[issue21896] Unexpected ConnectionResetError in urllib.request against a valid website
Ned Deily added the comment: It fails with Python 2's urllib2.urlopen as well. -- nosy: +ned.deily, orsenthil versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21896 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21909] PyLong_FromString drops const
New submission from Hristo Venev: PyObject* PyLong_FromString(const char *str, char **pend, int base) pend should be const char** I think casting const away when not required should be a crime punishable by imprisonment. -- messages: 222152 nosy: h.venev priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: PyLong_FromString drops const ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21909 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21909] PyLong_FromString drops const
Changes by Hristo Venev hri...@venev.name: -- components: +Interpreter Core type: - security versions: +Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21909 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16117] python2.7.3 struct misaligned when returned
Mark Lawrence added the comment: @Roland please accept our apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Can someone else take a look please as I know nothing about ctypes, thanks. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16117 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16132] ctypes incorrectly encodes .format attribute of memory views
Mark Lawrence added the comment: @David please accept our apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Can someone else take a look please as I know nothing about ctypes, thanks. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16132 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13985] Menu.tk_popup : menu doesn't disapear when main window is iconified.
Ned Deily added the comment: As far as I can tell, the problem you are seeing with the menu not disappearing when iconifying is caused by the use of grab_release() in do_popup(). If I remove it, using an X11-based Tk 8.6, the focus stays on the menu and clicking on the iconify button causes the menu to be dismissed. With grab_release(), the focus is released from the menu and clicking on the iconify button causes the menu to stay. Unfortunately, there are differences among the various Tk releases and, with the same release, among platform implementations (Windows Tk, X11 Tk, OS X Cocoa Tk, etc). Another issue was the use of the 0 entry argument on the call on tk_popup call. With the X11 Tk I tested with, that caused the menu to flash and disappear when clicking the window; removing the 0 argument caused the menu to stay as expected. With an OS X Cocoa Tk, your original test case worked fine without modification. A good modern resource for using Tk is the TkDocs website, which covers use of Tk from Tcl, Python, Ruby, and Perl. The menus sections describes some of the platform differences you may encounter and need to deal with: http://www.tkdocs.com/tutorial/menus.html -- nosy: +ned.deily resolution: - not a bug stage: - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13985 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13745] configuring --with-dbmliborder=bdb doesn't build the gdbm extension
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk: -- components: +Build type: - behavior versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13745 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13784] Documentation of xml.sax.xmlreader: Locator.getLineNumber() and Locator.getColumnNumber()
Mark Lawrence added the comment: @patrick please accept our apologies for the delay in getting back to you. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy, christian.heimes versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13784 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20337] bdist_rpm should support %config(noreplace)
Vitaly Isaev added the comment: I confirm the urgent need in this feature. -- nosy: +vitalyisaev2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20337 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15549] openssl version in windows builds does not support renegotiation
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org: -- resolution: - out of date stage: - resolved status: open - closed versions: -Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15549 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12857] Expose called function on frame object
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Note that #13672 referred to in msg156962 refers to #13855. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12857 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13855] Add qualname support to types.FunctionType
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Note that #13672 refers to #12857. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy type: behavior - enhancement versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13855 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13672] Add co_qualname attribute in code objects
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13672 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13940] imaplib: Mailbox names are not quoted
Mark Lawrence added the comment: @Joe sorry for the delay in getting back to you. @David is this within your remit? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy, r.david.murray versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13940 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13946] readline completer could return an iterable
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Is this a good, bad or indifferent idea? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13946 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10031] Withdraw anti-recommendation of relative imports from documentation
Andy Maier added the comment: Hi, I would like to revive this issue, and have a few comments: 1. In Darren's original proposal, I suggest to say implicit (old-style) relative imports instead of old-style relative imports, because that is the term used in the Python Tutorial (the description of the ´import´ statement in 2.7 does not mention implicit relative imports at all). 2. It seems to me that David's suggestion is already reflected in the original proposal. Or maybe I don't understand it right... 3. I agree with Éric's comment that implicit relative imports should still be explained. However, I'm not sure that needs to be done in the FAQ. After all, the FAQ does not explain absolute or explicit relative imports either, and spending more words on the discouraged approach than on the recommended approaches does not seem appropriate to me. 4. I have to say that I'm generally unhappy if I see PEPs mentioned as a specification (See PEP 328 for details). I have sympathy for referencing PEPs as background information and for the rationales they usually contain. Could we reference the description of the ´import´ statement for details, instead of referencing the PEP (in both FAQs)? Andy -- nosy: +andymaier ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10031 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21571] Python build should check CPATH, C_INCLUDE_PATH for module dependencies
Jan Kanis added the comment: I can write a patch. I haven't signed a contributor agreement but I have no problem doing so. I am not sure when I will have time to write a patch though, so it could take some time. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21571 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10225] Fix doctest runable examples in python manual
Andy Maier added the comment: Hi, I would like to revive this issue and have added a review comment to issue10225-py3k.diff. Otherwise, I have reviewed the changes in both diffs and think they are good to go. Andy -- nosy: +andymaier ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10225 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20069] Add unit test for os.chown
Changes by Claudiu Popa pcmantic...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +berker.peksag ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20069 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21910] File protocol should document if writelines must handle generators sensibly
New submission from Jan Kanis:
The resolution of issue 5445 should be documented somewhere properly, so people
can depend on it or not.
