[issue24724] Element.findall documentation misleading
New submission from Eric S: Documentation states: Element.findall() finds only elements with a tag which are direct children of the current element. More accurate to say direct descendents as direct children implies only one generation below whereas function goes down to all g...children. For-looping findall with inner recursion to rebuild hierarchy as dict, etc. can cause very large tree. -- messages: 247404 nosy: Eric S priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Element.findall documentation misleading ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24724 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24724] Element.findall documentation misleading
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com: -- components: +Documentation nosy: +eli.bendersky, scoder ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24724 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24724] Element.findall documentation misleading
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: The phrase occurs in https://docs.python.org/3/library/xml.etree.elementtree.html#finding-interesting-elements I think it should say, In this example, Element.findall() finds only elements with a tag which are direct children of the current element. Later it accurately says that, More sophisticated specification of which elements to look for is possible by using XPath. -- assignee: - rhettinger nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24724 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24613] array.fromstring Use After Free
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: The patch doesn't apply correctly. Looks as it is encoded with UTF-16. For future please provide a patch in the encoding of the source file (should be ASCII compatible, without BOM). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24613 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24683] Type confusion in json encoding
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: There is similar issue with key_separator and item_separator in 3.x. They are used with _PyAccu_Accumulate that performs a type check only in assert(). Here is a patch. -- keywords: +patch stage: needs patch - patch review versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.6 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40025/json_make_encoder_typecheck.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24683 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24683] Type confusion in json encoding
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Patch LGTM. -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24683 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24724] Element.findall documentation misleading
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40026/etree_clarify.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24724 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24613] array.fromstring Use After Free
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 2d39777f3477 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7': Issue #24613: Calling array.fromstring() with self is no longer allowed https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2d39777f3477 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24613 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18378] locale.getdefaultlocale() fails on Mac OS X with default language set to English
Ronald Oussoren added the comment: ping... I think the current behavior is a bug in Python and should be fixed in 2.7, 3.4, 3.5 and default (using Dmitry's patch). I'd like to commit the patch, but would like someone else's review of the patch before doing so. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18378 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24713] Import docs reference the deprecated imp.reload
New submission from Petr Viktorin: In 3.4, `imp.reload` was deprecated in favor of `importlib.reload`. https://docs.python.org/3/library/imp.html -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: docs.patch keywords: patch messages: 247319 nosy: docs@python, encukou, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Import docs reference the deprecated imp.reload versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40011/docs.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24713 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18378] locale.getdefaultlocale() fails on Mac OS X with default language set to English
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Needed tests.
With the patch:
$ LC_CTYPE=UTF-8 ./python
import locale
locale.getdefaultlocale()
(None, 'UTF-8')
locale.getpreferredencoding()
'ANSI_X3.4-1968'
locale.getlocale()
(None, None)
$ LC_CTYPE=en_US_UTF-8 ./python
import locale
locale.getdefaultlocale()
('en_US', 'UTF-8')
locale.getpreferredencoding()
'UTF-8'
locale.getlocale()
('en_US', 'UTF-8')
I think getpreferredencoding() and getlocale() should return the UTF-8 encoding.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18378
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18181] PEP447: Add type.__getdescriptor__
Ronald Oussoren added the comment: I've attached a new version of the patch (pep447-2015-07-25.txt). Changes in this version of the patch: 1) Works with the current trunk (as in all tests pass) 2) Types in C must explicitly set Py_TPFLAGS_GETDESCRIPTOR in tp_flags to enable the tp_getdescriptor slot. This is primarily done avoid crashing when loading a C extension for older CPython versions (even if that's not guaranteed to work anyway). The PEP needs to be updated for the second change, that's next on my list. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40012/pep447-2015-07-25.txt ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14373] C implementation of functools.lru_cache
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 5345e5ce2eed by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.5': Issue #14373: Fixed segmentation fault when gc.collect() is called during https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5345e5ce2eed New changeset 9c6d11d22801 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default': Issue #14373: Fixed segmentation fault when gc.collect() is called during https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9c6d11d22801 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14373 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14373] C implementation of functools.lru_cache
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Thank you Ned. Is anything left to do with this issue or it can be closed? -- priority: release blocker - normal status: open - pending ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14373 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18378] locale.getdefaultlocale() fails on Mac OS X with default language set to English
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka versions: +Python 3.5, Python 3.6 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18378 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24712] Docs page's sidebar vibrates on mouse wheel scroll on Chrome.
