both a function (the one-variable form) and a class constructor 
(the three variable form).

For the most part, I don't think the distinction is meaningful or helpful.

As a reference point, authors of Python books have avoided making a distinction 
and have favored the alphabetical ordering we have now (which has the virtue of 
making functions easy to find).

If you feel a need to provide groups of related functions, please do so in an 
addenda to the core function reference.

--
nosy: +rhettinger

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16927
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16927] Separate built-in types from functions and group similar functions in functions.rst

2014-04-05 Thread Raymond Hettinger

Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com:


--
versions:  -Python 2.7, Python 3.4

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16927
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21156] Consider moving importlib.abc.InspectLoader.source_to_code() to importlib.abc.Loader

2014-04-05 Thread Brett Cannon

Brett Cannon added the comment:

The inspiration was that I realized there was no technical reason to have it on 
InspectLoader. Past that there was my thinking of trying to come up with a 
source_to_module() method on importlib.abc.Loader which would do the right 
thing with create_module() and init_module_attrs() such that replicating 
imp.load_module() would be something like::

  loader = importlib.machinery.SourceLoader  # or something
  with open('file.py') as file:
module = loader.source_to_module(file.read(), location='file.py')

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21156
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21044] tarfile does not handle file .name being an int

2014-04-05 Thread eryksun

eryksun added the comment:

 you can't overwrite a io.FileIO().name attribute

A FileIO instance uses a dict for 'name' (msg214670): 

 vars(sys.stdin.buffer.raw)
{'name': 'stdin'}

 f = tempfile.TemporaryFile()
 vars(f.raw)
{'name': 3}

The name is optional meta-information. If it gets deleted, the repr falls back 
on using the file descriptor:

 f.raw
_io.FileIO name=3 mode='rb+'

 del f.raw.name
 f.raw
_io.FileIO fd=3 mode='rb+'

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21044
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21163] asyncio Task Possibly Incorrectly Garbage Collected

2014-04-05 Thread Richard Kiss

New submission from Richard Kiss:

Some tasks created via asyncio are vanishing because there is no reference to 
their resultant futures.

This behaviour does not occur in Python 3.3.3 with asyncio-0.4.1.

Also, doing a gc.collect() immediately after creating the tasks seems to fix 
the problem.

Attachment also available at https://gist.github.com/richardkiss/9988156

--
components: Library (Lib)
files: asyncio-gc-issue.py
hgrepos: 231
messages: 215633
nosy: richard.kiss
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: asyncio Task Possibly Incorrectly Garbage Collected
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34741/asyncio-gc-issue.py

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21163
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21163] asyncio Task Possibly Incorrectly Garbage Collected

2014-04-05 Thread Richard Kiss

Changes by Richard Kiss h...@richardkiss.com:


--
hgrepos:  -231

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21163
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21163] asyncio task possibly incorrectly garbage collected

2014-04-05 Thread Richard Kiss

Changes by Richard Kiss h...@richardkiss.com:


--
title: asyncio Task Possibly Incorrectly Garbage Collected - asyncio task 
possibly incorrectly garbage collected

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21163
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16927] Separate built-in types from functions and group similar functions in functions.rst

2014-04-05 Thread Ezio Melotti

Ezio Melotti added the comment:

 Tools like str(x) and int(x) are frequently used as if there were functions.

The description of each object already mentions the function/type duality, and 
links to https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html.
If they are grouped together, a paragraph like the objects in this section can 
be used both as constructors or as functions can be added at the beginning of 
the section

Similarly a paragraph pointing to itertools can be used in the section that 
describes map/zip/filter/all/any/etc.


 For the most part, I don't think the distinction is meaningful or helpful.