IOBase.writelines handles generator arguments without problems, i.e. without
first draining the entire generator and then writing the result in one go. That
would require large amounts of memory if the generator is large, and fail
entirely if the generator is infinite.
codecs.StreamWriter.writelines uses self.write(''.join(argument)) as
implementation, which fails on very large or infinite arguments.
According to issue 5445 it is not part of the file protocol that .writelines
must handle (large/infinite) generators, only list-like iterables. However as
far as I know this is not documented anywhere, and sometimes people assume that
writelines is meant for this case. E.g. jinja
(https://github.com/mitsuhiko/jinja2/blob/master/jinja2/environment.py#L1153,
the dump method is explicitly documented to stream). The guarantees that
.writelines makes or does not make in this regard should be documented
somewhere, so that either .writeline implementations that don't handle large
generators can be pointed out as bugs, or code that makes assumptions on
.writeline handling large generators can be.
I personally think .writelines should handle large generators, since in the
python 3 world a lot of apis were iterator-ified and it is wat a lot of people
would probably expect. But having a clear and documented decision on this is
more important.
(note: I've copied most of the nosy list from #5445)
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation, IO
messages: 222165
nosy: JanKanis, benjamin.peterson, dlesco, docs@python, hynek, lemburg, pitrou,
stutzbach, terry.reedy
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: File protocol should document if writelines must handle generators
sensibly
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21910
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21151] winreg.SetValueEx causes crash if value = None
Changes by Claudiu Popa pcmantic...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +steve.dower, zach.ware priority: normal - high ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21151 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10536] Enhancements to gettext docs
Andy Maier added the comment: Éric, I have reviewed the patch, and have one minor comment on it (see review page). Otherwise, I think it is good to go into v3 (The version list for this issue also shows 2.7, and the 2.7 version of this file is quite different from the v3 tip version, so a backport is still needed). Barry's review I think is also still needed :-) My 2 cents on your questions to Barry: On 3): I like your proposal. On a): Can you be more specific on where it is POSIX specific, and what the issue is with that? On b): After understanding that your comment is about the v3 version, I agree with the comment in general. However, the set of functions changes between 2.7 and 3.x tip (for example, ugettext() from v2 is no longer in v3 because gettext() now returns Unicode strings), and if people try to understand what changed, I think it would be helpful to be more explicit, particularly because the v2 text is also explicit. So I would leave the Unicode string verbiage unchanged. But I don't have a strong opinion on this and can go either way. Andy -- nosy: +andymaier ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10536 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21906] Tools\Scripts\md5sum.py doesn't work in Python 3.x
Changes by Josh Rosenberg shadowranger+pyt...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +josh.rosenberg ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21906 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21740] doctest doesn't allow duck-typing callables
Claudiu Popa added the comment: Here's a test patch which uses inspect.unwrap. Unfortunately, I can't test with numba, so I don't know if it works for that, but any decorated function which uses `functools.update_wrapper` or `wraps` should be detected by doctest. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35838/issue21740.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21740 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21911] IndexError: tuple index out of range should include the requested index and tuple length
New submission from Ram Rachum: Ditto for lists and any other place this could be applicable. -- components: Interpreter Core messages: 222168 nosy: cool-RR priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: IndexError: tuple index out of range should include the requested index and tuple length type: behavior versions: Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21911 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20218] Add methods to `pathlib.Path`: `write_text`, `read_text`, `write_bytes`, `read_bytes`
Changes by Ram Rachum r...@rachum.com: -- resolution: - rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20218 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18212] No way to check whether Future is finished?