Biwin John added the comment: The problem exist with the Chrome on Ubuntu, Windows and OSX, but ony with the python docs for version 2.7. Docs for 2.6 use the same sidebar. But in 2.7 docs, the content of sidebar is positioned with the style added on scroll, style=float: left; margin-right: 0px; width: 202px; top: 13px; The top value is calculated on scroll, the same code works with FireFox without any problem. So it might be the way chrome handles the change in values. And we must workaround with our code than waiting for Chrome to get fixed. Needs to be fixed as, 2.7 is the most used version, comes default with most distros and chrome is the most used browser (50.25% of all)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers] Recommendations: 1. Change the sidebar behavior to the 2.6 docs sidebar one.(default top value, users can scroll up to see the content) or. 2. Make the sidebar position:fixed and provide a inner scroll bar. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24712 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24714] Crash with string_at(None)
New submission from Michael Toews: On Debian x64 stable with Python 2.7 and 3.4, the following causes a segmentation fault: from ctypes import string_at string_at(None) On Windows 64-bit with Python 2.7 it raises WindowsError and Python 3.3 raises OSError, both showing a message access violation reading 0x, but it does not crash. The above behavior was found when reading a result from a C API that can be either a zero-terminated string or NULL. -- components: ctypes messages: 247325 nosy: mwtoews priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Crash with string_at(None) type: crash versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24714 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18378] locale.getdefaultlocale() fails on Mac OS X with default language set to English
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Perhaps the better way to solve this issue is to use aliases table. What is the LC_CTYPE environment variable set when the default language set to non-English? How different native MacOS X command-line programs behave when set LC_CTYPE to other encoding (e.g. ASCII, US-ASCII, ISO8859-1, ISO-8859-1, Latin1)? What if set it to UTF8 (no minus) or utf-8 (lower case)? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18378 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24714] Crash with string_at(None)
STINNER Victor added the comment: ctypes gives you a raw access to the memory. If you try to read unmapped memory areas, the program may or may not crash. Usually, you get a segmentation fault. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segmentation_fault Python doesn't provide a portable behaviour on segmentation faults. Note: You can use faulthandler to get the backtrace on segmentation fault. -- nosy: +haypo resolution: - not a bug ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24714 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24714] Crash with string_at(None)
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, meador.inge versions: +Python 3.5, Python 3.6 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24714 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24714] Crash with string_at(None)
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com: -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24714 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19475] Add timespec optional flag to datetime isoformat() to choose the precision
Changes by Alessandro Cucci alessandro.cu...@gmail.com: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40018/issue19475.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19475 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24721] The result of calling dict.* methods on OrderedDict is undefined.
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com: -- assignee: docs@python - rhettinger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24721 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23670] Modifications to support iOS as a cross-compilation target
Changes by Marco Paolini markopaol...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +mpaolini ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23670 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24721] The result of calling dict.* methods on OrderedDict is undefined.
New submission from Eric Snow:
(see issue24667)
collections.OrderedDict subclasses dict so calling dict's methods on an
OrderedDict works. However, neither the pure Python nor the C implementation
of OrderedDict was written to support doing so. In fact, both of them
currently enter an inconsistent state when this happens. For example:
# Python 3.4 (pure Python implementation)
from collections import OrderedDict
od = OrderedDict([('spam', 1), ('eggs', 2)])
dict.__delitem__(od, 'spam')
str(od)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
File /usr/lib/python3.4/reprlib.py, line 24, in wrapper
result = user_function(self)
File /usr/lib/python3.4/collections/__init__.py, line 198, in __repr__
return '%s(%r)' % (self.__class__.__name__, list(self.items()))
File /usr/lib/python3.4/_collections_abc.py, line 485, in __iter__
yield (key, self._mapping[key])
KeyError: 'spam'
# Python 3.5 (C implementation)
from collections import OrderedDict
od = OrderedDict([('spam', 1), ('eggs', 2)])
dict.__delitem__(od, 'spam')
str(od)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
KeyError: 'spam'
This is a consequence of subclassing a builtin type, which typically do not
have good support for subclassing (e.g. issue10977).
