[issue22226] Refactor dict result handling in Tkinter
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka:
Proposed patch refactors code which converts the result of Tcl call to Python
dict. Added new private function _splitdict() which does this in more robust
manner.
Also this patch fixes a bug in Treeview.heading(). The heading subcommand of
ttk::treeview return options dict in which one key surprisingly was not '-'
prefixed.
% ttk::treeview t
% .t heading #0
-text {} -image {} -anchor center -command {} state {}
Current code unconditionally cuts s from the state key.
from tkinter import ttk
t = ttk.Treeview()
t.heading('#0')
{'anchor': 'center', 'tate': '', 'image': '', 'text': '', 'command': ''}
--
assignee: serhiy.storchaka
components: Tkinter
files: tkinter_splitdict.diff
keywords: patch
messages: 225515
nosy: gpolo, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: patch review
status: open
title: Refactor dict result handling in Tkinter
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36411/tkinter_splitdict.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22208] tarfile can't add in memory files (reopened)
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com: -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22208 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22216] smtplip STARTTLS fails at second attampt due to unsufficiant quit()
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com: -- components: +email nosy: +barry, r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22216 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22208] tarfile can't add in memory files (reopened)
Mark Grandi added the comment: I still don't see why TarFile.add() can't be changed to accept a file like object so users don't have to fumble around with a TarInfo object when they just want add a file like object, and don't care about the permission bits and whatnot. It also says un the TarInfo section that you get those objects from gettarinfo(), and its not clear (at least to me) that you can just manually construct one, and that you only need the size property set. I still the easiest way to solve this is to have gettarinfo() or add() accept file like objects that don't have file descriptors, as it would go a long way to simplifying the use of this module as well. (in zip file you don't ever have to worry about ZipInfo objects unless you need them...) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22208 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22220] Ttk extensions test failure
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Sorry, it was wrong link. Correct one is: http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/x86%20XP-4%203.4/builds/411/steps/test/logs/stdio Build #411 failed, build #412 successful, and build #413 failed again. May be this is test order depending failure. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue0 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22215] embedded NUL character exceptions
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: BDFL have approved the idea (http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel/149000). Could anyone please make the review of concrete patch? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22215 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22215] embedded NUL character exceptions
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- assignee: - serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22215 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22090] Decimal and float formatting treat '%' differently for infinities and nans.
Mark Dickinson added the comment: The decimal.py part LGTM. (The rest looks good, too, but I haven't tested it.) This seems like one of those bugs that probably isn't worth backporting to 3.4, but given the projected longevity of 2.7 it might be worth applying there. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22090 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21163] asyncio doesn't warn if a task is destroyed during its execution
STINNER Victor added the comment: I don't understand how keeping a strong refrence would fix anything. You only provided one example (async-gc-bug.py) which uses Queue objects but keep weak references to them. Keeping strong references to tasks is not the right fix. You must keep strong references to queues. If a queue is destroyed, how can you put an item into it? Otherwise, the task will wait forever. Keeping a strong refrence to the task just hides the bug. Or I missed something. I dislike the idea of keeping strong references to tasks, it may create even more reference cycles. We already have too many cycles with exceptions stored in futures (in tasks). The current unit test uses low level functions to remove a variable using a frame object. Can you provide an example which shows the bug without using low level functions? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21163 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22227] Simplify tarfile iterator
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: TarFile iteration can be simplified by using a generator instead of iterator class. Attached patch get rid of the TarIter class and decrease sources size by 16 lines. -- components: Library (Lib) files: tarfile_tariter.diff keywords: patch messages: 225521 nosy: lars.gustaebel, serhiy.storchaka priority: normal severity: normal stage: patch review status: open title: Simplify tarfile iterator type: enhancement versions: Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36412/tarfile_tariter.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21163] asyncio doesn't warn if a task is destroyed during its execution