Ram Rachum added the comment: What do you think about exposing this directly? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18212 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20663] Introduce exception argument to iter
Ram Rachum added the comment: Hey-ho... Anyone feels like implementing this? (I don't program in C so I can't.) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20663 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21912] Deferred logging may use outdated references
New submission from Jonas Diemer: I was having trouble with the logging module under Jython: I was getting seemingly sporadic wierd null pointer exceptions in the logging code. The problem seemed to be related to references that were passed to the logger, e.g. logger.debug(My object: %s, myObject) It seems that logging defers the actual string formatting (maybe only when logging to files). By the time the string is formatted, the reference to the object may no longer be valid. In my case, myObject was a reference to a Java-class that had been invalidated. Initially, I thought this was only a Java issue. But it seems like this could be an issue with pure Python scripts as well. E.g., what happens if the object behind myObject is changed after the call to debug(), but before the actual log message is formatted? -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 222171 nosy: Jonas.Diemer priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Deferred logging may use outdated references type: behavior versions: Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21912] Deferred logging may use outdated references
Jonas Diemer added the comment: Find attached a demo script that causes the erratic behavior in regular Python (2.7.5 on Windows). The log file contains two lines, both show the new name of the object, although the first debug() was called befor the name change. I think this problem could be avoided if the message was formatted earlier (i.e. synchronous to the debug() call). -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35839/testlogging.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12842] Docs: first parameter of tp_richcompare() always has the correct type
Andrew Svetlov added the comment: Fixed in 71a0743f36db and 06bdd7e8fffd -- nosy: +asvetlov resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - resolved status: open - closed versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12842 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21755] test_importlib.test_locks fails --without-threads
R. David Murray added the comment: What is the reason for using the conditional approach rather than a skip decorator? Does it not work in this context, or is it just that you copied the existing approach? It's fine either way, but I'm curious. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21755 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13940] imaplib: Mailbox names are not quoted
R. David Murray added the comment: Yes. It will be necessary to check the RFC to figure out what should be done here. -- components: +email nosy: +barry ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13940 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21912] Deferred logging may use outdated references
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +vinay.sajip ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21912] Deferred logging may use outdated references
R. David Murray added the comment: The whole point of the logging API is that the message is *not* formatted unless the message is actually emitted. So this is just how logging works, not something that can be fixed, as far as I can see. -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21912] Deferred logging may use outdated references
Jonas Diemer added the comment: I see your point. The decision whether to log or not is actually made synchronously to the actual logging call, as far as I can tell (i.e. if self.isEnabledFor... is checked directly in debug()). So at this place, the formatting could already happen. I don't see a reason to defer the formatting to the actual output of the messages (other than the current implementation of logging). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14014] codecs.StreamWriter.reset contract not fulfilled
Mark Lawrence added the comment: On Windows 7 206 codecs tests passed and 4 skipped with the patch included. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35840/Issue14014.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14014 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14076] sqlite3 module ignores placeholders in CREATE TRIGGER code
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Can we have a reply to this please as I don't understand enough about sqlite3 to comment. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy title: sqlite3 module ignores placeholers in CREATE TRIGGER code - sqlite3 module ignores placeholders in CREATE TRIGGER code ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14076 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14124] _pickle.c comment/documentation improvement
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Can we have a patch review on this please -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14124 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14121] add a convenience C-API function for unpacking iterables
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Apparently not :) -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14121 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14189] Documentation for some C APIs is missing clear specification of the type of reference they return
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Can someone comment please as I'm not brave enough to touch the C code or docs. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14189 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21912] Deferred logging may use outdated references
R. David Murray added the comment: The decision as to whether or not to pass the message along to the next stage is made at numerous points in the pipeline. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14287] sys.stdin.readline and KeyboardInterrupt on windows
Mark Lawrence added the comment: FWIW the same occurs on Windows 7 with 3.5.0 but given there are known differences between Windows and *nix is this really an issue? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14287 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21912] Deferred logging may use outdated references