It probably isn't worth making any changes to the code of either OrderedDict
implementations. At most I'd recommend a note in the OrderedDict documentation
indicating that the results of passing an OrderedDict object to dict.* methods
are undefined.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 247354
nosy: docs@python, eric.snow, rhettinger
priority: low
severity: normal
status: open
title: The result of calling dict.* methods on OrderedDict is undefined.
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24721
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24721] The result of calling dict.* methods on OrderedDict is undefined.
Eric Snow added the comment: Feel free to close this, Raymond. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24721 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18181] PEP447: Add type.__getdescriptor__
Ronald Oussoren added the comment: Note: the error handling code for exceptions in __getdescriptor__ definitely isn't good enough yet. I'm writing tests and am hunting down the problems those tests find. I'm getting closer and will post a new version when I think I've found all bugs. Probably some time tomorrow. For now be warned that unexpected exceptions in __getdescriptor__ might crash the interpreter, especially when it is used to look for dunder methods. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24720] Python install help
Zachary Ware added the comment: 1) your paste appears to be invalid. You can just paste in a message here, or attach a screenshot (though text is preferable :)) 2) 3.5.0b2 is out of date, try with beta 3 (or beta 4, due out this weekend) -- components: +Installation, Windows nosy: +paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24719] Resourc Leak in cPickle Module
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset a789ee93f152 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '2.7': possible memory leak in error case (closes #24719) https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a789ee93f152 -- nosy: +python-dev resolution: - fixed stage: - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24719 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24667] OrderedDict.popitem()/__str__() raises KeyError
Eric Snow added the comment: Regarding this bug, it's clear now that the ordered keys and the underlying dict are getting out of sync somewhere. This is either due to a bug in the C OrderedDict implementation or the use of the concrete dict C-API (or dict.* methods; thanks Mark). It's undoubtedly the former since the pure Python implementation did not have this problem. I'm hoping to have some time today to identify the source of the problem. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24667 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24721] The result of calling dict.* methods on OrderedDict is undefined.
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: This is a consequence of subclassing a builtin type Not really. This is how subclassing works in general. Any time you a user calls a parent class directly on an instance of subclass, they are bypassing whatever the subclass needs to do to maintain its invariants. class A: def __init__(self): self.data = [] def add(self, x): self.data.append(x) class B(A): 'Track the number of odds' def __init__(self): A.__init__(self) self.odds = 0 def add(self, x): A.add(self, x) self.odds += (x % 2) b = B() b.add(1) b.add(2) b.add(3) b.add(4) A.add(b, 5) assert b.odds == sum(x%1 for x in b.data), 'OMG, B is broken!' There is nothing special about OrderedDicts in this regard. Perhaps there should be a FAQ entry regarding the facts of life in the world of object oriented programming. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24721 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24667] OrderedDict.popitem()/__str__() raises KeyError
Mark Shannon added the comment: The attached test case raises a KeyError for __str__() -- nosy: +Mark.Shannon Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40019/test.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24667 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24720] Python install help
New submission from node: I am trying to install Python 3.5.0b2 on Win 8.1 but cannot get it loaded http://pastebin.com/hKU2bvds the error. hoping some one can help. -- messages: 247352 nosy: node priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Python install help type: behavior versions: Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23496] Steps for Android Native Build of Python 3.4.2
Changes by Marco Paolini markopaol...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +mpaolini ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24667] OrderedDict.popitem()/__str__() raises KeyError
Eric Snow added the comment: @Mark, note that you get the same behavior with the pure Python OrderedDict. Calling dict.* methods on an OrderedDict gives you undefined behavior. I expect the same is true for most subclasses of builtin types that override builtin methods. Anyway, the problem with using dict.* methods with OrderedDict is a separate issue from the bug with pop/popitem reported here. I've opened issue24721 to address the former. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24667 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24721] The result of calling dict.* methods on OrderedDict is undefined.
Eric Snow added the comment: Ah, you're right. I was hung up on issue10977. :) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24721 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24708] strop.replace Integer Overflow
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Here is modified patch. In new code we try to avoid integer wrap around. It is safer to raise MemoryError right after PyMem_MALLOC(), otherwise it would possible to reraise unrelated exception instead MemoryError if strop.replace() is called without clearing current exception (should never happen, but...). Error message made consistent with str.replace(). -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40010/strop.replace_Integer_Overflow_2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24708 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24708] strop.replace Integer Overflow
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 7b5513e5afd2 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '2.7': proper overflow checks for mymemreplace (closes #24708) https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7b5513e5afd2 -- nosy: +python-dev resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24708 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24712] Docs page's sidebar vibrates on mouse wheel scroll on Chrome.