Marco Paolini added the comment: I don't understand how keeping a strong refrence would fix anything. You only provided one example (async-gc-bug.py) which uses Queue objects but keep weak references to them. Keeping strong references to tasks is not the right fix. You must keep strong references to queues. If a queue is destroyed, how can you put an item into it? Otherwise, the task will wait forever. Keeping a strong refrence to the task just hides the bug. Or I missed something. The original asyncio-gc-issue.py wasn't written by me, and yes, as you say it does have the reference bug you describe. I argue that bug shouldn't cause tasks to die: it should rather limit (as gc proceeds) the number of queues available to the producer in the WeakSet() and leaving alive all consumer waiting on an unreachable queue. Please look at my test2.py or even better test3.py for a simpler example. Note that in my issue_22163_patch_0.diff I only keep strong refs to futures a task is waiting on. Just as asyncio is already doing with asyncio.sleep() coroutine. I dislike the idea of keeping strong references to tasks, it may create even more reference cycles. We already have too many cycles with exceptions stored in futures (in tasks). We are also already keeping strong refs to futures like asyncio.sleep I dislike the idea of randomly losing tasks. I also dislike the idea of forcing the user to manage strong refs to its tasks. All 3rd party libraries will have to invent their own way and it will lead to even more leaks/cycles very hard to debug. Not just exceptions: everytime a task is yielding on a future asyncio creates a reference cycle. The current unit test uses low level functions to remove a variable using a frame object. Can you provide an example which shows the bug without using low level functions? My issue_22163_patch_0.diff only clears references by setting variables to `None`. No low level stuff needed. My test2.py example script also doesn't use any low level stuff I just uploaded test3.py with a simpler (and possibly more realistic) example. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36413/test3.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21163 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22228] Adapt bash readline operate-and-get-next function
New submission from Lele Gaifax: Bash implements an handy extension to the history/readline library called operate-and-get-next bound by default to Ctrl-O that lets you repeat an arbitrary sequence of input lines possibly editing some of them. This patch adapts the extension to the Python readline module. Since I have no way of testing it against the libedit alternative library, it targets only the real readline library. -- files: readline.patch keywords: patch messages: 225523 nosy: lelit, steven.daprano priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Adapt bash readline operate-and-get-next function type: enhancement Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36414/readline.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22208] tarfile can't add in memory files (reopened)
Lars Gustäbel added the comment: tarfile needs to know the size of a file object beforehand because the tar header is written first followed by the file object's data. If the file object is not based on a real file descriptor, tarfile cannot simply use os.fstat() but the user has to pass the size somehow. And I doubt that it's a good idea to add size arguments to TarFile.add() and .addfile() because it might lead to confusion. I think tarfile is rather good at exposing the important parts of its low-level api to the programmer, in a way that still leaves some work for him to do but without getting in his way. I don't see why manually creating TarInfo objects is such a big deal. It is the far superior way because it offers the maximum freedom for the programmer - admittedly at the cost of a slightly steeper learning curve. And we have to account for many different use cases that people have. For example, you don't mention what you think creating directories from scratch should be like in your opinion. With regard to the usage of the size attribute the documentation for TarFile.addfile() says clearly: Add the TarInfo object tarinfo to the archive. If fileobj is given, tarinfo.size bytes are read from it and added to the archive. You can create TarInfo objects using gettarinfo(). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22208 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1742205] ZipFile.writestr writes incorrect extended local headers
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: For now zip -T doesn't complain. -- assignee: - serhiy.storchaka nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1742205 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15795] Zipfile.extractall does not preserve file permissions
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: The TarFile.extract() method has the set_attrs parameter which controls similar behavior but is less flexible. It would be good to unify zipfile and tarfile abilities. set_attrs also controls setting file owner and time. When we restore unsafe uid/gid/sticky bits, it would be worth to restore also file owner. And it would be not bad to restore file time. -- assignee: - serhiy.storchaka nosy: +lars.gustaebel, serhiy.storchaka versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15795 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15125] argparse: positional arguments containing - in name not handled well