Vinay Sajip added the comment: I don't see a reason to defer the formatting to the actual output of the messages (other than the current implementation of logging). The current implementation of logging is like that for a reason, even though you may not see it - it defers doing work until it is needed (which improves throughput). This idiom is hardly uncommon. If you don't want to delay formatting until output, you can always do logger.debug(My object: %s % myObject) -- resolution: - not a bug status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14293] Message methods delegated via __getattr__ inaccessible using super().method
Mark Lawrence added the comment: @David I believe this is one for your TODO list. -- components: +email -Library (Lib) nosy: +BreamoreBoy, barry type: - behavior versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14293 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21912] Deferred logging may use outdated references
Jonas Diemer added the comment: Thanks for the explanation. Throughput is a valid reason. Your workaround does of course work, but it means that the string formatting is always done, even if the message is filtered out. Is this delayed logging behavior documented in any way (maybe I have overread it)? I am just trying to help people who may stumble upon this, as it cost me quite some time to figure out the resulting weird errors (especially in conjunction with Jython, which doesn't make debugging easier). By the way, my workaround is a little different: I forked logging and am catching exceptions during the string formatting. This way, I can at least print out the affected logging calls for me to fix. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21905] RuntimeError in pickle.whichmodule when sys.modules if mutated
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Sounds fine, but you should at least add a comment explaining the list() call. -- nosy: +alexandre.vassalotti, pitrou stage: - patch review type: crash - behavior ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21905 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21912] Deferred logging may use outdated references
Vinay Sajip added the comment: but it means that the string formatting is always done Not if you use logger.isEnabledFor(level) as a guard to avoid unnecessary work :-) I forked logging and am catching exceptions during the string formatting That might work with Jython and invalidated objects, but in the case of e.g. CPython (where the objects can't be invalidated/garbage collected as there is a reference to them in the LogRecord for the logged event) I don't see how that approach is generally applicable. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14301] xmlrpc client transport and threading problem
Mark Lawrence added the comment: @Kees sorry for the delay in getting back to you. @Martin can you comment on this please. -- components: +Library (Lib) -None nosy: +BreamoreBoy, loewis ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14301 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10485] http.server fails when query string contains addition '?' characters
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Slipped under the radar? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10485 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21755] test_importlib.test_locks fails --without-threads
Berker Peksag added the comment: Does it not work in this context Yes, it doesn't work after 34d65746d5ca because LOCK_TYPES is an empty dict (test_util.test_both() can't find the 'Frozen' and 'Source' keys in it) when Python is built without threads. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21755 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21905] RuntimeError in pickle.whichmodule when sys.modules if mutated
Olivier Grisel added the comment: New version of the patch to add an inline comment. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35841/pickle_whichmodule_20140703.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21905 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14050] Tutorial, list.sort() and items comparability
Andy Maier added the comment: Just out of curiosity: Why do the patches attached to this issue not have a review link? Also, both (2.7 and 3.2) patches do not line up with the current 2.7 and 3.x tip, both hunks get rejected. Comments on both patches: 1. It would be helpful if the text Each item needs to define an ordering relationship. was followed by a statement about what happens when that is not the case (that is what Ezio also suggested), and where to look for details on how to define an ordering relationship. The problem with that is that there is no good place that is devoted to exactly that. The relatively best place for defining comparison I found so far is: https://docs.python.org/2.7/tutorial/datastructures.html#comparing-sequences-and-other-types and its 3.x equivalent. 2. The example that raises the TypeError is not needed, IMHO. This puts too much focus on the case that does not work. If we mention in the description that a TypeError is raised, that should be sufficient. Andy -- nosy: +andymaier ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14050 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21912] Deferred logging may use outdated references
Jonas Diemer added the comment: 2014-07-03 16:42 GMT+02:00 Vinay Sajip rep...@bugs.python.org: I forked logging and am catching exceptions during the string formatting That might work with Jython and invalidated objects, but in the case of e.g. CPython (where the objects can't be invalidated/garbage collected as there is a reference to them in the LogRecord for the logged event) I don't see how that approach is generally applicable. True, it only helps for Jython. Still, I suggest adding this behavior to the documentation. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21151] winreg.SetValueEx causes crash if value = None
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset f2e6c33ce3e9 by Zachary Ware in branch '2.7': Issue #21151: Fixed a segfault in the _winreg module. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f2e6c33ce3e9 New changeset 0c5a1835af91 by Zachary Ware in branch '3.4': Issue #21151: Fixed a segfault in the winreg module. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/0c5a1835af91 New changeset 21cfbcacf0d8 by Zachary Ware in branch 'default': Closes #21151: Merge with 3.4 http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/21cfbcacf0d8 -- nosy: +python-dev resolution: - fixed stage: commit review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21151 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14050] Tutorial, list.sort() and items comparability
Ezio Melotti added the comment: Why do the patches attached to this issue not have a review link? because both (2.7 and 3.2) patches do not line up with the current 2.7 and 3.x tip, both hunks get rejected. The review link only appears if the patch applies cleanly on the default branch. Preparing a new patch against default should make the link appear. -- type: - enhancement versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14050 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21151] winreg.SetValueEx causes crash if value = None