There are two distinctions I want to make:
1) grouping the built-in types;
2) grouping related functions;

1 should be especially useful to people that are new to the language. Here they 
can know quickly what are the Python equivalents of the  objects they use in 
other languages (e.g. a structure similar to a C char*, or a JS object, or a 
PHP array...) and discover objects that might not exist in their language (e.g. 
sets, bytes, memoryviews).  
2 is useful to find related functions.  For example, if I'm looking at map(), I 
might be interested at zip() and filter() too, or if I'm looking at getattr(), 
having hasattr(), setattr() and delattr() nearby will make it easy to discover 
them and consult their docs.

 As a reference point, authors of Python books have avoided making a
 distinction and have favored the alphabetical ordering we have now
 (which has the virtue of making functions easy to find).

The table at the beginning and ctrl+f makes the alphabetic order almost 
useless, so more meaningful orderings can be used instead.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16927
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19655] Replace the ASDL parser carried with CPython

2014-04-05 Thread Eli Bendersky

Eli Bendersky added the comment:

Updated patch attached:

1. Python 3.3+ supported (I suspect 3.2 will work too)
2. Incorporated Serhiy's suggestions (thanks for the review!)

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34742/new-asdl-parser.issue19655.2.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19655
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16927] Separate built-in types from functions and group similar functions in functions.rst

2014-04-05 Thread Raymond Hettinger

Raymond Hettinger added the comment:

 This include two main groups that should be separated in 
 two different sections:  built-in types and functions.

I forgot to mention that the docs have already been organized to cover the two 
groups.  Section 3.2 has the built-in functions and Section 3.4 has the 
built-in types.  Where they overlap (str and list, for example), section 
section addresses their use as a function (i.e. list(iterable) acts like a 
function that loops over an iterable to create a list, and str(x) like a 
function to lookup the string representation of an object).

The current organization has been somewhat successful and I don't want to 
damage it by regrouping.  

 This will make it easier to find similar functions,

This isn't the primary role of a library reference.  That said, I would not 
object to either 1) an extra section that shows a high level grouping of 
functions or 2) adding to each function a list of see also links (the Microsoft 
Excel documentation takes that approach).

 and will allow us to factor out some documentation that is repeated[0].

This should not be done either.  For example, we really to want min() and max() 
to be completely documented in isolation from one another (this is a reference 
document, repeating definitions as dictionaries do is proper).

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16927
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21163] asyncio task possibly incorrectly garbage collected

2014-04-05 Thread Brett Cannon

Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org:


--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, haypo, pitrou, yselivanov

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21163
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21156] Consider moving importlib.abc.InspectLoader.source_to_code() to importlib.abc.Loader

2014-04-05 Thread Eric Snow

Eric Snow added the comment:

Now that I've thought about it a little more, I'm more open to the idea.  
Source is definitely a universal concept in Python, as is code.  So 
source_to_code() makes some sense on a most-base type like Loader.  On the 
other hand, source isn't necessarily associated with all loaders.

I guess my initial gut reaction was that it seemed out of place API-wise.  On 
InspectLoader it's presence is tied to get_code(), so it makes more sense.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21156
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21163] asyncio task possibly incorrectly garbage collected

2014-04-05 Thread Guido van Rossum

Guido van Rossum added the comment:

Ouch. That example is very obfuscated -- I fail to understand what it is trying 
to accomplish. Running it I see that it always prints 100 for the count with 
3.3 or DO_CG on; for me it prints 87 with 3.4 an DO_GC off. But I wouldn't be 
surprised if the reason calling do.collect() fixes whatever issue you have is 
that it causes there not to be any further collections until the next cycle 
through that main loop, and everything simply runs before being collected. But 
that's just a theory based on minimal understanding of the example.

I'm not sure that tasks are *supposed* to stay alive when there are no 
references to them. It seems that once they make it past a certain point they 
keep themselves alive.

One more thing: using a try/except I see that the lost consumers all get a 
GeneratorExit on their first iteration. You might want to look into this. 
(Sorry, gotta run, wanted to dump this.)