Keith Hughitt added the comment: Any progress on this issue? Still persists in Python 3.4.1. -- nosy: +khughitt ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15125 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1757072] Zipfile robustness
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Original issue was fixed in cc3255a707c7. Issue reported in msg73317 was fixed in issue14315. Is there something left about this issue? -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka status: open - pending ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1757072 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20042] Python Launcher, Windows, fails on scripts w/ non-latin names
eryksun added the comment: The problem is skip_whitespace mistakenly calls isspace instead of iswspace. http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/c0e311e010fc/PC/launcher.c#l48 isspace has undefined behavior when the argument is not EOF or in the range of 0 through 0xFF: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/y13z34da%28v=vs.100%29.aspx The display of debug messages should be handled in its own issue. IMO, setting stderr to _O_WTEXT mode or _O_U16TEXT mode looks reasonable. The launcher already uses wide-character strings and the wprintf family. It's just the default _O_TEXT mode ends up encoding to the console codepage. Regarding msg206744, %s in wide-character format strings is OK for VC++ 10: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hf4y5e3w%28v=vs.100%29.aspx This will be a legacy mode in VC++ 14 (CPython 3.5?): http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2014/06/18/crt-features-fixes-and-breaking-changes-in-visual-studio-14-ctp1.aspx P.S. In case someone wants an easy issue, I noticed a bug. There should only be one %s in the format string that starts on line 262: http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/c0e311e010fc/PC/launcher.c#l262 -- nosy: +eryksun ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20042 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22219] python -mzipfile fails to add empty folders to created zip
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: I think zipfile should add an entry for directories as zip tool does. Here is a patch. In additional it fixes zipfile -c for some corner cases (when arguments end with /, . or .. component). -- stage: needs patch - patch review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22219 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20291] Argument Clinic should understand *args and **kwargs parameters
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Yes, I agree we should follow the Python level semantics, and only capture the excess positional arguments. For the record, the four builtins I flagged as needing this in order to add introspection information: __build_class__ - 2 positional only args, arbitrary additional args - checks size with PyTuple_GET_SIZE - uses PyTuple_GET_ITEM x2 + PyTuple_GetSlice to unpack print - only arbitrary position args, iterates and extracts using PyTuple_GetItem - uses PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords with an empty tuple to extract the keyword-only args min max - use a shared helper function min_max - uses the args tuple directly if size 1 - otherwise uses PyArg_UnpackTuple to extract the supplied iterable - uses PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords with an empty tuple to extract the keyword-only args - this one arg means iterable style API might need to be a special case... -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20291 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15696] Correct __sizeof__ support for mmap
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 4aba144b752d by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7': Issue #15696: Add a __sizeof__ implementation for mmap objects on Windows. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4aba144b752d New changeset ca4a22256bf8 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.4': Issue #15696: Add a __sizeof__ implementation for mmap objects on Windows. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ca4a22256bf8 New changeset f543171d7f41 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default': Issue #15696: Add a __sizeof__ implementation for mmap objects on Windows. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f543171d7f41 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15696 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15513] Correct __sizeof__ support for pickle
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Required patch is already committed. Here is updated patch. -- stage: - patch review versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36415/pickle_sizeof-3.4.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15513 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22229] wsgiref doesn't appear to ever set REMOTE_HOST in the environ
New submission from Alex Gaynor: Based on a reading of the code: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/wsgiref/simple_server.py#L88-L90 is where REMOTE_HOST is set. However, `address_string` always returns `self.client_address[0]` (https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/http/server.py#L568), which means that `!=` comparison always returns False, which means REMOTE_HOST is never actually set correctly. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 225534 nosy: alex priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: wsgiref doesn't appear to ever set REMOTE_HOST in the environ versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18595] zipfile: symlinks etc.