Changes by asal ada asalad...@gmail.com: -- components: +2to3 (2.x to 3.x conversion tool), Benchmarks, Build, Cross-Build, Demos and Tools, IO, Installation, Interpreter Core, Library (Lib), Tests, Unicode, Windows, XML, email nosy: +barry, haypo, paul.moore, r.david.murray, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24712 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11872] cPickle gives strange error for large objects.
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Is this issue still actual? -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka status: open - pending ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11872 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2263] struct.pack() + numpy int raises SystemError
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- status: open - pending ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2263 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24712] Docs page's sidebar vibrates on mouse wheel scroll on Chrome.
Changes by Steve Dower steve.do...@microsoft.com: -- components: -2to3 (2.x to 3.x conversion tool), Benchmarks, Build, Cross-Build, Demos and Tools, IO, Installation, Interpreter Core, Library (Lib), Tests, Unicode, Windows, XML, email nosy: -steve.dower ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24712 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24715] Sorting HOW TO: bad example for reverse sort stability
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com: -- assignee: docs@python - rhettinger nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24715 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23496] Steps for Android Native Build of Python 3.4.2
Ryan Gonzalez added the comment: So...I have *no* clue why _struct can't be found. Can you use gdb to get the segfault backtrace like you did before? On July 25, 2015 6:56:10 AM CDT, Cyd Haselton rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Cyd Haselton added the comment: I assume so; I'm using whatever is pulled frommy fork of the git repo. I've actually run into a different error that occured when i rebuilt to include readline support; when I run ./python -m test I;m getting ImportError: no module named _struct found. Trying to figure that one out first... -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24667] OrderedDict.popitem()/__str__() raises KeyError
Fabian added the comment: Really this bug and not the one mentioned by Mark? I've been using 3.4(.3) since we use requests (and therefore urllib3) which happened a few months ago. I also can't remember any failure on a Python 3.4 Travis build. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24667 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24613] array.fromstring Use After Free
John Leitch added the comment: Attached is a patch that updates array.fromstring to throw a ValueError when self is passed. It also updates the unit tests to cover this new behavior. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40023/array.fromstring-Use-After-Free.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24613 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24717] python logging handler not used when added after a process is started
Vinay Sajip added the comment: This is not a bug - it's how processes work on POSIX. Multiprocessing on POSIX generally uses the fork system call, which happens when you create a another process via the Process(...) call. At this point, the created process is a copy of the original process. When you add the handler *before* the Process(...) call, the copy also has the handler already added, so process_logger (which is called in the copy) will behave as expected. When you add the handler after the Process(...) call, the handler has not been added in the copy, so process_logger (which is called in the copy) will not behave as expected. To avoid this sort of problem, ensure that logging is configured as desired in each process (normally, this means doing the logging configuration in code which is called (directly or indirectly) from the target=XXX callable which is passed to Process. -- resolution: - not a bug status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24717 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24585] Windows installer does not detect existing installs
Larry Hastings added the comment: Since we apparently can't test this without making the release, but it's important enough to not defer, I am in the unenviable position of shipping the last beta with this bug marked as a release blocker. Fingers crossed! -- nosy: +larry ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24585 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24635] test_typing is flaky
Larry Hastings added the comment: Deferring for beta 4. We should still fix before release. Preferably before RC1 depending on the availability of Certain Persons. -- nosy: +larry priority: release blocker - deferred blocker ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24635 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24723] The new typing module is not documented :-(
New submission from STINNER Victor: It looks like someone forgot to write the doc ;-) https://docs.python.org/dev/library/typing.html -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 247399 nosy: docs@python, gvanrossum, haypo priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: The new typing module is not documented :-( versions: Python 3.5, Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24723 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24667] OrderedDict.popitem()/__str__() raises KeyError
Larry Hastings added the comment: It produces the same exception under Python 3.4, too. -- nosy: +larry ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24667 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24619] async/await parser issues
Changes by Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org: -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24619 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24645] logging.handlers.QueueHandler should not lock when handling a record
Changes by Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk: -- resolution: - not a bug status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24645 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24667] OrderedDict.popitem()/__str__() raises KeyError
Larry Hastings added the comment: Mark's test case file produced a KeyError under 3.4 when I tried it. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24667 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24716] Multiple fdopen() on mkstemp() descriptor crashes py27 interpreter