Zachary Ware added the comment: Thanks to Dave for the report, eryksun for the suggestion, and John for the patch! I'm not sure why the test case doesn't fail on a regular test run on Python 3; it looks like BYTE *data starts out as NULL when Python is not in interactive mode, which makes no sense to me. The test case does crash on unpatched 2.7, though, so it's a legitimate test in my view. -- assignee: - zach.ware components: +Extension Modules -Library (Lib) priority: high - normal versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21151 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14069] In extensions (?...) the lookbehind assertion cannot choose between the beginning of string and a letter
Ezio Melotti added the comment: I believe this is not a bug. As the error says a look-behind requires the pattern to have a fixed length. In re.search(r'(?=(a|b))(\w+)', 'abc').groups() the two possible patterns in the look behind are a and b, both with length 1. In re.search(r'(?=(^|$))(\w+)', 'abc').groups() the two possible patterns in the look behind are ^ and $, both with length 0. In re.search(r'(?=(^|a))(\w+)', 'abc').groups() the two possible patterns in the look behind are ^ and a, one with length 0 and the other with length 1. This is not allowed and raises an error. Similarly, in re.search(r'(?=(ab|a))(\w+)', 'abc').groups() the two patterns have length 2 and 1, and the same error is raised. Closing as not a bug. -- resolution: - not a bug stage: - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14069 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15722] PEP 3121, 384 Refactoring applied to decimal module
Ezio Melotti added the comment: This sounds like a question for python-dev (or perhaps python-ideas). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15722 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21912] Deferred logging may use outdated references
Vinay Sajip added the comment: Still, I suggest adding this behavior to the documentation. It is already in the documentation. For example, https://docs.python.org/2/library/logging.html#logging.Formatter.format https://docs.python.org/2/howto/logging.html#optimization This behaviour has been in logging from the beginning. Generally, people have regarded it as desirable (when an opinion has been expressed). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21185] heapq fails to print in sorted order for certain inputs
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- stage: - resolved ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21185 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9116] test_capi.test_no_FatalError_infinite_loop crash on Windows
Zachary Ware added the comment: With the popup-supression context manager from #11732 in use and the buildbots using the regrtest '-n' option, I think we're at the point of being fixed enough and vote to close this issue. I'll leave the final decision to someone with a deeper understanding of the issue, though. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9116 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21051] incorrect utf-8 conversion with c api
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- stage: - resolved ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21051 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19279] UTF-7 to UTF-8 decoding crash
Mark Lawrence added the comment: To repeat the question do we or don't we fix this in 3.2? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19279 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12067] Doc: remove errors about mixed-type comparisons.
Andy Maier added the comment:
Hi, I'd like to revive this issue.
IMHO, the changes in issue12067-expressions_v2.diff go too far. I don't think
that deleting the entire section about the details of comparing objects of the
same type makes sense.
I agree with Terry's statement in msg170936 that the chapter is about the
operators and not about the ways to customize them, so some of what the patch
introduces in that area should not be introduced.
So far, that means that I'm pretty much against that patch entirely...
Having said that, I do believe that there are still issues:
1. both the 2.7 and 3.x sections about the comparison operators are
sufficiently convoluted and could be organized better by grouping the various
statements that are made, into categories like this:
- comparisons involving objects of user-defined types
- comparing objects of same built-in type
- comparing objects of differing built-in type
2. There are still some errors, ambiguities and omissions that need to be
fixed. For example, in the 3.x version:
a) omission about treatment of NaN for numbers of different type (could in
theory be implied from the statement are converted to same type, but that
statement is problematic as was pointed out in Mark's comment on this issue).
b) Amgiguous statement Most numeric types [of same type] can be compared with
one another.. I think what is true is that all built-in numeric types
(including Fraction and Decimal) compare mathematically correct in 3.x, and
that the only non-support is that complex numbers are not considered orderable
and an attempt to use an ordering operator raises TypeError.
c) Ambiguous statement When cross-type comparison is not supported, the
comparison method returns NotImplemented.. If this is about the customization
methods, it should not be here, but there. Here, it is relevant that a
TypeError is raised when using the operator.
d) Terminology in Bytes objects are compared lexicographically using the
numeric values of their elements.: Chapter [4.8.1. Bytes] defines bytes
objects as immutable sequences of single bytes (not elements).
e) Terminology in Tuples and lists are compared lexicographically using
comparison of corresponding elements.: lists and tuples contain items not
elements, and an item-wise comparison should not be called
lexicographically because that makes sense only when the items are characters.
f) Ambiguity in If not equal, the sequences are ordered the same as their
first differing elements.: Are ordered could be interpreted (e.g. by
non-native speakers) to mean that the sequence is changed to achieve that
ordering, which is not the case of course.
g) Editorial: In the list item about sets and froze sets, the example set {2,3}
is not in example font.
h) Omission: Range types are not covered.
i) Omission: The section Comparison of objects of differing types... is
silent about which built-in types support comparison across types (except for
numeric types where that is covered). I think that should be explicitly listed
for those built-in types that are also listed explicitly in the section about
comparing objects of same type.