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18595 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22230] 'python -mzipfile -c' does not zip empty directories
New submission from Ryan Wilson: Running command: $ mkdir foo; python -mzipfile -c foo.zip foo; python -mzipfile -e foo.zip dest ls: cannot access dest: No such file or directory This is because 'foo.zip' is empty since running 'python -mzipfile -c foo.zip foo' does not zip empty directories. Running 'unzip foo.zip' also produces: Archive: foo.zip warning [foo.zip]: zipfile is empty The following posted patch fixes this issue. -- components: Library (Lib) files: add_empty_dirs_to_zipfile.patch keywords: patch messages: 225535 nosy: ryantimwilson priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: 'python -mzipfile -c' does not zip empty directories type: behavior versions: Python 2.7 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36416/add_empty_dirs_to_zipfile.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22230 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22230] 'python -mzipfile -c' does not zip empty directories
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: This is a duplicate of issue22219. -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka resolution: - duplicate stage: - resolved status: open - closed superseder: - python -mzipfile fails to add empty folders to created zip ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22230 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22228] Adapt bash readline operate-and-get-next function
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk: -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy, Rosuav ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15696] Correct __sizeof__ support for mmap
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - resolved status: open - closed versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15696 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19884] Importing readline produces erroneous output
Changes by Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +geoffreyspear ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19884 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22208] tarfile can't add in memory files (reopened)
Mark Grandi added the comment: I was just thinking that if os.stat fails, then you try getting the size by just calling len() on it, as stuff like io.BytesIO and io.StringIO will respond to that. But if we are not changing the behavior of the API, at the very least there needs to be documentation changes / an example of adding a file that does not have a file descriptor. I can do that if needed. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22208 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21389] The repr of BoundMethod objects sometimes incorrectly identifies the bound function
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: That seems reasonable. Can you please write tests for the new behavior, though, and also fix test_defaultdict? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21389 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22208] tarfile can't add in memory files (reopened)
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: The example given by Lars shows that it's not that easy to come up with the right code. Why not make it easier? -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22208 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20328] mailbox: add method to delete mailbox
Jonathan Dowland added the comment: Hi David, whilst writing my patch I've tried to keep an open mind as to users of the methods, but I do have my own purpose in the back of my mind, and that's an archive mail tool which I would like to delete mail folders if, after performing an archive operation, they are empty. However, the archive mail tool has no awareness or interest in sub-folders. The user would be surprised, however, if it deleted them, should they exist. There's also the issue of lack of locks for Maildirs. If one wanted to avoid recursive deleting, how could one achieve it? consider pseudo code if len(mbox.list_folders()) = 0: # no sub-folders, safe to delete? mbox.delete() There are no guarantees an external process didn't create a sub folder between the test and the delete operation. Finally, if one has a delete() operation that doesn't operate on sub-folders, but you want to recursively delete, you can at least assemble such a method. If you have a recursively-deleting method, and you *don't* want to delete sub-folders, you're stuck. Having said all that please let me know what you're thinking; I'll happily try to cook up a patch to add both recursive and non-recursive delete methods. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20328 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19628] maxlevels -1 on compileall for unlimited recursion
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: Why can't we just reuse the -l option? -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19628 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19628] maxlevels -1 on compileall for unlimited recursion
Claudiu Popa added the comment: Backward compatibility reasons, I guess. compileall -l completely deactivates the recursion, so using -l for controlling the number of levels seems to overwrite its original meaning. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19628 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22179] Idle. Search dialog found text not highlited on Windows
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: As it is now, show_hit should have a comment something like this: # On Windows, selection highight is visible while the dialog is open. # A 'hit' tag is used while the dialog is open (see #22179). # The 'hit' tag should be deleted when this dialog is closed. # The 'sel' tag keeps the text marked after closing. However, there is a slight bug in show_hit behavior. For example, finding 'i' in def i(): this list is 'is' # is not finds all 6 'i's, one after the other, but only the 4 in identifier, plain text, builtin, and comment are visibly highlighted. The 2 in the keyword and string are not. The selection tag, however, is visible on the 'i' of is or 'is'after the dialog is closed. Checking ColorDelegator, I do not see an obvious reason for why two tags are handled differently. If this cannot be fixed, we should try the alternate fix of making the sel tag visible and dump the found tag. Otherwise, I think I like the heavier highlighting while the dialog is open. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22179 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19628] maxlevels -1 on compileall for unlimited recursion
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset a62368778d6c by Benjamin Peterson in branch 'default': allow recursion depth to be specified (closes #19628) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a62368778d6c -- nosy: +python-dev resolution: - fixed stage: commit review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19628 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22211] Remove VMS specific code in expat.h xmlrole.h