eryksun added the comment: Reassigning f closes the first file object, but not before the second file object gets created. You can write to the already-closed file, assuming the write is small enough to not flush the FILE stream buffer (e.g. beer, given an empty 4 KiB buffer). However, closing an already-closed file is an EBADF (bad file descriptor) error. In this case, Microsoft's C runtime defaults to calling an invalid parameter handler that terminates the process. File operations have to be guarded to work around this, which isn't implemented for 2.x file objects. However, this check is implemented for functions in the os module. To avoid killing the process you could check os.fstat(f.fileno()), which raises OSError for a bad file descriptor. -- nosy: +eryksun ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24716 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24716] Multiple fdopen() on mkstemp() descriptor crashes py27 interpreter
STINNER Victor added the comment: As eryksun explained, you have a bug in your example. You should fix your code. I would not call it a bug in Python, but more yet another bug (or unexpected behaviour) of the C stdio of Windows. My list of bugs in the C stdio is already long: https://haypo-notes.readthedocs.org/python.html#bugs-in-the-c-stdio-used-by-the-python-i-o You should try to use the io module which is available since Python 2.6. On Linux with Python 2.7.10, I get an OSError: $ python x.py Traceback (most recent call last): File x.py, line 7, in module f.close() IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor I suggest to close the issue as not a bug. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24716 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24720] Python install help
node added the comment: Steve, I have Admin privilege -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24635] test_typing is flaky
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24635 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24681] Put most likely test first in set_add_entry()
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com: -- nosy: -haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24681 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19475] Add timespec optional flag to datetime isoformat() to choose the precision
STINNER Victor added the comment: @acucci: Nice first try, but your patch contains multiple bugs. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19475 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19475] Add timespec optional flag to datetime isoformat() to choose the precision
Alessandro Cucci added the comment: @haypo thanks for the review and the suggestions, I'll correct the code soon -- nosy: +acucci ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19475 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19475] Add timespec optional flag to datetime isoformat() to choose the precision
Changes by Alessandro Cucci alessandro.cu...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40024/issue19475_v2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19475 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24720] Python install help
node added the comment: http://pastebin.com/D5eVxF1b Sorry, try this where to get the latest version pls.. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24722] Python install help
New submission from node: http://pastebin.com/D5eVxF1b Sorry, where can I download the latest version? I went to python site and only saw this version -- messages: 247362 nosy: node priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Python install help type: behavior versions: Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24722 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23496] Steps for Android Native Build of Python 3.4.2
Cyd Haselton added the comment: As soon as I build a PIE gdb I can. And right now, running ./python -m test throws the ImportError...so I'll need to resolve that first On Jul 25, 2015 12:38 PM, Ryan Gonzalez rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Ryan Gonzalez added the comment: So...I have *no* clue why _struct can't be found. Can you use gdb to get the segfault backtrace like you did before? On July 25, 2015 6:56:10 AM CDT, Cyd Haselton rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Cyd Haselton added the comment: I assume so; I'm using whatever is pulled frommy fork of the git repo. I've actually run into a different error that occured when i rebuilt to include readline support; when I run ./python -m test I;m getting ImportError: no module named _struct found. Trying to figure that one out first... -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15989] Possible integer overflow of PyLong_AsLong() results
Robert Collins added the comment: @serhiy - I'm a little confused about the state of this patch. It seems like you need more review? -- nosy: +rbcollins ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15989 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20544] Use specific asserts in operator tests
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Backporting this to older releases is needed to help backporting future tests. We should keep tests consistent if possible. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20544 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24722] Python install help
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: -- resolution: - duplicate stage: - resolved status: open - closed superseder: - Python install help ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24722 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24715] Sorting HOW TO: bad example for reverse sort stability
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40022/reverse_stablity.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24715 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23926] skipitem() in getargs.c still supports 'w' and 'w#', and shouldn't
Joe Jevnik added the comment: bumping so that we don't forget about this. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23926 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24717] python logging handler not used when added after a process is started
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org: -- nosy: +vinay.sajip ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24717 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12006] strptime should implement %G, %V and %u directives
Alexander Belopolsky added the comment: Reverting to needs patch stage because there are still issues to be ironed out. -- stage: commit review - needs patch versions: +Python 3.6 -Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12006 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20544] Use specific asserts in operator tests