I'll try to come up with a patch for 3.x, and once that is agreed, with one for
2.x.
Andy
--
nosy: +andymaier
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12067
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15014] smtplib: add support for arbitrary auth methods
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 42917d774476 by R David Murray in branch 'default': #15014: Add 'auth' command to implement auth mechanisms and use it in login. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/42917d774476 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15014 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15014] smtplib: add support for arbitrary auth methods
R. David Murray added the comment: Thanks, Milan. I made some tweaks...mostly documentation and code style (your code style wasn't wrong, I just have some slightly different preferences with regards to line folding). I also eliminated the authobjects test method, since I didn't see that it added anything to duplicate the code from the login method to test them...they get tested via the login methods. Instead I added the loop to the test for the auth method, so that we test that calling the public API with the auth objects that are documented as part of the public API work. That is, if someone were to change login such that the method names changed but login still worked, the auth test method will throw an error because the documented method names changed. I'm attaching the final patch here so you can look at the differences via the reitveld patch-diff function, if you want to. -- resolution: - fixed stage: needs patch - resolved status: open - closed Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35842/smtplib_auth.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15014 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14050] Tutorial, list.sort() and items comparability
Andy Maier added the comment: Ah! I was somehow suspecting that. Thanks for clarifying! I'll prepare a patch. To correct my earlier message, the best place to link for comparisons is probably the Conparisons subchapter of the Expressions chapter in the reference. See also issue12067. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14050 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14050] Tutorial, list.sort() and items comparability
R. David Murray added the comment: The review link will also appear if the patch is generated via hg diff with diff.git turned *off*. You will note that both existing patches use --git, which omits parent changeset information, so our system can't figure out what to apply them against in order to generate the review link. -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14050 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12067] Doc: remove errors about mixed-type comparisons.
Changes by Andy Maier andreas.r.ma...@gmx.de: -- versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35843/issue12067-expressions_v3.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12067 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12067] Doc: remove errors about mixed-type comparisons.
Andy Maier added the comment: Uploaded issue12067-expressions_v3.diff for the 3.5 tip. Please review. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12067 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16037] httplib: header parsing is unlimited
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Is any further work needed on this and similar issues #16038, #16040, #16041, #16042 and #16043 ? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16037 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17997] ssl.match_hostname(): sub string wildcard should not match IDNA prefix
Mark Lawrence added the comment: For future reference how do I find out if this has been applied to 3.2? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18747] Re-seed OpenSSL's PRNG after fork
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Is this really an enhancement request or should it be a security issue? Which versions if any actually need work doing on them? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18747 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15722] PEP 3121, 384 Refactoring applied to decimal module
Stefan Krah added the comment: Yes, python-ideas is probably better. -- I just noticed that the total slowdown is even 40% if the global variable cached_context is also placed into the module state (as it should). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15722 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16188] Windows C Runtime Library Mismatch
Mark Lawrence added the comment: I'm not aware of any similar problems being reported with any Python version so can this be closed not a bug as was #14608 ? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16188 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12067] Doc: remove errors about mixed-type comparisons.