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21163
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16927] Separate built-in types from functions and group similar functions in functions.rst

2014-04-05 Thread Raymond Hettinger

Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com:


--
assignee: ezio.melotti - rhettinger

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16927
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21163] asyncio task possibly incorrectly garbage collected

2014-04-05 Thread Richard Kiss

Richard Kiss added the comment:

I agree it's confusing and I apologize for that.

Background:

This multiplexing pattern is used in pycoinnet, a bitcoin client I'm developing 
at https://github.com/richardkiss/pycoinnet. The BitcoinPeerProtocol class 
multiplexes protocol messages into multiple asyncio.Queue objects so each 
interested listener can react. An example listener is in 
pycoinnet.helpers.standards.install_pong_manager, which looks for ping 
messages and sends pong responses. When the peer disconnects, the pong 
manager sees a None (to indicate EOF), and it exits. The return value is 
uninteresting, so no reference to the Task is kept.

My client is in late alpha, and mostly works, but when I tried it on Python 
3.4.0, it stopped working and I narrowed it down to this.

I'm not certain this behaviour is incorrect, but it's definitely different from 
3.3.3, and it seems odd that a GC cycle BEFORE additional references can be 
made would allow it to work.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21163
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21163] asyncio task possibly incorrectly garbage collected

2014-04-05 Thread Guido van Rossum

Guido van Rossum added the comment:

Most likely your program is simply relying on undefined behavior and the right 
way to fix it is to keep strong references to all tasks until they 
self-destruct.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21163
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16927] Separate built-in types from functions and group similar functions in functions.rst

2014-04-05 Thread Raymond Hettinger

Raymond Hettinger added the comment:

Nikita, your additional dispatch table looks like a reasonable addition.  I'll 
wait on additional commentary before pushing it forward

1 should be especially useful to people that are new to the language
Ezio, please take care not to conflate the role of reference material (where 
people lookup what a function does) and tutorials (which introduce, synthesize, 
and organize).  

Also take consider that the proposed groupings have some downsides as well (for 
example str and repr don't appear in the same grouping, likewise, int and round 
aren't in the same grouping).

And, I *really* don't want to separate-out types (that is what section 3.4 is 
for).  You're fighting a long-standing decision to use 3.2 to talk about the 
tools as functions and again in 3.4 as types.  For example, it is not helpful 
at all to classify range() as a type.   Its usage is better grouped with 
looping idioms like range, zip, enumerate, sorted, and reversed.

A possible solution is to list words in more than one category so that int() 
would be listed as a type conversion (so it wouldn't get separated from str(), 
and listed math related (so it won't be separated from round() which is another 
way to convert a float to an integer).

This documentation page has proven useful in its current form to a great many 
users.  We should take care not to muck-up one of the better pages in the docs. 
 In particular, we REALLY don't want to factor-out redundant text -- as 
reference material, each function's description needs to stand-alone.  This is 
not a page that people typically read start to finish in a book like form -- it 
is much closer to a dictionary or encyclopedia where topics are looked up 
directly.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16927
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21163] asyncio task possibly incorrectly garbage collected

2014-04-05 Thread Richard Kiss

Richard Kiss added the comment:

I'll investigate further.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21163
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16927] Separate built-in types from functions and group similar functions in functions.rst

2014-04-05 Thread Terry J. Reedy

Terry J. Reedy added the comment:

I would be happy enough to just add a second index section, with short 
annotations or commentaries about the categories -- nitika's patch with 
sentences added. I would put it after the current table, and not box the links. 
Short example:

The following functions convert an integer to a binary, octal, or hexadecimal 
string: :func:`bin`, :func:`oct`, :func:`hex`.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16927
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16927] Separate built-in types from functions and group similar functions in functions.rst

2014-04-05 Thread Raymond Hettinger

Raymond Hettinger added the comment:

Terry, I concur.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16927
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21015] support SSL_CTX_set_ecdh_auto on newer OpenSSLs

2014-04-05 Thread Ned Deily

Ned Deily added the comment:

test_default_ecdh_curve is failing on current OS X systems (10.9 Mavericks and 
10.8 Mountain Lion, at least) using the system-supplied OpenSSL libraries:

==
ERROR: test_default_ecdh_curve (test.test_ssl.ThreadedTests)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /py/3x/unix/source/Lib/test/test_ssl.py, line 2596, in 
test_default_ecdh_curve
context.set_ciphers(ECDH)
ssl.SSLError: ('No cipher can be selected.',)

--

The OpenSSL command advertise itself as 0.9.8y but it doesn't include any ECDH 
ciphers.  It appears from the OpenSSL source that it's possible to specify at 
build configure time which ciphers are included so I guess the version test in 
_ssl.c for ECDH isn't sufficient.

$ sw_vers
ProductName:Mac OS X
ProductVersion: 10.9.2
BuildVersion:   13C64
$ /usr/bin/openssl version
OpenSSL 0.9.8y 5 Feb 2013
$ /usr/bin/openssl ciphers -v 'ALL:eNULL'
ADH-SEED-SHASSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=None Enc=SEED(128) Mac=SHA1
DHE-RSA-SEED-SHASSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=RSA  Enc=SEED(128) Mac=SHA1
DHE-DSS-SEED-SHASSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=DSS  Enc=SEED(128) Mac=SHA1
SEED-SHASSLv3 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=SEED(128) Mac=SHA1
ADH-AES256-SHA  SSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=None Enc=AES(256)  Mac=SHA1
DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA  SSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=RSA  Enc=AES(256)  Mac=SHA1
DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA  SSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=DSS  Enc=AES(256)  Mac=SHA1
AES256-SHA  SSLv3 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=AES(256)  Mac=SHA1
ADH-AES128-SHA  SSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=None Enc=AES(128)  Mac=SHA1
DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA  SSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=RSA  Enc=AES(128)  Mac=SHA1
DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA  SSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=DSS  Enc=AES(128)  Mac=SHA1
AES128-SHA  SSLv3 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=AES(128)  Mac=SHA1
ADH-DES-CBC3-SHASSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=None Enc=3DES(168) Mac=SHA1
ADH-DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=None Enc=DES(56)   Mac=SHA1
EXP-ADH-DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH(512)  Au=None Enc=DES(40)   Mac=SHA1 export
ADH-RC4-MD5 SSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=None Enc=RC4(128)  Mac=MD5
EXP-ADH-RC4-MD5 SSLv3 Kx=DH(512)  Au=None Enc=RC4(40)   Mac=MD5  export
EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHASSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=RSA  Enc=3DES(168) Mac=SHA1
EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=RSA  Enc=DES(56)   Mac=SHA1
EXP-EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH(512)  Au=RSA  Enc=DES(40)   Mac=SHA1 export
EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHASSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=DSS  Enc=3DES(168) Mac=SHA1
EDH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH   Au=DSS  Enc=DES(56)   Mac=SHA1
EXP-EDH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH(512)  Au=DSS  Enc=DES(40)   Mac=SHA1 export
DES-CBC3-SHASSLv3 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=3DES(168) Mac=SHA1
DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=DES(56)   Mac=SHA1
EXP-DES-CBC-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA  Enc=DES(40)   Mac=SHA1 export
EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 SSLv3 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA  Enc=RC2(40)   Mac=MD5  export
RC4-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=RC4(128)  Mac=SHA1
RC4-MD5 SSLv3 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=RC4(128)  Mac=MD5
EXP-RC4-MD5 SSLv3 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA  Enc=RC4(40)   Mac=MD5  export
DES-CBC3-MD5SSLv2 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=3DES(168) Mac=MD5
DES-CBC-MD5 SSLv2 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=DES(56)   Mac=MD5
EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 SSLv2 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA  Enc=RC2(40)   Mac=MD5  export
RC2-CBC-MD5 SSLv2 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=RC2(128)  Mac=MD5
EXP-RC4-MD5 SSLv2 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA  Enc=RC4(40)   Mac=MD5  export
RC4-MD5 SSLv2 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=RC4(128)  Mac=MD5
NULL-SHASSLv3 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=None  Mac=SHA1
NULL-MD5SSLv3 Kx=RSA  Au=RSA  Enc=None  Mac=MD5