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: I don't think kind of shallow changes to the test suite should be backported. They probably shouldn't have been done at all. When you change code, the tests are a safety net. When you change tests, you have almost no safety net at all. If the original test was developed using test-driven-development or for a bug-fix, then it was demonstrated to have failed at one time. But when pointlessly refactored, the revised tests have no longer been demonstrated to actually detect to original underlying bug. If the whole point of specific asserts is to have better error messages on a failure, then we should wait until there is an actual failure to make the change. Otherwise, this reduced the reliability of the test suite with zero benefit. Most of these tests will never become broken (I can't recall the last time any of them failed) and if they did, their existing message would suffice. Another reason this should be done is Guido's notion of holistic refactoring. The idea is that someone shouldn't travel through modules making shallow changes. That work should be deferred to the module maintainer to be done in the course of normal deeply thought out work on the module. The last reason these kind of changes shouldn't be made is that undoes work by the person who originally wrote it, making the code less familiar to them when they come back. For example, most of the tests for sets are written in a way that reflects how I was thinking about the problem when I wrote it. If someone comes through and renames the variables, rewraps the lines, switches the choice of assertions, etc. Then they make it more difficult to recover the original line of thinking by the designer. Put another way, no one likes to have code they're written needlessly scrambled around. If there is a real bug fix, then yes. Otherwise, shallow wholesale search and replace missions should be approached reluctantly. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20544 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24710] Class name hardcoded in TracebackException.from_exception()
Robert Collins added the comment: I know it 'works', I just think its not appropriate here. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24710 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24720] Python install help
Steve Dower added the comment: Are you being promoted for administrative privileges? Unfortunately there's no way around requiring them to install the C Runtime update, so if you are blocked from applying Windows Updates to your machine unfortunately there's no good way around this. Alternatively, do you have VS 2015 final release installed? This may be an error due to attempting to downgrade (3.5.0b3 was built with a prerelease version of VS), though it shouldn't be failing because of that. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20544] Use specific asserts in operator tests
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Everyone except Raymond seems to agree the patch is a good think, so it should probably be applied. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20544 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21750] mock_open data is visible only once for the life of the class
Changes by Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net: -- resolution: - fixed stage: needs patch - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21750 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2091] file accepts 'rU+' as a mode
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 1a5bbb31f740 by Robert Collins in branch 'default': - Issue #2091: error correctly on open() with mode 'U' and '+' https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1a5bbb31f740 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2091 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2091] file accepts 'rU+' as a mode
Changes by Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net: -- resolution: - fixed stage: commit review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2091 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2091] file accepts 'rU+' as a mode
Robert Collins added the comment: @larry thanks - that was my inclination too. Applied to 3.6 @Serhiy I've not done a warning in 3.4/3.5 because - the behaviour is already broken, this patch just catches it a lot earlier (on open rather than subsequent operations). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2091 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24710] Class name hardcoded in TracebackException.from_exception()
Robert Collins added the comment: We can't use from_exception in __init__ because from_exception's job is to look up __traceback__, but the legacy API allows arbitrary tb objects which may not be exc.__traceback__, and modifying exc.__traceback__ or creating a shim object just to be able to use from_exception doesn't make sense to me. This patch looks good, and I'm applying to 3.6. It has no functional impact (except for perhaps weird mocking corner cases, but as its a pure class that shouldn't be needed), so I'm leaving it out of 3.5, since i'm not 100% sure where the move to a new repo is at, and its not worth figuring that out. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24710 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10388] spwd returning different value depending on privileges
Robert Collins added the comment: Too late for 3.5 for this IMO. -- nosy: +rbcollins versions: +Python 3.6 -Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10388 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18787] Misleading error from getspnam function of spwd module
Robert Collins added the comment: Sounds like we want something analogous to http://bugs.python.org/file33404/fix_error_message_getspall_v2.patch for this bug. Moving to patch needed. It looks like it would be easily tested too, so I'd like to see a test too please. -- nosy: +rbcollins stage: test needed - needs patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18787 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20544] Use specific asserts in operator tests
Robert Collins added the comment: Looks sane to me. Should go in 3.6 if we're going to do this or get closed to remove cognitive overhead in the issue tracker. No point backporting this to older releases. -- nosy: +rbcollins versions: +Python 3.6 -Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20544 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24710] Class name hardcoded in TracebackException.from_exception()
Robert Collins added the comment: Oh I see, - different things could have been meant but that application will work. But - please don't use self.from_exception: its a class method, so TracebackException.from_exception(...) is the right spelling. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24710 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24710] Class name hardcoded in TracebackException.from_exception()
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- resolution: fixed - stage: resolved - patch review status: closed - open ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24710 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24710] Class name hardcoded in TracebackException.from_exception()
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: self.from_exception() works as well. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24710 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24721] The result of calling dict.* methods on OrderedDict is undefined.