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com: -- assignee: docs@python - rhettinger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12067 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14050] Tutorial, list.sort() and items comparability
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com: -- assignee: docs@python - rhettinger nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14050 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20663] Introduce exception argument to iter
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Your suggestion and an example appears to have been taken directly from the itertools recipes: def iter_except(func, exception, first=None): Call a function repeatedly until an exception is raised. Converts a call-until-exception interface to an iterator interface. Like __builtin__.iter(func, sentinel) but uses an exception instead of a sentinel to end the loop. Examples: bsddbiter = iter_except(db.next, bsddb.error, db.first) heapiter = iter_except(functools.partial(heappop, h), IndexError) dictiter = iter_except(d.popitem, KeyError) dequeiter = iter_except(d.popleft, IndexError) queueiter = iter_except(q.get_nowait, Queue.Empty) setiter = iter_except(s.pop, KeyError) try: if first is not None: yield first() while 1: yield func() except exception: pass FWIW, this idea was explored before an aside from the examples given in the docstring above, it seems to have very limited application. Accordingly, it was left as a recipe and not added to itertools or the the iter() function. -- assignee: - rhettinger nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20663 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21911] IndexError: tuple index out of range should include the requested index and tuple length
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Why? Is there any known use case? The IndexError exception is commonly used for control flow. Slowing down the instantiation to add an index that no one really needs would be a waste. This exception has been around for 20+ years -- if they were an actual need, we would have known by now. To my eyes, this appears to be gratuitous feature creep. -- assignee: - rhettinger nosy: +rhettinger priority: normal - low ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21911 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21906] Tools\Scripts\md5sum.py doesn't work in Python 3.x
Zachary Ware added the comment: Hmmm, I was just reloading the page to post a patch I'd worked up, and lo and behold there's already one here! Here's mine anyway; you can use any parts of it that you like, Berker. There are a couple of not-quite-related changes in test_tools that might be better split into a separate issue, but they're in there anyway. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21906 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21906] Tools\Scripts\md5sum.py doesn't work in Python 3.x
Zachary Ware added the comment: Hmmm, I was just reloading the page to post a patch I'd worked up, and lo and behold there's already one here! Here's mine anyway; you can use any parts of it that you like, Berker. There are a couple of not-quite-related changes in test_tools that might be better split into a separate issue, but there in there anyway. -- assignee: - berker.peksag nosy: +zach.ware Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35844/issue21906.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21906 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21906] Tools\Scripts\md5sum.py doesn't work in Python 3.x
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg17 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21906 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11924] Pickle and copyreg modules don't document the interface
Mark Lawrence added the comment: @Jesús can you provide a patch for this? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11924 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16188] Windows C Runtime Library Mismatch
rlinscheer added the comment: Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring now. -- resolution: - wont fix status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16188 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20663] Introduce exception argument to iter
Ram Rachum added the comment: I understand. Personally I think it'll be useful enough (and more useful to me than the builtin `sentinel`), but maybe that's just me. And I guess Terry liked it too. I don't know whether other people would like it as well. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20663 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21911] IndexError: tuple index out of range should include the requested index and tuple length
Ram Rachum added the comment:
Raymond: I do take your point about performance, and I understand that if this
results in a performance problem, then that's a good argument to not include
this feature.
But I'm baffled as to why you're asking me regarding this feature Why? Is
there any known use case?
Why do we have an exception text like TypeError: f() takes 1 positional
argument but 3 were given instead of TypeError: f() takes a different number
of arguments than you tried to give it? Why do we have ImportError: No module
named 'foobas' instead of ImportError: No such module? Do I need to spell
out the reason and all the different scenario in which these exception text are
super useful?
Why does an operation like `{}[42]` result in `KeyError: 42` instead of
`KeyError: Key doesn't exist? And now that I think about it, KeyError is used
for control flow too, so why is it okay for it to contain the value, but on
`IndexError` it's a no-no?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21911
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19279] UTF-7 to UTF-8 decoding crash
STINNER Victor added the comment: I suggest to close the issue. It's just another way to crash Python 3.2, like any other bug fix. Python 3.2 does not accept bug fixes anymore. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19279 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21868] Tbuffer in turtle allows negative size
Lita Cho added the comment: Hey Raymond, just wanted to ping you to see if you had a chance to review this patch yet. Thanks! -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21868 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12513] codec.StreamReaderWriter: issues with interlaced read-write
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Codecs gurus FYI. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy, doerwalter, lemburg type: - behavior versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12513 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14121] add a convenience C-API function for unpacking iterables
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Regarding the redundancy, I don't think the C API should be expanded unnecessarily. Also, PyTuple_GET_ITEM() and its kin are very old, widely used, and very fast. I don't see a need to upset that apple cart. -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14121 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20663] Introduce exception argument to iter
Josh Rosenberg added the comment:
+1; I've had several cases where I'd have used something like this (for the
exact purpose mentioned, to destructively consume an input iterable). I don't
think it's more or less useful than the sentinel version, which is convenient
for iterating a file by blocks instead of by line, e.g.:
from functools import partial
with open('...', 'rb') as f:
for block in iter(partial(f.read, 4096), b''):
...
But it would still nice to be able to destructively iterate sequences,
particularly in CPython, where doing it at the C level can get you atomicity
without relying on anything beyond the GIL (and without wrapping infinite while
loops in try/except: pass blocks, which is pointlessly verbose).