--
nosy: +ned.deily
resolution: fixed - 
stage: committed/rejected - needs patch
status: closed - open

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21015
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21163] asyncio task possibly incorrectly garbage collected

2014-04-05 Thread Richard Kiss

Richard Kiss added the comment:

You were right: adding a strong reference to each Task seems to have solved the 
original problem in pycoinnet. I see that the reference to the global lists of 
asyncio.tasks is a weakset, so it's necessary to keep a strong reference myself.

This does seem a little surprising. It can make it trickier to create a task 
that is only important in its side effect. Compare to threaded programming: 
unreferenced threads are never collected.

For example:

f = asyncio.Task(some_coroutine())
f.add_callback(some_completion_callback)
f = None

In theory, the some_coroutine task can be collected, preventing 
some_completion_callback from ever being called. While technically correct, 
it does seem surprising.

(I couldn't get this to work in a simple example, although I did get it to work 
in a complicated example.)

Some change between 3.3 and 3.4 means garbage collection is much more 
aggressive at collecting up unreferenced tasks, which means broken code, like 
mine, that worked in 3.3 fails in 3.4. This may trip up other early adopters of 
tulip.

Maybe adding a do_not_collect=True flag to asyncio.async or asyncio.Task, 
which would keep a strong reference by throwing it into a singleton set 
(removing it as a future callback) would bring attention to this subtle issue. 
Or displaying a warning in debug mode when a Task is garbage-collected before 
finishing.

Thanks for your help.

--
resolution:  - invalid

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21163
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue21163] asyncio task possibly incorrectly garbage collected

2014-04-05 Thread Guido van Rossum

Guido van Rossum added the comment:

Thanks for understanding. 

It's definitely subtle: there is also some code in asyncio that logs an error 
when a Future holding an exception becomes unreachable before anyone has asked 
for it; this has been a valuable debugging tool, and it depends on *not* 
holding references to Futures.

Regarding the difference between Python 3.3 and 3.4, I don't know the exact 
reason, but GC definitely gets more precise with each new revision, and there 
are also some differences in how exactly the debug feature I just mentioned is 
implemented (look for _tb_logger in asyncio/futures.py).

OTOH it does seem a little odd to just GC a coroutine that hasn't exited yet, 
and I'm not 100% convinced there *isn't* a bug here. The more I think about it, 
the more I think that it's suspicious that it's always the *first* iteration 
that gets GC'ed. So I'd like to keep this open as a reminder.

Finally, I'm not sure the analogy with threads holds -- a thread manages OS 
resources that really do have to be destroyed explicitly, but that's not so for 
tasks, and any cleanup you do need can be handled using try/finally. (In 
general drawing analogies between threads and asyncio tasks/coroutines is 
probably one of the less fruitful lines of thinking about the latter; there are 
more differences than similarities.)

--
resolution: invalid - remind

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21163
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue20383] Add a keyword-only spec argument to types.ModuleType

2014-04-05 Thread Raymond Hettinger

Raymond Hettinger added the comment:

 Would allow for the name attribute to be optional
  ...
  with the idea that sometime in the future we can
 deprecate pulling attributes from a module directly

Is there any chance that this would ever happen?
The __name__ attribute has been around almost forever
is widely relied on.  Deprecating it would be a very
disruptive event for nearly zero benefit.

--
nosy: +rhettinger

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20383
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue20383] Add a keyword-only spec argument to types.ModuleType

2014-04-05 Thread Eric Snow

Eric Snow added the comment:

I made roughly the same point in the current import-sig thread that relates 
here:

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/import-sig/2014-April/000805.html

Basically, I agree we should be careful with both __name__ and __file__.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20383
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com