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com: -- resolution: - not a bug status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24721 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24710] Class name hardcoded in TracebackException.from_exception()
Changes by Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net: -- resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24710 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24710] Class name hardcoded in TracebackException.from_exception()
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 1be4d7388279 by Robert Collins in branch 'default': Issue #24710: Use cls in TracebackException.from_exception. https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1be4d7388279 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24710 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24710] Class name hardcoded in TracebackException.from_exception()
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: We can use from_exception() in __init__ because in both cases first three arguments of TracebackException() are type(e), e, e.__traceback__. Without this change changing from_exception() makes less sense. Here is a patch. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40020/classmethod_2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24710 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24651] Mock.assert* API is in user namespace
Robert Collins added the comment: Some great points raised here. Yes, we'd need .calls and .returnvalue and so on all made accessible via another route, and that would be a less direct spelling. e.g. a_mock.returnvalue = 3 - # function set_returnvalue(a_mock, 3) or # separate object to get at the mock housekeeping vs the mocked interface mocki(a_mock).returnvalue = 3 etc. None of which make me want to say 'wow thats a great api'. I wouldn't want to advocate for a patch for this unless: - it would feel as convenient to use as the current API does - it would be possible to be both forward and backwards compatible with the existing API indefinitely: There are lots of users of mock, and offering a [presumably] improved API is not worth turning all that code into an instant sea-anchor: if we're going to change this, we need to do so in a -very- graceful fashion, because unlike e.g. the mock_open things that only affect some users of mock, this would (if done poorly) break every user ever. For clarity, I have no plans to write such a patch at this time, though if someone did come up with a proof of concept I'd happily review it, and dig up Michael to get his thoughts *if and only if* it met the two constraints above. I'm not sure of the right bug tracker state to say 'this is a maybe, maintainer isn't enthused about it'. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24651 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2091] file accepts 'rU+' as a mode
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Perhaps the 'U' mode should just raise an exception in 3.6. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2091 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24651] Mock.assert* API is in user namespace
Changes by Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net: -- priority: normal - low ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24651 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15989] Possible integer overflow of PyLong_AsLong() results
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Yes, it would be good if other's pair of eyes will look on the patch. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15989 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10388] spwd returning different value depending on privileges
Robert Collins added the comment: I'm moving this back to patch review - it needs a test, particularly because of the question I have around setspent. -- stage: commit review - patch review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10388 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10388] spwd returning different value depending on privileges
Robert Collins added the comment: The man page for setspent says this: The functions that return a pointer return NULL if no more entries are available or if an error occurs during processing. The functions which have int as the return value return 0 for success and -1 for failure, with errno set to indicate the cause of the error. For the nonreentrant functions, the return value may point to static area, and may be overwritten by subsequent calls to these functions. The reentrant functions return zero on success. In case of error, an error number is returned. - that is, setspent's interaction with errno is undefined, at least on Linux. I'm a little worried about whether this may pickup false errors as a result. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10388 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24712] Docs page's sidebar vibrates on mouse wheel scroll on Chrome.
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org: -- nosy: +georg.brandl ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24712 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20544] Use specific asserts in operator tests
Robert Collins added the comment: So, is this specific patch ok to apply, or are we going to reject it? I don't particularly care either way, but having this issue open and stalled just adds cognitive load to working with the bug tracker. FWIW I agree that it should not be backported. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20544 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20544] Use specific asserts in operator tests
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Antoine, I'm surprised, usually you're the first to oppose backporting anything other than bug-fixes and were generally supportive of Guido's admonitions about holistic refactoring. It seems you feel strongly enough about the patch to warrant telling all the other participants to simply dismiss the concerns of another senior developer, so go ahead and apply it. But, you should have strong reservations about backporting -- that seems completely unjustified. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20544 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