One issue: You can't just make the second argument allow exception types as
well, since it's possible (however unlikely) for an exception type to be a
legitimate return type from a function. Making it keyword only would solve that
problem though.
--
nosy: +josh.rosenberg
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20663
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2057] difflib: add patch capability
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: I don't think this should be done. Python is primarily a language with a standard library, not a command-line development toolkit. We should avoid mission creep. There are plenty of mature, robust, full-featured solutions already available. For example, when I was developing Python on Windows, I used the GNU Win32 toolkit. If anything, this ought to be an offering on PyPI. There is could live freely outside our rather slow release cycle which is too lethargic to respond the challenges that would inevitably arise with a new command-line tool (i.e. it won't handle input from some diff utility, or isn't robust against minor spacing issues or encoding issues, or it can't handle slightly offset hunks etc). -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2057 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12854] PyOS_Readline usage in tokenizer ignores sys.stdin/sys.stdout
Mark Lawrence added the comment: @Albert sorry about the delay in responding to this. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy type: - behavior versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12854 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21911] IndexError: tuple index out of range should include the requested index and tuple length
Josh Rosenberg added the comment: TypeError also should be more specific because it can occur for a multitude of reasons; along with stuff like AttributeError, it's one of those exceptions that could arise from multiple causes on a single line of code, none of them obvious. For the specific case of passing the wrong number of arguments, that's usually a result of programmer error, not input errors to a valid program, so it's not a case worth optimizing. For control flow uses of TypeError (e.g. using duck typing to choose code paths), performance loss is a valid point. ImportError requires disambiguation for similar reasons (since a single import statement could error because the target module is missing, or because one of its dependencies fails to import; you need to be able to tell the difference, and a line number doesn't help). Beyond that, there is little cost to making fully detailed ImportErrors; if you're risking ImportErrors in your program's hot paths, something is wrong with your design. As for needing a use case: Every feature starts at minus 100 points (ref: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericgu/archive/2004/01/12/57985.aspx ). There is a limited amount of development and testing resources, more code means more opportunity for errors and increased disk and memory usage, etc. I agree that KeyError is a relevant comparison, though you'd be surprised how much cheaper indexing a sequence is relative to dictionary access; hashing and collision chaining are usually tripling or quadrupling the work relative to a simple integer lookup in a sequence. The more expensive the non-exceptional operation, the less you need to worry about the expense of the exceptional case, simply because the code was never going to run that quickly anyway. -- nosy: +josh.rosenberg ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21911 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21868] Tbuffer in turtle allows negative size
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: I looked at this and marked it as high priority (crashes are an unacceptable outcome). The patch looks fine but I haven't had a chance to test it yet. If it passes muster, I'll apply it shortly (I'm overseas traveling this week). In the meantime, can you mark the versions in the tracker so I'll know in advance whether this applies to 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5? Thanks. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21868 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21911] IndexError: tuple index out of range should include the requested index and tuple length
Ram Rachum added the comment: Josh... The reason I gave all these examples of where Python gives detailed error messages, is not so you'd explain the obvious reason, which is that it makes it easier to debug, figure out what's wrong with your program, and fix it. The reason I gave these examples is that I'm baffled by this attitude that I see all the time on python-dev, where people are asking me questions when the answers are obvious to all of us. I suggested adding more information to the IndexError: tuple index out of range, like IndexError: tuple only has 4 elements, can't access element number 7. It should be obvious to any programming novice why this is helpful: Because it makes it much easier to figure out what your program is doing wrong, so you could fix it. (I feel silly having to spell it out in company of so many experienced developers who all understand this basic fact.) I'm very frustrated that a core Python developer would ask me Why? Is there any known use case? on such a no-brainer suggestion. Now, if you want to make the performance argument, that's acceptable. But it's very, very frustrating that people on python-dev, who are very experienced developers, need to be explained the virtue of very simple and obvious features. (This happens many times, not just on this ticket.) I'm baffled as to why they do this. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21911 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10417] unittest triggers UnicodeEncodeError with non-ASCII character in the docstring of the test function
Michael Foord added the comment: So the proposed fix does the backslashreplace for errors and then re-decodes, allowing the encode in the stream to work. That seems like a good fix. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10417 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21868] Tbuffer in turtle allows negative size
Changes by Lita Cho lita@gmail.com: -- versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21868 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21868] Tbuffer in turtle allows negative size
Changes by Lita Cho lita@gmail.com: -- versions: +Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21868 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
