Richard Musil <risa20...@gmail.com> added the comment:
It looks like I am resurrecting an old item, but I have been just hit by this and was directed to this issue (https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-id...@python.org/thread/WT6Z6YJDEZXKQ6OQLGAPB3OZ4OHCTPDU/) I wonder if adding something similar to what `simplejson` uses (i.e. explicitly specifying in `json.dump(s)` how to serialize `decimal.Decimal`) could be acceptable. Or, the other idea would be to expose a method in JSONEncoder, which would accept "raw" textual output, i.e. string (or even `bytes`) and would encode it without adding additional characters to it. (as explained in my posts in the other threads). As it seems right now, there is no way to serialize `decimal.Decimal` the same way it is deserialized, i.e. while preserving the (arbitrary) precision. ---------- nosy: +risa2000 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue16535> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