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +christian.heimes ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22211 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20328] mailbox: add method to delete mailbox
R. David Murray added the comment: Well, if you can delete subfolders, then you aren't deleting the main folder, either (unless it is empty?). So isn't this really a 'delete_messages' method? In which case, how does it differ from the 'clear' method? Only in that it deletes the folder if it is empty? That doesn't sound like a good API to me. I find myself really confused as to what your goal is here. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20328 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7283] test_site failure when .local/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages hasn't been created yet
Ned Deily added the comment: Closing, since this problem apparently no longer occurs -- resolution: - out of date stage: needs patch - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7283 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12006] strptime should implement %V or %u directive from libc
Changes by Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36417/12006_3.5_complete.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12006 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12006] strptime should implement %V or %u directive from libc
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk: -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12006 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21308] PEP 466: backport ssl changes
Alex Gaynor added the comment: New patch additionally backports the Tools/ssl/ directory from Python3, which has two utilities for generating some of the code used. Thanks to Benjamin for catching this. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36418/ssl-backport.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21308 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21308] PEP 466: backport ssl changes
Alex Gaynor added the comment: Last version had some stray stuff due to the fact that I don't know how to use version control. New version should resolve that. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36419/ssl-backport.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21308 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8797] urllib2 basicauth broken in 2.6.5: RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded in cmp
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset c1edc4e43eb1 by Senthil Kumaran in branch '2.7': Fix Issue #8797: Raise HTTPError on failed Basic Authentication immediately. Initial patch by Sam Bull. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c1edc4e43eb1 New changeset 30e8a8f22a2a by Senthil Kumaran in branch '3.4': Fix Issue #8797: Raise HTTPError on failed Basic Authentication immediately. Initial patch by Sam Bull. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/30e8a8f22a2a New changeset 10d0a692b1b6 by Senthil Kumaran in branch 'default': merge from 3.4 http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/10d0a692b1b6 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8797 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21308] PEP 466: backport ssl changes
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: Running test_ssl gives this: % ./python Lib/test/regrtest.py test_ssl test_ssl Exception in thread Thread-104: Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/benjamin/dev/python/2.7/Lib/threading.py, line 810, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File /home/benjamin/dev/python/2.7/Lib/test/test_ssl.py, line 1594, in run if not self.wrap_conn(): File /home/benjamin/dev/python/2.7/Lib/test/test_ssl.py, line 1545, in wrap_conn self.sock, server_side=True) File /home/benjamin/dev/python/2.7/Lib/ssl.py, line 350, in wrap_socket _context=self) File /home/benjamin/dev/python/2.7/Lib/ssl.py, line 561, in __init__ self.do_handshake() File /home/benjamin/dev/python/2.7/Lib/ssl.py, line 784, in do_handshake self._sslobj.do_handshake() error: [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21308 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21308] PEP 466: backport ssl changes
Alex Gaynor added the comment: On what platform? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21308 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21308] PEP 466: backport ssl changes
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: Gentoo Linux. Openssl 1.0.1i On Tue, Aug 19, 2014, at 19:29, Alex Gaynor wrote: Alex Gaynor added the comment: On what platform? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21308 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21308 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22231] httplib: unicode url will cause an ascii codec error when combined with a utf-8 string header
New submission from Bob Chen:
Try to run these two script below, and you will understand what I'm talking
about.
If you specified an url and it happened to be an unicode string(which is quite
common in python because python processes string as unicode and you could
possibly get it from somewhere else), and your header contains a utf-8 string
converted from a foreign language, like u'呵呵', then the codec error occurred.
File /usr/lib/python2.7/httplib.py, line 808, in _send_output
msg = \r\n.join(self._buffer)
# -*- encoding: utf-8 -*-
# should fail
import httplib, urllib
params = urllib.urlencode({'@number': 12524, '@type': 'issue', '@action':
'show'})
headers = {Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded,
Accept: text/plain, 'notes': u'呵呵'.encode('utf-8')}
conn = httplib.HTTPConnection(ubugs.python.org)
conn.request(POST, uhttp://bugs.python.org/any_url;, params, headers)
response = conn.getresponse()
print response.status, response.reason
# -*- encoding: utf-8 -*-
# should be ok
import httplib, urllib
params = urllib.urlencode({'@number': 12524, '@type': 'issue', '@action':
'show'})
headers = {Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded,
Accept: text/plain, 'notes': u'呵呵'.encode('utf-8')}
conn = httplib.HTTPConnection(ubugs.python.org)
conn.request(POST, http://bugs.python.org/any_url;, params, headers)
response = conn.getresponse()
print response.status, response.reason
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 225553
nosy: Bob.Chen
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: httplib: unicode url will cause an ascii codec error when combined with
a utf-8 string header
type: crash
versions: Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22231
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21308] PEP 466: backport ssl changes
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: In load_cert_chain, you may find it convenient to not Py_DECREF and Py_CLEAR keyfile_bytes and certfile_bytes, which aren't PyObject *. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21308 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
